The Infidel
EVIL CONSERVATIVE
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I had never seen a major media outlet as openly partisan and an avowed propaganda arm of a major political party
Their performance prior to the 2012 election was laughable as was their coverage of Fast and Furious and Benghazi
...you'd never watched ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS.. CNN or Public Broadcasting ?
LOL
Typical response...but FoxNews is not in the league of legitimate networks
No other network would offer employment to Glenn Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Palin and Newt
Let's clarify
All of America except for Fox Nation
They still believe Romney is going to win
What's your fixation on Fox News?
I had never seen a major media outlet as openly partisan and an avowed propaganda arm of a major political party
Their performance prior to the 2012 election was laughable as was their coverage of Fast and Furious and Benghazi
What's your fixation on Fox News?
I had never seen a major media outlet as openly partisan and an avowed propaganda arm of a major political party
Their performance prior to the 2012 election was laughable as was their coverage of Fast and Furious and Benghazi
both are cover ups you're just to stupid too see it.
I had never seen a major media outlet as openly partisan and an avowed propaganda arm of a major political party
Their performance prior to the 2012 election was laughable as was their coverage of Fast and Furious and Benghazi
both are cover ups you're just to stupid too see it.
Both involved Monday Morning Quarterbacking and false outrage by the rightwing propaganda machine
...you'd never watched ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS.. CNN or Public Broadcasting ?
LOL
Typical response...but FoxNews is not in the league of legitimate networks
No other network would offer employment to Glenn Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Palin and Newt
Of course not moron, they are firmly in the liberal camp.
Over 5.6 trillion added to the national debt by Obama/Democrats.
The business and economic climate showing no hope of restoration.
The natives or their leaders showing no signs of reconciliation or respect.
4 more years of this crap... What the Hell..???
Congress allocates the money, in every instance. No spending can occur without BOTH Houses of Congress passing the required legislation.
Since you claim that Obama and the Democrats are solely responsible, would you care to explain how that happened without the GOP dominated House approving of it?
Democrats Take Control on Hill
Friday, January 5, 2007
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was elected America's first female speaker of the House yesterday in a raucous, bipartisan celebration of a historic breakthrough, and hours later she presided over passage of the broadest ethics and lobbying revision since the Watergate era.
Democrats took control of the House and Senate after 12 years of nearly unbroken Republican rule, with resolute calls for bipartisan comity and a pledge to move quickly on an agenda of health-care, homeland security, education and energy proposals. Sen. Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), the soft-spoken son of a hard-rock miner, took the helm of the Senate, after a closed-door session in the Capitol's stately Old Senate Chamber. But with the eyes of history riveted on her, it was Pelosi's day.
"This is an historic moment, for Congress, and for the women of this country. It is a moment for which we have waited more than 200 years," Pelosi proclaimed, to a roaring ovation in the packed House chamber. "For our daughters and granddaughters, today we have broken the marble ceiling. To our daughters and our granddaughters, the sky is the limit
LOL
Typical response...but FoxNews is not in the league of legitimate networks
No other network would offer employment to Glenn Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Palin and Newt
Of course not moron, they are firmly in the liberal camp.
no... because they're disgusting... liars... and in at least two of those cases, probably nuts.
Then you're not paying attention to the lame stream media, are you?
Rightwinger believes the New York Times is ultra conservative..
New York Times has set Journalism standards unmatched in history
THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE HOLOCAUST
Below I attach three articles from 1942 and 1945 from The Guardian newspaper, which was then known as The Manchester Guardian, and an account by Zalmen Gradowski, a Polish Jew, written shortly before his death in Auschwitz.
I attach the articles from The Guardian (which speaks in 1942 of "The German scheme for total extermination [of the Jews]") as a reminder that there were news reports concerning the genocide of European Jewry from 1941 but the Allied powers did next to nothing to stop it over the next four years.
As I have pointed out before on this list, the most influential paper in the world, the New York Times, fearing that people might think it a "Jewish" paper, deliberately suppressed coverage of the Holocaust. When it did carry reports, these were often brief and buried inside the paper.
Example 1:
The two inches (yes, that was all) that the New York Times devoted on June 27, 1942 to the news that "700,000 Jews were reported slain in Poland."
Example 2: Reports in December 1942 that "two million Jews had been killed and five million more faced extermination" appeared only on page 20 of the New York Times.
Example 3: The New York Times reported (accurately) on July 2, 1944 that 400,000 Hungarian Jews had been deported to their deaths so far and 350,000 more were to be killed in the next weeks. Yet this news received only four column inches on page 12. The Times found room on that edition's front page to analyze the problem of New York holiday crowds on the move.
The disgraceful lack of coverage by the New York Times and other American papers has been well documented by historians. The New York Times has never adequately apologized for it. Had the Times reported properly on the Holocaust at the time (this in an age before television), other papers would probably have followed suit, and US public opinion may have forced the US government to act
Over 5.6 trillion added to the national debt by Obama/Democrats.
The business and economic climate showing no hope of restoration.
The natives or their leaders showing no signs of reconciliation or respect.
4 more years of this crap... What the Hell..???
Rightwinger believes the New York Times is ultra conservative..
New York Times has set Journalism standards unmatched in history
The New York Times is a discrace
THE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE HOLOCAUST
Below I attach three articles from 1942 and 1945 from The Guardian newspaper, which was then known as The Manchester Guardian, and an account by Zalmen Gradowski, a Polish Jew, written shortly before his death in Auschwitz.
I attach the articles from The Guardian (which speaks in 1942 of "The German scheme for total extermination [of the Jews]") as a reminder that there were news reports concerning the genocide of European Jewry from 1941 but the Allied powers did next to nothing to stop it over the next four years.
As I have pointed out before on this list, the most influential paper in the world, the New York Times, fearing that people might think it a "Jewish" paper, deliberately suppressed coverage of the Holocaust. When it did carry reports, these were often brief and buried inside the paper.
Example 1:
The two inches (yes, that was all) that the New York Times devoted on June 27, 1942 to the news that "700,000 Jews were reported slain in Poland."
Example 2: Reports in December 1942 that "two million Jews had been killed and five million more faced extermination" appeared only on page 20 of the New York Times.
Example 3: The New York Times reported (accurately) on July 2, 1944 that 400,000 Hungarian Jews had been deported to their deaths so far and 350,000 more were to be killed in the next weeks. Yet this news received only four column inches on page 12. The Times found room on that edition's front page to analyze the problem of New York holiday crowds on the move.
The disgraceful lack of coverage by the New York Times and other American papers has been well documented by historians. The New York Times has never adequately apologized for it. Had the Times reported properly on the Holocaust at the time (this in an age before television), other papers would probably have followed suit, and US public opinion may have forced the US government to act
Mideast Dispatch Archive: The New York Times and the Holocaust, and other items
Over 5.6 trillion added to the national debt by Obama/Democrats.
The business and economic climate showing no hope of restoration.
The natives or their leaders showing no signs of reconciliation or respect.
4 more years of this crap... What the Hell..???
LOL, another of your "ain't it awful" posts, why? I think we get it lumpy, you hate Obama, Democrats, liberals, RINOs and apparently our Constitution. Otherwise you would quit whining and man-up; post a thread wherein you and others so despondent by the election can work together to understand why you lost; consider it therapy.
Your side lost and you seem not to wonder why. Mature adults stop whining when they lose and evaluate the reasons for their loose. Whining and blaming isn't helpful. Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and try to understand this fact: The GOP has moved so far to the right they cannot win an election unless it occurs in a small region.
Of course not moron, they are firmly in the liberal camp.
no... because they're disgusting... liars... and in at least two of those cases, probably nuts.
And yet, you'd suck the black off of obama's cock...you know, that disgusting liar currently squatting in the People's House.
Unfortunately, they got it ass-backwards. "Choke your country to death for all its cash in the treasury and then some. Then pass enough laws where you won't have to work another day in your leisurely life to pay rent, medical, food, and all other aspects of welfare. Take 2 names and vacation with the bonus." Isn't what goes down the pike screwy.Your side lost and you seem not to wonder why. Mature adults stop whining when they lose and evaluate the reasons for their loose. Whining and blaming isn't helpful. Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and try to understand this fact: The GOP has moved so far to the right they cannot win an election unless it occurs in a small region.
No... The left is willing to give away more of our sovereignty and are willing to print and barrow more money for entitlements than the right.
This is a fact... Obama Claus proved that.
You remember that famous line "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country" ?
Those were very egregious lies of omission on their part, and they got worse as years went by. Their rag isn't even fit to line your garbage any more. It smells too bad.Rightwinger believes the New York Times is ultra conservative..
New York Times has set Journalism standards unmatched in history
The New York Times is a discrace
Mideast Dispatch Archive: The New York Times and the Holocaust, and other itemsTHE NEW YORK TIMES AND THE HOLOCAUST
Below I attach three articles from 1942 and 1945 from The Guardian newspaper, which was then known as The Manchester Guardian, and an account by Zalmen Gradowski, a Polish Jew, written shortly before his death in Auschwitz.
I attach the articles from The Guardian (which speaks in 1942 of "The German scheme for total extermination [of the Jews]") as a reminder that there were news reports concerning the genocide of European Jewry from 1941 but the Allied powers did next to nothing to stop it over the next four years.
As I have pointed out before on this list, the most influential paper in the world, the New York Times, fearing that people might think it a "Jewish" paper, deliberately suppressed coverage of the Holocaust. When it did carry reports, these were often brief and buried inside the paper.
Example 1:
The two inches (yes, that was all) that the New York Times devoted on June 27, 1942 to the news that "700,000 Jews were reported slain in Poland."
Example 2: Reports in December 1942 that "two million Jews had been killed and five million more faced extermination" appeared only on page 20 of the New York Times.
Example 3: The New York Times reported (accurately) on July 2, 1944 that 400,000 Hungarian Jews had been deported to their deaths so far and 350,000 more were to be killed in the next weeks. Yet this news received only four column inches on page 12. The Times found room on that edition's front page to analyze the problem of New York holiday crowds on the move.
The disgraceful lack of coverage by the New York Times and other American papers has been well documented by historians. The New York Times has never adequately apologized for it. Had the Times reported properly on the Holocaust at the time (this in an age before television), other papers would probably have followed suit, and US public opinion may have forced the US government to act
no... because they're disgusting... liars... and in at least two of those cases, probably nuts.
And yet, you'd suck the black off of obama's cock...you know, that disgusting liar currently squatting in the People's House.
you're disgusting.
the fact that you say vile things like that to women for doing nothing more than disagreeing with your stupidity speaks volumes about the kind of lowlife you are.
you should be very proud.
Let's clarify
All of America except for Fox Nation
They still believe Romney is going to win
What's your fixation on Fox News?
I had never seen a major media outlet as openly partisan and an avowed propaganda arm of a major political party
Their performance prior to the 2012 election was laughable as was their coverage of Fast and Furious and Benghazi
I had never seen a major media outlet as openly partisan and an avowed propaganda arm of a major political party
Their performance prior to the 2012 election was laughable as was their coverage of Fast and Furious and Benghazi
...you'd never watched ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS.. CNN or Public Broadcasting ?
LOL
Typical response...but FoxNews is not in the league of legitimate networks
No other network would offer employment to Glenn Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Palin and Newt
Someone needs to clue their Campaigner-in-Chief that apparently he won and it's time to actually do some work. If only we could harness the energy he expends beating his gums, we wouldn't have an energy crisis, either. It's time the guy STFU, quit bloviating, and actually applied his alleged intelligence to healing this country.
Obama pushing for 'fiscal cliff' deal with Tinkertoy factory tour - San Jose Mercury News
Over 5.6 trillion added to the national debt by Obama/Democrats.
The business and economic climate showing no hope of restoration.
The natives or their leaders showing no signs of reconciliation or respect.
4 more years of this crap... What the Hell..???
Congress allocates the money, in every instance. No spending can occur without BOTH Houses of Congress passing the required legislation.
Since you claim that Obama and the Democrats are solely responsible, would you care to explain how that happened without the GOP dominated House approving of it?