Obama called a 'Traitor' In France

Thats exactly what he did...

Chavez comes to mind..

He had no business doing what he did.

If GM failed then sobeit..... He didn't want that tho because UAW (among other unions) got him elected.

Obama is a fucking tyrant for that alone.

Nope:

Yet the doomsayers were wrong. Unlike, say, France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy, who used public funds to support Renault and Peugeot-Citroën on condition that they did not close factories in France, Mr Obama has been tough from the start. GM had to promise to slim down dramatically—cutting jobs, shuttering factories and shedding brands—to win its lifeline. The firm was forced to declare bankruptcy. Shareholders were wiped out. Top managers were swept aside. Unions did win some special favours: when Chrysler was divided among its creditors, for example, a union health fund did far better than secured bondholders whose claims should have been senior. Congress has put pressure on GM to build new models in America rather than Asia, and to keep open dealerships in certain electoral districts. But by and large Mr Obama has not used his stakes in GM and Chrysler for political ends. On the contrary, his goal has been to restore both firms to health and then get out as quickly as possible. GM is now profitable again and Chrysler, managed by Fiat, is making progress. Taxpayers might even turn a profit when GM is sold.

So was the auto bail-out a success? It is hard to be sure. Had the government not stepped in, GM might have restructured under normal bankruptcy procedures, without putting public money at risk. Many observers think this unlikely, however. Given the panic that gripped private purse-strings last year, it is more likely that GM would have been liquidated, sending a cascade of destruction through the supply chain on which its rivals, too, depended.

General Motors: Government Motors no more | The Economist

I don't fucking care how you philosophize it...

Its wrong...

You may as well try to convince the cop you only stole the car because you didn't have one, therefore its justified..

Its still stealing...

Now, Obama took over a business and it was out of his power to do so..

Anyone who claims what he did was "swell" is a tyrant just like he is...

If you cant obey the Bill of Rights then you're a fucking tyrant, If you cant understand the Bill of Rights you're a fucking idiot.

So NOW you are claiming that what obama did with GM was criminal?? Care to back that one up too?

Furthermore, how did he not obey the bill of rights??
 
Obama is a tyrant, and so are many on the left.

The guy only took over a goddamn company like socialist dictators do.

You would think that in the United States of America the goddamn president who is allegedly a constitutional wizard would view seizing a company to be a total Fourth Amendment violation.

Who the fuck specializes in a philosophy they don't even respect??

you were shaken as a baby huh?

Show me where Obama has the right to seize a business...

Show where he seized GM and since you are the one claiming illegality the burden is on you to show that anything he did concerning GM was illegal.
 
I thought the left's Big Tent had room for all views.

Guess not. :lol:

The left does and no one on the left is saying that he doesn't have a right to say it but that isn't what has everyone so interested. What got everyone's attention is that the right usually doesn't have a big tent and yet because this actor, which the right usually argues should stay out of politics andstick to acting, gave an opinon that denegrates obama a right winger jumps at the chance to use it.

Obama is attacked by the right for going overseas and "apologizing for the US" and yet here is this actor overseas denegrating the president of the US and the right jumps at the chance to use it.

Funny how you missed that contradiction, isn't it? LOL
 
Last edited:
A Yeah, Duh, it's me- what was it, the "hellofrom warsaw"?
B. Fond DID make a MOVIE about the BP spill ya know!! PR much?
C. Yup, it's always the Pubs who screwed it up, for money...

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't it the democrats in control handling the BP spill?
 
A Yeah, Duh, it's me- what was it, the "hellofrom warsaw"?
B. Fond DID make a MOVIE about the BP spill ya know!! PR much?
C. Yup, it's always the Pubs who screwed it up, for money...

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't it the democrats in control handling the BP spill?

Yes and BP should have been doing it not the govt. Personal responsibility and all that.
 
Are you unaware that Obama took over GM?

Not only did he take it over, he made taxpayers foot the bill via the Cash for Clunkers program to stimulate the company and UAW in general.

In short he took over a company, then gave tax dollars to people to buy their product... He kept his voting base employed in the process by creating a demand for UAW autos.

Oh and this was while non-union private sector workers were losing their jobs left and right.

By the way, how is GM doing now? Explain how they were doing when he had to do someting there.

Explain it. I dare you. Now try to stay on point....HOW ARE THEY DOING NOW?

You don't get it do you tyrant???

You libfucks don't understand - nor do you care.

You only have the right to spew your nonsense because the First Amendment allows you to do so...

What makes our Fourth Amendment any less than your right to be an ignorant fool and spew it (First Amendment).

What the fuck would you say if the government cut off your internet because they didn't like your views???

So why the fuck does the Fourth Amendment get treated differently?

What, just because liberals don't understand it - therefore its not important???

And people wonder why I have a problem with liberals???

Why are you babbling about the fourth amendment?? Do you have a point or is calling those who dare to disagree with you names all that you have to offer?
 
Neither of the Fonda kids are politically in turn, they are just rich and think we care about what they say and they are right look at all of us commenting on Peters words and then there is Jane who should have been tried and convicted of treason.
 
I think Obama is a filthy Marxist, but I would not call him a traitor.

I do think Jane Fonda might fit that description :)

Even a Marxist is entitled to his opinion and once elected by fools, he is entitled to do whatever he thinks best as long as it is Constitutional.

Now many things the Marxist has done has been Unconstitutional. Commiecare comes ti mind. Going around Congress is also questionable.

Thanks for the propaganda. It's funny how the right didn't feel that way about an individual mandate when they proposed it to counter clinton's health care plan back in 93.

Going around congress?? details?
 
Show me where Obama has the right to seize a business...

seize? lol....what a fucking retard. We've bailed out the car companies a few times.
Reagan must have been a tyrant as well.
Stop abusing terms for the sake of being a whining little child.

Obama SEIZED GM...

Do you not understand that???

The way you rationalize what he did is meaningless to the facts.

Barack Obama violated the Bill of Rights in doing such.

Care to explain how he "SEIZED" GM??
 
I think Obama is a filthy Marxist, but I would not call him a traitor.

I do think Jane Fonda might fit that description :)

Even a Marxist is entitled to his opinion and once elected by fools, he is entitled to do whatever he thinks best as long as it is Constitutional.

Now many things the Marxist has done has been Unconstitutional. Commiecare comes ti mind. Going around Congress is also questionable.

He violated the Fourth Amendment right in front of our faces...

Hes a tyrant for violating the Bill of Rights.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Exactly how did he violate the fourth amendment??

BTW merely restating your claim that he SEIZED GM is not good enough. Explain in detail how he SEIZED it and how that violated the fourth amendment.

Saying it doesn't make it so and repeating it doesn't make it so either.
 
You would think that in the United States of America the goddamn president who is allegedly a constitutional wizard would view seizing a company to be a total Fourth Amendment violation.

What makes our Fourth Amendment any less than your right to be an ignorant fool and spew it (First Amendment)

He violated the Fourth Amendment right in front of our faces...

Hes a tyrant for violating the Bill of Rights.

That would be an alleged 5th Amendment violation. In which case you might want to chill on the ‘ignorant fool’ stuff.

BTW when and where did the founding fathers speak of wanting a natural born citizen to consist of being born to parents who were both born in country??

Never and nowhere.

The Fifth Amendment is the right to not self incriminate..

What the fuck man....

WOW!

Seriously, you need to go and read the fifth amendment.
 
I thought the left's Big Tent had room for all views.

Guess not. :lol:

The left does and no one on the left is saying that he doesn't have a right to say it but that isn't what has everyone so interested. What got everyone's attention is that the right usually doesn't have a big tent and yet because this actor, which the right usually argues should stay out of politics andstick to acting, gave an opinon that denegrates obama a right winger jumps at the chance to use it.

Obama is attacked by the right for going overseas and "apologizing for the US" and yet here is this actor overseas denegrating the president of the US and the right jumps at the chance to use it.

Funny how you missed that contradiction, isn't it? LOL
Still bitterly clinging to the myth of the left's Big Tent, I see. :lol:

The Dixie Chicks were jerks to denigrate a sitting President while overseas. Fonda's a jerk to denigrate a sitting President while overseas. That's what I've seen mostly from rightwingers here in this thread, and it's my view, too.

Did you condemn the Chix when Bush was in office?
 
LOL that is a stretch! First, legit Obama bashing is fine, but I don't get the bash Obama on the oil spill. What could he have done? Maybe sent advisors or engineers (which I'm sure he did), but beyond that I don't know. Fonda is bashing him for his handling of the spill. Fonda is a moron. He is a Hollywood Elitist Liberal that say oil makes us sick as he drives his gas guzzler, flies around the world and powers his masion using the same amount of energy 20 apartment building uses! He hates when YOU use oil or gas, he loves when HE uses oil or gas. He's an elitest hypocrite like Al Gore.

Second, I fault Obama for his handling of off shore drilling and oil. He stopped it, yet promotes Brazilian drilling. Then he attacks Libya, which has shot up the price of oil.

Lastly, I also don't think its cool or good for the nation to bash the president overseas in front of a foreign audience. It's his right and we shouldn't take it away from him. But I don't have to like him for it or support his crap movies. I am not an Obama supporter, but he is still the President of my country and deserves some respect!

Fonda realizes that what Obama did are actions of what Usurpers do when they take over. The founders warned us of such a possibility. They warned of having a man in power without sole allegiance to the USA and that is why they wanted a natural born citizen born to two US citizen parents with born sole allegiance to America. Obama was born with Allegiance to the British Crown and now we are seeing those divided loyalties in action. The man is not eligible Constitutionally.




Peter Fonda calls Obama 'traitor' at Cannes - Yahoo! News

Peter Fonda launched a four-letter attack on US President Barack Obama at the Cannes film festival on Wednesday, calling him a traitor over the handling of the aftermath of the Gulf oil spill.

The star of the 1969 road movie "Easy Rider" was in Cannes for the premiere of "The Big Fix" by Rebecca and Josh Tickell, the only feature documentary in the official selection at the Cannes film festival this year.

Fonda -- a keen environmentalist and co-producer of the film which centres on the explosion of the BP oil rig Deepwater Horizon, the ensuing spill and its consequences -- accused Washington of trying to gag reporting on the issue.

"I sent an email to President Obama saying, 'You are a f(expletive) traitor,' using those words... 'You're a traitor, you allowed foreign boots on our soil telling our military -- in this case the coastguard -- what they can and could not do, and telling us, the citizens of the United States, what we could or could not do'."
 
Last edited:
No he didnt, stop lying dipshit

President Obama sezies GM - Google Search

Reality says otherwise...
Obama Gives Automakers a Short Lifeline - NYTimes.com

maybe you should read it before making shit up...they where not forced to do anything. Thats not seizing dipshit


It's obvious he does not know the definition of the word "seized" anymore than he actually knows the constitution based on his myopic view of the fifth...

The Fifth Amendment is the right to not self incriminate.


...which is probably based soley on watching court room dramas.

His inability to make a valid argument to support his spin exposes that lack of understanding. So, more than likely he heard some rightwing talking head spew out that nonsense and is here regurgitating it even though he has no understanding of it.
 
Obama Gives Automakers a Short Lifeline - NYTimes.com

maybe you should read it before making shit up...they where not forced to do anything. Thats not seizing dipshit

:lol:

Believe whatever makes you sleep better.

That motherfucker seized GM...

Some op-ed clowns will use soft words and others will be blunt like I am, however at the end of the day the "takeover" occurred...

LOL So your proof that "he seized GM" is the fact that you can repeat "he seized GM" over and over while failing to provide any substantive argument to support said claim?

Got it.
 
Obama is a tyrant, and so are many on the left.

The guy only took over a goddamn company like socialist dictators do.

You would think that in the United States of America the goddamn president who is allegedly a constitutional wizard would view seizing a company to be a total Fourth Amendment violation.

Who the fuck specializes in a philosophy they don't even respect??



Wow, such ignorance...and three people thanked you for it too.




Scary dumb.



I do like the birther guy still hanging around though, holy crap that's funny right there.


Is being fucking retarded a prerequisite for being progressive??


Every time I post something libdfuck retards don't agree with and they cant refute they resort to name calling...

I can deal with you calling me a name, but what truly pisses me off is your lack of substance and pure name calling...

So you start by calling names and then whine when what you are dishing out is served right back at you?? LOL

Your first post in this thread.

Obama is a tyrant, and so are many on the left.

BTW it's funny how you claim to be against a lack of substance when all you have done is make a few claims while providing nothing of substance to support them and then repeat those same claims over and over again. So when are you going to provide the substance?
 
Obama Gives Automakers a Short Lifeline - NYTimes.com

maybe you should read it before making shit up...they where not forced to do anything. Thats not seizing dipshit

:lol:

Believe whatever makes you sleep better.

That motherfucker seized GM...

Some op-ed clowns will use soft words and others will be blunt like I am, however at the end of the day the "takeover" occurred...

lol so you rather remain ignorant. That Nytimes was off your google link dipshit.

And what he also fails to understand is that most of the links he provided are op-eds. LOL

His first link comes from the opinion section of a canadian paper.

Obama takes over GM

LOL
 
Boggles the mind, doesn't it?

No, it doesn't. It is the level of intellect that I have come to expect from posters such as USC.

Be that as it may...at times USC appears to be ON...and most others he appears to be LOST...He's in the LOST column in this one...

It's interesting how you trolls choose to focus on USC calling attention to the author of the OP who chose to focus on fonda's location when he made the comments even as you fail to call out the OP for making the location part of the debate.

Why not go to the source of the comments instead of piling on the middle man or do you have some ulterior motive for piling on USC??
 

Forum List

Back
Top