Next up on the progressive ban list

I love how you skipped over how you plan to enforce your control of women's bodies. Will you force c sections? Tie them down? Put poor mothers in prison for life?

The issue is whether women are killing babies. If so, then we need to find a way to work things out.

You may as well argue that snuffing out babies once they are born is OK as well.
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?
You seriously want to go there?
 
I love how you skipped over how you plan to enforce your control of women's bodies. Will you force c sections? Tie them down? Put poor mothers in prison for life?

The issue is whether women are killing babies. If so, then we need to find a way to work things out.

You may as well argue that snuffing out babies once they are born is OK as well.
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?

But they want to kill off everyone in coma's.

The left is all about euthanasia.

Ironically, Hitler did the same thing. He started in hospitals where the nonproductive citizens lay dying and euthanized them
 
Last edited:
Trying to convince these people that the unborn are actually human beings is like trying to convince Hitler that Jews were his equals as well.

Last I checked, every fetus comes out human.
I love how you skipped over how you plan to enforce your control of women's bodies. Will you force c sections? Tie them down? Put poor mothers in prison for life?

The issue is whether women are killing babies. If so, then we need to find a way to work things out.

You may as well argue that snuffing out babies once they are born is OK as well.
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Translation, beyond 20 weeks ripping a fetus apart makes you uncomfortable.

It reminds me of the Nazis who used to shoot Jews in the head. I guess the business was too gruesome and messy for them, so they put them in gas chambers instead. Then they would just have Jews go round them up and bury them.

Out of sight, out of mind.

Exactly, you nailed it.
 
The issue is whether women are killing babies. If so, then we need to find a way to work things out.

You may as well argue that snuffing out babies once they are born is OK as well.
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?
You seriously want to go there?

You set the bar at consciousness for kill/don't kill. I guess mentally handicapped babies should be killed upon birth?
 
The issue is whether women are killing babies. If so, then we need to find a way to work things out.

You may as well argue that snuffing out babies once they are born is OK as well.
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?
You seriously want to go there?

Yes I do. As the Bible once said, the root of all evil is the love of money. Most abortions are done due to financial concerns.

Interestingly, the Bible also talks about child sacrifice in the ancient world. Essentially men and women would sacrifice their children to the gods in order to benefit financially in some way, whether it be for fertile crops, a successful military campaign, or just to have more offspring to work the fields.

I think people of today are no different than these ancient peoples.
 
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?
You seriously want to go there?

You set the bar at consciousness for kill/don't kill. I guess mentally handicapped babies should be killed upon birth?
Mentally handicapped babies are conscious, unless you have no idea what that means.
 
The issue is whether women are killing babies. If so, then we need to find a way to work things out.

You may as well argue that snuffing out babies once they are born is OK as well.
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?

But they want to kill off everyone in coma's.

The left is all about euthanasia.

I consider the inhumane horrors committed by the Nazi's and can't imagine how human beings could do those things, then I look at the left and its clear humanity hasn't outgrown that evil.
 
Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?
You seriously want to go there?

You set the bar at consciousness for kill/don't kill. I guess mentally handicapped babies should be killed upon birth?
Mentally handicapped babies are conscious, unless you have no idea what that means.

Not everyone agrees. Fabian socialists, for example, would have no problem killing such a child.

I guess that is what separates us. You think you have all the answers and wish to tell us when life begins, depending on some arbitrary period of development. Others would pick another arbitrary period of development. Others may just see us as glorified animals. After all, what separates us from the animals? Why not enslave humans like we do animals and then eat them for dinner?

In fact, that is how socialism treats people. like animals. They herd us around as a group, not individuals.
 
Last edited:
Jesus christ, I explicitly stated I don't support abortion around 20 weeks, and your subsequent dodging of the question tells me all I need to know, you have no rational idea on how to do any of your bullshit. What, do we have an abortion task force? Jails for women who have miscarriages? Oh wait, how do you tell the difference? Better have special teams for that to. Learn a thing or two from the past, your bullshit was thrown out with roe vs wade.

Around 20 weeks?

Good God, you can't even come up with a definitive time table for when life begins.

Why not help the women in need who are pregnant?

Oh, that's right, the most cost effective thing to do is kill the infant.
Clinics do help alot, in fact, abortion rates decrease with birth control/abortion clinics enmasse. That's the time when consciousness, as we perceive it, supposedly comes about.

Why don't we just kill off all those people in coma's then?

But they want to kill off everyone in coma's.

The left is all about euthanasia.

I consider the inhumane horrors committed by the Nazi's and can't imagine how human beings could do those things, then I look at the left and its clear humanity hasn't outgrown that evil.

Unfortunately, people don't change. History just repeats itself.

That is why the Nazis hated books. They didn't want people to understand the evils they were recreating. In fact, every evil done to the Jews, like the ghettos and stars of David and mass killings, were done in Europe already. Hitler just did it on a larger scale is all. I think it is also why the left hates the comparison to the Nazi regime. They don't want us to connect the dots either as we see the Occupy Wall Street crowd hang hate signs regarding Jewish bankers.

Somehow the left thinks that Hitler was a once in a life time anomaly. Perhaps he was an alien of some kind.
 
And in the racist pinhead world of shit-suckers like Screwey Lewey Farrakhan, free speech for others should be suppressed.
You can't talk about him - he's not an elected official.

I can talk about him. Elected or not.

He's a dirty lowlife filthy vile racist rotting rat twat.
OK. This wingnut just complained about us talking about the Palin slut because she's not elected:

Unmarried Conservative Having Another Kid US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
 
And in the racist pinhead world of shit-suckers like Screwey Lewey Farrakhan, free speech for others should be suppressed.
You can't talk about him - he's not an elected official.

I can talk about him. Elected or not.

He's a dirty lowlife filthy vile racist rotting rat twat.
OK. This wingnut just complained about us talking about the Palin slut because she's not elected:

Unmarried Conservative Having Another Kid US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

That's just a general rule of civility, you dipstick mofo.

You libturds hated it when some folks noted that Carter's daughter and Clinton's daughter were kind of unsightly.

Evidently, such general rules of politeness only applies to you and your filthy ilk when you are the beneficiary of such rules. You can dish it out but you can't take it and you are a hypocrite.

Meanwhile, Screwey Looey fucking Farrakhan made his asshole statements AS a public figure. One need not be "elected" to be a public figure of one's own making.
 
And in the racist pinhead world of shit-suckers like Screwey Lewey Farrakhan, free speech for others should be suppressed.
You can't talk about him - he's not an elected official.

I can talk about him. Elected or not.

He's a dirty lowlife filthy vile racist rotting rat twat.
OK. This wingnut just complained about us talking about the Palin slut because she's not elected:

Unmarried Conservative Having Another Kid US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

You kids are still talking about Sarah Palin? Is this the same person idiot John Maverick McCain picked to represent conservatives that he hates?

Morons.
 
Political correctness has gone absolutely bonkers. It is unreal what is happening in this country. Liberals and progressives are getting there wish... more government tyranny and less freedom.
Anyone who has studied the rise of the Nazi Party is squirming in their seat right now..

Other things on the list to be banned: Christianity.
 
Political correctness has gone absolutely bonkers. It is unreal what is happening in this country. Liberals and progressives are getting there wish... more government tyranny and less freedom.
Anyone who has studied the rise of the Nazi Party is squirming in their seat right now..

Other things on the list to be banned: Christianity.
Yes, Christianity is high up on the priority list of things to ban...
 
Mason jars. Too reminiscent of the mason Dixie line.

Dixie cup. See above.

Grey pinstripes suits. Grey was the color of the uniforms of the south

South needle on compass

Sweet Home Alabama

Winn Dixie

I wonder if I'm still allowed to put white sheets on my bed?
You'll need to check with the PC police and see if it is still allowed... :nono:
 
And in the racist pinhead world of shit-suckers like Screwey Lewey Farrakhan, free speech for others should be suppressed.
You can't talk about him - he's not an elected official.

I can talk about him. Elected or not.

He's a dirty lowlife filthy vile racist rotting rat twat.
OK. This wingnut just complained about us talking about the Palin slut because she's not elected:

Unmarried Conservative Having Another Kid US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

That's just a general rule of civility, you dipstick mofo.

You libturds hated it when some folks noted that Carter's daughter and Clinton's daughter were kind of unsightly.

Evidently, such general rules of politeness only applies to you and your filthy ilk when you are the beneficiary of such rules. You can dish it out but you can't take it and you are a hypocrite.

Meanwhile, Screwey Looey fucking Farrakhan made his asshole statements AS a public figure. One need not be "elected" to be a public figure of one's own making.
Poor Sarah wasn't POTUS, and never ran for POTUS, like Carter and Clinton. She couldn't even muster the dignity of finishing her term, as she had promised. The $$$ signs were all she could see. And now she's a joke. And her family is a joke.
 

Forum List

Back
Top