dudmuck
Diamond Member
Appears that Tim Scott explained it pretty well.So, how does that prove that Republicans hate black folks?Republicans generally get less than 10% of the black vote.
also, dont forget your history: Lee Atwater.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Appears that Tim Scott explained it pretty well.So, how does that prove that Republicans hate black folks?Republicans generally get less than 10% of the black vote.
Tim Scott, the black guy from the party of Lincoln in contrast to the party of the KKK?Appears that Tim Scott explained it pretty well.So, how does that prove that Republicans hate black folks?Republicans generally get less than 10% of the black vote.
also, dont forget your history: Lee Atwater.
New Quinnipiac poll: 90% of African Americans disprove of Trump. 8% approve
Wow, how weird, go figure.
.
A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.Wow, how weird, go figure.
.
I guess after 16 freaking years, he figured, that he position on it was established and that only a dick would ask the question again.
Nothing in that, that should turn off any African American.
Thats why i mentioned Lee Atwater, because so many forgot the southern strategy / Strom Thurmond period.Tim Scott, the black guy from the party of Lincoln in contrast to the party of the KKK?Appears that Tim Scott explained it pretty well.So, how does that prove that Republicans hate black folks?Republicans generally get less than 10% of the black vote.
also, dont forget your history: Lee Atwater.
A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.Wow, how weird, go figure.
.
I guess after 16 freaking years, he figured, that he position on it was established and that only a dick would ask the question again.
Nothing in that, that should turn off any African American.
Yes, that is going to anger a lot of black people, for very good reason. You may not understand why, but you don't have to.
.
Why couldn't he have just said the same thing he had said before?A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.Wow, how weird, go figure.
.
I guess after 16 freaking years, he figured, that he position on it was established and that only a dick would ask the question again.
Nothing in that, that should turn off any African American.
Yes, that is going to anger a lot of black people, for very good reason. You may not understand why, but you don't have to.
.
The proper response to being asked about David Duke, is to punch the interviewer in the face.
That will send the right message I think.
Why couldn't he have just said the same thing he had said before?A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.Wow, how weird, go figure.
.
I guess after 16 freaking years, he figured, that he position on it was established and that only a dick would ask the question again.
Nothing in that, that should turn off any African American.
Yes, that is going to anger a lot of black people, for very good reason. You may not understand why, but you don't have to.
.
The proper response to being asked about David Duke, is to punch the interviewer in the face.
That will send the right message I think.
Why did he choose to clumsily and dishonestly dance around the question?
Those are fair questions, and he sent a clear message.
.
Well, I'd never punch someone in the face unless they were literally physically attacking a member of my family.Why couldn't he have just said the same thing he had said before?A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.Wow, how weird, go figure.
.
I guess after 16 freaking years, he figured, that he position on it was established and that only a dick would ask the question again.
Nothing in that, that should turn off any African American.
Yes, that is going to anger a lot of black people, for very good reason. You may not understand why, but you don't have to.
.
The proper response to being asked about David Duke, is to punch the interviewer in the face.
That will send the right message I think.
Why did he choose to clumsily and dishonestly dance around the question?
Those are fair questions, and he sent a clear message.
.
How many times would you have to be asked if you were a racist, or supported racism, before you were ready to punch the next one that asked you, in the face?
you know? nope, no fking way.I know....right?#walkaway?
Well, I'd never punch someone in the face unless they were literally physically attacking a member of my family.Why couldn't he have just said the same thing he had said before?A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.I guess after 16 freaking years, he figured, that he position on it was established and that only a dick would ask the question again.
Nothing in that, that should turn off any African American.
Yes, that is going to anger a lot of black people, for very good reason. You may not understand why, but you don't have to.
.
The proper response to being asked about David Duke, is to punch the interviewer in the face.
That will send the right message I think.
Why did he choose to clumsily and dishonestly dance around the question?
Those are fair questions, and he sent a clear message.
.
How many times would you have to be asked if you were a racist, or supported racism, before you were ready to punch the next one that asked you, in the face?
He was running for President. He chose to dodge and lie. That's up to him.
I'm just saying he earned the distrust of minorities, from the perspective of the minorities.
.
What a bunch of horse shit.Appears that Tim Scott explained it pretty well.
My history?also, dont forget your history: Lee Atwater.
PARTY IDENTIFICATIONRemember that made up "Blexit" meme?
Since it’s invention on Twitter and conservative message boards (amplified by Russian trolls) Democrats took over the House and Trump’s approval among black registered voters continues to be super horrible.
See demographic breakdown:
QU Poll Release Detail
Okay, well, until then there won't be much trust.Well, I'd never punch someone in the face unless they were literally physically attacking a member of my family.Why couldn't he have just said the same thing he had said before?A guy knows a KKK leader one day, and knows exactly what he is. Then later he's asked and he claims to not know at all.
Yes, that is going to anger a lot of black people, for very good reason. You may not understand why, but you don't have to.
.
The proper response to being asked about David Duke, is to punch the interviewer in the face.
That will send the right message I think.
Why did he choose to clumsily and dishonestly dance around the question?
Those are fair questions, and he sent a clear message.
.
How many times would you have to be asked if you were a racist, or supported racism, before you were ready to punch the next one that asked you, in the face?
He was running for President. He chose to dodge and lie. That's up to him.
I'm just saying he earned the distrust of minorities, from the perspective of the minorities.
.
Every time that question is asked of a republican, it is a propaganda ploy, serving not to really ask the question, but to support the vile lie, that the question is valid to ask of republicans.
ANY answer allows the propaganda to continue.
A punch is the face is what we need to try next.
Of course minorities distrust Republicans. For generations they have been bombarded with vile propaganda like that.
We cons need to get real about the power of such vile assholes and get very serious about how we fight back.
Okay, well, until then there won't be much trust.Well, I'd never punch someone in the face unless they were literally physically attacking a member of my family.Why couldn't he have just said the same thing he had said before?The proper response to being asked about David Duke, is to punch the interviewer in the face.
That will send the right message I think.
Why did he choose to clumsily and dishonestly dance around the question?
Those are fair questions, and he sent a clear message.
.
How many times would you have to be asked if you were a racist, or supported racism, before you were ready to punch the next one that asked you, in the face?
He was running for President. He chose to dodge and lie. That's up to him.
I'm just saying he earned the distrust of minorities, from the perspective of the minorities.
.
Every time that question is asked of a republican, it is a propaganda ploy, serving not to really ask the question, but to support the vile lie, that the question is valid to ask of republicans.
ANY answer allows the propaganda to continue.
A punch is the face is what we need to try next.
Of course minorities distrust Republicans. For generations they have been bombarded with vile propaganda like that.
We cons need to get real about the power of such vile assholes and get very serious about how we fight back.
You may want to start by marginalizing people who claim not to know who David Duke is, after admitting he knew before.
.