- Moderator
- #201
I've skirted nothing.
Does the "WHY" matter when the target is a civilian target like a crowded market place or a cinema? Like most cases of terrorism the "WHY" is to produce terror in the targeted population.
Are you trying to justify this?
Killing civilians is killing civilians. I just find it interesting that you are trying to justify one and condemn the other.
In either case - both Begin and Mandella went on to promote peace and reconciliation and achieved it and that is what makes it worthy of a Peace Prize.
NO unlike team Palestine that have to justify every act by the Palestinians along race lines.
Wrong I condemn all terrorist attacks on civlians
Really?
One was fighting for his very existence the other was a communist fighting to gain world domination. That is the difference.
Who is fighting for world domination?
Are you saying that the above justifies murdering civilians becuase it sure sounds like it.
The muslims and neo marxists of course it is part of their religion.
.
The Palestinians are fighting for a state, not world domination. I have no idea where the neo-marxists fit. Your replies seem non-sequitor.
They had a state which they left to join the insurgents at war with the Jews. Proven many times over that the vast majority of Palestinians are recent illegal immigrants and have no ties to the nation. They will fight to the last man rather than give up an inch of dar al islam . The neo Marxists are akin to the muslims in their views and they are friendly with each other, so much so the neo Marxists push the Islamic ideology to the fore.
Proven only in your imagination.