No....Mr trump....you are not exonerated...

[Rambunctious]

ou're right, Trump's followers do think he's been totally exonerated. But then again, they will swallow whole any lie that comes from their Orange Messiah

And we will go in mass and vote for him again too.....we can't wait to vote...so we can watch the cries of a dying ideology once again....

 

[harmonica]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

This is far from over!

that's what you said--a MILLION times

 

[Marion Morrison]

 

[harmonica]

I'll say it again--you people [ anti-Trumpers ] are out of your minds

 

[bripat9643]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

 

[Crepitus]

YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...

His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.

 

[harmonica]

they don't say ''we find the defendant exonerated''
they say ''we find the defendant NOT guilty''
hahahahhahahahahah

 

[Ambivalent1]

YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...

His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.

And yet....no charges.

 

[harmonica]

YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...

His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.

NOT guilty and exonerated
in fact, it was a ''nazi''' investigation--without probable cause

 

[ABikerSailor]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Actually, he had enough to indict him, but he chose not to due to the protections afforded a sitting president.

The Obstruction Case Against Trump that Barr Tried to Hide

Mueller still could have reached a conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, but he believed it would be unfair to reach a conclusion that Trump could not rebut in court. How do we know this? Because Mueller says it. If he had reached a conclusion that Trump obstructed justice, Mueller wrote, Trump could not go to court to obtain a “speedy and public trial” with the “procedural protections” afforded to a criminal defendant by the Constitution.

 

[Crepitus]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Actually no. "Not enough evidence to convict" and "exonerated" are two totally different things.

 

[harmonica]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

Actually, he had enough to indict him, but he chose not to due to the protections afforded a sitting president.

The Obstruction Case Against Trump that Barr Tried to Hide

Mueller still could have reached a conclusion regarding obstruction of justice, but he believed it would be unfair to reach a conclusion that Trump could not rebut in court. How do we know this? Because Mueller says it. If he had reached a conclusion that Trump obstructed justice, Mueller wrote, Trump could not go to court to obtain a “speedy and public trial” with the “procedural protections” afforded to a criminal defendant by the Constitution.

keep wishing and dreaming

 

[candycorn]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

This on November 11, 2016:

Turn out there was numerous contacts including from Ms. Hicks herself….

And this is what is known about from the Mueller report (dark circle); this of course doesn’t include meetings for which there is no record.

 

[Lakhota]

I wonder just how far Barr will go to destroy his reputation?

 

[22lcidw]

YES HE IS...as far as his voters are concerned he was totally exonerated...100%...

His cultists (you that is) would have claimed that no matter what the report said.

Cultists! Obama was the King of cultist adolatry. Remember in his first term when African American kids were in brown shirt uniforms?

 

[harmonica]

you people are morons/out of your minds
what do you not understand about:
NO indictment
Trump IS the POTUS--legally/fairly elected
???!!!!!!????

 

[Jitss617]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

Barr and Rosenstein sat down and agreed that mueller intended that there was NO CRIMES! Starr charged Bill Clinton with 11 obstruction charges mueller charged trump with zero.!

 

[B. Kidd]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

In short: he didn't have enough evidence to indict. On other words, Trump is exonerated. Furthermore, exonerating people is not a legitimate function of a prosecutor.

This fact escapes them. But, they are real unhinged and stoopid, as a result of being unhinged.

 

[Jackson]

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President
clearly did not commit obstruction of justice , we would so state. Based on the facts and the
applicable legal standards , however , we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we
obtained about the President ' s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from
conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does
not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
______________________________________________________________________________

Mueller never intended for Barr to come out and say NO OBSTRUCTION! The DOJ cannot indict a president and they should not be able to decide whether one should be indicted. Allow Congress to decide that...

Enough is enough. We have had three years of "Gotcha Investigations." The government's and parties' would be better served turning their angst to doing the nation's business.

 

[JimH52]

the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue the sky is NOT blue etc etc
keep dreaming and wishing

Sounds like a trump cabinet meeting....