No....Mr trump....you are not exonerated...

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly states that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....
 
Last edited:
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
Barr and Rosenstein sat down and agreed that mueller intended that there was NO CRIMES! Starr charged Bill Clinton with 11 obstruction charges mueller charged trump with zero.!

Wait....a Republican charged a Democratic president....but another Republican refused to charge a Republican so called president...Gotcha
 
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly stares that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....

Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.
 
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
Put your money where your balls are, in your mouth, and impeach him. The landslide loss you would end up with in the next election would be welcome.
 
YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...:113::113::113::113::113::113:
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
 
YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...:113::113::113::113::113::113:
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.
 
YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...:113::113::113::113::113::113:
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.


Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.
 
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
Barr and Rosenstein sat down and agreed that mueller intended that there was NO CRIMES! Starr charged Bill Clinton with 11 obstruction charges mueller charged trump with zero.!

Wait....a Republican charged a Democratic president....but another Republican refused to charge a Republican so called president...Gotcha
What!!
 
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly stares that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....

Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.

Wrong....that is what the political hack....Barr TRIED to do....
 
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.


Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.
Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?
 
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.


Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.
Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?

They are becoming very confused.....
 
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...
In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Shit for Brains....the report clearly stares that thump IS NOT EXONERATED..

Mueller did not have authority to Indict the POS....He clearly left it up to Congress....

Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…

Again.

Wrong....that is what the political hack....Barr TRIED to do....

You simply cannot be this stupid.
Mueller's job was not to EXONERATE anyone, it was to recommend prosecution. He couldn't. Please tell you aren't that stupid.
 
YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...:113::113::113::113::113::113:
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.
Ouch....Did you run out of butt balm?.....
 
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.


Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…


Again.
Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?


Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.
 
YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...:113::113::113::113::113::113:
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
I put a link in my signature line.
It's a downloadable version.
So you can save it to your hard drive and read it at Starbucks.

Most of the redactions are for on going cases or new cases being filed.
See what I mean? "Harm to Ongoing Matter".

D4hiuIMWsAAci8M.jpg
 
His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.
NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.
Ouch....Did you run out of butt balm?.....
How is him being ignorant hurting my butt?
 
Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.

______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

This on November 11, 2016:

View attachment 256785

Turn out there was numerous contacts including from Ms. Hicks herself….

View attachment 256784

And this is what is known about from the Mueller report (dark circle); this of course doesn’t include meetings for which there is no record.
You're looking kinda melty, bro.
1acandycorn.gif
 
None of you fools have read the report, you're all just parroting what faux Noize told you.
hahahhahahahahhahaha
no need to
Typical RWNJ. Ignorant as fuck and happy with it.


Prosecutors don't "exonerate" people dumbass. You're being played...…


Again.
Then why are you dingbats claiming he did?


Show me one place where I said anyone exonerated anyone?
You can't. His job was to "prosecute". He couldn't.
Lord give these people a brain.
Not you specifically, you as in the tRumpkins in general.
 

Forum List

Back
Top