Netanyahu's Crocodile Tears...

Hi, and welcome. Don't mind the fruit-loops calling you names, it happened to me when I joined; all part of the "hazing" you get from the Hasbarists and paid shills; they're paid to do it to discourage free-thinkers from contributing anything negative against the "Zionist paradise" in Palestine. :)

Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES
 
Anyone who defends an entity like Israhell is brainwashed by the media, Nutty is a fraud, a fake jew and an imposter. Wake up!

Hi, and welcome. Don't mind the fruit-loops calling you names, it happened to me when I joined; all part of the "hazing" you get from the Hasbarists and paid shills; they're paid to do it to discourage free-thinkers from contributing anything negative against the "Zionist paradise" in Palestine. :)

Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

Here's an example of a paid shill; just writes what his/her controllers tell him to write.




And here is an example of an unpaid brainwashed ISLAMONAZI STOOGE just repeats what his imam/cleric tells him to repeat.

In your dreams, perhaps. In reality just a normal and rational Humanist who has discovered that Zionists have been telling lies for decades. I couldn't care less about Mohammed, or Islam, or any other religion for that matter. I care about underdogs, had the internet been around in the 1930's, I'd be the Pro-Jewish poster protesting the treatment of Europe's Jewish population, while Phoney would still be repeating whatever his paymaster at the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda told him to say.




nYep typical ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGE reply, deny the truth as long and as loudly as you can then attack the opponent with personal abuse. Are your instructions written down or are you told them ?
 
Hi, and welcome. Don't mind the fruit-loops calling you names, it happened to me when I joined; all part of the "hazing" you get from the Hasbarists and paid shills; they're paid to do it to discourage free-thinkers from contributing anything negative against the "Zionist paradise" in Palestine. :)

Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

Here's an example of a paid shill; just writes what his/her controllers tell him to write.




And here is an example of an unpaid brainwashed ISLAMONAZI STOOGE just repeats what his imam/cleric tells him to repeat.

In your dreams, perhaps. In reality just a normal and rational Humanist who has discovered that Zionists have been telling lies for decades. I couldn't care less about Mohammed, or Islam, or any other religion for that matter. I care about underdogs, had the internet been around in the 1930's, I'd be the Pro-Jewish poster protesting the treatment of Europe's Jewish population, while Phoney would still be repeating whatever his paymaster at the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda told him to say.




nYep typical ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGE reply, deny the truth as long and as loudly as you can then attack the opponent with personal abuse. Are your instructions written down or are you told them ?

LOL, You started it, I just responded to your lies.
 
Hi, and welcome. Don't mind the fruit-loops calling you names, it happened to me when I joined; all part of the "hazing" you get from the Hasbarists and paid shills; they're paid to do it to discourage free-thinkers from contributing anything negative against the "Zionist paradise" in Palestine. :)

Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

Here's an example of a paid shill; just writes what his/her controllers tell him to write.




And here is an example of an unpaid brainwashed ISLAMONAZI STOOGE just repeats what his imam/cleric tells him to repeat.

In your dreams, perhaps. In reality just a normal and rational Humanist who has discovered that Zionists have been telling lies for decades. I couldn't care less about Mohammed, or Islam, or any other religion for that matter. I care about underdogs, had the internet been around in the 1930's, I'd be the Pro-Jewish poster protesting the treatment of Europe's Jewish population, while Phoney would still be repeating whatever his paymaster at the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda told him to say.




nYep typical ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGE reply, deny the truth as long and as loudly as you can then attack the opponent with personal abuse. Are your instructions written down or are you told them ?

Opponent? Hardly, you'd have to think for yourself to get anywhere near that level, you're just a mouthpiece.
 
Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

Here's an example of a paid shill; just writes what his/her controllers tell him to write.




And here is an example of an unpaid brainwashed ISLAMONAZI STOOGE just repeats what his imam/cleric tells him to repeat.

In your dreams, perhaps. In reality just a normal and rational Humanist who has discovered that Zionists have been telling lies for decades. I couldn't care less about Mohammed, or Islam, or any other religion for that matter. I care about underdogs, had the internet been around in the 1930's, I'd be the Pro-Jewish poster protesting the treatment of Europe's Jewish population, while Phoney would still be repeating whatever his paymaster at the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda told him to say.




nYep typical ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGE reply, deny the truth as long and as loudly as you can then attack the opponent with personal abuse. Are your instructions written down or are you told them ?

LOL, You started it, I just responded to your lies.



What LIES, how about some evidence of these alleged LIES so that your friends on here can see that you are grasping at straws. Should not take much to disprove my posts if you are that certain of yourself. Or will you ignore this request because you have been caught on the back foot again
 
Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

Here's an example of a paid shill; just writes what his/her controllers tell him to write.




And here is an example of an unpaid brainwashed ISLAMONAZI STOOGE just repeats what his imam/cleric tells him to repeat.

In your dreams, perhaps. In reality just a normal and rational Humanist who has discovered that Zionists have been telling lies for decades. I couldn't care less about Mohammed, or Islam, or any other religion for that matter. I care about underdogs, had the internet been around in the 1930's, I'd be the Pro-Jewish poster protesting the treatment of Europe's Jewish population, while Phoney would still be repeating whatever his paymaster at the Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda told him to say.




nYep typical ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGE reply, deny the truth as long and as loudly as you can then attack the opponent with personal abuse. Are your instructions written down or are you told them ?

Opponent? Hardly, you'd have to think for yourself to get anywhere near that level, you're just a mouthpiece.





For myself and my beliefs, unlike you who is a brainwashed stooge for ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS
 
Hi, and welcome. Don't mind the fruit-loops calling you names, it happened to me when I joined; all part of the "hazing" you get from the Hasbarists and paid shills; they're paid to do it to discourage free-thinkers from contributing anything negative against the "Zionist paradise" in Palestine. :)

Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.
 
Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.
 
Hahaha poor deluded Pali Nazi is too stupid to see an obvious sock. What an incredibly dumb response you just gave . Free-thinker? Hahahahahaha !

Pro Palestinians are anything BUT free thinkers. They are delusional thinkers.

A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.

"Will be"? perhaps, I suppose just like "nut-job", "whacko", "tosser" and "Wrongagainrudee"
 
Last edited:
A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.

No, Islamophobe = someone who has been told what to think about Islam, and anything else for that matter, and is too afraid (-phobia) to think or find out for themselves.
 
A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.

"Will be"? perhaps, I suppose just like "nut-job", "whacko", "tosser" and "Wrongagainrudee"



No more like ISLAMIC PROPAGANDIST, BRAINWASHED, SEMI LITERATE to name but a few terms to describe muslims. Why even highly trained doctors have been seduced by the dark side of islam to kill innocent children in the name of allah.
 
No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.

No, Islamophobe = someone who has been told what to think about Islam, and anything else for that matter, and is too afraid (-phobia) to think or find out for themselves.




Did your imam tell you to say that. Strange how the term only came about when free thinkers from the west started looking at islam more closely. When they saw that it was founded of violence, murder, bloodlust, theft and world domination and had very close ties to NAZISM and FASCISM which were based on the Islamic concepts enshrined in the Pact of Omar and the dhimmi laws. The educated muslim leaders started to become agitated and concerned that the free thinkers would blow the lid on their power and control of the worlds largest religious army rendering them unprotected. This is were the arab spring came from initially, the input from the free thinkers showing that the teachings of islam given in the mosques were wrong. Even extremist muslims found that the beliefs they held and had been told were different to what the Koran actually says, and they have been questioning the clerics words.

That is why the ISLAMONAZIS coined the phrase islamophobia to try and instil a thought of mental health problems in those that speak out against islam. They are the ones with the phobia, afraid of losing their cushy lifestyle paid for by the blood and sweat of others.
 
No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.

No, Islamophobe = someone who has been told what to think about Islam, and anything else for that matter, and is too afraid (-phobia) to think or find out for themselves.




Did your imam tell you to say that. Strange how the term only came about when free thinkers from the west started looking at islam more closely. When they saw that it was founded of violence, murder, bloodlust, theft and world domination and had very close ties to NAZISM and FASCISM which were based on the Islamic concepts enshrined in the Pact of Omar and the dhimmi laws. The educated muslim leaders started to become agitated and concerned that the free thinkers would blow the lid on their power and control of the worlds largest religious army rendering them unprotected. This is were the arab spring came from initially, the input from the free thinkers showing that the teachings of islam given in the mosques were wrong. Even extremist muslims found that the beliefs they held and had been told were different to what the Koran actually says, and they have been questioning the clerics words.

That is why the ISLAMONAZIS coined the phrase islamophobia to try and instil a thought of mental health problems in those that speak out against islam. They are the ones with the phobia, afraid of losing their cushy lifestyle paid for by the blood and sweat of others.

No, they're called Conservatives or Republicans... or even Zionists
 
No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.

"Will be"? perhaps, I suppose just like "nut-job", "whacko", "tosser" and "Wrongagainrudee"



No more like ISLAMIC PROPAGANDIST, BRAINWASHED, SEMI LITERATE to name but a few terms to describe muslims. Why even highly trained doctors have been seduced by the dark side of islam to kill innocent children in the name of allah.

Ookaay...you know Star Wars was just a film series, right? :cuckoo::scared1:
 
No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.

No, Islamophobe = someone who has been told what to think about Islam, and anything else for that matter, and is too afraid (-phobia) to think or find out for themselves.




Did your imam tell you to say that. Strange how the term only came about when free thinkers from the west started looking at islam more closely. When they saw that it was founded of violence, murder, bloodlust, theft and world domination and had very close ties to NAZISM and FASCISM which were based on the Islamic concepts enshrined in the Pact of Omar and the dhimmi laws. The educated muslim leaders started to become agitated and concerned that the free thinkers would blow the lid on their power and control of the worlds largest religious army rendering them unprotected. This is were the arab spring came from initially, the input from the free thinkers showing that the teachings of islam given in the mosques were wrong. Even extremist muslims found that the beliefs they held and had been told were different to what the Koran actually says, and they have been questioning the clerics words.

That is why the ISLAMONAZIS coined the phrase islamophobia to try and instil a thought of mental health problems in those that speak out against islam. They are the ones with the phobia, afraid of losing their cushy lifestyle paid for by the blood and sweat of others.

No, they're called Conservatives or Republicans... or even Zionists




More evidence of your brainwashing and psychosis in regards to islam being always right. You do realise that before the incident at Medina that your prophet was a Zionist don't you.
 
No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.

"Will be"? perhaps, I suppose just like "nut-job", "whacko", "tosser" and "Wrongagainrudee"



No more like ISLAMIC PROPAGANDIST, BRAINWASHED, SEMI LITERATE to name but a few terms to describe muslims. Why even highly trained doctors have been seduced by the dark side of islam to kill innocent children in the name of allah.

Ookaay...you know Star Wars was just a film series, right? :cuckoo::scared1:




Yes and did you know that your prophet used the lowest of arab godlings to base his religion around, and that he was mentally deficient and suffered from a medical condition that caused him to hallucinate and hear voices ?
 
A free thinker who supports IslamoFacism. Now that's a doozy. :cool:

No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.

"Will be"? perhaps, I suppose just like "nut-job", "whacko", "tosser" and "Wrongagainrudee"

IslamoFacism is an accepted and understood term that is used by writers, historians, and others when describing the behavior of Islamists. Not my problem that the truth bothers you terrorist ass kissers.
 
No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.

No, Islamophobe = someone who has been told what to think about Islam, and anything else for that matter, and is too afraid (-phobia) to think or find out for themselves.

When Islamic savagery, barbarism and intolerance is an everyday headline across the world, people don't really need to be told anything about Islam that isn't already totally obvious. :clap2:
 
No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.




Like islamophobia then, a made up word by ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDISTS to demonise anyone that knew too much about islam and was spreading the word.


Never seen any criticism about the term ISLAMOFASCISM apart from ISLAMONAZI BRAINWASHED STOOGES

Islamophobe = someone who knows the truth about Islamism.

No, Islamophobe = someone who has been told what to think about Islam, and anything else for that matter, and is too afraid (-phobia) to think or find out for themselves.

When Islamic savagery, barbarism and intolerance is an everyday headline across the world, people don't really need to be told anything about Islam that isn't already totally obvious. :clap2:

So all Americans are genocidal torturers and war criminals then, by your logic?
 
No such thing as Islamo-Fascism.

No?

Islamofacism

The term Islamofascism is a neologism based on clerical fascism which draws an analogy between the ideological characteristics of specific Islamist movements and a broad range of European fascist movements of the early 20th century, neofascist movements, or totalitarianism.

analogy between Islamism and Fascism

Proponents of the term argue that there are similarities between historical fascism and Islam.

“ The most obvious points of comparison would be these: Both movements are based on a cult of murderous violence that exalts death and destruction and despises the life of the mind. ("Death to the intellect! Long live death!" as Gen. Francisco Franco's sidekick Millán Astray so pithily phrased it.) Both are hostile to modernity (except when it comes to the pursuit of weapons), and both are bitterly nostalgic for past empires and lost glories. Both are obsessed with real and imagined "humiliations" and thirsty for revenge. Both are chronically infected with the toxin of anti-Jewish paranoia (interestingly, also, with its milder cousin, anti-Freemason paranoia). Both are inclined to leader worship and to the exclusive stress on the power of one great book. Both have a strong commitment to sexual repression—especially to the repression of any sexual "deviance"—and to its counterparts the subordination of the female and contempt for the feminine. Both despise art and literature as symptoms of degeneracy and decadence; both burn books and destroy museums and treasures.”

American author and Richard Nixon speechwriter William Safire wrote that the term fulfills a need for a term to distinguish traditional Islam from terrorists: "Islamofascism may have legs: the compound defines those terrorists who profess a religious mission while embracing totalitarian methods and helps separate them from devout Muslims who want no part of terrorist means."Christopher Hitchens also publicly defended the term in Slate, noting along with the fact that he finds the comparison apt, that the names for other forms of religious fascism, like clerical fascism have a less contested existence.

Author Malise Ruthven, a Scottish writer and historian who focuses his work on religion and Islamic affairs, opposes redefining Islamism as `Islamofascism`, but also finds the resemblances between the two ideologies "compelling".

Michael Howard has defended the use of the term drawing parallels between Wahhabism and European Fascist ideology.

In an April 2010 article in The New Republic, historian Jeffrey Herf outlined the ideological linkage of Islamism with World War II Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda which was broadcast to Muslims throughout the Middle East:

The alliance between the Nazis and the Arab and Islamist collaborators in wartime Berlin was not simply one of convenience based on the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Rather, collaboration rested just as much on shared values, namely rejection of liberal democracy and, above all, hatred of the Jews and of Zionist aspirations. Though the meeting of hearts and minds in wartime Berlin was relatively short, it was an important chapter in the much longer history of political Islamism.

No. It's a made up word, a neologism; "...a newly coined term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been accepted into mainstream language." It was created by the political Zionist Right for propaganda purposes and is wildly inaccurate and much criticised as a term.

Lots of words didn't exist before, including Islamofacism and IslamoNazism. Now however, they clearly exist and will be accepted into the English langauge because of Muslim behavior, and the indisputable similarities between islamic behavior and Nazism and facism.

"Will be"? perhaps, I suppose just like "nut-job", "whacko", "tosser" and "Wrongagainrudee"

IslamoFacism is an accepted and understood term that is used by writers, historians, and others when describing the behavior of Islamists. Not my problem that the truth bothers you terrorist ass kissers.

Look at your Wiki article again, you missed out the critiques.
 

Forum List

Back
Top