Discussion in 'US Law for Jabrones' started by CaféAuLait, Oct 10, 2010.
I think the conspiracy theorist would be the one hyping the Kent state ...terrorist theory...lol
Where is your evidence Allie.
Anything, something, SOMEWHERE.
I can hear the ice rumbling in your glass.
Arson in this case = terrorism, nitwit.
Which student was killed for arson Allie?
You are a dumbass.
I never said a student was killed for arson, dip.
I said acts of terrorism result in innocent people being killed.
And like an idiot, you denied terrorism was involved.
Bullshit. 40 years later and "suddenly" the FBI produces statements.
Let's get your lies straight. Throwing rocks and bottles is NOT unarmed. Most of those Guardsmen were the same age as those students, and trained every bit as well.
The fact is, the Dean told those students to get the Hell off his campus -- the one HE was responsible for and in control of.
You cannot justify the mob mentality of those students. Period. They just got lucky more weren't killed. They got off easy, IMO, considering they brought rocks and bottles to a gunfight.
Where have I justified the mob mentality of the students?
Where did I state some of the students did not have rocks and bottles?
So which is it there Moe? You speak out of both sides of your mouth. Is it the Dean's fault or the Guards' fault? And where did I state the Dean was not at fault?
Your shot gun approach is exactly the same as the Dean, the Governor and the Guard used.
All undisciplined and you are on board as well with that. I would have thought military men are disciplined.
And identify which of the students killed and wounded had rocks and bottles.
Talk about lies. Close the lid on the can you are holding.
The ROTC student killed brought rocks and bottles to the gunfight?
Prove that one. You know there is no evidence to prove that innocent ROTC student was not killed in cold blood. I thought you would overcome your ideological bias and have an open mind to the facts as a military man and support that ROTC student and his family.
But I was wrong. Your ideology blinds your common sense.
I speak out of both sides, huh? Wrong. I said it's the students faults from Day One.
And spare me the ideological bias blather. I don't have to prove nor disprove your pulling some wild-ass accusation out of your butt. YOU have to prove your accusation; which, you have failed to do in an exceptional manner.
Let's just break this down to simple common sense and logic, just for you. I have a gun. You have a rock and/or bottle. Guess who gets shot. Nothing ideological about THAT. Simple math.
Yet I'm supposed to stand there and let you brain me and not use what I have at my disposal as a means of self defense?
Your entire argument just plain sucks.
All you have is students with "rocks and bottles" against Guard with bayonets and automatic weapons.
You are an insult to every ROTC college student in The United States of America.
Shame on you as you are supposed to be a role model for them.
What evidence? Anyone with common sense and not some overly-dramatical sense of self and "their rights" -- which usually infringe on others' rights -- doesn't need a map to what happened.
Students illegally occupying a campus after being told to disperse attacked Army Nat'l Guard troops. If I have a rifle and you start throwing bottles at me, I'm going to sooner or later shoot your ass.
This just in: rocks and bottles hurt, so fuck you.
Separate names with a comma.