None Of This Is True...#DCBlackOut

[luchitociencia]

i avoid using a capital letter when ever possible.

thank you for noticing.

as for the rest of what you wrote, my give a fuck was donated to science.

Don't try science, such branch of knowledge is not for you. Just keep doing with your fake news, you are good doing such kind of entertainment.

 

[iceberg]

i avoid using a capital letter when ever possible.

thank you for noticing.

as for the rest of what you wrote, my give a fuck was donated to science.

Don't try science, such branch of knowledge is not for you. Just keep doing with your fake news, you are good doing such kind of entertainment.

you still here?

how cute.

now if i paypal you $1.91 will you go away?

 

[DOTR]

And here - again, back to the "what is true what is false dilemma" and the mindset that seems to think if it's on twitter it must be true. Who's behind a tweet, or an FB identity? Pulling strings?

Lots of divergent interests, other nations, or just individuals interested in creating chaos.

THIS tweet, in fact - led to a mass of threads advocating self defense, or violence towards whomever, people in real life suburban/small town areas arming themselves and standing watch ready for...who ever gets shot.

White supremacists pose as Antifa online, call for violence in post Trump Jr. drew attention to: Twitter

A Twitter account that tweeted a call to violence and claimed to be representing the position of “Antifa” was in fact created by a known white supremacist group, Twitter said …

ktla.com

A Twitter account that tweeted a call to violence and claimed to be representing the position of “Antifa” was in fact created by a known white supremacist group, Twitter said Monday. The company removed the account.

The fake account, @ANTIFA_US, tweeted Sunday, “ALERT Tonight’s the night, Comrades Tonight we say “F**k The City” and we move into the residential areas… the white hoods…. and we take what’s ours #BlacklivesMaters #F**kAmerica.”

in all fairness, who knows anymore?

getting mad cause the info you find matches your rage simply makes you the most easy target to bait in order to get to said rage. not saying YOU IN PARTICULAR - just saying do we really have facts now on either side to say much of anything?

seen a lot of antifa passing out bricks. now they're supremacists passing out bricks looking like antifa?

we've lost our collective grip on anything that is real and without that, we're kinda making it up as we go. pretty dangerous.

Lol

(1) Blacks are rioting because they have righteous grievances.

(2)Uh....it’s actually antifa mind controlling blacks!

(3) It’s white nationalists and Russians pretending to be blacks!

(4)The cops are the ones really rioting!

(5)Tomorrow:Trump and Jared are running through Minneapolis with a Bible upside down breaking windows and beating whites while blaming blacks!


The liberal mind is truly a dumping ground.

 

[DOTR]

How much of these protests and reactions is being driven by disinformation designed to foment violence and unrest?

'None Of This Is True': Protests Become Fertile Ground for Online Disinformation

A well-funded and elaborate social media disinformation campaign played out online Sunday night, experts say, showing how polarization creates situations where lies go viral.

www.npr.org

View attachment 344468

A fake story began circulating Sunday evening into Monday morning, which was then disputed by real journalists as well as a number of bots. Experts say the campaign may have been meant to make people question whether anything they see online is true.

The image would shock just about anyone: a fire so large that it seems to stretch halfway up the 550-foot-tall Washington Monument, and burning so bright that it dramatically illuminated the landmark.

Shocking, but fake.

The image was a screenshot from the fictional ABC show "Designated Survivor." But coming on the third day of raucous protests around the White House against police violence — which did include some fires that were intentionally set — it could have seemed like it was real.

The image quickly went viral on Twitter, not unlike a number of other rumors that spread during moments of uncertainty and chaos over the weekend, and which showed how the intense polarization of the current moment is fertile ground for online disinformation campaigns.

And there were claims spread under the #dcblackout hashtag that cell phones and other communication devices were blocked as part of a strategy to allow violent police reprisals to go unreported. That, too, was not true.

"Some of my videos and pics being posted by accounts saying they were last before a "#dcblackout" where streams and cells shut down. I didn't experience anything like that and — though I didn't try streaming — had no issue with phone as I tweeted and worked until 2:30 am at least," tweeted Yahoo! reporter Hunter Walker on Monday morning.

"Stop retweeting #dcblackout," added CBS reporter Christina Ruffini. "None of this is true. Eventually, even TV crews need to sleep, but ours and many others were out late into the night. Their phones worked. Live signal was strong. Many of these tweets are the same wording. Don't fall for whatever is happening here."

Experts say the #dcblackout hashtag seemed to be the work of a"well-funded" and organized internet campaign, and a successful one at that.

Many of the accounts promoting the #dcblackout claims had few followers themselves, indicating that they could have been created specifically for the purpose of spreading disinformation, said Alex Engler, a scholar at the Brookings Institution who has followed the use of social media and technology to spread propaganda.

"A lot of these accounts are pretty suspicious, especially the ones disseminating them at night. But there are very real people now promoting this. By 9 a.m. the fact that the origin of the story seems to be manufactured would already be obscured to you," he says.

"Even if a huge percentage of those real people are using that hashtag to say, 'hey, this isn't real' — it doesn't matter," Linvill said. Even if only 20% of people posting about it believe it, "20% of a million is still 200,000 people."

A lot of people here over the weekend were definitely buying into it. I don't know that anyone was deliberately lying, but the lies, exaggerations and misinformation were swallowed hook, line and sinker. It did its work. We all condemn the destruction and the looting, the fires, the chucking bricks at the police. But it had people screaming for blood, for shooting on sight, etc. etc.

It was worrisome.

Thank you for the article, Coyote. I knew there was a Set Your Hair On Fire campaign going on, but how do you prove it? Harder still, how do you stop people from buying it?

Speaking of disinformation...aren’t you the one who said “the church is not on fire”?

We've been through this and I'm sure you've read it. I was concerned and I was hunting every way I knew how to find out if it was. But until Hoss set me up with a news link, all anyone had was FB rumors. I read two or more writeups during that time that SAID a building across the street was on fire, and that a building near the church was on fire. Another article said it was the parish office, not the church. I was not trying to spread misinformation and I thanked Hoss for the heartbreaking vid.

Doesn’t matter if you were trying. That you did it because you are gullible and brainwashed doesn’t change the fact that you were spreading disinformation. I don’t care how many sites you checked...the media lies. All day every day. They were trying to contain this through people like you.
They have lost control of this and are now in damage control mode.

 

[luchitociencia]

you still here?

how cute.

now if i paypal you $1.91 will you go away?

For being a minor degree journalist you are cheap. Now I'm curious, what was your master: Cashier at McDonald?

The use of the media for brainwashing the minds of people is very dangerous. Even when later on the fake news is clear up with the correct information, the "shock" caused by a fake picture has already hit the brain of the weak, and this might includes you, so be aware of what I'm writing, I'm a master in Sensation and Perception.

The goal is a set of similar fake news which will impress instantaneously the thoughts of the victims, who will repeat those to others.

While president Trump responds attackers face to face, on the other side Democrats use the underground of consciousness to insert their mischievous and evil messages. This is why you can't notice how deep liberals have pulled your legs. You have been easily made fool by news like Russian collusion, impeachment, and more.

Such ideas are now part of your insight, and they won't get out. You have been programed to hate the president, and if you read your messages you will see exactly what I'm writing to you, that you have been paid to write what you write, or you are just another dude who's legs have been pulled.

I can't and I won't do anything to help you, because a change to vindicate your mind is opt to you. Read all your messages and you will see hatred against the president as your common denominator.

And no one needs a master in psychology to obtain the same conclusion I have reached about your attitude against the president.

 

[iceberg]

you still here?

how cute.

now if i paypal you $1.91 will you go away?

For being a minor degree journalist you are cheap. Now I'm curious, what was your master: Cashier at McDonald?

The use of the media for brainwashing the minds of people is very dangerous. Even when later on the fake news is clear up with the correct information, the "shock" caused by a fake picture has already hit the brain of the weak, and this might includes you, so be aware of what I'm writing, I'm a master in Sensation and Perception.

The goal is a set of similar fake news which will impress instantaneously the thoughts of the victims, who will repeat those to others.

While president Trump responds attackers face to face, on the other side Democrats use the underground of consciousness to insert their mischievous and evil messages. This is why you can't notice how deep liberals have pulled your legs. You have been easily made fool by news like Russian collusion, impeachment, and more.

Such ideas are now part of your insight, and they won't get out. You have been programed to hate the president, and if you read your messages you will see exactly what I'm writing to you, that you have been paid to write what you write, or you are just another dude who's legs have been pulled.

I can't and I won't do anything to help you, because a change to vindicate your mind is opt to you. Read all your messages and you will see hatred against the president as your common denominator.

And no one needs a master in psychology to obtain the same conclusion I have reached about your attitude against the president.

You typed a lot of shit I didn't read.

Please do it again.

 

[Oldestyle]

Was that in the OP or the article? If so, please show it to me.

I asked, because that seemed to be what you were asserting.

The fact is, leftist bed wetters have been destroying shit across the country. There is nothing false about that statement. Some twittertwat posting a picture has nothing to do with the fact most of the media is BULLSHIT. I'm not singling any of it out. It's ALL DESIGNED TO MANIPULATE OPINIONS.

Pretending as if NPR, PBS, CBS, NBS or CNNBS is fully credible makes you look like just as big a retard as those who hang on every word Hannity speaks and act as if he has no agenda.

.

I am asserting what is in the OP.

If any of that is wrong (per your claim of NPR credibility) - point it out.

On sources and media - there those that are good, better, average, and largely laughable. I rate NPR as good. CNN average. Hannity is opinion - talk show.

Edited to add - we all have to trust sources to some degree because for the most part we don't have first hand info.

You seriously rate CNN as "average", Coyote? LOL

Yes.

I suspect there sources you rate as good that, well, I would find laughable.

With all due respect, Coyote? If you attempt to claim that CNN is average when it come to trustworthiness then why would anyone take you seriously? CNN is what it is. They have a pronounced "slant" to their news...and that's being generous. Claiming otherwise borders on farce!

Having a "slant" or a "bias" does not mean not credible - it means it has a bias. You read it with that in mind. They all have some form of bias. Not credible in my view is a source that repeatedly provably false material, does not correct errors, and uses certain types of red flag language.

And, I would ask the same of you - why would anyone take any source of yours as "credible"?

What "source" have I quoted?
You can't really be serious when you claim that CNN doesn't repeat provably false material, corrects errors and never uses types of red flag language? They do all of those things and they do so consistently. CNN isn't a news station anymore. They used to be. They used to report the news in a straight forward fashion but that was YEARS ago! Now they push narratives...not the news!

 

[Coyote]

Was that in the OP or the article? If so, please show it to me.

I asked, because that seemed to be what you were asserting.

The fact is, leftist bed wetters have been destroying shit across the country. There is nothing false about that statement. Some twittertwat posting a picture has nothing to do with the fact most of the media is BULLSHIT. I'm not singling any of it out. It's ALL DESIGNED TO MANIPULATE OPINIONS.

Pretending as if NPR, PBS, CBS, NBS or CNNBS is fully credible makes you look like just as big a retard as those who hang on every word Hannity speaks and act as if he has no agenda.

.

I am asserting what is in the OP.

If any of that is wrong (per your claim of NPR credibility) - point it out.

On sources and media - there those that are good, better, average, and largely laughable. I rate NPR as good. CNN average. Hannity is opinion - talk show.

Edited to add - we all have to trust sources to some degree because for the most part we don't have first hand info.

You seriously rate CNN as "average", Coyote? LOL

Yes.

I suspect there sources you rate as good that, well, I would find laughable.

With all due respect, Coyote? If you attempt to claim that CNN is average when it come to trustworthiness then why would anyone take you seriously? CNN is what it is. They have a pronounced "slant" to their news...and that's being generous. Claiming otherwise borders on farce!

Having a "slant" or a "bias" does not mean not credible - it means it has a bias. You read it with that in mind. They all have some form of bias. Not credible in my view is a source that repeatedly provably false material, does not correct errors, and uses certain types of red flag language.

And, I would ask the same of you - why would anyone take any source of yours as "credible"?

They have been caught outright lying as much as Trump has.

"They" are not the president.

 

[Coyote]

How much of these protests and reactions is being driven by disinformation designed to foment violence and unrest?

Concerning the protests, my guess would be, close to none. Why would they be swayed by the likes of @yourAnonCentral?

Generally speaking, folks aren't being swayed by anything. They may be agitated by something they were bent on believing anyway. You see it here every hour of the day.

In the end, whoever has their thirteenth birthday behind them, and finds themselves on a rampage because, "I saw something on twitter!", is a lost case anyway.

I don't about that.

Look for example at the tweet claimed to be by Antifa, that they were going to wreak violence on the suburbs - it spread like wildfire, and you have grown rational men and women arming themselves to protect their property as a direct result.

 

[westwall]

Was that in the OP or the article? If so, please show it to me.

I asked, because that seemed to be what you were asserting.

The fact is, leftist bed wetters have been destroying shit across the country. There is nothing false about that statement. Some twittertwat posting a picture has nothing to do with the fact most of the media is BULLSHIT. I'm not singling any of it out. It's ALL DESIGNED TO MANIPULATE OPINIONS.

Pretending as if NPR, PBS, CBS, NBS or CNNBS is fully credible makes you look like just as big a retard as those who hang on every word Hannity speaks and act as if he has no agenda.

.

I am asserting what is in the OP.

If any of that is wrong (per your claim of NPR credibility) - point it out.

On sources and media - there those that are good, better, average, and largely laughable. I rate NPR as good. CNN average. Hannity is opinion - talk show.

Edited to add - we all have to trust sources to some degree because for the most part we don't have first hand info.

You seriously rate CNN as "average", Coyote? LOL

Yes.

I suspect there sources you rate as good that, well, I would find laughable.

With all due respect, Coyote? If you attempt to claim that CNN is average when it come to trustworthiness then why would anyone take you seriously? CNN is what it is. They have a pronounced "slant" to their news...and that's being generous. Claiming otherwise borders on farce!

Having a "slant" or a "bias" does not mean not credible - it means it has a bias. You read it with that in mind. They all have some form of bias. Not credible in my view is a source that repeatedly provably false material, does not correct errors, and uses certain types of red flag language.

And, I would ask the same of you - why would anyone take any source of yours as "credible"?

They have been caught outright lying as much as Trump has.

"They" are not the president.

And "they" are not credible.

They have been known as the " clinton news network" for decades Coyote.

You should ask yourself why.

 

[Coyote]

Was that in the OP or the article? If so, please show it to me.

I asked, because that seemed to be what you were asserting.

The fact is, leftist bed wetters have been destroying shit across the country. There is nothing false about that statement. Some twittertwat posting a picture has nothing to do with the fact most of the media is BULLSHIT. I'm not singling any of it out. It's ALL DESIGNED TO MANIPULATE OPINIONS.

Pretending as if NPR, PBS, CBS, NBS or CNNBS is fully credible makes you look like just as big a retard as those who hang on every word Hannity speaks and act as if he has no agenda.

.

I am asserting what is in the OP.

If any of that is wrong (per your claim of NPR credibility) - point it out.

On sources and media - there those that are good, better, average, and largely laughable. I rate NPR as good. CNN average. Hannity is opinion - talk show.

Edited to add - we all have to trust sources to some degree because for the most part we don't have first hand info.

You seriously rate CNN as "average", Coyote? LOL

Yes.

I suspect there sources you rate as good that, well, I would find laughable.

With all due respect, Coyote? If you attempt to claim that CNN is average when it come to trustworthiness then why would anyone take you seriously? CNN is what it is. They have a pronounced "slant" to their news...and that's being generous. Claiming otherwise borders on farce!

Having a "slant" or a "bias" does not mean not credible - it means it has a bias. You read it with that in mind. They all have some form of bias. Not credible in my view is a source that repeatedly provably false material, does not correct errors, and uses certain types of red flag language.

And, I would ask the same of you - why would anyone take any source of yours as "credible"?

They have been caught outright lying as much as Trump has.

"They" are not the president.

And "they" are not credible.

They have been known as the " clinton news network" for decades Coyote.

You should ask yourself why.

"They" are not one entity. "They" range from credible to laughable. It's easy enough to fact check claims. That's on us.

 

[OldLady]

That you did it because you are gullible and brainwashed

So the fact that I wanted some confirmation other than a FB post from God-knows-who makes ME gullible?
lol

 

[DOTR]

That you did it because you are gullible and brainwashed

So the fact that I wanted some confirmation other than a FB post from God-knows-who makes ME gullible?
lol

Old lady....just when I was starting to feel bad you do this. You didn’t ask for confirmation. You stated the church was not burning. Twice. You cited CNN...known liars, Clintonistas and degenerates. You spread their misinformation and fake news even if unintentional (which I’m prepared to believe it was). But that’s often how they get their message spread.

 

[flacaltenn]

How much of these protests and reactions is being driven by disinformation designed to foment violence and unrest?

'None Of This Is True': Protests Become Fertile Ground for Online Disinformation

A well-funded and elaborate social media disinformation campaign played out online Sunday night, experts say, showing how polarization creates situations where lies go viral.

www.npr.org

View attachment 344468

A fake story began circulating Sunday evening into Monday morning, which was then disputed by real journalists as well as a number of bots. Experts say the campaign may have been meant to make people question whether anything they see online is true.

The image would shock just about anyone: a fire so large that it seems to stretch halfway up the 550-foot-tall Washington Monument, and burning so bright that it dramatically illuminated the landmark.

Shocking, but fake.

The image was a screenshot from the fictional ABC show "Designated Survivor." But coming on the third day of raucous protests around the White House against police violence — which did include some fires that were intentionally set — it could have seemed like it was real.

The image quickly went viral on Twitter, not unlike a number of other rumors that spread during moments of uncertainty and chaos over the weekend, and which showed how the intense polarization of the current moment is fertile ground for online disinformation campaigns.

And there were claims spread under the #dcblackout hashtag that cell phones and other communication devices were blocked as part of a strategy to allow violent police reprisals to go unreported. That, too, was not true.

"Some of my videos and pics being posted by accounts saying they were last before a "#dcblackout" where streams and cells shut down. I didn't experience anything like that and — though I didn't try streaming — had no issue with phone as I tweeted and worked until 2:30 am at least," tweeted Yahoo! reporter Hunter Walker on Monday morning.

"Stop retweeting #dcblackout," added CBS reporter Christina Ruffini. "None of this is true. Eventually, even TV crews need to sleep, but ours and many others were out late into the night. Their phones worked. Live signal was strong. Many of these tweets are the same wording. Don't fall for whatever is happening here."

Experts say the #dcblackout hashtag seemed to be the work of a"well-funded" and organized internet campaign, and a successful one at that.

Many of the accounts promoting the #dcblackout claims had few followers themselves, indicating that they could have been created specifically for the purpose of spreading disinformation, said Alex Engler, a scholar at the Brookings Institution who has followed the use of social media and technology to spread propaganda.

"A lot of these accounts are pretty suspicious, especially the ones disseminating them at night. But there are very real people now promoting this. By 9 a.m. the fact that the origin of the story seems to be manufactured would already be obscured to you," he says.

"Even if a huge percentage of those real people are using that hashtag to say, 'hey, this isn't real' — it doesn't matter," Linvill said. Even if only 20% of people posting about it believe it, "20% of a million is still 200,000 people."

Does this mean you admit that media produce a lot of fake news, after all you seem to try hard to defend a media that has produced fake crap every week.

The hypocrisy is noted.

I don't really consider twitter "media".. More like a virtual "purging party". And the HOSTS there are all bulimics.

 

[flacaltenn]

How much of these protests and reactions is being driven by disinformation designed to foment violence and unrest?

'None Of This Is True': Protests Become Fertile Ground for Online Disinformation

A well-funded and elaborate social media disinformation campaign played out online Sunday night, experts say, showing how polarization creates situations where lies go viral.

www.npr.org

View attachment 344468

A fake story began circulating Sunday evening into Monday morning, which was then disputed by real journalists as well as a number of bots. Experts say the campaign may have been meant to make people question whether anything they see online is true.

The image would shock just about anyone: a fire so large that it seems to stretch halfway up the 550-foot-tall Washington Monument, and burning so bright that it dramatically illuminated the landmark.

Shocking, but fake.

The image was a screenshot from the fictional ABC show "Designated Survivor." But coming on the third day of raucous protests around the White House against police violence — which did include some fires that were intentionally set — it could have seemed like it was real.

The image quickly went viral on Twitter, not unlike a number of other rumors that spread during moments of uncertainty and chaos over the weekend, and which showed how the intense polarization of the current moment is fertile ground for online disinformation campaigns.

And there were claims spread under the #dcblackout hashtag that cell phones and other communication devices were blocked as part of a strategy to allow violent police reprisals to go unreported. That, too, was not true.

"Some of my videos and pics being posted by accounts saying they were last before a "#dcblackout" where streams and cells shut down. I didn't experience anything like that and — though I didn't try streaming — had no issue with phone as I tweeted and worked until 2:30 am at least," tweeted Yahoo! reporter Hunter Walker on Monday morning.

"Stop retweeting #dcblackout," added CBS reporter Christina Ruffini. "None of this is true. Eventually, even TV crews need to sleep, but ours and many others were out late into the night. Their phones worked. Live signal was strong. Many of these tweets are the same wording. Don't fall for whatever is happening here."

Experts say the #dcblackout hashtag seemed to be the work of a"well-funded" and organized internet campaign, and a successful one at that.

Many of the accounts promoting the #dcblackout claims had few followers themselves, indicating that they could have been created specifically for the purpose of spreading disinformation, said Alex Engler, a scholar at the Brookings Institution who has followed the use of social media and technology to spread propaganda.

"A lot of these accounts are pretty suspicious, especially the ones disseminating them at night. But there are very real people now promoting this. By 9 a.m. the fact that the origin of the story seems to be manufactured would already be obscured to you," he says.

"Even if a huge percentage of those real people are using that hashtag to say, 'hey, this isn't real' — it doesn't matter," Linvill said. Even if only 20% of people posting about it believe it, "20% of a million is still 200,000 people."

Wish folks would FOCUS on the actual topic here because without THINKING about the credibility of ANY reporting or article, we make ourselves COMPLETELY vulnerable to ACTUAL Russian/Chinese/N'erDoWell meddling in our affairs.. If you DON"T ignore "media" that has been so wrong so many times -- It's like waving a white flag and inviting Putin/Xi/NameYourConspiracy to COME ON IN....

In retrospect it's pretty clear that the article was a fraud, but I needed someone to remind me that the scene of the WH burning in the Tweet was from that TV Series I watched.

When the COVID thing was winding up, I ran across OBVIOUS PRChina propaganda sites POSING as Covid "statistical analysts",.. Really bad numbers and too much about the "patriotic American Chinese that started this site" crap.. On further review, there was WAY too much information supporting the Chinese Communists lies to be DONE by "patriotic Amer. Chinese".. Later found out this site WAS directed from outside the country..

Just ignore the sewer of Twitter. Those morons couldn't judge "violence" if they were the victims. It's all crap.. But it's the REST of what CLAIMS to be the media that worries me the most..

 

[Olde Europe]

In the end, whoever has their thirteenth birthday behind them, and finds themselves on a rampage because, "I saw something on twitter!", is a lost case anyway.

I don't about that.

Look for example at the tweet claimed to be by Antifa, that they were going to wreak violence on the suburbs - it spread like wildfire, and you have grown rational men and women arming themselves to protect their property as a direct result.

Is Antifa known to run roughshod over suburban neighborhoods? They aren't, because they don't. Whoever goes on a gun-buying spree based on a tweet is neither grown-up nor rational. Rather, they are the hysterical twitter people, and willing marks for the next spoof.

 

[DOTR]

Was that in the OP or the article? If so, please show it to me.

I asked, because that seemed to be what you were asserting.

The fact is, leftist bed wetters have been destroying shit across the country. There is nothing false about that statement. Some twittertwat posting a picture has nothing to do with the fact most of the media is BULLSHIT. I'm not singling any of it out. It's ALL DESIGNED TO MANIPULATE OPINIONS.

Pretending as if NPR, PBS, CBS, NBS or CNNBS is fully credible makes you look like just as big a retard as those who hang on every word Hannity speaks and act as if he has no agenda.

.

I am asserting what is in the OP.

If any of that is wrong (per your claim of NPR credibility) - point it out.

On sources and media - there those that are good, better, average, and largely laughable. I rate NPR as good. CNN average. Hannity is opinion - talk show.

Edited to add - we all have to trust sources to some degree because for the most part we don't have first hand info.

You seriously rate CNN as "average", Coyote? LOL

Yes.

I suspect there sources you rate as good that, well, I would find laughable.

With all due respect, Coyote? If you attempt to claim that CNN is average when it come to trustworthiness then why would anyone take you seriously? CNN is what it is. They have a pronounced "slant" to their news...and that's being generous. Claiming otherwise borders on farce!

Having a "slant" or a "bias" does not mean not credible - it means it has a bias. You read it with that in mind. They all have some form of bias. Not credible in my view is a source that repeatedly provably false material, does not correct errors, and uses certain types of red flag language.

And, I would ask the same of you - why would anyone take any source of yours as "credible"?

They have been caught outright lying as much as Trump has.

"They" are not the president.

They have more power than the president.

 

[Pete7469]

What are you talking about...or...are you incapable of addressing the points made? Seems like it...but hey, prove me wrong or, even better - prove the OP was wrong and that really was a fire in Washington. I'll wait.

I did, you ignored it. There was a fire at the church.

It wasn't a massive inferno that some twittertwat tried to assert, but who that fuck is he?

Crews put out fire at DC's historic St. John's Church

Police have now taken back the area around St. John's Church, and it is not known yet the extent of damage the church basement received Sunday evening.

www.wusa9.com

A look at damage inside historic St. John's Church, which burned during protests

The church's rector says he forgives whoever set the church on fire.

www.today.com

The fact is, the antifa terrorists who you support set fire to a religious institution almost as old as the country itself and vandalized monuments to war heroes. Your side of the political fence has absolutely no sense (at all, in any context of the word or) of patriotism. You're globalists and you hate this country. You never exalt the virtue of freedom unless it has to do with deviancy.

Sometimes I like you Coyote, but on this thread you utterly disgust me.

.

 

[Coyote]

What are you talking about...or...are you incapable of addressing the points made? Seems like it...but hey, prove me wrong or, even better - prove the OP was wrong and that really was a fire in Washington. I'll wait.

I did, you ignored it. There was a fire at the church.

It wasn't a massive inferno that some twittertwat tried to assert, but who that fuck is he?

Crews put out fire at DC's historic St. John's Church

Police have now taken back the area around St. John's Church, and it is not known yet the extent of damage the church basement received Sunday evening.

www.wusa9.com

A look at damage inside historic St. John's Church, which burned during protests

The church's rector says he forgives whoever set the church on fire.

www.today.com

The fact is, the antifa terrorists who you support set fire to a religious institution almost as old as the country itself and vandalized monuments to war heroes. Your side of the political fence has absolutely no sense (at all, in any context of the word or) of patriotism. You're globalists and you hate this country. You never exalt the virtue of freedom unless it has to do with deviancy.

Sometimes I like you Coyote, but on this thread you utterly disgust me.

.

ARE they Antifa? You know this for a fact?

 

[Pete7469]

ARE they Antifa? You know this for a fact?

Ohh wow Ms. Alex Jones... you're right. They could have been right wing FBI agents.

Get a grip.

You lost the little respect I had for you.

Dumb bitch.


.