New Evidence? Kent State shootings.

Discussion in 'US Law for Jabrones' started by CaféAuLait, Oct 10, 2010.

  1. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,035
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,612
    I think the conspiracy theorist would be the one hyping the Kent state ...terrorist theory...lol
     
  2. Gadawg73
    Offline

    Gadawg73 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    14,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,603
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +1,678
    Where is your evidence Allie.
    Anything, something, SOMEWHERE.
    I can hear the ice rumbling in your glass.
     
  3. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,664
    Arson in this case = terrorism, nitwit.
     
  4. Gadawg73
    Offline

    Gadawg73 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    14,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,603
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +1,678
    Which student was killed for arson Allie?
    You are a dumbass.
     
  5. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,664
    I never said a student was killed for arson, dip.

    I said acts of terrorism result in innocent people being killed.

    And like an idiot, you denied terrorism was involved.

    Moron.
     
  6. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,755
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,786
    Bullshit. 40 years later and "suddenly" the FBI produces statements.

    Let's get your lies straight. Throwing rocks and bottles is NOT unarmed. Most of those Guardsmen were the same age as those students, and trained every bit as well.

    The fact is, the Dean told those students to get the Hell off his campus -- the one HE was responsible for and in control of.

    You cannot justify the mob mentality of those students. Period. They just got lucky more weren't killed. They got off easy, IMO, considering they brought rocks and bottles to a gunfight.
     
  7. Gadawg73
    Offline

    Gadawg73 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    14,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,603
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +1,678
    Where have I justified the mob mentality of the students?
    Where did I state some of the students did not have rocks and bottles?
    So which is it there Moe? You speak out of both sides of your mouth. Is it the Dean's fault or the Guards' fault? And where did I state the Dean was not at fault?
    Your shot gun approach is exactly the same as the Dean, the Governor and the Guard used.
    All undisciplined and you are on board as well with that. I would have thought military men are disciplined.
    And identify which of the students killed and wounded had rocks and bottles.
    Talk about lies. Close the lid on the can you are holding.
    The ROTC student killed brought rocks and bottles to the gunfight?
    Prove that one. You know there is no evidence to prove that innocent ROTC student was not killed in cold blood. I thought you would overcome your ideological bias and have an open mind to the facts as a military man and support that ROTC student and his family.
    But I was wrong. Your ideology blinds your common sense.
     
  8. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,755
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,786
    I speak out of both sides, huh? Wrong. I said it's the students faults from Day One.

    And spare me the ideological bias blather. I don't have to prove nor disprove your pulling some wild-ass accusation out of your butt. YOU have to prove your accusation; which, you have failed to do in an exceptional manner.

    Let's just break this down to simple common sense and logic, just for you. I have a gun. You have a rock and/or bottle. Guess who gets shot. Nothing ideological about THAT. Simple math.

    Yet I'm supposed to stand there and let you brain me and not use what I have at my disposal as a means of self defense?

    Your entire argument just plain sucks.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Gadawg73
    Offline

    Gadawg73 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    14,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,603
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +1,678
    All you have is students with "rocks and bottles" against Guard with bayonets and automatic weapons.
    You are an insult to every ROTC college student in The United States of America.
    Shame on you as you are supposed to be a role model for them.
     
  10. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,755
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,786
    What evidence? Anyone with common sense and not some overly-dramatical sense of self and "their rights" -- which usually infringe on others' rights -- doesn't need a map to what happened.

    Students illegally occupying a campus after being told to disperse attacked Army Nat'l Guard troops. If I have a rifle and you start throwing bottles at me, I'm going to sooner or later shoot your ass.

    This just in: rocks and bottles hurt, so fuck you.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page