New York Morons Allow Muslim To Be a Judge

[paperview]

Once again, no they don't.

Correct. Liberals have no concept or respect for the Supremacy Clause (Article 6, Section 2) which bans Islam, and all other supremacisms, as well.

Wow.

You really are retarded.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

There you have it. In their own words. Muslims looking to have court benches filled with ragheads bringing the illegal Koran into our justice system, and banning the Bible.

I didn't know that the Quran was an illegal book?

If that's the case, the local Barnes&Noble sells them and needs to be raided by the police. .......

Not illegal but complete bull.

 

[mdk]

If she is a fair and impartial jurist, who cares? Either way, get over it, b/c you can't really do anything about it except whine on message boards.

 

[Syriusly]

Protectionist sooooo believes in the Constitution- that he wants a religious test to be applied by the government- thereby pissing on the Constitution

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

You are a bad poster. You put words in other posters mouths. I never said one word about any religious test, or anything pertaining to the subject of religion.

Why yes you did

Not only have the ultra-libbies in la la land New York City allowed a Muslim woman to be a judge, but incredibly they swore her in on a Koran.

 

[protectionist]

I didn't know that the Quran was an illegal book?

If that's the case, the local Barnes&Noble sells them and needs to be raided by the police. .......

1. Now you know. US CONSTITUTION (Article 6, section 2) + US Codes 2384 & 2385 + numerous suras of the Koran that advocate (if not command) the violation of US laws (ex. Murder, theft, wife-beating, sex discrimination, pedophilia, slavery, animal cruelty, torture, mutilation, religious discrimianation, etc)

2. Yes, the Koran should be removed from all bookstores, schools, libraries, etc. Of course.

 

[Syriusly]

Yeah- because the 2 million Muslims in America are all out there burning down buildings and blowing up bridges and spraying graffitti on your mobile home......

1. I said nothing about "burning down buildings and blowing up bridges" - YOU said that. What's the matter ? You have terrorism on your mind ? Why might that be ??

You: Muslims having the clear goal of destroying American civilization

Since American Muslims are not burning down buildings and blowing up bridges- why are they not 'destorying American civilization' as you claim is their goal?

 

[Syriusly]

[
2. Yes, the Koran should be removed from all bookstores, schools, libraries, etc. Of course.

Because Protectionist believes the Bill of Rights is something he can piss on when it is inconvenient to his prejudices.

 

[protectionist]

If she is a fair and impartial jurist, who cares? Either way, get over it, b/c you can't really do anything about it except whine on message boards.

Oh that is entirely false. Citizens can have judges removed, and do so all the time, and for reasons a lot less serious than this. And since she wears a hijab, was sworn in on a Koran, and has banned the Bible from the courtroom, sh has already clearly displayed that she is not "fair and impartial"

 

[protectionist]

Why yes you did

Not only have the ultra-libbies in la la land New York City allowed a Muslim woman to be a judge, but incredibly they swore her in on a Koran.

That has nothing to do with religion. The Koran is not a religious book, and being a Muslim has nothing to do with religion.

And if Islam was a religion, it still wouldn't matter. Religions are not exempt from the Constitution's Supremacy Clause. NOTHING is.

 

[protectionist]

You: Muslims having the clear goal of destroying American civilization

Since American Muslims are not burning down buildings and blowing up bridges- why are they not 'destorying American civilization' as you claim is their goal?

I don't claim destroying America (and all western civilization) is their goal. THEY DO >>

"The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood in North America] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."

Mohamed Akram, "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" May 22, 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, United States vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al. 7 (21).

 

[mdk]

If she is a fair and impartial jurist, who cares? Either way, get over it, b/c you can't really do anything about it except whine on message boards.

Oh that is entirely false. Citizens can have judges removed, and do so all the time, and for reasons a lot less serious than this. And since she wears a hijab, was sworn in on a Koran, and has banned the Bible from the courtroom, sh has already clearly displayed that she is not "fair and impartial"

Irrational butthurt isn't grounds for removing a duly elected official of the court. You are going to have to do a lot better than icky Muslim.

 

[protectionist]

[
2. Yes, the Koran should be removed from all bookstores, schools, libraries, etc. Of course.

Because Protectionist believes the Bill of Rights is something he can piss on when it is inconvenient to his prejudices.

Because Syriusly believes the Supremacy Clause, and Chapter 115 of US Code 18 is something he can piss on when it is inconvenient to his prejudices

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Not only have the ultra-libbies in la la land New York City allowed a Muslim woman to be a judge, but incredibly they swore her in on a Koran.

Why wouldn't they?

 

[protectionist]

You: Muslims having the clear goal of destroying American civilization

Since American Muslims are not burning down buildings and blowing up bridges- why are they not 'destorying American civilization' as you claim is their goal?

And Muslims HAVE BEEN destroying American civilization, for years now, in hundreds of instances. You simply are UNAWARE of all this Islamization, because you get your information from liberal sources, who routinely OMIT Islamization, and don't report it. In order to know about Islamization, you hav eto go to conservative sources, and you don't right ? Have you read these books ? >>

The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America ---- by Andrew McCarthy

American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us ----- by Steven Emerson

Because They Hate ---- by Brigitte Gabriel

They Must Be Stopped ------ by Brigitte Gabriel

Hating America ------ by John Gibson

Stop the Islamization of America ----- by Pamela Geller

Secrets of the Kingdom: The Inside Story of the Secret Saudi-U.S. Connection------ by Gerald Posner

Stealth Jihad ----- by Robert Spencer

The Brotherhood: America's Next Great Enemy ------ by Erik Stakelbeck

Outrage ----- by Dick Morris & Eileen McGann

Infiltration ------ by Paul Sperry

The 9/11 Commission Report

The Truth About Muhammad ------ by Robert Spencer

In Mortal Danger ------- by Tom Tancredo

State of Emergency ----- by Pat Buchanan

Muslim Mafia ----- by P.David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry

 

[protectionist]

Irrational butthurt isn't grounds for removing a duly elected official of the court. You are going to have to do a lot better than icky Muslim.

Sounds like you don't know much about Islam. Try reading my posts in this thread. They explain it (with references)

 

[protectionist]

Why wouldn't they?

You also haven't been reading the thread. Read Baby! Read.

 

[protectionist]

Wow. You really are retarded.

Wow you are really ignorant. (when I have given you the information you need right here in this thread).

 

[protectionist]

Not illegal but complete bull.

It IS illegal (Constitution Article 6, Section 2 + Chapter 115 US Codes, Particularly 2384 & 2385.)

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." (Constitution, Article 6, Section 2)

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

 

[flacaltenn]

There you have it. In their own words. Muslims looking to have court benches filled with ragheads bringing the illegal Koran into our justice system, and banning the Bible.

I didn't know that the Quran was an illegal book?

If that's the case, the local Barnes&Noble sells them and needs to be raided by the police. .......

There are some versions of the Koran that maybe oughta be considered illegal.. Like the Wahabist English translations that the Saudis love to buy for us.. But no -- Koran is not illegal in a legal proceeding if there is a relevance to bringing it into the discussion..

 

[ABikerSailor]

Hey, people elected Keith Ellison to Congress, and he was sworn in on Thomas Jefferson's copy of the Koran.

Ellison Uses Thomas Jefferson's Quran