Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

The Hill @thehill
Fox News anchor: There's more evidence of Russian collusion with Democrats than with Trump http://hill.cm/v6fza7u pic.twitter.com/DZIFdega7t

Follow
SHRED @Hobie_SHRED

#Democrats colluded with #Russia to flood the internet with pro-Trump propaganda.
In what world does that make any sense?
3788f3ea8c2b3c20d452a3928d61cb755e79bb918d90f2acd109e209ebb1d0ee.jpg
3788f3ea8c2b3c20d452a3928d61cb755e79bb918d90f2acd109e209ebb1d0ee.jpg
3788f3ea8c2b3c20d452a3928d61cb755e79bb918d90f2acd109e209ebb1d0ee.jpg


2. In the last several day's we've learned
a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.





3. Now....the last nail in the Democrat Coffin, proof of their collusion with Moscow.
The infamous dossier, designed to sink the Trump campaign....
It cam from the Kremlin.

a· "Perhaps the two most damaging claims are an allegation of ongoing collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russian intelligence, facilitating the sharing of sensitive information beneficial to both sides; and an allegation that Russia has video footage of Trump watching sex workers engage in a sex act.

· The memos, dated June 20 to October 20 of last year – are based on the former intelligence agent’s “recent interactions with Russian sources,” according to an interview he conducted with Mother Jones’ David Corn in October. An official in the U.S. administration who spoke to the Guardian described the author of the memos as “consistently reliable, meticulous, and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.”
What we know about Russia’s “compromising material” on Donald Trump

"Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive.[1][2][3] The English word is a translation of the Russian dezinformatsiya,[1][2][3] derived from the title of a KGB black propaganda department.[4] The book Disinformation documents that Joseph Stalin coined the term,..."
Disinformation - Wikipedia

The dossier came from a Brit. The quid pro quo of the uranium deal has already been debunked.




A Brit, working with the russians. Duh. It's amazing how dense you are.

Working with the Russians? lol
 
Putin wanted Hillary as President....not Trump.
3788f3ea8c2b3c20d452a3928d61cb755e79bb918d90f2acd109e209ebb1d0ee.jpg

SHRED @Hobie_SHRED
#Democrats colluded with #Russia to flood the internet with pro-Trump propaganda.
In what world does that make any sense?

3788f3ea8c2b3c20d452a3928d61cb755e79bb918d90f2acd109e209ebb1d0ee.jpg

12:50 PM - Oct 27, 2017.......................



Let's get this straight, you dunce.....the Kremlin didn't want a disruptor....Trump.
Proof?
Check out Russian Television..RT

"....the claim that RT America is pro-Trump is that it is simply false. Many of the channel’s biggest names were either ardently anti-Trump or highly skeptical of what a Trump presidency might mean for America.

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist and former Middle East bureau chief for The New York Times, who hosts the show On Contact, was consistently anti-Trump in his outlook. Hedges has called Trump “woefully unprepared” for the presidency and said his election could mean the creation of a “draconian police state.”

Stalwart liberal Thom Hartmann, who hosts The Big Picture, has aired programs with names like: “Dictator Trump Threatens Free Speech,” “Why Trump’s Cabinet Is a Basket of Deplorables,” “How Trump Could Bring on the Crash of 2016,” “Does Trump Mean the End of the Internet as We Know It?,” “Why Trump’s Win Is a Koch Coup Against Our Democracy” and “Is Donald Trump the Master of BS?”—to name a few.

Ed Schultz, who hosts News with Ed Schultz, also routinely ran segments that criticized Trump. “Who’s gonna stop Donald Trump!?” pleaded Schultz before a segment on how the GOP was worried about the reality-TV star’s unstoppable rise. Schultz also aired an interview with Bernie Sanders, who lambasted Trump’s bigotry and sexism and called Clinton “far and away the superior candidate”.

Lesser-known names on RT America have also criticized Trump on-air. Lee Camp, who hosts the satirical show Redacted Tonight, has mocked Trump relentlessly, calling one segment on climate change: “Why Donald Trump Is Dangerous For All Humanity.”
RT America Was Not ‘Pro-Trump’

A simple look through RT America’s YouTube channel throws up numerous clips in which guests refer to Trump as misogynistic, bigoted, and racist." RT America Was Not ‘Pro-Trump’
 
3788f3ea8c2b3c20d452a3928d61cb755e79bb918d90f2acd109e209ebb1d0ee.jpg
Scrutiny mounts for Trump digital operation
tumblr_lci86kVPb71qc6kz5.gif

Source: the hill



By Morgan Chalfant - 10/27/17 06:01 AM EDT


Scrutiny on the digital side of President Trump’s 2016 campaign is mounting after revelations that the head of Cambridge Analytica, a data mining and analysis firm that worked for the campaign, contacted WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange about Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The Daily Beast reported Wednesday that Alexander Nix, Cambridge Analytica’s CEO, told a third party that he reached out to the WikiLeaks founder last year about the emails that Clinton deleted from the server she used while secretary of State.

The Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica millions during the 2016 presidential race. In the aftermath of the Assange revelations, aides have raced to distance the campaign from the firm.

The company, which is partially owned by the family of billionaire Trump supporter Robert Mercer, mines online data in order to target potential voters with personalized political messaging. It reportedly also worked on the United Kingdom's referendum over leaving the European Union. ........................................

Read more: Scrutiny mounts for Trump digital operation


"After studying Russian leadership for 40 years, focusing on Putin in particular, Cohen said it was hard for him believe that the Russian president would have done such a thing.

"I could find not one piece of factual evidence," he said. "The only evidence ever presented was a study hired by the Clintons -- the DNC -- to do an examination of their computers. They [Crowdstrike] concluded the Russians did it. Their report has fallen apart." He added, "Why didn't the FBI do their own investigation?"

Tucker pointed out that even Republicans say that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies (including Coast Guard Intelligence!) have concluded that Russian intelligence was behind this.

"They say that, but it's bogus," Cohen argued. "When Clapper, the director of national intelligence, signed that report in January, technically he represents all seventeen. I'll bet you a dime to a nickel you couldn't get a guest on, unprepared, who could name ten of them. This figure -- seventeen -- is bogus!"
Prof. Cohen: Not One Piece of Factual Evidence That Russia 'Hacked the Election'

================================================

".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "

The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust  

===================================================



1. "Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart









2. "While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror







3. Democrat Feinstein, too







4. Here is 'proud Hillary voter,' Alan Dershowitz, protesting that 'there is no crime.'

Dershowitz: 'There is no statute that has been violated....firing Comey is [Trump's] constitutional and statutory right...'






5. Democrat Joe Manchin: no evidence





6.Maxine Waters: no evidence


Waters Admits No Proof Exists Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign, Russia

Waters Admits No Proof Exists Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign, Russia


7. Comey Says He Was Never Pressured By Anyone To Stop Investigations



Comey Said He Had NOT Been Pressured To End Any Investigation, Debunks Leftist Media Narrative

YouTube

=============================================

Let's take a look at the score...

1. former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper

2. National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers

3. and former FBI Director James Comey

4. Democrat Feinstein

5. Hillary supporter and Professor of Law, Alan Dershowitz

6. Democrat Joe Manchin

7. Democrat Maxine Waters


Oh....and
8."Ex-CIA Director John Brennan: I’ve Seen No Evidence Of Collusion With Russia"
Ex-CIA Director John Brennan: I’ve Seen No Evidence of Collusion with Russia



....all indicate that poor eddie is being led around by a ring in is nose by the Left......


Yet....here you are squealing like a stuck pig: "Is toooooo, issssss toooooo!!!!"


So very, very sad.
 
Putin wanted Hillary as President....not Trump.

That sentence alone, proves you're full of shit, and you know it.
huh?

If Putin wanted Clinton as president, why did he do so much to help Trump? NSA intercepts overheard top russian officials celebrating the Trump victory.

"After studying Russian leadership for 40 years, focusing on Putin in particular, Cohen said it was hard for him believe that the Russian president would have done such a thing.

"I could find not one piece of factual evidence," he said. "The only evidence ever presented was a study hired by the Clintons -- the DNC -- to do an examination of their computers. They [Crowdstrike] concluded the Russians did it. Their report has fallen apart." He added, "Why didn't the FBI do their own investigation?"

Tucker pointed out that even Republicans say that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies (including Coast Guard Intelligence!) have concluded that Russian intelligence was behind this.

"They say that, but it's bogus," Cohen argued. "When Clapper, the director of national intelligence, signed that report in January, technically he represents all seventeen. I'll bet you a dime to a nickel you couldn't get a guest on, unprepared, who could name ten of them. This figure -- seventeen -- is bogus!"
Prof. Cohen: Not One Piece of Factual Evidence That Russia 'Hacked the Election'

================================================

".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "

The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust  

===================================================



1. "Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.


TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart









2. "While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states." FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror







3. Democrat Feinstein, too







4. Here is 'proud Hillary voter,' Alan Dershowitz, protesting that 'there is no crime.'

Dershowitz: 'There is no statute that has been violated....firing Comey is [Trump's] constitutional and statutory right...'






5. Democrat Joe Manchin: no evidence





6.Maxine Waters: no evidence


Waters Admits No Proof Exists Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign, Russia

Waters Admits No Proof Exists Of Collusion Between Trump Campaign, Russia


7. Comey Says He Was Never Pressured By Anyone To Stop Investigations



Comey Said He Had NOT Been Pressured To End Any Investigation, Debunks Leftist Media Narrative

YouTube

=============================================

Let's take a look at the score...

1. former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper

2. National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers

3. and former FBI Director James Comey

4. Democrat Feinstein

5. Hillary supporter and Professor of Law, Alan Dershowitz

6. Democrat Joe Manchin

7. Democrat Maxine Waters


Oh....and
8."Ex-CIA Director John Brennan: I’ve Seen No Evidence Of Collusion With Russia"
Ex-CIA Director John Brennan: I’ve Seen No Evidence of Collusion with Russia



....all indicate that poor eddie is being led around by a ring in is nose by the Left......


Yet....here you are squealing like a stuck pig: "Is toooooo, issssss toooooo!!!!"


So very, very sad.
 
Surely you are so interested in Assange's role in this you would WANT....NAY....DEMAND the FBI and DOJ interview him and make that INTEVIEW PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE!

The DOJ and FBI should interview Vladimir Putin. Give him a lie detector test and ask him about his links to Trump. But that ain't gonna happen.



"Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive.[1][2][3] The English word is a translation of the Russian dezinformatsiya,[1][2][3] derived from the title of a KGB black propaganda department.[4] The book Disinformation documents that Joseph Stalin coined the term,..."
Disinformation - Wikipedia
 
1. Four months ago this thread claimed.....and proved .....that Putin's dream for the presidency was none other than the career criminal and congenital liar, Hillary Clinton:

Time To Reveal Who Putin Wanted As President

Through the months,the Left/Democrats/Liberals have engineered a full court press to tie Trump to the Kremlin which, in light of the last week's revelations, proves the axiom
"To know what the Left is doing, note what they blame the other side for."



2. In the last several day's we've learned
a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.





3. Now....the last nail in the Democrat Coffin, proof of their collusion with Moscow.
The infamous dossier, designed to sink the Trump campaign....
It cam from the Kremlin.

a· "Perhaps the two most damaging claims are an allegation of ongoing collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russian intelligence, facilitating the sharing of sensitive information beneficial to both sides; and an allegation that Russia has video footage of Trump watching sex workers engage in a sex act.

· The memos, dated June 20 to October 20 of last year – are based on the former intelligence agent’s “recent interactions with Russian sources,” according to an interview he conducted with Mother Jones’ David Corn in October. An official in the U.S. administration who spoke to the Guardian described the author of the memos as “consistently reliable, meticulous, and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.”
What we know about Russia’s “compromising material” on Donald Trump

"Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive.[1][2][3] The English word is a translation of the Russian dezinformatsiya,[1][2][3] derived from the title of a KGB black propaganda department.[4] The book Disinformation documents that Joseph Stalin coined the term,..."
Disinformation - Wikipedia




4. Where did the dossier come from?????
" ....evidence points to Russian involvement—via Hillary financiers and their hired-gun Russia lobby firm Fusion GPS—in fabricating the “dossier” to discredit Trump by claiming that he was part of a conspiracy to help elect himself president.

A Russia expert with 50 years’ experience, writing for Forbes, says the “dossier” reads like it was written by “a Russian trained in the KGB tradition.” Its “poor grammar and shaky spelling” with “KGB-style intelligence reporting” just does not “fit the image” of work by a “highly connected former British intelligence” officer, who was Oxford educated.

It’s not Trump and his associates who should be under scrutiny; it’s Hillary Clinton and her paid operatives—and their ties to Russia.

[Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



5. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the dossier came from Russia.


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

lol, so right off you admit to starting a duplicate thread on a topic that already has a thread about it?
Don't want to talk about the criminal he voted for, then he deflects and spins the topic.

The dossier was initialized by a Never Trump group, which will be named in the next week or so by the same court that has revealed Hillary's connections to it.





Wrong. They initiated the oppo research, the dnc commissioned the dossier. COLLUSION!
Wrong again.
Who paid for it?
During the Republican primaries, a donor opposed to Mr. Trump becoming the party’s presidential candidate retained a research firm called Fusion GPS to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump.

The donor has never been identified, but several possible suspects have denied responsibility, including officials from the so-called super PACs that supported the rival campaigns of Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida.

After Mr. Trump secured the nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the D.N.C. by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to compile research about Mr. Trump, his businesses and associates — including possible connections with Russia. It was at that point that Fusion GPS hired Mr. Steele, who has deep sourcing in Russia, to gather information.

READ MORE:
What to Know About the Dossier of Trump Research and Who Paid for It
 








Wow, you trot out this old fraud. How unoriginal of you. How about presenting some EVIDENCE (you do know what EVIDENCE is don't you) to support your BS.

Why are the Trumpanzee's growing impatient with Mueller's investigation?????



gmc15357920171019090700.jpg

FAKE NEWS!!!! The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve



Soooo.....the Russians gave the Clintons $145 million for......charity???


When discussing your IQ it should be written in lower case.
 
1. Four months ago this thread claimed.....and proved .....that Putin's dream for the presidency was none other than the career criminal and congenital liar, Hillary Clinton:

Time To Reveal Who Putin Wanted As President

Through the months,the Left/Democrats/Liberals have engineered a full court press to tie Trump to the Kremlin which, in light of the last week's revelations, proves the axiom
"To know what the Left is doing, note what they blame the other side for."



2. In the last several day's we've learned
a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.





3. Now....the last nail in the Democrat Coffin, proof of their collusion with Moscow.
The infamous dossier, designed to sink the Trump campaign....
It cam from the Kremlin.

a· "Perhaps the two most damaging claims are an allegation of ongoing collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russian intelligence, facilitating the sharing of sensitive information beneficial to both sides; and an allegation that Russia has video footage of Trump watching sex workers engage in a sex act.

· The memos, dated June 20 to October 20 of last year – are based on the former intelligence agent’s “recent interactions with Russian sources,” according to an interview he conducted with Mother Jones’ David Corn in October. An official in the U.S. administration who spoke to the Guardian described the author of the memos as “consistently reliable, meticulous, and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.”
What we know about Russia’s “compromising material” on Donald Trump

"Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive.[1][2][3] The English word is a translation of the Russian dezinformatsiya,[1][2][3] derived from the title of a KGB black propaganda department.[4] The book Disinformation documents that Joseph Stalin coined the term,..."
Disinformation - Wikipedia




4. Where did the dossier come from?????
" ....evidence points to Russian involvement—via Hillary financiers and their hired-gun Russia lobby firm Fusion GPS—in fabricating the “dossier” to discredit Trump by claiming that he was part of a conspiracy to help elect himself president.

A Russia expert with 50 years’ experience, writing for Forbes, says the “dossier” reads like it was written by “a Russian trained in the KGB tradition.” Its “poor grammar and shaky spelling” with “KGB-style intelligence reporting” just does not “fit the image” of work by a “highly connected former British intelligence” officer, who was Oxford educated.

It’s not Trump and his associates who should be under scrutiny; it’s Hillary Clinton and her paid operatives—and their ties to Russia.

[Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



5. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the dossier came from Russia.


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

lol, so right off you admit to starting a duplicate thread on a topic that already has a thread about it?
Don't want to talk about the criminal he voted for, then he deflects and spins the topic.

The dossier was initialized by a Never Trump group, which will be named in the next week or so by the same court that has revealed Hillary's connections to it.





Wrong. They initiated the oppo research, the dnc commissioned the dossier. COLLUSION!
Wrong again.
Who paid for it?
During the Republican primaries, a donor opposed to Mr. Trump becoming the party’s presidential candidate retained a research firm called Fusion GPS to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump.

The donor has never been identified, but several possible suspects have denied responsibility, including officials from the so-called super PACs that supported the rival campaigns of Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida.

After Mr. Trump secured the nomination, Fusion GPS was hired on behalf of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign and the D.N.C. by their law firm, Perkins Coie, to compile research about Mr. Trump, his businesses and associates — including possible connections with Russia. It was at that point that Fusion GPS hired Mr. Steele, who has deep sourcing in Russia, to gather information.

READ MORE:
What to Know About the Dossier of Trump Research and Who Paid for It





That's all old propaganda dude! You need to catch up!
 
the dossier he is using as his raison detre
If the dossier was actually a fraud, neither DoTard Trump nor his dupes would be whining so much!

Hamlet:
Madam, how like you this play?

Queen:
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
- Hamlet Act 3, scene 2
Proving yet again that you have the brain power of a gnat. The reason why they care is because it has been used to generate FISA warrants. Thus people are being illegally "wiretapped" due to a fraud. Guess what. They don't like that.
BULLSHIT!
Please post the dates of the FISA warrants and the date of the dossier.
Of course you won't because you are just making shit up out of nothing.
As you well know, the FISA warrant on Manafort was from 2014, well before the dossier was even commissioned by the GOP.


Wasn't that neat the way I rammed your words back down your lying throat???

This:


[The uranium that the Democrats sold to Russia:] "... it has never left the good old USA."

How about I prove you are lying?

Good plan?

And I use the Leftist NYTimes as the source:

"....despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.

Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license."
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal




Aren't we having fun????
So typical of the lying scum Right, they ALWAYS leave out the most important facts when they lie with a half-truth.

From your OWN link:
most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.
 
Soooo.....the Russians gave the Clintons $145 million for......charity???
As had already been shown in this thread and in YOUR OWN LINK, $131.3 million was donated by Frank Giustra, Uranium one’s founder, who sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
 
The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
Already shown to be a lie by YOUR OWN LINK, but the truth never stops the lying CON$ervoFascist scum from lying.
 
the dossier he is using as his raison detre
If the dossier was actually a fraud, neither DoTard Trump nor his dupes would be whining so much!

Hamlet:
Madam, how like you this play?

Queen:
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
- Hamlet Act 3, scene 2
Proving yet again that you have the brain power of a gnat. The reason why they care is because it has been used to generate FISA warrants. Thus people are being illegally "wiretapped" due to a fraud. Guess what. They don't like that.
BULLSHIT!
Please post the dates of the FISA warrants and the date of the dossier.
Of course you won't because you are just making shit up out of nothing.
As you well know, the FISA warrant on Manafort was from 2014, well before the dossier was even commissioned by the GOP.


Wasn't that neat the way I rammed your words back down your lying throat???

This:


[The uranium that the Democrats sold to Russia:] "... it has never left the good old USA."

How about I prove you are lying?

Good plan?

And I use the Leftist NYTimes as the source:

"....despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.

Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license."
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal




Aren't we having fun????
So typical of the lying scum Right, they ALWAYS leave out the most important facts when they lie with a half-truth.

From your OWN link:
most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.


Wasn't that neat the way I rammed your words back down your lying throat???

This:
[The uranium that the Democrats sold to Russia:] "... it has never left the good old USA."

How about I prove you are lying?

Good plan?

And I use the Leftist NYTimes as the source:

"....despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.

Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license."
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal




Aren't we having fun????
 
Soooo.....the Russians gave the Clintons $145 million for......charity???
As had already been shown in this thread and in YOUR OWN LINK, $131.3 million was donated by Frank Giustra, Uranium one’s founder, who sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.


What was the name of the nation that got the uranium???
 
The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
Already shown to be a lie by YOUR OWN LINK, but the truth never stops the lying CON$ervoFascist scum from lying.


I never lie.....you know that.

I never have to, 'cause I'm never wrong.


Bet you wish you could say that, huh?
 
Aren't we having fun????
Washington Free Beacon funded initial Fusion GPS anti-Trump research
Source: CBS

The conservative website the Washington Free Beacon originally funded research by the firm Fusion GPS that eventually resulted in the now-infamous Trump "dossier," the publication's editor-in-chief and chairman acknowledged in a statement Friday night.

The research effort was known to have been supported by Republican allies before the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign picked up the tab for the research. The resulting dossier was compiled by former British spy Michael Steele and contained unsubstantiated allegations about then-candidate Trump's connections to Russia. Mr. Trump has denied the allegations.

The Free Beacon's connection to the dossier was first reported by the Washington Examiner Friday night.

Read more: Washington Free Beacon funded initial Fusion GPS anti-Trump research
 
Aren't we having fun????
Washington Free Beacon funded initial Fusion GPS anti-Trump research
Source: CBS

The conservative website the Washington Free Beacon originally funded research by the firm Fusion GPS that eventually resulted in the now-infamous Trump "dossier," the publication's editor-in-chief and chairman acknowledged in a statement Friday night.

The research effort was known to have been supported by Republican allies before the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign picked up the tab for the research. The resulting dossier was compiled by former British spy Michael Steele and contained unsubstantiated allegations about then-candidate Trump's connections to Russia. Mr. Trump has denied the allegations.

The Free Beacon's connection to the dossier was first reported by the Washington Examiner Friday night.

Read more: Washington Free Beacon funded initial Fusion GPS anti-Trump research



Where did the material that we call the dossier come from?


" ....evidence points to Russian involvement—via Hillary financiers and their hired-gun Russia lobby firm Fusion GPS—in fabricating the “dossier” to discredit Trump by claiming that he was part of a conspiracy to help elect himself president.

A Russia expert with 50 years’ experience, writing for Forbes, says the “dossier” reads like it was written by “a Russian trained in the KGB tradition.” Its “poor grammar and shaky spelling” with “KGB-style intelligence reporting” just does not “fit the image” of work by a “highly connected former British intelligence” officer, who was Oxford educated.

It’s not Trump and his associates who should be under scrutiny; it’s Hillary Clinton and her paid operatives—and their ties to Russia.

[Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the dossier came from Russia.


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
 
1. Four months ago this thread claimed.....and proved .....that Putin's dream for the presidency was none other than the career criminal and congenital liar, Hillary Clinton:

Time To Reveal Who Putin Wanted As President

Through the months,the Left/Democrats/Liberals have engineered a full court press to tie Trump to the Kremlin which, in light of the last week's revelations, proves the axiom
"To know what the Left is doing, note what they blame the other side for."



2. In the last several day's we've learned
a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.





3. Now....the last nail in the Democrat Coffin, proof of their collusion with Moscow.
The infamous dossier, designed to sink the Trump campaign....
It cam from the Kremlin.

a· "Perhaps the two most damaging claims are an allegation of ongoing collusion between Trump campaign officials and Russian intelligence, facilitating the sharing of sensitive information beneficial to both sides; and an allegation that Russia has video footage of Trump watching sex workers engage in a sex act.

· The memos, dated June 20 to October 20 of last year – are based on the former intelligence agent’s “recent interactions with Russian sources,” according to an interview he conducted with Mother Jones’ David Corn in October. An official in the U.S. administration who spoke to the Guardian described the author of the memos as “consistently reliable, meticulous, and well-informed, with a reputation for having extensive Russian contacts.”
What we know about Russia’s “compromising material” on Donald Trump

"Disinformation is false information spread deliberately to deceive.[1][2][3] The English word is a translation of the Russian dezinformatsiya,[1][2][3] derived from the title of a KGB black propaganda department.[4] The book Disinformation documents that Joseph Stalin coined the term,..."
Disinformation - Wikipedia




4. Where did the dossier come from?????
" ....evidence points to Russian involvement—via Hillary financiers and their hired-gun Russia lobby firm Fusion GPS—in fabricating the “dossier” to discredit Trump by claiming that he was part of a conspiracy to help elect himself president.

A Russia expert with 50 years’ experience, writing for Forbes, says the “dossier” reads like it was written by “a Russian trained in the KGB tradition.” Its “poor grammar and shaky spelling” with “KGB-style intelligence reporting” just does not “fit the image” of work by a “highly connected former British intelligence” officer, who was Oxford educated.

It’s not Trump and his associates who should be under scrutiny; it’s Hillary Clinton and her paid operatives—and their ties to Russia.

[Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



5. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the dossier came from Russia.


QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.

lol, so right off you admit to starting a duplicate thread on a topic that already has a thread about it?
I love how she’s been kicking ass! :laugh:
 
Aren't we having fun????
Pay attention for Favor

As Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at the Middlebury Institute, described it, Russia’s purchase of the company "had as much of an impact on national security as it would have if they set the money on fire. That’s probably why (all the U.S. agencies involved) approved it."

The key to this issue’s resurgence this week is that Hillary Clinton was secretary of state at the time, Bill Clinton was getting lucrative speaking fees in Russia, and Russian money was finding its way to the Clinton Foundation, although the amount turns out to be small. However, even if there was no wrongdoing on the part of the administration or the Clintons, and no national security reason for anyone to oppose this deal, some still want to make it another Benghazi.

Claims of Clinton-Russia Uranium Collusion Are A Real Empty Barrel
 

Forum List

Back
Top