- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,613
- 10,629
- 2,030
Social justice. Fair distribution of wealth and power. Redistribution taxes and public services.
So you now support social justice koshergrl? How Progressive of you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Social justice. Fair distribution of wealth and power. Redistribution taxes and public services.
That's cool.Social justice. Fair distribution of wealth and power. Redistribution taxes and public services.
Oh, so he's wrong when he identifies himself as such.
He can be socially liberal in his views, yet not politically active with those views you stupid troll.
Oh, so he's wrong when he identifies himself as such.
He can be socially liberal in his views, yet not politically active with those views you stupid troll.
Words mean something. If you flounce into a new forum with a few of your friends and you all announce you are socially liberal, and you're not, then you are irredeemably stupid.
If you state you're a social liberal, but not according to the accepted definition, you're some OTHER sort of social liberal that has NOTHING to do with the definition of social liberalism that is understood by the world...then you're using the same MO as social progressives everywhere...aka, lying about what your real agenda is, and changing the definitions of phrases and words as they apply to your political views...
So is he stupid, or a liar?
I think you should thank KG...now your post count is high enough to PM and post links, mostly due to her.Oh, so he's wrong when he identifies himself as such.
Once again, for me to say I am socially liberal does not equal "I am a social liberal"
Context....
Oh, so he's wrong when he identifies himself as such.
He can be socially liberal in his views, yet not politically active with those views you stupid troll.
Words mean something. If you flounce into a new forum with a few of your friends and you all announce you are socially liberal, and you're not, then you are irredeemably stupid.
If you state you're a social liberal, but not according to the accepted definition, you're some OTHER sort of social liberal that has NOTHING to do with the definition of social liberalism that is understood by the world...then you're using the same MO as social progressives everywhere...aka, lying about what your real agenda is, and changing the definitions of phrases and words as they apply to your political views...
So is he stupid, or a liar?
Oh, so he's wrong when he identifies himself as such.
He can be socially liberal in his views, yet not politically active with those views you stupid troll.
Words mean something. If you flounce into a new forum with a few of your friends and you all announce you are socially liberal, and you're not, then you are irredeemably stupid.
If you state you're a social liberal, but not according to the accepted definition, you're some OTHER sort of social liberal that has NOTHING to do with the definition of social liberalism that is understood by the world...then you're using the same MO as social progressives everywhere...aka, lying about what your real agenda is, and changing the definitions of phrases and words as they apply to your political views...
So is he stupid, or a liar?
He can be socially liberal in his views, yet not politically active with those views you stupid troll.
Words mean something. If you flounce into a new forum with a few of your friends and you all announce you are socially liberal, and you're not, then you are irredeemably stupid.
If you state you're a social liberal, but not according to the accepted definition, you're some OTHER sort of social liberal that has NOTHING to do with the definition of social liberalism that is understood by the world...then you're using the same MO as social progressives everywhere...aka, lying about what your real agenda is, and changing the definitions of phrases and words as they apply to your political views...
So is he stupid, or a liar?
Context means something too you nitwit. You can't seem to get it through your thick skull that I said I am "socially liberal", I explained what that means and yet you sit here and hold on to your term "social liberal" and it's rigid definition. I have explained multiple times that I do not believe in social justice or any of the other crap that comes with that term yet you will not let go.
So now I ask kindly, would you please go f*ck yourself?
I love it when people who are owned for stupidity proclaim the person who noted their ignorance is *stoopid*.
The person who started the thread to introduce themselves.....are they still around?? ~LoL~
The person who started the thread to introduce themselves.....are they still around?? ~LoL~
That's what I'm wondering. I'm gonna go track his ass down and make him come back and answer for this mess he started.
You identified yourself as a social liberal, you moron:
"The term "social liberalism" is often used interchangeably with "modern liberalism".
Social liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm sorry you're too stupid to effectively communicate your political stance on a political board, if indeed you are not just lying..
which is what I suspect. Particularly given your BFF on this board are shrieking, slobbering progressives.
You've made some mighty fine progressive friends, you call yourself socially liberal...
But you say you're not A social liberal, and that you apparently have a different set of definitions for a term that is universally recognized as "liberal", and which you applied to yourself.
Hmmmmm..
BTW, progressives (and anarchists) often clothe their ignorant asses in the title of "libertarian" as a way to divert attention from the fact that they're just anti-establishment eugenecist progressives who think they should be able to do whatever they want without ever being held accountable......
http://www.usmessageboard.com/#cite_note-richardson-8