New York Times alters Clinton email story

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

There's no leftist bias in the media. None at all. It's all just a right wing conspiracy

The New York Times made small but significant changes to an exclusive report about a potential criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton's State Department email account late Thursday night, but provided no notification of or explanation for of the changes.

The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."

That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry "into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."

The Times also changed the headline of the story, from "Criminal Inquiry Sought in Hillary Clinton’s Use of Email" to "Criminal Inquiry Is Sought in Clinton Email Account," reflecting a similar recasting of Clinton's possible role. The article's URL was also changed to reflect the new headline.

New York Times alters Clinton email story - POLITICO

 

[defcon4]

There's no leftist bias in the media. None at all. It's all just a right wing conspiracy

The New York Times??? That's unheard of. The OP is right.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Holy newsprint, Batman!!!

An editor made a change to a news story!

That has never happened before in the entire history of the media!

No wonder the OP believes that it is a "right wing conspiracy"!

 

[MisterBeale]

People who know who she is don't care, they already aren't reading anything having to do with her. Compared to her previous scandals, this one is peanuts.

And folks that have made up their pea brains to vote for her could care less. She could do the same thing OJ did. She could. . . .

​

. . . and they could find the bloody glove, sword, what have you, and they would STILL vote for her. So what does it matter?

 

[Statistikhengst]

 

[Derideo_Te]

People who know who she is don't care, they already aren't reading anything having to do with her. Compared to her previous scandals, this one is peanuts.

And folks that have made up their pea brains to vote for her could care less. She could do the same thing OJ did. She could. . . .

​

. . . and they could find the bloody glove, sword, what have you, and they would STILL vote for her. So what does it matter?

Anyone who knows how email works understands that every single email she sent or received from any government dept would automatically be copied to the government backup files.

Her use of a private server wasn't illegal and no government emails have been lost.

This is an extremist rightwing wet dream fantasy. There is no substance to this crotch...er, internet sniffing investigation.

 

[defcon4]

Her use of a private server wasn't illegal and no government emails have been lost.

So, where are they?

 

[peach174]

Holy newsprint, Batman!!!

An editor made a change to a news story!

That has never happened before in the entire history of the media!

No wonder the OP believes that it is a "right wing conspiracy"!

It's about her and Hubby who are controllers.
Both have corralled off the press and her team complained so they caved in.
One of the reporters of the story, Michael Schmidt, explained early Friday that the Clinton campaign had complained about the story to the Times.

“It was a response to complaints we received from the Clinton camp that we thought were reasonable, and we made them,” Schmidt said.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The Unraveling Of A New York Times Story About A ‘Criminal Probe’ Of Hillary Clinton

by Emily Atkin Jul 24, 2015

The evolution of what would otherwise be a damning attack on the former secretary of state.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Holy newsprint, Batman!!!

An editor made a change to a news story!

That has never happened before in the entire history of the media!

No wonder the OP believes that it is a "right wing conspiracy"!

It's about her and Hubby who are controllers.
Both have corralled off the press and her team complained so they caved in.
One of the reporters of the story, Michael Schmidt, explained early Friday that the Clinton campaign had complained about the story to the Times.

“It was a response to complaints we received from the Clinton camp that we thought were reasonable, and we made them,” Schmidt said.

Gosh!

The media got the facts wrong and corrected them when it was pointed out to them.

Happens on a daily basis!

But because it is about the Clintons this is "evidence" of a "conspiracy" to the extremist rightwingers?

There are two kinds of conspiracies.

One is where there is some kind of evil supernatural mind altering force that is wielded by dark overlords like the Clintons.

The other is the more mundane "cock up conspiracy" where someone screws up because people do that all the time and gullible fools imagine that there is an "evil supernatural mind altering force wielded by dark overlords like the Clintons".

 

[MisterBeale]

People who know who she is don't care, they already aren't reading anything having to do with her. Compared to her previous scandals, this one is peanuts.

And folks that have made up their pea brains to vote for her could care less. She could do the same thing OJ did. She could. . . .

​

. . . and they could find the bloody glove, sword, what have you, and they would STILL vote for her. So what does it matter?

Anyone who knows how email works understands that every single email she sent or received from any government dept would automatically be copied to the government backup files.

Her use of a private server wasn't illegal and no government emails have been lost.

This is an extremist rightwing wet dream fantasy. There is no substance to this crotch...er, internet sniffing investigation.

Everything you said is absolutely correct.

However, here is the rub. She conducted much of US government business through her private email server. None of these correspondences have been made immediately available to the public. She combed through them and censored what she wanted to make available. She did this to create her own paradigm of truth about what she was doing in the Obama administration. The reason she did this, is because most Americans are distracted by their own lives, entertainment, the NFL, shopping, what have you, to pay attention to what she was actually doing or HAS DONE. What she was doing was screwing America over.

Did she do anything illegal? NO. Did she do something nefarious to cover up who she actually is? You bet.

Stephen Mihm: Clinton isn't only one who didn't like to share records
Hillary Clinton kept emails on a private server - The Morning Call

In Clinton's case, the State Department has been provided with 55,000 pages of correspondence that she turned over to fulfill her obligations under the Federal Records Act. And when it comes to the emails on her private server, she said she had "broken no rules or laws." When Clinton was in the office, no rule explicitly prohibited federal employees from using private accounts. In October 2009, 10 months into her tenure at state, new regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration required federal agencies to ensure that records sent or received on private email systems "are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system."

These rules were tightened after she left office, in 2013, to require federal officials to use government email addresses to conduct official business. And that's the crux of Clinton's email problem. The trouble isn't that she had a private account; it's that she has behaved as though her public correspondence belonged in her personal archives.

See, she is the one that has gotten to decide which emails, "are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system." And there is no rule or regulation that says she can't. But this just speaks to her honesty and character. Does anyone think she even has the integrity of Nixon? Fat Chance. What IS she hiding?

Well, clearly she is hiding discussions with huge corporations that have stakes in the negotiations of the TPP. She was the MAIN government point man on getting that trade pact completed. The funny thing is, once it was done, and now that she has to run for president, she wants to somehow distance herself from all her work.

I was having a discussion with a friend of mine who actually thought Bernie Sanders had integrity. Well, I ended that thought real quick. See, the thing is, Sanders is a creature of Washington. So he knew, all along that Hillary was negotiating this trade deal.

In this article for Foreign Policy, she boasts about her accomplishment. SHE IS PROUD OF IT. But the reasons she doesn't want those emails to come to light is because she doesn't want her role in the construction of this trade deal to come to the fore.

America’s Pacific Century
The future of politics will be decided in Asia, not Afghanistan or Iraq, and the United States will be right at the center of the action.
By Hillary Clinton
America s Pacific Century Foreign Policy

Now, if you read that article, it's pretty damn clear who is behind the US efforts on the TPP, is it not? Likewise, it's pretty clear where she stands on this issue.

Now comes campaign season.

Bernie Sanders Goes After Hillary on TPP: ‘You Can’t Not Have a Position’
Sanders Hits Hillary on TPP You Can t Not Have a Position Mediaite
Seriously? If this isn't a Frank Underwood move, I don't know what is. Watching Bernie, it's clear he isn't really serious about a run at the oval office. HE KNOWS what her position is. Only idiots and dupes don't what it is. The whole CFR media knows. They also know that the American voter has the attention span of a Tasmanian gnat. That is why it is SO IMPORTANT that Hillary decides which emails go public, and which remain private. Bright sunshine can't be shown onto the public business that she was conducting. No evidence can be given by the independent media, or anyone else about what she was up to.

This was not a Democrat policy, it was GLOBALIST policy. It is why the Republicans were allowed to re-take the Senate. Because the Democrats couldn't be counted on to vote for the TPP. Republicans can always be counted on to destroy small businesses and American industry in favor of the globalist trade deals.

 

[MisterBeale]

Oh yeah, and I suppose there might be emails in there about Benghazi too, but. . . .

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

The media got the facts wrong and corrected them when it was pointed out to them.

They didn't get any facts wrong. Nor did the NYT admit to getting any facts wrong.

JACKASS.

 

[Zander]

The 4th estate is DEAD.

 

[MisterBeale]

Who cares? The fifth estate is alive and well. The unfortunate thing is those TV watching bozos are corralled like sheep, unaware that it even exists.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Her use of a private server wasn't illegal and no government emails have been lost.

So, where are they?

Just submit an FOIA request for all emails sent to or received from Hillary to the government.

 

[eagle1462010]

US Ambassador Fired For Hillary-Like Use Of Private Email The Daily Caller

The U.S. ambassador to Kenya was forced out in 2012 after an inspector general report showed managerial incompetence, including his use of a private email system to evade agency rules.

The ambassador’s boss, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, also used her own private email system.


Do as I say...........Not as I do..................

 

[Derideo_Te]

People who know who she is don't care, they already aren't reading anything having to do with her. Compared to her previous scandals, this one is peanuts.

And folks that have made up their pea brains to vote for her could care less. She could do the same thing OJ did. She could. . . .

​

. . . and they could find the bloody glove, sword, what have you, and they would STILL vote for her. So what does it matter?

Anyone who knows how email works understands that every single email she sent or received from any government dept would automatically be copied to the government backup files.

Her use of a private server wasn't illegal and no government emails have been lost.

This is an extremist rightwing wet dream fantasy. There is no substance to this crotch...er, internet sniffing investigation.

Everything you said is absolutely correct.

However, here is the rub. She conducted much of US government business through her private email server. None of these correspondences have been made immediately available to the public. She combed through them and censored what she wanted to make available. She did this to create her own paradigm of truth about what she was doing in the Obama administration. The reason she did this, is because most Americans are distracted by their own lives, entertainment, the NFL, shopping, what have you, to pay attention to what she was actually doing or HAS DONE. What she was doing was screwing America over.

Did she do anything illegal? NO. Did she do something nefarious to cover up who she actually is? You bet.

Stephen Mihm: Clinton isn't only one who didn't like to share records
Hillary Clinton kept emails on a private server - The Morning Call

In Clinton's case, the State Department has been provided with 55,000 pages of correspondence that she turned over to fulfill her obligations under the Federal Records Act. And when it comes to the emails on her private server, she said she had "broken no rules or laws." When Clinton was in the office, no rule explicitly prohibited federal employees from using private accounts. In October 2009, 10 months into her tenure at state, new regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration required federal agencies to ensure that records sent or received on private email systems "are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system."

These rules were tightened after she left office, in 2013, to require federal officials to use government email addresses to conduct official business. And that's the crux of Clinton's email problem. The trouble isn't that she had a private account; it's that she has behaved as though her public correspondence belonged in her personal archives.

See, she is the one that has gotten to decide which emails, "are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system." And there is no rule or regulation that says she can't. But this just speaks to her honesty and character. Does anyone think she even has the integrity of Nixon? Fat Chance. What IS she hiding?

Well, clearly she is hiding discussions with huge corporations that have stakes in the negotiations of the TPP. She was the MAIN government point man on getting that trade pact completed. The funny thing is, once it was done, and now that she has to run for president, she wants to somehow distance herself from all her work.

I was having a discussion with a friend of mine who actually thought Bernie Sanders had integrity. Well, I ended that thought real quick. See, the thing is, Sanders is a creature of Washington. So he knew, all along that Hillary was negotiating this trade deal.

In this article for Foreign Policy, she boasts about her accomplishment. SHE IS PROUD OF IT. But the reasons she doesn't want those emails to come to light is because she doesn't want her role in the construction of this trade deal to come to the fore.

America’s Pacific Century
The future of politics will be decided in Asia, not Afghanistan or Iraq, and the United States will be right at the center of the action.
By Hillary Clinton
America s Pacific Century Foreign Policy

Now, if you read that article, it's pretty damn clear who is behind the US efforts on the TPP, is it not? Likewise, it's pretty clear where she stands on this issue.

Now comes campaign season.

Bernie Sanders Goes After Hillary on TPP: ‘You Can’t Not Have a Position’
Sanders Hits Hillary on TPP You Can t Not Have a Position Mediaite
Seriously? If this isn't a Frank Underwood move, I don't know what is. Watching Bernie, it's clear he isn't really serious about a run at the oval office. HE KNOWS what her position is. Only idiots and dupes don't what it is. The whole CFR media knows. They also know that the American voter has the attention span of a Tasmanian gnat. That is why it is SO IMPORTANT that Hillary decides which emails go public, and which remain private. Bright sunshine can't be shown onto the public business that she was conducting. No evidence can be given by the independent media, or anyone else about what she was up to.

This was not a Democrat policy, it was GLOBALIST policy. It is why the Republicans were allowed to re-take the Senate. Because the Democrats couldn't be counted on to vote for the TPP. Republicans can always be counted on to destroy small businesses and American industry in favor of the globalist trade deals.

Hillary has no control over the copies of the emails on the government servers that she sent and received.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Oh yeah, and I suppose there might be emails in there about Benghazi too, but. . . .

The copies of those emails will be on the government servers. She can't delete those. Just file an FOIA and you can see them for yourself.

 

[eagle1462010]

People who know who she is don't care, they already aren't reading anything having to do with her. Compared to her previous scandals, this one is peanuts.

And folks that have made up their pea brains to vote for her could care less. She could do the same thing OJ did. She could. . . .

​

. . . and they could find the bloody glove, sword, what have you, and they would STILL vote for her. So what does it matter?

Anyone who knows how email works understands that every single email she sent or received from any government dept would automatically be copied to the government backup files.

Her use of a private server wasn't illegal and no government emails have been lost.

This is an extremist rightwing wet dream fantasy. There is no substance to this crotch...er, internet sniffing investigation.

Everything you said is absolutely correct.

However, here is the rub. She conducted much of US government business through her private email server. None of these correspondences have been made immediately available to the public. She combed through them and censored what she wanted to make available. She did this to create her own paradigm of truth about what she was doing in the Obama administration. The reason she did this, is because most Americans are distracted by their own lives, entertainment, the NFL, shopping, what have you, to pay attention to what she was actually doing or HAS DONE. What she was doing was screwing America over.

Did she do anything illegal? NO. Did she do something nefarious to cover up who she actually is? You bet.

Stephen Mihm: Clinton isn't only one who didn't like to share records
Hillary Clinton kept emails on a private server - The Morning Call

In Clinton's case, the State Department has been provided with 55,000 pages of correspondence that she turned over to fulfill her obligations under the Federal Records Act. And when it comes to the emails on her private server, she said she had "broken no rules or laws." When Clinton was in the office, no rule explicitly prohibited federal employees from using private accounts. In October 2009, 10 months into her tenure at state, new regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration required federal agencies to ensure that records sent or received on private email systems "are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system."

These rules were tightened after she left office, in 2013, to require federal officials to use government email addresses to conduct official business. And that's the crux of Clinton's email problem. The trouble isn't that she had a private account; it's that she has behaved as though her public correspondence belonged in her personal archives.

See, she is the one that has gotten to decide which emails, "are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system." And there is no rule or regulation that says she can't. But this just speaks to her honesty and character. Does anyone think she even has the integrity of Nixon? Fat Chance. What IS she hiding?

Well, clearly she is hiding discussions with huge corporations that have stakes in the negotiations of the TPP. She was the MAIN government point man on getting that trade pact completed. The funny thing is, once it was done, and now that she has to run for president, she wants to somehow distance herself from all her work.

I was having a discussion with a friend of mine who actually thought Bernie Sanders had integrity. Well, I ended that thought real quick. See, the thing is, Sanders is a creature of Washington. So he knew, all along that Hillary was negotiating this trade deal.

In this article for Foreign Policy, she boasts about her accomplishment. SHE IS PROUD OF IT. But the reasons she doesn't want those emails to come to light is because she doesn't want her role in the construction of this trade deal to come to the fore.

America’s Pacific Century
The future of politics will be decided in Asia, not Afghanistan or Iraq, and the United States will be right at the center of the action.
By Hillary Clinton
America s Pacific Century Foreign Policy

Now, if you read that article, it's pretty damn clear who is behind the US efforts on the TPP, is it not? Likewise, it's pretty clear where she stands on this issue.

Now comes campaign season.

Bernie Sanders Goes After Hillary on TPP: ‘You Can’t Not Have a Position’
Sanders Hits Hillary on TPP You Can t Not Have a Position Mediaite
Seriously? If this isn't a Frank Underwood move, I don't know what is. Watching Bernie, it's clear he isn't really serious about a run at the oval office. HE KNOWS what her position is. Only idiots and dupes don't what it is. The whole CFR media knows. They also know that the American voter has the attention span of a Tasmanian gnat. That is why it is SO IMPORTANT that Hillary decides which emails go public, and which remain private. Bright sunshine can't be shown onto the public business that she was conducting. No evidence can be given by the independent media, or anyone else about what she was up to.

This was not a Democrat policy, it was GLOBALIST policy. It is why the Republicans were allowed to re-take the Senate. Because the Democrats couldn't be counted on to vote for the TPP. Republicans can always be counted on to destroy small businesses and American industry in favor of the globalist trade deals.

Hillary has no control over the copies of the emails on the government servers that she sent and received.

He he ha ha he he ha haw haw haw

HE HAW HE HAW HE HAW HE HAW.......