ScarletRage
VIP Member
- Jun 26, 2014
- 1,191
- 157
- 80
- Moderator
- #221
At some point, Brown was withdrawing and no longer attacking Wilson. The ''self-defense'' justification ended at that point. If Wilson then followed Brown and shot him four more times in a fit of rage, then he committed a homicide --- either Murder 2 [premeditation was nullified by rage] or Voluntary Manslaughter [rage was reasonably provoked by Brown's assault]. Brown was not near the police car when Wilson killed him. This case presents a classic bar examination question.
Here is my reply on another thread.
Self defense isn't the issue fool. A police officer in MO can shoot a fleeing or resisting felon. The statute has been posted SEVERAL times.
Wrong. A police officer can only use deadly force if such force is necessary to make the arrest. If deadly force is not necessary to arrest him, the statute does not apply.