New Army Manual Warns US Soldiers Not to Insult Taliban or Speak Ill of Ped*philia

[Wehrwolfen]

New Army Manual Warns US Soldiers Not to Insult Taliban or Speak Ill of Ped*philia​

by Jim Hoft
December 14, 2012


It’s an Obama World.
A proposed new Army handbook for Americans serving in Afghanistan warns them not to speak ill about the Taliban or speak out against ped*philia.

Army 'political correctness' gone too far? | Fox News Video​

Jewish World Review reported:


Barack Obama says he’s a Christian. Good for him (and for the Gospel). But rarely has a Christian paid such obeisance to another faith and ideology. The president’s bow and scrape to Islam knows no end. That’s not so good.

The U.S. Army is soon to issue a handbook instructing soldiers to copy Mr. Obama’s example of when and how to defer to an alien ideology that stands against everything Americans are taught, whether by faith, ethics, morals or another code of good conduct.

The new manual, which runs to 75 pages, orders American military personnel to refrain from saying anything to offend the Taliban in Afghanistan, to be careful not to criticize the practice of sexual relations with children, the abuse of women, beheadings, massacres of girls and the killing of “unbelievers” and Muslims who Taliban enforcers regard as insufficiently devout in the faith. Holding to what they have been taught, whether at Sunday school or a mother’s knee, is presumably OK for American soldiers, at least for now. But they must keep such ideas to themselves.

The manual, issued in the name of the U.S. Government, obviously at the command of the commander in chief, suggests that Western ignorance and arrogance and not the Taliban are responsible for the surge in deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the soldiers of the allied coalition.

U.S. troops should prepare for “psychologically challenging conditions” inAfghanistan, and be prepared for “stressors” that some American soldiers have remarked from previous deployments, such as finding Afghan security forces “profoundly dishonest and [having] no personal integrity,” and “gutless in combat,” and “ignorant and basically stupid.”



Read more:
Wesley Pruden: Another low bow to radical Islam

 

[g5000]

Wow. That post just drips with objectivity!

.

 

[Oldguy]

Learn to use the search function. Already debunked.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/military/267568-gettin-pussy-in-the-military.html

 

[g5000]

This is an old story.

2009: New Army Handbook Teaches Afghanistan Lessons

More than a year has passed since an Afghan police commander turned on coalition forces and helped insurgents carry out a surprise attack that killed nine Americans, wounded more than 30 United States and Afghan troops and nearly resulted in the loss of an allied outpost in one of the deadliest engagements of the war.

Within days of the attack, Army historians and tactical analysts arrived in eastern Afghanistan to review the debacle near Wanat, interviewing soldiers who survived the intense battle, in which outnumbered Americans exchanged gunfire for more than four hours with insurgents, often at distances closer than 50 feet.

Now, that effort to harvest lessons from the firefight of July 13, 2008, has contributed to a new battlefield manual that will be delivered over coming days to Army units joining the fight in Afghanistan with the troop increase ordered by President Obama.

The handbook, “Small-Unit Operations in Afghanistan,” strikes a tone of respect for the Taliban and other insurgent groups, which are acknowledged to be extremely experienced fighters; even more, American soldiers are warned that the insurgents rapidly adapt to shifts in tactics.

In page after page, the handbook draws on lessons from Wanat and other missions, some successful and some that resulted in death and injury for American and allied forces. The manual can be read as an effort to push the nuances of the complex counterinsurgency fight now under way in Afghanistan down from the generals and colonels to newly minted privates as well as to the sergeants and junior officers who lead small units into combat.

Copies of the 123-page handbook, produced by the Center for Army Lessons Learned, are being distributed throughout the service and are available to NATO allies and other nations with troops in Afghanistan. A copy was provided in advance to The New York Times by an official involved in the distribution, who said consideration was being given to a broader public release.

.

 

[g5000]

New Army Manual Warns US Soldiers Not to Insult Taliban or Speak Ill of Ped*philia​

by Jim Hoft
December 14, 2012


It’s an Obama World.
A proposed new Army handbook for Americans serving in Afghanistan warns them not to speak ill about the Taliban or speak out against ped*philia.

Army 'political correctness' gone too far? | Fox News Video​

Jewish World Review reported:


Barack Obama says he’s a Christian. Good for him (and for the Gospel). But rarely has a Christian paid such obeisance to another faith and ideology. The president’s bow and scrape to Islam knows no end. That’s not so good.

The U.S. Army is soon to issue a handbook instructing soldiers to copy Mr. Obama’s example of when and how to defer to an alien ideology that stands against everything Americans are taught, whether by faith, ethics, morals or another code of good conduct.

The new manual, which runs to 75 pages, orders American military personnel to refrain from saying anything to offend the Taliban in Afghanistan, to be careful not to criticize the practice of sexual relations with children, the abuse of women, beheadings, massacres of girls and the killing of “unbelievers” and Muslims who Taliban enforcers regard as insufficiently devout in the faith. Holding to what they have been taught, whether at Sunday school or a mother’s knee, is presumably OK for American soldiers, at least for now. But they must keep such ideas to themselves.

The manual, issued in the name of the U.S. Government, obviously at the command of the commander in chief, suggests that Western ignorance and arrogance and not the Taliban are responsible for the surge in deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the soldiers of the allied coalition.

U.S. troops should prepare for “psychologically challenging conditions” inAfghanistan, and be prepared for “stressors” that some American soldiers have remarked from previous deployments, such as finding Afghan security forces “profoundly dishonest and [having] no personal integrity,” and “gutless in combat,” and “ignorant and basically stupid.”



Read more:
Wesley Pruden: Another low bow to radical Islam

"The manual, issued in the name of the U.S. Government, obviously at the command of the commander in chief..."

The manual was created as a direct result of an attack in July 2008. So that would be Bush.

.

 

[High_Gravity]

Shoot at them, just don't say mean things about them.

 

[g5000]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/world/asia/13military.html

“Every soldier or leader involved in command post operations is one less soldier or leader available to send on patrol, provide security, or staff a quick-reaction force,” the handbook says. One lesson of Wanat was that the primitive forward firebase was understaffed.

The handbook’s publication days after the first anniversary of the Wanat battle was first noted by a blog operated by the Combined Arms Center, the Army’s headquarters for advanced learning and leader development at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

The blogger, Frontier 6, said the handbook drew together lessons of successes in Afghanistan, as well as what has been gleaned from operations when Americans left the battlefield badly bloodied.

That blogger was Lieutenant General William Caldwell, and the article was “Learning from the Sacrifice of Others”. The link in the article no longer works.

.

 

[g5000]

Shoot at them, just don't say mean things about them.

What I object to is the incredibly shoddy hack "journalism" of the Opening Post. These dickwads manufactured complete and total bullshit, and then attempted to fling it at Obama to see if it would stick.

For some mindless drones like Wehrwolfen, it does. He makes a meal of this kind of shit several times a day, and asks for more.

The manual was created within the army as a result of a July 2008 attack. That the shit meisters tossed in the casual "obviously at the command of the commander in chief" Barack Obama demonstrates the abject indigence of their integrity.

This manual was created by the Army in an effort to prevent further such incidents like the July 2008 attack. It was initiated in 2008, and therefore not by Obama.

Fucking, fucking, fucking assholes.

And notice how conveniently these dipshits forget the alacrity with which George W. Bush made a point of making public appearances with Muslims immediately after 9/11.

.