Stop your programming. You lie more than Trump ever did.Pay attention. Stop your programming from you seeing it as a quotation. It's hilariously pathetic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stop your programming. You lie more than Trump ever did.Pay attention. Stop your programming from you seeing it as a quotation. It's hilariously pathetic.
That's an impossibility!Stop your programming. You lie more than Trump ever did.
No, you lie more than Trump on a daily basis.That's an impossibility!
Incredible!One conversation: Opinion | Conversations and insights about the moment.
The PointConversations and insights about the moment.
May 22, 2024
In the distant and innocent year of 2002, lawmakers really thought they could cut back on negative and corrosive political advertising with one simple trick: Making candidates personally stand behind their ads...The law never applied to independent or super PAC ads, which drenched the airwaves in mud, and the “stand by your ad” requirements never applied to internet ads, which would soon become one of the dominant ways in which candidates misled voters.
More crucially, the requirement apparently had little effect on the era of Donald Trump. That was evident as recently as Monday, when Trump reposted a video in which he precelebrated his 2024 victory and answered the question of “what’s next for America?” with an image containing the words: “the creation of a unified Reich.”
It was clear in Trump’s first presidential campaign that this level of cartoonish outrageousness would help him get the attention he craved...In 2015, when Trump retweeted a dumb post mocking Iowa voters for preferring Ben Carson, he later deleted the tweet and put full responsibility on an intern, who he said had apologized. (Trump himself, of course, almost never apologizes.)
In the case of the Reich video, the campaign said it was created by a “random account online” and reposted “by a staffer,” though the posting was done in Trump’s own name. (The campaign took it down the next day, after the inevitable outcry.) Too bad Congress didn’t prohibit blaming the help for a candidate’s deeply offensive messages.
So here we have what is all over the media, and part of it is Trump and his campaign running away from things. So much for being a tough fighter and counter-puncher (I've always said "sucker puncher not counter puncher). The above is a snippet of one conversation pinned on the group that shows up on the NYT page: The Point
Yes, you lie an incredible amount.Incredible!
In the distant and innocent year of 2002, lawmakers really thought they could cut back on negative and corrosive political advertising with one simple trick: Making candidates personally stand behind their ads...The law never applied to independent or super PAC ads, which drenched the airwaves in mud, and the “stand by your ad” requirements never applied to internet ads, which would soon become one of the dominant ways in which candidates misled voters.
More crucially, the requirement apparently had little effect on the era of Donald Trump. That was evident as recently as Monday, when Trump reposted a video in which he precelebrated his 2024 victory and answered the question of “what’s next for America?” with an image containing the words: “the creation of a unified Reich.”
You people always say "Biden" when it's his campaign, so be fair and honest. I know it will be difficult to do, but I'm a rootin fer ya bubba.Yes, you lie an incredible amount.
Why should I pay attention to a fascist pig, like you?You people always say "Biden" when it's his campaign, so be fair and honest. I know it will be difficult to do, but I'm a rootin fer ya bubba.
Pay attention:
Trump campaign deletes video alluding to Nazi Germany era
Donald Trump’s campaign has removed a video shared by the former president on social media that included a reference to the establishment of a “unified Reich” if the Republican candidate were to win a second term in the White House.The campaign was forced to delete the video from his Truth Social account on Tuesday, saying it had been accidentally reposted by a staffer who had not noticed the reference to Nazi Germany.Trump’s sharing of the video reignited concerns about his extremist far-right rhetoric and authoritarian plans if he wins back the White House from President Joe Biden in November’s election.
Subscribe to read
www.ft.com
Why should I pay attention to a fascist pig, like you?
If Donald is innocent of all the indictments and charges, why is he spending throusands to delay all of the trials? Oh....wait....maybe is knows he is NOT innocent of all the charges and indictments against him.
Maybe...just maybe he is a Pig?
Try taking off your facediaper prikcrusted and breathing in some oxygen.Try paying attention to what is being said, and not what your warped mind hears.
Trump always stands up for what is right and is not about to let a bunch of ignorant commies run all over him.If Donald is innocent of all the indictments and charges, why is he spending throusands to delay all of the trials? Oh....wait....maybe is knows he is NOT innocent of all the charges and indictments against him.
Maybe...just maybe he is a Pig?
Your favorite book that mommy reads to you."Parroting ‘Mein Kampf’
One conversation: Opinion | Conversations and insights about the moment.One conversation: Opinion | Conversations and insights about the moment.
The PointConversations and insights about the moment.
May 22, 2024
In the distant and innocent year of 2002, lawmakers really thought they could cut back on negative and corrosive political advertising with one simple trick: Making candidates personally stand behind their ads...The law never applied to independent or super PAC ads, which drenched the airwaves in mud, and the “stand by your ad” requirements never applied to internet ads, which would soon become one of the dominant ways in which candidates misled voters.
More crucially, the requirement apparently had little effect on the era of Donald Trump. That was evident as recently as Monday, when Trump reposted a video in which he precelebrated his 2024 victory and answered the question of “what’s next for America?” with an image containing the words: “the creation of a unified Reich.”
It was clear in Trump’s first presidential campaign that this level of cartoonish outrageousness would help him get the attention he craved...In 2015, when Trump retweeted a dumb post mocking Iowa voters for preferring Ben Carson, he later deleted the tweet and put full responsibility on an intern, who he said had apologized. (Trump himself, of course, almost never apologizes.)
In the case of the Reich video, the campaign said it was created by a “random account online” and reposted “by a staffer,” though the posting was done in Trump’s own name. (The campaign took it down the next day, after the inevitable outcry.) Too bad Congress didn’t prohibit blaming the help for a candidate’s deeply offensive messages.
So here we have what is all over the media, and part of it is Trump and his campaign running away from things. So much for being a tough fighter and counter-puncher (I've always said "sucker puncher not counter puncher). The above is a snippet of one conversation pinned on the group that shows up on the NYT page: The Point
More crucially, the requirement apparently had little effect on the era of Donald Trump. That was evident as recently as Monday, when Trump reposted a video in which he precelebrated his 2024 victory and answered the question of “what’s next for America?” with an image containing the words: “the creation of a unified Reich.”
It was clear in Trump’s first presidential campaign that this level of cartoonish outrageousness would help him get the attention he craved...In 2015, when Trump retweeted a dumb post mocking Iowa voters for preferring Ben Carson, he later deleted the tweet and put full responsibility on an intern, who he said had apologized. (Trump himself, of course, almost never apologizes.)
In the case of the Reich video, the campaign said it was created by a “random account online” and reposted “by a staffer,” though the posting was done in Trump’s own name. (The campaign took it down the next day, after the inevitable outcry.) Too bad Congress didn’t prohibit blaming the help for a candidate’s deeply offensive messages.
So here we have what is all over the media, and part of it is Trump and his campaign running away from things. So much for being a tough fighter and counter-puncher (I've always said "sucker puncher not counter puncher). The above is a snippet of one conversation pinned on the group that shows up on the NYT page: The Point
Squeals the nazi who is cheering on the nazi tactics.
MirrorWhy should I pay attention to a fascist pig, like you?
Nah, it was a strike to the inside corner. You're too slow.westwall strikes again -- strikes out