Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Fuck you, lying pile of shit.
This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.
{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.
The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}
You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.
Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.
Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.
See, here is the thing - I've actually READ the report. I CITE the report when I make a claim. YOU just bleat what the most sleazy hate sites like DailyKOS and CNN claim.
Look at my siggy & you will see where the 10 acts of obstruction are located within the report. Pretty easy stuff
DERP
Trump called the witch hunt a "witch hunt," OBSTRUCTION
DERP
Trump fired James Comey, his subordinate who was engaged in felonies leaking classified information to the press - OBSTRUCTION.
Weissman if a petulant little fuck who could not make the case for ANY criminal acts. Anyone who reads the report sees clearly that Weissman is a butthurt little **** who failed to GET TRUMP.
Well, you said you "CITE" (sic) the report when you make a claim, then you proceed to whine that others here only "bleat sleazy hate."
Then when I pointed to the very section of the report in which the 10 acts of obstruction are contained in you come back with more of your fucking whining.
Please, just fucking go away .............
Well, you said you "CITE" (sic) the report when you make a claim,
2 : to quote by way of example, authority, or proof cites several noteworthy authors
3a : to refer to especially : to mention formally in commendation or praise She was cited for bravery.
b : to name in a citation cited by the trustees for his work in public health
Definition of CITE
DURR.