He's right when he said: "What your attraction may be is something else, but how you act upon those impulses is a choice."
Yes, the only choice is in acting upon our natural or god-given attractions. In a free society, why should it matter if we choose to act upon our attractions as long as it is with other consenting adults? Why should that disqualify us from equal protection under the law for our partnerships?
The Governor should be asked how he would feel if California were to pass a law, by people's referendum, that would prohibit Mormons from getting a civil marriage license.
No one is limiting your partnerships. You are as free to write a partnership agreement as anyone else.
There is a Constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of religion. There is no Constitutionally guaranteed right to fuck.
I never said limiting partnerships, I said not treating them equally under the law. My marriage is not treated the same as your marriage. That will end when the rest of DOMA is struck down or when the SCOTUS rules all anti gay marriage laws unconstitutional.
No matter how many laws are struck down, you still won't have a marriage. You can do no more than pretend to have a marriage. Even if you have laws protecting your delusion, it will never be more than a delusion.