New York Times publishes Officer Darren Wilson’s account of the Michael Brown shooting

..but he didn't so your fantasy scenario is invalid. Why do you want to change the subject now?

Why not discuss THIS case, rather than figments of your imagination?

If he had gunned down a white kid, he'd be in prison. Everyone knows this.

..but he didn't so your fantasy scenario is invalid. Why do you want to change the subject now?

Why not discuss THIS case, rather than figments of your imagination?

If he had gunned down a white kid, he'd be in prison. Everyone knows this.
What makes you think that? No one likes thugs, no matter what color they are. Whats to like about them? They suck and they should all be shot by the police. Quit race baiting.
 
The negro didn't get shot for stealing cigars, though. He got killed for punching a cop and trying to take his weapon.
2 separate, violent felonies..Wilson didn't violate any laws by shooting a fleeing..(or attacking) felon.
Hate it for you.

Good, legal shoot

So let's put him on trial in front of 12 people from that community and see what they say. Sounds fair.
May as well make Crump judge, Sharpton the foreman and you and the Brown family in the jury.
 
Let me get this right; The New York Times releases this story reported to be telling Officer Wilson's side. I read the story, and it still gives credence to Michael Brown's accomplice's side of the story. .
I think they're just trying to sell papers.
Nothing gives credence to the accomplice's lies.

He bobs and weaves and changes details every time he speak, and, is a convicted liar.

A first year law student would rip him apart on cross examination were anyone stupid enough to call him as a witness.
 
Let me get this right; The New York Times releases this story reported to be telling Officer Wilson's side. I read the story, and it still gives credence to Michael Brown's accomplice's side of the story. .
I think they're just trying to sell papers.
Nothing gives credence to the accomplice's lies.

He bobs and weaves and changes details every time he speak, and, is a convicted liar.

A first year law student would rip him apart on cross examination were anyone stupid enough to call him as a witness.

This was never about telling the truth. The Democrats' big thing is racism. This case was used to minimize the damage Obama has done to Democrats since he won re-election. Everyone knows that Republicans are the kkk. Just ask anyone on the left.
 
The narrative was pushed, the news is convoluted. It does not matter one bit to the race baiting party in an election year.

They edified their moronic base by dividing the races. The democrats are the EXPERTS at class division, race division all while they convince the ignorant that are truly on their side.

Quite impressive really, and sad how the so called smarty pants liberals are actual morons.

It will not matter what the facts are in this case. Democrats are committed to using the same formula that has acquired power in government for 50 years.

The key to their utopia myth that they sell to the ignorant is to convince them and maintain that they are the perpetual victim of the American system. All with the help of the know it all ivy league cocksuckers in our socialist praetorian media.

It is an utter waste of our time to show the facts. The perpetually brainwashed asshole democrat voters are nothing but squishpots of the democrat, socialist party. They are that simple minded, and show conclusively that they have ZERO ability to think for themselves. They stand for nothing, no matter how many rallies they hold or how much they feign outrage over any of their so called issues.
 
The negro didn't get shot for stealing cigars, though. He got killed for punching a cop and trying to take his weapon.
2 separate, violent felonies..Wilson didn't violate any laws by shooting a fleeing..(or attacking) felon.
Hate it for you.

Good, legal shoot

So let's put him on trial in front of 12 people from that community and see what they say. Sounds fair.

If evidence is found that merit charges being filed, that's exactly what will happen, isn't it?
 
HOW do you know who or what Brown was?[...]
I won't ask if you saw the convenience store video because I'm quite sure you did. What is most interesting to me is in spite of that your instinct is to defend the bullying sonofabitch.

There are two kinds of Black citizens in America. There are decent, civilized Black people -- and there are niggars like "Big Mike" Brown and those who ignore his anti-social propensity and defend him in spite of it.

And in my opinion, which I'm sure is shared by many others, including many Blacks, the world would be a better place without these niggars -- whose very existence is the reason why racism remains constant.

If you are Black, and if you are sometimes subjected to exclusion and other effects of racism, you can blame it on niggars like Brown.


I saw the video. Brown was no angel. But he was entitled to a fair trial. He did not deserve to be shot six times, almost like a one-man lynching.

The spontaneous outcry of the construction worker deserves much weight. In law, an ''excited utterance to a startling event'' is not only an exception to the hearsay rule but also compelling evidence that an event occurred as it did because there is no time for fabrication.

The racial slurs used on this thread may well be the kind of ignorant and disgusting slurs heard in Ferguson; and it is no surprise that violence erupts.

Take away the right to a trial for one man deemed to be a ''thug'' diminishes the right for everyone. You never know how someone might be judging you or your right to live. We then become worse than the Nazis.

What the fuck are you talking about fair trial? For what killing Wilson if Wilson didn't defend himself? You people are STUPID. I mean absolutely, positively fucking retarded. How dumb can you be sir?


SMARTER-THAN-THE-AVERAGE-BEAR

You are simply a bigoted blackguard who is linguistically limited to named-calling than being capable of well-articulated thought, a poltroon who spews hate speech from behind a computer screen. I am putting you on my ignore of DUMBER-THAN-AVERAGE GUTTERSNIPES to avoid the dog dirt you leave on this site.
 
If he had gunned down a white kid, he'd be in prison. Everyone knows this.
I don't think so.

A 6'3" 300 pound White "kid" who presented himself in the same manner as Brown had would be regarded as an aggressive, low-life, criminal punk by White society. There would be some minor protest activity but overall he wouldn't be missed (except by his mother -- maybe).

Do you think police never kill White people?
 
Only on an anonymous board do people try to get away with that Chris Rock bullshit.
Chris Rock is one of the most successful stand-up comics. His success is predicated on the very simple rule that many a truth is said in jest. Chris Rock is gifted with a rare philosophical skill which enables him to find humor in truth and irony.

Tell you what, go talk to decent, law-abiding black folks, and tell them about the "*******." Go ahead. Have some guts.

First, I would have no reason or wish to offend decent, law-abiding Black people.

But if I did, what would happen? Some big badass, like "Big Mike" Brown would attack me? Probably. Unless I were Brown's size, in which case the badass would say and do nothing.

And while you're in that frame of mind I urge you to give some thought to why so many badasses are doing time. And why others, like Mike Brown, have no more time to do.

You need to understand the difference between "guts" and stupidity.

I know who Chris Rock is. He's very funny, true. I do wonder how he feels about being the anonymous message-board racists' best friend because of that bit.

Why would you have a problem with saying "******" in front of decent black folks? Don't you think they have just as much of, if not more of, a grasp on the difference between themselves and "*******"?

Of course, they also have, I guarantee, been called "******" at least a few times in their lives, even as decent, law-abiding, hard-working black men and women.

Isn't that a damned shame, Mike? It's almost like black folks can't win with some people.
 
Why would you have a problem with saying "******" in front of decent black folks? Don't you think they have just as much of, if not more of, a grasp on the difference between themselves and "*******"?
That would depend on how well acquainted we were and the context of conversation. Generally I carefully avoid offending anyone whom I respect and have no cause to offend.

Of course, they also have, I guarantee, been called "******" at least a few times in their lives, even as decent, law-abiding, hard-working black men and women.
I don't know what part of the Country you live in, but I'm from New York and and New Jersey and having been around for quite a few years I can confidently disagree with that presumption.

Based on my experience and observation Black people are never abused or offended here in the north, where Jim Crow never lived, unless they do something to provoke hostility.

Isn't that a damned shame, Mike? It's almost like black folks can't win with some people.
Again, based on my experience, Black people who avoid problems don't have any. But I will be interested in reading about any personal experiences you've had or witnessed which would support your argument.
 
I don't know what part of the Country you live in, but I'm from New York and and New Jersey and having been around for quite a few years I can confidently disagree with that presumption.

Based on my experience and observation Black people are never abused or offended here in the north, where Jim Crow never lived, unless they do something to provoke hostility.


Again, based on my experience, Black people who avoid problems don't have any. But I will be interested in reading about any personal experiences you've had or witnessed which would support your argument.

Based on my experience (in New York), every black person I've ever spoken to on the subject has a story of being harassed because of their race. Now, do I go asking every black person I meet? No. What I do is talk to many, many people of color regularly. Why, we recently had a local story of a white woman on video calling a black guy a "******" because he started his car next to her children.

Again, Mike, with some people black folks can't win. Undoubtedly, racists will find lots of ways in which a black person "provokes hostility."
 
Based on my experience (in New York), every black person I've ever spoken to on the subject has a story of being harassed because of their race. Now, do I go asking every black person I meet? No. What I do is talk to many, many people of color regularly. Why, we recently had a local story of a white woman on video calling a black guy a "******" because he started his car next to her children.

Again, Mike, with some people black folks can't win. Undoubtedly, racists will find lots of ways in which a black person "provokes hostility."
I asked you for recollections of personal experience and observations, not vague reference to hearsay.

Re: that White woman who called some Black guy a niggar: If he was Italian she would have called him a guinea or a dago. Big deal -- a pissed off woman. Such situations are easily balanced with a reciprocal insult and forgotten.

If people were not offended by these ethnic insults, which are intended to offend, the use of such a simple way to piss someone off would soon be abandoned and forgotten.

My lineage is German. If you call me a kraut or a Nazi either I will laugh or I'll totally ignore it. These are only words which are intended to cause pain but only will if one allows them to -- or wants them to.

And some people like nothing better than feeling offended. Such people thrive on sympathy.
 
Last edited:
..but he didn't so your fantasy scenario is invalid. Why do you want to change the subject now?

Why not discuss THIS case, rather than figments of your imagination?

If he had gunned down a white kid, he'd be in prison. Everyone knows this.


Really? Then why was the shooter of Dillon Taylor ( a white kid) not jailed? This happened the same time as the Brown shooting and all we hear about is Brown and not Taylor.

Utah Local News - Salt Lake City News Sports Archive - The Salt Lake Tribune


Video: Cop killing Dillon Taylor, no weapon, no crime, complying with officers demands and did not attack officer:


 
.
He did not deserve to be shot six times, almost like a one-man lynching.

You don't know what he deserved since you weren't there...if he attacked the officer, and then charged the officer it was a legitimate shoot...

Who is to blame for the outcome...well...you could blame the generations of teenagers raising children on government welfare with no adults role modeling adult behavior...who instill in their young men a fear and aggression toward the police where they feel completely okay with assaulting officers because the people in their community have brainwashed them to think it is okay...and then you end up with dead teenagers because they followed those teachings...

We could start there...
 
Do you think police never kill White people?

In fact, they kill more white men than black men...check the stats...but you wouldn't know it by media coverage...I guess cops are racists toward white people...right?
 
This case is pretty much over. The authorities are leaking facts out as the feed this baby. Brown had so much THC in his system it was enough to trigger hallucinations. At least according to the medical report. It's quite likely that he was so high he didn't even know he was shot in the arm.

This case is going nowhere. Wilson is entited to a massive apology and his job back with another commendation
 

Forum List

Back
Top