TheOldSchool
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #41
Typical republican, supporting a police state.Only the Whiny Liberals who refuse to get off the street.Fine by me. As long as they don't start killing people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Typical republican, supporting a police state.Only the Whiny Liberals who refuse to get off the street.Fine by me. As long as they don't start killing people.
No... typical America Citizen... sick to death of the mess Libs have created in recent years... and finding gallows humor in such sugar-plum visions.Typical republican, supporting a police state.Only the Whiny Liberals who refuse to get off the street.Fine by me. As long as they don't start killing people.
Yeah you just said you're okay with the government killing unarmed, non-aggressive citizens. Just like the founders intended...No... typical America Citizen... sick to death of the mess Libs have created in recent years... and finding gallows humor in such sugar-plum visions.Typical republican, supporting a police state.Only the Whiny Liberals who refuse to get off the street.Fine by me. As long as they don't start killing people.
Off your high horse, Gertrude.
Yeah... I just said it... and I immediately identified it as 'gallows humor', didn't I?Yeah you just said you're okay with the government killing unarmed, non-aggressive citizens. Just like the founders intended...No... typical America Citizen... sick to death of the mess Libs have created in recent years... and finding gallows humor in such sugar-plum visions.Typical republican, supporting a police state.Only the Whiny Liberals who refuse to get off the street.Fine by me. As long as they don't start killing people.
Off your high horse, Gertrude.
I can't believe how many RWs don't know they have the constitutional right to protest. Indeed, our Declaration of Independence states we have the moral obligation. The first job of law enforcement is and should be to uphold the laws of the land - including protecting enabling protesters.
Yeah you just said you're okay with the government killing unarmed, non-aggressive citizens. Just like the founders intended...No... typical America Citizen... sick to death of the mess Libs have created in recent years... and finding gallows humor in such sugar-plum visions. Off your high horse, Gertrude.
Well I believe this is what they did by ordering them to get out of the way of oncoming cars which is what the roads were made for in the first place: transportation, not protesting. Making people who protest take their protesting to the side walk doesn't mean that their protesting has to come to an end. It is all about where the protesting takes place and nothing else.I can't believe how many RWs don't know they have the constitutional right to protest. Indeed, our Declaration of Independence states we have the moral obligation.To me, before they complain, they should consider themselves lucky that they are still allowed to continue with their protesting at all.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
The first job of law enforcement is and should be to uphold the laws of the land - including protecting enabling protesters.
Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Clearing the streets is "fine with me." Killing unarmed people who are not agressive as long as they're liberal is what I was objecting to. You dumb fuck. How about you read the posts before replying next time?Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Typical Loony Lefty ... talking from both sides of his (or her) mouth. On page one you responded "fine with me" to a post which called for clearing the streets of protestors and your fellow loon, Lone Laugher, stated: "This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do."
Using your "logic" that would mean you both support what you call "a police state."
Clearing the streets is "fine with me." Killing unarmed people who are not agressive as long as they're liberal is what I was objecting to. You dumb fuck. How about you read the posts before replying next time?Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Typical Loony Lefty ... talking from both sides of his (or her) mouth. On page one you responded "fine with me" to a post which called for clearing the streets of protestors and your fellow loon, Lone Laugher, stated: "This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do."
Using your "logic" that would mean you both support what you call "a police state."
You taking it seriously is the horse-laugh of the evening...Clearing the streets is "fine with me." Killing unarmed people who are not agressive as long as they're liberal is what I was objecting to. You dumb fuck. How about you read the posts before replying next time?Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Typical Loony Lefty ... talking from both sides of his (or her) mouth. On page one you responded "fine with me" to a post which called for clearing the streets of protestors and your fellow loon, Lone Laugher, stated: "This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do."
Using your "logic" that would mean you both support what you call "a police state."
I'm sorry you need things from an internet forum. Maybe you should get out more.You taking it seriously is the horse-laugh of the evening...Clearing the streets is "fine with me." Killing unarmed people who are not agressive as long as they're liberal is what I was objecting to. You dumb fuck. How about you read the posts before replying next time?Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Typical Loony Lefty ... talking from both sides of his (or her) mouth. On page one you responded "fine with me" to a post which called for clearing the streets of protestors and your fellow loon, Lone Laugher, stated: "This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do."
Using your "logic" that would mean you both support what you call "a police state."
Thanks... I needed that.
Horse Laugh Number Two for the evening... you're battin' a thousand so far... thanks for the fun.I'm sorry you need things from an internet forum. Maybe you should get out more.You taking it seriously is the horse-laugh of the evening...Clearing the streets is "fine with me." Killing unarmed people who are not agressive as long as they're liberal is what I was objecting to. You dumb fuck. How about you read the posts before replying next time?Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Typical Loony Lefty ... talking from both sides of his (or her) mouth. On page one you responded "fine with me" to a post which called for clearing the streets of protestors and your fellow loon, Lone Laugher, stated: "This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do."
Using your "logic" that would mean you both support what you call "a police state."
Thanks... I needed that.
This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do.
The OP can't help himself, though. He started this thread so he could make it a lib/con issue. It isn't. It's a public safety issue. Ya huge asshole.
Let's see if we can help the little dummy find some people to oppose this policy, shall we? What is reasonable "aggression" in this case? What level of offense should law enforcement officers employ in keeping the roadway clear of protesters?
Want to take a stab at it?
You're right BUT -
The OP is correct that its always liberals who fight for Constitutional rights.
If left to the RWs, we will be living in a police state.
Why should protestors be allowed to interfere with the freedom of others to go about their own business?
It's not exactly PEACEFUL to violate other people's rights.
Way to go! You inferred that I think protesters should be allowed to interfere with the freedom of others!! Awesome nutter strategy. If you are lucky, another idiot will see your post and reply thinking that I had actually said that. Isn't being a disingenuous nutbag fun?!
You don't consider blocking others from using roadways and sidewalks to be interferring with the rights of others?
Typical Progloon - no consideration whatsoever for the rights of others to go about their own business unmolested by your self-righteous twaddle.
Why so stoopid? Why u not read da whole thread b4 open ur big pie hole?
^^^ What.A.Moron ^^^
Here are your own words, you blithering idiot:
"Lots of things inflict pain. You weren't specific at all. What level of pain should a person be subjected to for blocking the roadway during a peaceful protest?"
What did I say in my first post in this thread? You are calling me a moron...but it is you who is failing to understand the simplest concept.
Keep posting. Let the world know just how stupid you are.
A throuough ass-kicking followed by tossing off the Oakland Bridge.This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do.
The OP can't help himself, though. He started this thread so he could make it a lib/con issue. It isn't. It's a public safety issue. Ya huge asshole.
Let's see if we can help the little dummy find some people to oppose this policy, shall we? What is reasonable "aggression" in this case? What level of offense should law enforcement officers employ in keeping the roadway clear of protesters?
Want to take a stab at it?
So the South protesting by going to war was okay with you?To me, before they complain, they should consider themselves lucky that they are still allowed to continue with their protesting at all.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
I can't believe how many RWs don't know they have the constitutional right to protest. Indeed, our Declaration of Independence states we have the moral obligation.
The first job of law enforcement is and should be to uphold the laws of the land - including protecting enabling protesters.
How about you reading posts. Nobody said cops should gun down unarmed protesters.Clearing the streets is "fine with me." Killing unarmed people who are not agressive as long as they're liberal is what I was objecting to. You dumb fuck. How about you read the posts before replying next time?Typical republican, supporting a police state.
Typical Loony Lefty ... talking from both sides of his (or her) mouth. On page one you responded "fine with me" to a post which called for clearing the streets of protestors and your fellow loon, Lone Laugher, stated: "This liberal thinks preventing protesters from blocking the roadway is a reasonable thing for law enforcement to do."
Using your "logic" that would mean you both support what you call "a police state."