"No collusion......No obstruction......Completely cleared"?????

[caddo kid]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

 

[edward37]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

Brownie Trump is the most corrupt divisive pos EVER to enter our WH......Makes a mockery of our constitution

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

Except trump makes nixon look like a choir boy

 

[Uncensored2008]

You whacked out, lying fuck..

Was there ever a time in your life when you had integrity? Maybe when you were very young and hadn't yet sucked your first cock?

UnHinged.......it may be time for your daily enema........LMAO

{The investigation did not, however, yield evidence sufficient to sustain any charge that any
individual affiliated with the Trump Campaign acted as an agent of a foreign principal within the
meaning of FARA or, in terms of Section 951, subject to the direction or control of the government
of Russia, or any official thereof. In particular, the Office did not and evidence likely to prove
beyond a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafort, George Papadopoulos,
and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian government or at its direction, control, or
request during the relevant time eriod.1232}

Okay, so the dossier refutes you and the lies you've told for the last two years, that just means you need to LIE HARDER....

LOL speaking of lies The lying scum in our WH NOW is past 10,000 lies and republicans believed them

Oh, lies..

Let's look at some of the things the little Goebbels of the fascist press have dubbed "lies" by Donald Trump.

"This is a great day for America." - CNN claimed that Trump declaring his election great is a "lie."

"The poverty rate for Wisconsin families has reached the lowest rate in 22 years." - Politafraud. Trump was truthful, Politifraud being hacks, were lying. Politifraud wanted to give credit to Obamugabe - but even if Mugabe was the reason, the statement remains true.

Wisconsin poverty measures by Eric Litke - Infogram

"With a late-term abortion, "the mother meets with the doctor. They take care of the baby, they wrap the baby beautifully. And then the doctor and the mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby." - Politifraud, the fucking lying scum - called this a lie by Trump



Obviously Politifraud are fucking liars, Trump told the truth.

We can do this 10,000 times.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

Brownie Trump is the most corrupt divisive pos EVER to enter our WH......Makes a mockery of our constitution

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

 

[edward37]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

BUT lordbrownie and uncensored say they're all wrong Throw in red ,ice,bri, sassy ptb, 007 and it'll be a close LOL call

 

[caddo kid]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

Brownie Trump is the most corrupt divisive pos EVER to enter our WH......Makes a mockery of our constitution

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

 

[Uncensored2008]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

BUT lordbrownie and uncensored say they're all wrong Throw in red ,ice,bri, sassy ptb, 007 and it'll be a close LOL call

No, I just point out that you Stalinists are FUCKING LIARS.

{Finally, the Office investigated whether one of the above campaign advisors George
Papadopoulos acted as an agent of, or at the direction and control of, the government of Israel.
While the investigation revealed significant ties between Papadopoulos and Israel (and search
warrants were obtained in part on that basis), the Office ultimately determined that the evidence
was not sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction under FARA or Section 951.}

I post the ACTUAL TEXT from the Mueller report to expose the fact that you and the other Marxists are lying through your fucking teeth.

Hey, but maybe if you just LIE HARDER....

 

[leftwinger]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

All Dem loons are failed lawyers. Prosectutors are former lawyers. Finding 916 Dem loons in a pile of human garbage is likely.

 

[caddo kid]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

All Dem loons are failed lawyers. Prosectutors are former lawyers. Finding 916 Dem loons in a pile of human garbage is likely.

so, you believe ALL 916 of those folks are Dems?

LOFL ................ so, they took your brain instead when they attempted the abortion I see

 

[Defiant1]

My good, sane fellow posters......Keep an eye and ear out for the judge who will be exposing for ALL of us the damaging testimony that Flynn (the traitor) offered to Mueller.

I'm just hoping that the expose' will not have Trump so pissed off that he might bomb Switzerland.

Judges can't bring charges against people.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

Brownie Trump is the most corrupt divisive pos EVER to enter our WH......Makes a mockery of our constitution

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wow. Its over. Please seek help.

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

916? Wow!

Is that like 97% of former prosecutors?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Multiple counts of obstruction is not "over."

The only reason Trump has yet to face an indictment is because he is POTUS.

That means Trump is above the law.

It is up to Congress to exercise their responsibility as a check on the executive for Trump's abuse of power.

Unless Congress does just that then Trump will continue to be 'above the law.'

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

All Dem loons are failed lawyers. Prosectutors are former lawyers. Finding 916 Dem loons in a pile of human garbage is likely.

so, you believe ALL 916 of those folks are Dems?

LOFL ................ so, they took your brain instead when they attempted the abortion I see

Deep state anti-Trump.

Oh, and several claim that the fascist media is DISTORTING their words. Imagine, the Marxist propaganda corps lying about these prosecutors.

 

[caddo kid]

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

Brownie Trump is the most corrupt divisive pos EVER to enter our WH......Makes a mockery of our constitution

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.

Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Brownie Trump is the most corrupt divisive pos EVER to enter our WH......Makes a mockery of our constitution

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.

Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.

See, here is the thing - I've actually READ the report. I CITE the report when I make a claim. YOU just bleat what the most sleazy hate sites like DailyKOS and CNN claim.

 

[leftwinger]

He did nothing above the law but you said nothing when O was wadding up the constitution. Your little tears fall on dry ground.

NOTHING ??? 900 former prosecutors are on record for saying if he wasn't president he'd be in jail

Yes, now 916 prosecutors agree Trump is a POS criminal

Grid view copy - Airtable

All Dem loons are failed lawyers. Prosectutors are former lawyers. Finding 916 Dem loons in a pile of human garbage is likely.

so, you believe ALL 916 of those folks are Dems?

LOFL ................ so, they took your brain instead when they attempted the abortion I see

Deep state anti-Trump.

Oh, and several claim that the fascist media is DISTORTING their words. Imagine, the Marxist propaganda corps lying about these prosecutors.

Also depends what question was really asked. Can't just believe any poll or survey from any MSM outlet.

 

[caddo kid]

I put Trump in the company of Nixon; they are on a very similar level in many respects

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.

Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.

See, here is the thing - I've actually READ the report. I CITE the report when I make a claim. YOU just bleat what the most sleazy hate sites like DailyKOS and CNN claim.

Look at my siggy & you will see where the 10 acts of obstruction are located within the report. Pretty easy stuff. Each act of obstruction is documented, commentary is offered, even commentary on 'intent' for each of the 10 acts documented.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'd put Obama in the company of Robert Mugabe. Like Mugabe, he used government resources to try and alter elections, spied on his opponents, and worked with foreign powers to thwart free elections.

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.

Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.

See, here is the thing - I've actually READ the report. I CITE the report when I make a claim. YOU just bleat what the most sleazy hate sites like DailyKOS and CNN claim.

Look at my siggy & you will see where the 10 acts of obstruction are located within the report. Pretty easy stuff

DERP

Trump called the witch hunt a "witch hunt," OBSTRUCTION

DERP

Trump fired James Comey, his subordinate who was engaged in felonies leaking classified information to the press - OBSTRUCTION.

Weissman is a petulant little fuck who could not make the case for ANY criminal acts. Anyone who reads the report sees clearly that Weissman is a butthurt little kunt who failed to GET TRUMP.

 

[caddo kid]

I don't give two flying fucks about your opinion on Obama because the thread isn't about Obama.

Go fuck up a different thread ...........

Fuck you, lying pile of shit.

This thread is about you gutter scum LYING to try and reverse the Mueller Dossier.

{For that reason, this Office?s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was
on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term "collusion." The Office
considered in particular whether contacts between Trump Campaign officials and Russia-linked
individuals could trigger liability for the crime of conspiracy?either under statutes that have their
own conspiracy language 18 U.S.C. 1349, l951(a)), or under the general conspiracy
statute (l 8 U.S.C. 371). The investigation did not establish that the contacts described in Volume
1, Section IV, supra, amounted to an agreement to commit any substantive violation of federal
criminal law - including foreign-influence and campaign-finance laws, both of which are
discussed further below. The Office therefore did not charge any individual associated with the
Trump Campaign with conspiracy to commit a federal offense arising from Russia contacts, either
under a specific statute or under Section 371 ?s offenses clause.

The Office also did not charge any campaign official or associate with a conspiracy under
Section 371 ?s defraud clause. That clause criminalizes participating in an agreement to obstruct a
lawful function of the US. government or its agencies through deceitful or dishonest means. See
Dennis v. United States, 384 US. 855, 861 (1966); v. United States, 265 U.S.
182, 188 (1924); see also United States v. Consulting LLC, 347 F. Supp. 3d 38,
46 (BBC. 2018). The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials?
or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful
function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in
Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign
official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the
Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.
Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with
conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section
IV above.}

You're just a lying little fuck, thinking that if you LIE HARDER somehow you can change the DISASTER that was the Mueller report.

Mueller's team of investigators documented the multiple abuses of power by Trump & by Trump associates.

Sorry that hurts your fragile feelings.

See, here is the thing - I've actually READ the report. I CITE the report when I make a claim. YOU just bleat what the most sleazy hate sites like DailyKOS and CNN claim.

Look at my siggy & you will see where the 10 acts of obstruction are located within the report. Pretty easy stuff

DERP

Trump called the witch hunt a "witch hunt," OBSTRUCTION

DERP

Trump fired James Comey, his subordinate who was engaged in felonies leaking classified information to the press - OBSTRUCTION.

Weissman if a petulant little fuck who could not make the case for ANY criminal acts. Anyone who reads the report sees clearly that Weissman is a butthurt little **** who failed to GET TRUMP.

Well, you said you "CITE" (sic) the report when you make a claim, then you proceed to whine that others here only "bleat sleazy hate."
Then when I pointed to the very section of the report in which the 10 acts of obstruction are contained in you come back with more of your fucking whining.
Please, just fucking go away .............

 

[nat4900]

Okay, so the dossier refutes you and the lies you've told for the last two years, that just means you need to LIE HARDER....

Dimwit.....I know you feel all "cosmopolitan" when using the term "dossier"......but you're still a fucking idiot.......Your orange turd can't last too long from the barrage of reality that is about to hit him in the next months.

You may choose to believe his constant LIES (after all, you are an idiot).....but most sane voters have had enough of the clown.

Keep drinking that kool aid.