Obama a marxist.

Funny you mention Bush..

Funny how sleazy your are.

{Prescott's involvement with Nazi finance is more complicated. Though Thyssen had been an ardent backer of the Nazis in the early days, he broke with them in 1938 after the Kristallnacht pogrom against the Jews. He fled to Switzerland the following year, and Hitler confiscated his fortune and stripped him of his citizenship. In I Paid Hitler Thyssen confessed his role in financing the Nazis and denounced the Führer. Arrested in Vichy France, he spent the balance of the war as an Axis prisoner. Prescott Bush, for his part, owned a single share of stock (of 4,000) in UBC, the Thyssen bank. According to a 2001 Boston Globe piece, the New York Herald Tribune ran a story in July 1942 headlined "Hitler's Angel Has 3 Million in US Bank," in which Prescott and other BBH partners "explain[ed] to government regulators that their position [as directors of UBC] was merely an unpaid courtesy for a client."}

The Straight Dope: Was President Bush's great-grandfather a Nazi?

Hey, you're a liar - it's what you do, part of living an integrity-free life.

How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

Rumours of a link between the US first family and the Nazi war machine have circulated for decades. Now the Guardian can reveal how repercussions of events that culminated in action under the Trading with the Enemy Act are still being felt by today's president

George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

That's a direct lie.

Thyssen had all of the holdings of UBC stolen by the Nazis.

You leftists sure lie a lot to smear your enemies you're a lot - well, exactly, like Hitler in that way.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power | World news | The Guardian

The Guardian is openly lying - as you are. This was debunked a decade ago and even the Guardian had to retract the open libel.

Buy you live an integrity-free life, so you'll tell any lie at any time. Lying is a big part of who you are.

You guys can sure pick 'em! :D

At least we don't have to fabricate urban legends decades after they are proven false.

Do you view integrity as a weakness? We all know the contempt you have for honesty, but do you view the act of being truthful as a sign of weakness?
 
He is not a pure Marxist, or Socialist, or Pure Anything.

Neither was Stalin or even Mao. The central theme is the lust for power, absolute power.

He is a Hybrid, he thinks he knows how to re-package old Marxist, Socialist, and Capitalist Ideas into some Hybrid Utopia. He thinks it can be done with out Descending into an Authoritarian State like every other time these ideas have been tried.

You are correct.
 
Repeating that lie does not make it any less of a lie. Obama said "TRICKLE DOWN" does not work and never has worked.

"Trickle Down" is a left-wing pejorative meaning "the free market." Anytime a liberal says "trickle down doesn't work," what he really means is "capitalism doesn't work."
As I have shown so many times before, when CON$ are caught lying, they merely lie some more. Trickle down means the "Supply Side" Reagonomics theory. You know it, and I know it, but as a CON$ervative you are too dishonest to admit it.

October 11, 2011
RUSH: I've often said, I said last week he who controls the definition of words, the meaning of words, controls the debate. He who controls the language controls the debate.
 
90% of all libs are sucking on the government tit. That's why they are libs.
5652.strip.gif


So then tell us, asslick, since you dispute my estimate, what percentage of libs are sucking on the government tit?

BTW, it isn't just the unemployed who are ticks on the ass of society. All non-military government personnel are useless ticks. they produce virtually nothing I would pay for voluntarily. I include all public school teachers in that list. Also, everyone collecting a Social Security check is sucking on the government tit.
However many there are, there are more CON$ sucking on the government teat because on the average Libs EARN more than you lazy-assed CON$ervative slackers. Get a job you lazy fuck!
 
However many there are, there are more CON$ sucking on the government teat because on the average Libs EARN more than you lazy-assed CON$ervative slackers. Get a job you lazy fuck!

Making shit up again, Edtheliar?

The extremely (obscenely) rich and the lower class tend to be democrats. The middle belongs to the GOP, always has.
 
Funny you mention Bush..

Funny how sleazy your are.

{Prescott's involvement with Nazi finance is more complicated. Though Thyssen had been an ardent backer of the Nazis in the early days, he broke with them in 1938 after the Kristallnacht pogrom against the Jews. He fled to Switzerland the following year, and Hitler confiscated his fortune and stripped him of his citizenship. In I Paid Hitler Thyssen confessed his role in financing the Nazis and denounced the Führer. Arrested in Vichy France, he spent the balance of the war as an Axis prisoner. Prescott Bush, for his part, owned a single share of stock (of 4,000) in UBC, the Thyssen bank. According to a 2001 Boston Globe piece, the New York Herald Tribune ran a story in July 1942 headlined "Hitler's Angel Has 3 Million in US Bank," in which Prescott and other BBH partners "explain[ed] to government regulators that their position [as directors of UBC] was merely an unpaid courtesy for a client."}

The Straight Dope: Was President Bush's great-grandfather a Nazi?

Hey, you're a liar - it's what you do, part of living an integrity-free life.

How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power

Rumours of a link between the US first family and the Nazi war machine have circulated for decades. Now the Guardian can reveal how repercussions of events that culminated in action under the Trading with the Enemy Act are still being felt by today's president

George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

That's a direct lie.

Thyssen had all of the holdings of UBC stolen by the Nazis.

You leftists sure lie a lot to smear your enemies you're a lot - well, exactly, like Hitler in that way.

The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power | World news | The Guardian

The Guardian is openly lying - as you are. This was debunked a decade ago and even the Guardian had to retract the open libel.

Buy you live an integrity-free life, so you'll tell any lie at any time. Lying is a big part of who you are.

You guys can sure pick 'em! :D

At least we don't have to fabricate urban legends decades after they are proven false.

Do you view integrity as a weakness? We all know the contempt you have for honesty, but do you view the act of being truthful as a sign of weakness?

It wasn't "debunked". Prescott was charged with doing business with the enemy. George W. Bush took over Arbusto...that company was started by Osama Bin Laden's brother.

You fucks seem to have no problem profitting from the bad guys.
 
As I have shown so many times before, when CON$ are caught lying, they merely lie some more. Trickle down means the "Supply Side" Reagonomics theory. You know it, and I know it, but as a CON$ervative you are too dishonest to admit it.

October 11, 2011
RUSH: I've often said, I said last week he who controls the definition of words, the meaning of words, controls the debate. He who controls the language controls the debate.

The so-called "supply side" is just a snazzy new public relations term for the free market.
 
It wasn't "debunked".

Of course you know it was, even Snopes lists it as an urban legend.

Prescott was charged with doing business with the enemy.

No, he certainly wasn't, you are flat out lying.

George W. Bush took over Arbusto...that company was started by Osama Bin Laden's brother.

Exposed in your lie, you fling shit wildly in hopes some will stick and obscure your fabrications.

{Union Banking was owned by a Dutch bank, Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaardt N.V., which was "closely affiliated" with the German conglomerate United Steel Works, according to an Oct. 5, 1942, report from the federal Office of Alien Property Custodian. The Dutch bank and the steel firm were part of the business and financial empire of Thyssen and his brother, Heinrich Thyssen-Bornemisza, the report said.

The 4,000 Union Banking shares owned by the Dutch bank were registered in the names of the seven U.S. directors, according a document signed by Homer Jones, chief of the division of investigation and research of the Office of Alien Property Custodian, a World War II-era agency that no longer exists.

E. Roland Harriman, the bank chairman and brother of former New York Gov. W. Averell Harriman (search), held 3,991 shares. Bush had one share.

Both Harrimans and Bush were partners in the New York investment firm of Brown Brothers, Harriman and Co., which handled the financial transactions of the bank as well as other financial dealings with several other companies linked to Bank voor Handel that were confiscated by the U.S. government during World War II.

Read more: Documents: Bush's Grandfather Directed Bank Tied to Man Who Funded Hitler | Fox News
}

You sir, are a complete liar - as we all know. Hey, it's what you do.

Living the integrity-free lifestyle.

You fucks seem to have no problem profitting from the bad guys.

You have no problem lying through your fucking teeth. I assume you've been diagnosed as a sociopath, yes?
 
As I have shown so many times before, when CON$ are caught lying, they merely lie some more. Trickle down means the "Supply Side" Reagonomics theory. You know it, and I know it, but as a CON$ervative you are too dishonest to admit it.

October 11, 2011
RUSH: I've often said, I said last week he who controls the definition of words, the meaning of words, controls the debate. He who controls the language controls the debate.

The so-called "supply side" is just a snazzy new public relations term for the free market.
BULLSHIT!

Once CON$ sink their teeth into a lie, they never let go.

Reaganomics Definition | Investopedia

Investopedia explains 'Reaganomics'

The term was used by supporters and detractors of Reagan's policies alike. Reaganomics was partially based on the principles of supply-side economics and the trickle-down theory. These theories hold the view that decreases in taxes, especially for corporations, is the best way to stimulate economic growth: the idea is that if the expenses of corporations are reduced, the savings will "trickle down" to the rest of the economy, spurring growth.
 
BULLSHIT!

Once CON$ sink their teeth into a lie, they never let go.

Reaganomics Definition | Investopedia

Investopedia explains 'Reaganomics'

The term was used by supporters and detractors of Reagan's policies alike. Reaganomics was partially based on the principles of supply-side economics and the trickle-down theory. These theories hold the view that decreases in taxes, especially for corporations, is the best way to stimulate economic growth: the idea is that if the expenses of corporations are reduced, the savings will "trickle down" to the rest of the economy, spurring growth.

"Investopedia?" Now there's a credible "unbiased" source.

Why would anyone accept what some liberal says about the term "supply side?"
 
BULLSHIT!

Once CON$ sink their teeth into a lie, they never let go.

Reaganomics Definition | Investopedia

Investopedia explains 'Reaganomics'

The term was used by supporters and detractors of Reagan's policies alike. Reaganomics was partially based on the principles of supply-side economics and the trickle-down theory. These theories hold the view that decreases in taxes, especially for corporations, is the best way to stimulate economic growth: the idea is that if the expenses of corporations are reduced, the savings will "trickle down" to the rest of the economy, spurring growth.

"Investopedia?" Now there's a credible "unbiased" source.

Why would anyone accept what some liberal says about the term "supply side?"
There is nothing political about Investopedia, you as a CON$ervative will never admit the truth.

Here is the extremist Right-wing American Stinker saying the same thing:

June 24, 2011 Understanding Supply Side Economics

By Henry Oliner

It has been derided as voodoo economics by George H.W. Bush and contemptuously as 'trickle down' economics by opponents from the left and some from the right. When Ronald Reagan embraced supply side economics many Republicans and Democrats were skeptical. When unemployment shot up to 11 percent and interest rates spiked to 20%, Reagan's own party and even members of his cabinet were questioning the wisdom of cutting taxes at the high end of the rates.
High unemployment, painful as it was, helped bring inflation under control. Interest rates and unemployment fell.
Supply side economics has retained a bitter opposition. Economics is often not intuitive: at first glance the proposition seems illogical, but after further consideration and analysis it proves to make good sense. Unfortunately few issues get beyond first glances before minds are ossified, and fail to understand the principle.
It is not immediately intuitive that decreasing tax rates (percentages) can possibly yield greater tax revenue (dollars). It is unsatisfactory to describe the process as a trickledown effect: that by leaving more money in the hands of the wealthier taxpayers that they will generate more income that will trickle down to the less fortunate. Supply side theory states that this can happen, but it does not apply in unlimited situations.


Read more: Articles: Understanding Supply Side Economics
 
There is nothing political about Investopedia, you as a CON$ervative will never admit the truth.

Yeah, right. Ivestopedia is a subsidiary of Wikipedia, and any non-drone understands that the later is Democrat propaganda organ.

The claim that economic issues are "non-political" is too absurd for words.
 
I agree with you to a point... except I think we should start with getting money out of the Political Process....I think that the "buying" of our elected representation is the biggest factor in the "incompetency" of our government. In other words....they aren't really incompetent... just bought.
Here is where I agree with you. Get the money out. Give the power back to the people. Also get the socialists out, they have NO place in American politics as far as I am concerned.

oh... so you want to give the power back to the people... but only the people you approve of? Nahh... I'll pass on that.

Either that or you totally miss the point. When we speak of Liberty, it is about Limited Control. Your issue is who controls, there is a distinction, especially where control is unwarranted and uninvited. ;) That is where Tyranny is born.
 
I actually like Libertarians too... they are probably more in line with my own thought process than anyone else. Except I do happen to believe that we are our brothers' keeper, so to speak. I forget who said it...I think it was Ghandi... that a measure of a society is how it treats it's weakest citizens....or something close to that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top