Obama Gives Phones to Illegal Aliens for Votes

No, he didn't.

Do you have anything to back your claim up?

obama was a board member for Annenberg Who does fact check?

No, Obama has never been a board member of The Annenberg Foundation.

He was on the board of The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a project funded partially by the Annenberg Foundation. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge has NOTHING to do with factcheck - in fact, factcheck.org started 4 years after the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was done.
 
Obama has never been, no will he ever be, on "the board" of factcheck.

In fact, he has never had anything at all to do with factcheck.

Annenberg which is also does fact check

No, he was never on the board of The Annenberg Foundation either.

He was on the board of a program that got funding from Annenberg. That's all.

You can keep repeating as much as you like, but that won't make it come true.
It's all quid-pro-quo in those circles, Dr.
 
Obama has never been, no will he ever be, on "the board" of factcheck.

In fact, he has never had anything at all to do with factcheck.

Annenberg which is also does fact check

No, he was never on the board of The Annenberg Foundation either.

He was on the board of a program that got funding from Annenberg. That's all.

You can keep repeating as much as you like, but that won't make it come true.

Annenberg Challenge and Annenberg Foundation are both part of the same group
Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge

Annenberg Foundation | Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge
Tell another lie.
 
No, he didn't.

Do you have anything to back your claim up?

obama was a board member for Annenberg Who does fact check?

No, Obama has never been a board member of The Annenberg Foundation.

He was on the board of The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a project funded partially by the Annenberg Foundation. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge has NOTHING to do with factcheck - in fact, factcheck.org started 4 years after the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was done.
Sorry, imho it has everything to do with why "Fact Check" only checks facts Annenberg Ayers wants checked that will benefit the socialization of America and protecting his golden goose Obama.
 
Annenberg which is also does fact check

No, he was never on the board of The Annenberg Foundation either.

He was on the board of a program that got funding from Annenberg. That's all.

You can keep repeating as much as you like, but that won't make it come true.

Annenberg Challenge and Annenberg Foundation are both part of the same group
Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge

Annenberg Foundation | Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge
Tell another lie.

They're not "part of the same group". One is funded by the other.

The Annenberg Foundation is an enormous umbrella organization, that funded both the Annenberg Challenge, and Factcheck.org.
 
No, he was never on the board of The Annenberg Foundation either.

He was on the board of a program that got funding from Annenberg. That's all.

You can keep repeating as much as you like, but that won't make it come true.
It's all quid-pro-quo in those circles, Dr.

What are you talking about? What "quid pro quo"?
The one you cute little ostriches with your heads in the sand cannot "see".
 
obama was a board member for Annenberg Who does fact check?

No, Obama has never been a board member of The Annenberg Foundation.

He was on the board of The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a project funded partially by the Annenberg Foundation. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge has NOTHING to do with factcheck - in fact, factcheck.org started 4 years after the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was done.
Sorry, imho it has everything to do with why "Fact Check" only checks facts Annenberg Ayers wants checked that will benefit the socialization of America and protecting his golden goose Obama.
You know, things like this make you look silly.

It's Glenn Beck's chalkboard nonsense.
 
No, he was never on the board of The Annenberg Foundation either.

He was on the board of a program that got funding from Annenberg. That's all.

You can keep repeating as much as you like, but that won't make it come true.

Annenberg Challenge and Annenberg Foundation are both part of the same group
Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge

Annenberg Foundation | Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge
Tell another lie.

They're not "part of the same group". One is funded by the other.

The Annenberg Foundation is an enormous umbrella organization, that funded both the Annenberg Challenge, and Factcheck.org.
Yes they are tell another lie.
Annenberg Foundation | Annenberg Foundation | Other Annenberg Organizations and Programs | Annenberg Challenge
If one is funded by the other wouldn't that make them part of the same group?
Tell another lie.
 
Last edited:
What are you talking about? What "quid pro quo"?
The one you cute little ostriches with your heads in the sand cannot "see".

You know, nothing says you've lost an argument more than resorting to personal attacks.
No, nothing shows that someone has lost an argument than one who declares the other person lost the argument when the opposition actually made a very good point with no personal attack damage whatever as charged. :rolleyes:
 
The one you cute little ostriches with your heads in the sand cannot "see".

You know, nothing says you've lost an argument more than resorting to personal attacks.
No, nothing shows that someone has lost an argument than one who declares the other person lost the argument when the opposition actually made a very good point with no personal attack damage whatever as charged. :rolleyes:

This is his argument
The Annenberg Foundation is an enormous umbrella organization, that funded both the Annenberg Challenge, and Factcheck.org.
and he says they aren't connected.:eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
The one you cute little ostriches with your heads in the sand cannot "see".

You know, nothing says you've lost an argument more than resorting to personal attacks.
No, nothing shows that someone has lost an argument than one who declares the other person lost the argument when the opposition actually made a very good point with no personal attack damage whatever as charged. :rolleyes:

Well, let's go down the list.

First, in your OP, you claimed that "Obama was giving free cell phones to illegal immigrants in exchange for votes".

It was pointed out to you that 1.) There's no program that gives taxpayer-funded cell phones to ANYONE, 2.) That Illegal Immigrants don't qualify for free phones anyway, and 3.) That the program (a privately funded one) started under Bush.

Your response to that was attacking factcheck, claiming that "Obama was on the board".

When I pointed out that he wasn't, you called me an ostrich with my head in the sand.

This is classic conspiracy theory logical fallacies - any evidence that goes against your beliefs immediately become part of the conspiracy.

You shouldn't believe something just because you really want to.
 
No, Obama has never been a board member of The Annenberg Foundation.

He was on the board of The Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a project funded partially by the Annenberg Foundation. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge has NOTHING to do with factcheck - in fact, factcheck.org started 4 years after the Chicago Annenberg Challenge was done.
Sorry, imho it has everything to do with why "Fact Check" only checks facts Annenberg Ayers wants checked that will benefit the socialization of America and protecting his golden goose Obama.
You know, things like this make you look silly.

It's Glenn Beck's chalkboard nonsense.
I did not consult Glenn Beck, thank you very much.
 
You know, nothing says you've lost an argument more than resorting to personal attacks.
No, nothing shows that someone has lost an argument than one who declares the other person lost the argument when the opposition actually made a very good point with no personal attack damage whatever as charged. :rolleyes:

This is his argument
The Annenberg Foundation is an enormous umbrella organization, that funded both the Annenberg Challenge, and Factcheck.org.
and he says they are connected.:eusa_whistle:

Do you really think that the fact Obama was on the board of an organization that received money from the same organization that funds factcheck makes him a "board member" of factcheck?
 
Sorry, imho it has everything to do with why "Fact Check" only checks facts Annenberg Ayers wants checked that will benefit the socialization of America and protecting his golden goose Obama.
You know, things like this make you look silly.

It's Glenn Beck's chalkboard nonsense.
I did not consult Glenn Beck, thank you very much.

I wasn't saying that you did.

It's the same sort of logical fallacy conspiracy theory connecting the dots as Beck does, though.
 
No, nothing shows that someone has lost an argument than one who declares the other person lost the argument when the opposition actually made a very good point with no personal attack damage whatever as charged. :rolleyes:

This is his argument
The Annenberg Foundation is an enormous umbrella organization, that funded both the Annenberg Challenge, and Factcheck.org.
and he says they are connected.:eusa_whistle:

Do you really think that the fact Obama was on the board of an organization that received money from the same organization that funds factcheck makes him a "board member" of factcheck?

Dude Annenberg is Annenberg stop with the lies.
 
You know, nothing says you've lost an argument more than resorting to personal attacks.

No, nothing shows that someone has lost an argument than one who declares the other person lost the argument when the opposition actually made a very good point with no personal attack damage whatever as charged. :rolleyes:


Well, let's go down the list.


First, in your OP, you claimed that "Obama was giving free cell phones to illegal immigrants in exchange for votes".


It was pointed out to you that 1.) There's no program that gives taxpayer-funded cell phones to ANYONE, 2.) That Illegal Immigrants don't qualify for free phones anyway, and 3.) That the program (a privately funded one) started under Bush.


Your response to that was attacking factcheck, claiming that "Obama was on the board".


When I pointed out that he wasn't, you called me an ostrich with my head in the sand.


This is classic conspiracy theory logical fallacies - any evidence that goes against your beliefs immediately become part of the conspiracy.

You shouldn't believe something just because you really want to.

(1) Partisans pointed out they disagreed with the OP by disparaging its source.
(2) I showed how they do qualify and I showed it twice.
(3) Congress funds what it wishes according to the COTUS.

There are factions in this country that solicit votes from illegal immigrants by going against what is right, which is citizenship through application prior to entry into the country.

Your charge of conspiracy theory is both erroneous and vapid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top