Newt hammers CNN about acting like a tabloid outlet

[Nosmo King]

My bet is you realize what a terrible president Obama is. Otherwise why would you be considering the possibility that Newt (with all his baggage) may become president.

Telling

Just a bit outside!

I'm incredulous why a constituency CLAIMING to be for American Family Values and decency could rush to support someone who has utterly failed to demonstrate ANY family values by committing adultery on a serial basis? Hypocrisy? Willful ignorance? Blind partisanship?

Any Red State Tea Bagger wants to tell any American she can't marry the woman she loves because it's a sin after voting for Gingrich has lost any moral high ground. Prepare to argue Family Values without a platform of morality from which to pontificate.

I'm incredulous that a constituency CLAIMING no values at all is suddenly declaring itself the moral arbiters for the rest of us, and somehow imagining that anyone respects them enough to care what they think.

When I need you to define values for me that you don't profess yourself, Jack, I'll ask.

Values shmalues! The Right is abandoning its values to defeat Obama by electing Gingerich.

So much for the value of your "Values"!

 

[Zoom]

God Damn America.

 

[BlindBoo]

God Damn America.

What for? Is this a fill in the blank????

 

[Nosmo King]

My bet is you realize what a terrible president Obama is. Otherwise why would you be considering the possibility that Newt (with all his baggage) may become president.

Telling

Just a bit outside!

I'm incredulous why a constituency CLAIMING to be for American Family Values and decency could rush to support someone who has utterly failed to demonstrate ANY family values by committing adultery on a serial basis? Hypocrisy? Willful ignorance? Blind partisanship?

Any Red State Tea Bagger wants to tell any American she can't marry the woman she loves because it's a sin after voting for Gingrich has lost any moral high ground. Prepare to argue Family Values without a platform of morality from which to pontificate.

I can support him because I simply don't care. I want a leader who can fix our country and I don't care who he boinked 15 years ago. It has 0 impact on the issues that matter. He is being elected to the presidency not the Vatican.

good boy. Spoken like a Clinton supporter circa 1998.

 

[paulitician]

Stupid Democrat jerk-offs. These are the same fools who still worship Ted Kennendy as a God. That creep only murdered a poor young girl for God's sake. And they loyally defended that Slick Willy pervert too. So they have no credibility on issues like this. They're just being dishonest hypocrites as usual. So fuck em.

 

[code1211]

In Fairness, It's current News, thanks to his Ex. He needs to work through it, not evade it. Life has consequences for us all.

Right. This is hot news. Let's see... When was that divorce final?

 

[paulitician]

In Fairness, It's current News, thanks to his Ex. He needs to work through it, not evade it. Life has consequences for us all.

Right. This is hot news. Let's see... When was that divorce final?

It's only hot news for ignorant Democrat assholes who watch GE/MSNBC all day. They're so fuckin dumb.

 

[code1211]

Unfortunately, this is the kinda shit the so-called press feasts on.... when you're an (R). (D)? You get questions like "How's your day?" and "Who's your favorite musical act?".

Good for Newt but he'd better get used to it and deal with it effectively. I think in this case he called them on it well.

True. The tough part was that it was the opening salvo. It sort of caught him off guard. It was a cheap shot, the way it was done.

This is the first spark of rage that any candidate has shown.

Rage is what i feel about the mess the Pretender in Chief has engendered.

Newter Obama.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Unfortunately, this is the kinda shit the so-called press feasts on.... when you're an (R). (D)? You get questions like "How's your day?" and "Who's your favorite musical act?".

Good for Newt but he'd better get used to it and deal with it effectively. I think in this case he called them on it well.

True. The tough part was that it was the opening salvo. It sort of caught him off guard. It was a cheap shot, the way it was done.

This is the first spark of rage that any candidate has shown.

Rage is what i feel about the mess the Pretender in Chief has engendered.

Newter Obama.

+ rep for the sig

Very clever

 

[Dr Grump]

Just a bit outside!

I'm incredulous why a constituency CLAIMING to be for American Family Values and decency could rush to support someone who has utterly failed to demonstrate ANY family values by committing adultery on a serial basis? Hypocrisy? Willful ignorance? Blind partisanship?

Any Red State Tea Bagger wants to tell any American she can't marry the woman she loves because it's a sin after voting for Gingrich has lost any moral high ground. Prepare to argue Family Values without a platform of morality from which to pontificate.

I can support him because I simply don't care. I want a leader who can fix our country and I don't care who he boinked 15 years ago. It has 0 impact on the issues that matter. He is being elected to the presidency not the Vatican.

good boy. Spoken like a Clinton supporter circa 1998.

You say that like it's a bad thing...

 

[Mustang]

Gingrich Outraged at Debate Host For Asking About Ex-Wife's Claim That He Wanted an "Open Marriage" - YouTube

Completely personal bullshit that has nothing to do with politics. I bet CNN takes a hit in the ratings after this.

Were in the middle of a war. Our economy is very frail. Iran is rattling their swords. UE is through the roof. Our debt is crushing us.

And the first fucking question is tabloid style sex crap.

Newt is a petulant child in the body of a 68 yo man. He's suffering what he probably considers shameful treatment due to his own ignominious behavior. Repeated behavior, I might add.

Here's a question Americans might want to ask themselves: Do you want a first lady who acknowledges having had an extramarital affair with a married man for six long years, even if they are now married?

 

[skookerasbil]

POP question............

The chances of CNN opening a presidential debate with this question to Obama???


"Mr President........for years, it has been rumoured that you have some close associations with people like William Ayers and Reverand Wright in Chicago. Could you please elaborate on this because it is a concern of a great many citizens?


Chances are?????????

 

[NYcarbineer]

True. The tough part was that it was the opening salvo. It sort of caught him off guard. It was a cheap shot, the way it was done.

Nah. Newt had a day to prepare for that question. It was a telegraphed softball.

I thought peoples personal sex life was off limits?

I thought marriage was some sort of sacred institution to conservatives.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Newt needs to be asked a simple question:

When, between 1998 and now, did this become out of bounds? And, as Newt called it, appalling...

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused

That should be the first question to Newt in the next GOP debate.

 

[skookerasbil]

Nah. Newt had a day to prepare for that question. It was a telegraphed softball.

I thought peoples personal sex life was off limits?

I thought marriage was some sort of sacred institution to conservatives.

meh.........what every dumbass liberal says during GOP primary season.

Independents arent going to give a rats ass about this crap in the general.........they will care about who can take this nation out of the second class status it has obtained in the last 3 years.

 

[Political Junky]

If the question hadn't been asked, at the start, Newt would have brought it up.

 

[jillian]

I can support him because I simply don't care. I want a leader who can fix our country and I don't care who he boinked 15 years ago. It has 0 impact on the issues that matter. He is being elected to the presidency not the Vatican.

good boy. Spoken like a Clinton supporter circa 1998.

You say that like it's a bad thing...

i think he's commenting on the hypocrisy of the right.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

good boy. Spoken like a Clinton supporter circa 1998.

You say that like it's a bad thing...

i think he's commenting on the hypocrisy of the right.

There is NO hypocrisy on my part so his comment is both stupid and misguided.

 

[JimH52]

Gingrich Outraged at Debate Host For Asking About Ex-Wife's Claim That He Wanted an "Open Marriage" - YouTube

Completely personal bullshit that has nothing to do with politics. I bet CNN takes a hit in the ratings after this.

Were in the middle of a war. Our economy is very frail. Iran is rattling their swords. UE is through the roof. Our debt is crushing us.

And the first fucking question is tabloid style sex crap.

Newt is a petulant child in the body of a 68 yo man. He's suffering what he probably considers shameful treatment due to his own ignominious behavior. Repeated behavior, I might add.

Here's a question Americans might want to ask themselves: Do you want a first lady who acknowledges having had an extramarital affair with a married man for six long years, even if they are now married?

If the GOP is stupid enough to nominate Newt, they will get what they asked for, another WH loss...I think this is hilarious. If Gingrich pulls this off, he will be the all time Champion Snake Oil Salesman!

 

[Cecilie1200]

Just a bit outside!

I'm incredulous why a constituency CLAIMING to be for American Family Values and decency could rush to support someone who has utterly failed to demonstrate ANY family values by committing adultery on a serial basis? Hypocrisy? Willful ignorance? Blind partisanship?

Any Red State Tea Bagger wants to tell any American she can't marry the woman she loves because it's a sin after voting for Gingrich has lost any moral high ground. Prepare to argue Family Values without a platform of morality from which to pontificate.

I can support him because I simply don't care. I want a leader who can fix our country and I don't care who he boinked 15 years ago. It has 0 impact on the issues that matter. He is being elected to the presidency not the Vatican.

good boy. Spoken like a Clinton supporter circa 1998.

Except that with Clinton, we weren't talking about fifteen years earlier. We were talking about who he boinked last week, in the Oval Office, and then suborned perjury from. (For the liberals among us, that last part would be what mattered.)