Oh shit, this would be better than Jpjo could ever be!!!
------------
Hotair ^ | 121/09/2019
Caveat: These arenāt the numbers you get when you airdrop Clinton into the race and no one else. This is what the race looked like when Harvard-Harris added Clinton and Mike Bloomberg and John Kerry(?!) to the mix.
If you thought the Democratic top tier was lily-white now, imagine those three being stirred into the pot. Blinding white, one might call it.
I mean, the whiteness of Hillary and Kerry alone is so bright that you can scarcely find it elsewhere in nature.
Anyway, the interesting result here is the fact her entry wouldnāt collapse Joe Bidenās numbers while leaving Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren unscathed. Thatās what I would have expected, but nope.
Harvard-Harris, top 5 current 2020 field among Democratic voters:
Biden 29
Sanders 16
Warren 13
Buttigieg 8
Bloomberg 7
If Hillary Clinton and John Kerry get in race?
Clinton 21
Biden 20
Sanders 12
Warren 9
Buttigieg & Kerry 5https://t.co/KiEbT2ik7Z
ā Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) December 9, 2019
Biden takes the worst hit, as youād assume, since he and Hillary would compete for center-left and black voters. But Sanders slips out of the teens and Warren falls out of double digits. Who are those voters? Which Bernie fan is sitting around like āTime to right the mistake of 2016 ā unless I can vote for Clinton againā?
Dick Morris thinks she really is thinking about it:
āBiden and Warren were blocking the lanes Hillary needs to run in in order to get nominated. Warren, because sheās a woman, and now with Kamala Harris out of the race, and Warren having slipped, that road may be open. Hillary may be able to say, āvote for me, because Iām the only chance we have to elect a woman president.'āā¦
āAnd the lane that Biden was occupying is the lane that people would say, āWell, letās at least join somebody thatās shown they can beat Donald Trump ā thatās shown they have the ability to win a national election like Biden did,ā Morris told host John Catsimatidis.
āHillary will basically say, āI have that capacity. I got more votes than Donald Trump did last time. I know I can beat this guy. People should vote for me because Iām the only proven warrior out there that can tackle him.'ā
āIām the only one who can beat this guyā would be a ballsy assertion coming from someone who might well have been the only Democrat with a national profile capable of losing to someone as unpopular as Trump was in 2016. Her special cocktail of blandness, scandal, and mushy establishmentarianism gave him jussssst enough lesser-of-two-evils juice to make magic in the battleground states.
What Morris says about Clintonās potential gender pitch is interesting, though. The freefall decline in the polls of one of the two most prominent women running this year, Kamala Harris, was masked in a way by the fact that Warren soared in polling over the same period. Because of that surge, no one at the time could credibly claim that Dem voters werenāt giving women candidates a fair chance this year the way critics are now claiming that they havenāt given black candidates a fair chance per Harrisās and Cory Bookerās poor showings. But now that Warren has lost nearly half her share of the national primary vote since October and has slipped to third in Iowa and New Hampshire, weāre poised for a full-fledged media freakout if she slips further.
Can you imagine the angry takes if the new year begins with a clear-cut top three of white dudes Biden, Bernie, and Buttigieg? The press might demand a Hillary reprise purely as a nod to diversity. Progressives might even endorse it for tactical reasons, believing that sheād bleed votes mainly from Grandpa Joe and Mayor Pete, clearing a path for Sanders.
The DNC would have a collective panic attack for the same reason, especially since Clinton would be too late to qualify for the ballot in some primaries. One scenario is that sheād divide the centrist vote and inadvertently help Sanders sweep to the nomination; a second scenario is that sheād win just enough of the vote to cause a stalemate with Biden or Buttigieg and Sanders, ensuring a nightmarish brokered convention. Iām not sure which scenario is worse from the DNCās perspective. (Presumably the first one.) Letās try it and see.
Hereās Bernie discussing the coming match-up with Hillary. Sorry, I mean the last match-up with Hillary.
Sen. Bernie Sanders responds to Hillaryās criticism of him: āIām sorry that Hillary Clinton is rerunning 2016ā¦ I worked as hard as humanly possible. We did dozens and dozens of rallies around this country.āpic.twitter.com/MFybZVT2lD
ā Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) December 9, 2019
------------
Hotair ^ | 121/09/2019
Caveat: These arenāt the numbers you get when you airdrop Clinton into the race and no one else. This is what the race looked like when Harvard-Harris added Clinton and Mike Bloomberg and John Kerry(?!) to the mix.
If you thought the Democratic top tier was lily-white now, imagine those three being stirred into the pot. Blinding white, one might call it.
I mean, the whiteness of Hillary and Kerry alone is so bright that you can scarcely find it elsewhere in nature.
Anyway, the interesting result here is the fact her entry wouldnāt collapse Joe Bidenās numbers while leaving Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren unscathed. Thatās what I would have expected, but nope.
Harvard-Harris, top 5 current 2020 field among Democratic voters:
Biden 29
Sanders 16
Warren 13
Buttigieg 8
Bloomberg 7
If Hillary Clinton and John Kerry get in race?
Clinton 21
Biden 20
Sanders 12
Warren 9
Buttigieg & Kerry 5https://t.co/KiEbT2ik7Z
ā Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) December 9, 2019
Biden takes the worst hit, as youād assume, since he and Hillary would compete for center-left and black voters. But Sanders slips out of the teens and Warren falls out of double digits. Who are those voters? Which Bernie fan is sitting around like āTime to right the mistake of 2016 ā unless I can vote for Clinton againā?
Dick Morris thinks she really is thinking about it:
āBiden and Warren were blocking the lanes Hillary needs to run in in order to get nominated. Warren, because sheās a woman, and now with Kamala Harris out of the race, and Warren having slipped, that road may be open. Hillary may be able to say, āvote for me, because Iām the only chance we have to elect a woman president.'āā¦
āAnd the lane that Biden was occupying is the lane that people would say, āWell, letās at least join somebody thatās shown they can beat Donald Trump ā thatās shown they have the ability to win a national election like Biden did,ā Morris told host John Catsimatidis.
āHillary will basically say, āI have that capacity. I got more votes than Donald Trump did last time. I know I can beat this guy. People should vote for me because Iām the only proven warrior out there that can tackle him.'ā
āIām the only one who can beat this guyā would be a ballsy assertion coming from someone who might well have been the only Democrat with a national profile capable of losing to someone as unpopular as Trump was in 2016. Her special cocktail of blandness, scandal, and mushy establishmentarianism gave him jussssst enough lesser-of-two-evils juice to make magic in the battleground states.
What Morris says about Clintonās potential gender pitch is interesting, though. The freefall decline in the polls of one of the two most prominent women running this year, Kamala Harris, was masked in a way by the fact that Warren soared in polling over the same period. Because of that surge, no one at the time could credibly claim that Dem voters werenāt giving women candidates a fair chance this year the way critics are now claiming that they havenāt given black candidates a fair chance per Harrisās and Cory Bookerās poor showings. But now that Warren has lost nearly half her share of the national primary vote since October and has slipped to third in Iowa and New Hampshire, weāre poised for a full-fledged media freakout if she slips further.
Can you imagine the angry takes if the new year begins with a clear-cut top three of white dudes Biden, Bernie, and Buttigieg? The press might demand a Hillary reprise purely as a nod to diversity. Progressives might even endorse it for tactical reasons, believing that sheād bleed votes mainly from Grandpa Joe and Mayor Pete, clearing a path for Sanders.
The DNC would have a collective panic attack for the same reason, especially since Clinton would be too late to qualify for the ballot in some primaries. One scenario is that sheād divide the centrist vote and inadvertently help Sanders sweep to the nomination; a second scenario is that sheād win just enough of the vote to cause a stalemate with Biden or Buttigieg and Sanders, ensuring a nightmarish brokered convention. Iām not sure which scenario is worse from the DNCās perspective. (Presumably the first one.) Letās try it and see.
Hereās Bernie discussing the coming match-up with Hillary. Sorry, I mean the last match-up with Hillary.
Sen. Bernie Sanders responds to Hillaryās criticism of him: āIām sorry that Hillary Clinton is rerunning 2016ā¦ I worked as hard as humanly possible. We did dozens and dozens of rallies around this country.āpic.twitter.com/MFybZVT2lD
ā Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) December 9, 2019
