Neo Nazis Are Wonderful People: Here is proof.

I'm not too big on Hitler supporters, but it's better than Gay Communist Jews..
Americans (who understand the Founders), divide "right" and "left" differently from the Europeans.

In America, the left are those who place government above the sovereignty of the individual.

The right believes the government only exists to serve the will of the individual without violating the basic rights of all of the citizens.

Nazis and communists are government worshipers. They are both on the left.

You are either a Statist, or an Individualist.

The Founders were Individualists.

I stand with the Founders.

The term Right Wing stems from Europe, though.

Most neo-Fascists (Like myself) believe Government must step into manage society for a Socially Conservative environment.
Because freedom, and Capitalist sell out to Liberalism.
Liberals believe that government must step in to manage society to stop people like you,

Yeah, and it works, because Republicans think it's a Liberty to allow people like you to step on everyone's toes.
If you think that the use of government to prevent fascists from trampling on the rights of other, to prevent anarchy from taking hold, to thwart social Darwinism is wrong , that is your problem
Social Darwinism is a great thing. Let the lame and lazy die.
 
Virginia teen shot girlfriend’s parents and self because they wouldn’t let their daughter date a neo-Nazi

I wonder if he said "Merry Christmas " before he pulled the trigger

A Reston, VA couple are dead and their daughter’s boyfriend is in critical condition after the teenager shot them both and then himself because they refused to let their daughter date a neo-Nazi.
The Washington Post said that Buckley Kuhn-Fricker, 43, and her husband Scott, 48, were shot dead in their daughter’s bedroom in the early morning hours of Friday, Dec. 22 and that the teen gunman turned the gun on himself, but survived.

Do any of you right wingers want to try to defend this? I mean, after all, how many of you blamed the victim after Charlottesville. How many of you defended Trump when he said there are fine people on both sides and that the Nazis had a permit to march when the counter protesters , allegedly did not!! Speak up! Let's hear from you scum bukettes


The Washington Post said that Buckley Kuhn-Fricker, 43, and her husband Scott, 48, were shot dead in their daughter’s bedroom in the early morning hours of Friday, Dec. 22 and that the teen gunman turned the gun on himself, but survived.

Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker’s mother Janet Kuhn told the Post that the family had deep misgivings about the boy their daughter was dating. Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker called the teen an “outspoken neo-Nazi” and friends and family say she had forced her daughter to break up with the boy in the days before the double murder.

“We can’t allow her to see someone associated with Nazis,” a friend who spoke on the condition of anonymity recalled Kuhn-Fricker saying. “We don’t associate with hate groups in our house.”

The two teens had been dating since June. The family became concerned when their daughter began to parrot pro-Nazi talking points like blaming Europe’s Jewish population for World War II.

Report Advertisement
Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker — a social justice activist who specialized in improving the lives of the elderly — saw messages on her daughter’s phone attributed to an online account believed to be operated by the teen boy, who the Post declined to name.

The concerned mom printed off copies of the messages, which “had retweeted missives praising Hitler, supporting Nazi book burnings, calling for ‘white revolution,’ making derogatory comments about Jews and featuring an illustration of a man hanging from a noose beneath a slur for gay people.”

She submitted the information to the principal of her daughter and the boy’s school and asked the boy’s mother to keep him away from her daughter.

Late Friday night, the Kuhn-Fricker’s were awakened by a noise in their daughter’s room. They found the boy there brandishing a gun. An angry confrontation reportedly ensued, wherein the boy murdered both adults and shot himself.

Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker’s final Facebook post, written when she believed she had permanently excised the disturbed teen from her family’s life, said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

The quote is commonly attributed to Irish philosopher and statesman Edmund Burke.

Read the full report here.

Watch video about this story, embedded below:




That you would think any of us would defend this is just a sign of how utterly and actively ignorant you are.
 
Are you trying to say the parents shouldn’t had been so bigoted?
That is just as stupid as stupid gets. The parents were bigoted? For trying to protect their daughter from a BIGOT??

So then you are saying the parents should be allowed to control their daughter and who she dates.
That is exactly what I'm saying. !! Parents have an obligation to protect their children from their bad judgement . You don't think so? I hope to the Goddess that you are not a parent and fear for you children if you are.

Yes I do believe parents have that right. That’s not what regressives usually stand for. They want girls to have whatever sex life they want, and abortion-on-demand as birth control.
That is just too FUCKING STUPID

I agree, it is fucking stupid. But that’s liberalism and feminism for you.
 
Do any of you right wingers want to try to defend this?
Nope. He's one of yours. A STATIST. A worshiper of GODvernment.
A fervent Trump supporter, like yourself
A fervent Trump supporter

fact, or opinion?
The neo-nazi movement was vital for Trump's emerging from the primaries and edging out Clinton in the general.


You are a filthy liar.
 
The neo-nazi movement was vital for Trump's emerging from the primaries and edging out Clinton in the general.


Yet, every time you discuss the Jewish state, your hatred for them just jumps off the page.

I guess if you are a progressive nazi and not a neo nazi, it's just all okey dokey, then, isn't it?
 
The neo-nazi movement was vital for Trump's emerging from the primaries and edging out Clinton in the general.


Yet, every time you discuss the Jewish state, your hatred for them just jumps off the page.

I guess if you are a progressive nazi and not a neo nazi, it's just all okey dokey, then, isn't it?
Well that's a lie so... :dunno:

:itsok:
 
Are you trying to say the parents shouldn’t had been so bigoted?
That is just as stupid as stupid gets. The parents were bigoted? For trying to protect their daughter from a BIGOT??

So then you are saying the parents should be allowed to control their daughter and who she dates.


I really don't think what the Mother Fricker did was out of line.

Ask yourself the same question in regards to the girl going out with an Islamist.
 
The neo-nazi movement was vital for Trump's emerging from the primaries and edging out Clinton in the general.


Yet, every time you discuss the Jewish state, your hatred for them just jumps off the page.

I guess if you are a progressive nazi and not a neo nazi, it's just all okey dokey, then, isn't it?
Well that's a lie so... :dunno:

:itsok:
You know damn well it's not a lie, moron.
It is, snowflake
itsok.gif
 
Well, at least they were not victims of a hate crime...white people cannot be victims of hate crimes.

Yes they can be.

Not according to Eric Holder and Barry Sotoro.

Pay attention and listen carefully. Holder is saying that attacking someone for what they say or the position that they take is not covered under the hate crime statute. That is different than attacking someone for who or what they are. And while the law is intended to protect minorities who historically have been victimized, if a white person, or a straight person, or a Christian were attacked, and the motive could be established as hate, I'm willing to be that they could be prosecuted as a hate crime. I don't know if you and Sessions are just being pig headed or playing a sick game. Read the damned law: Hate Crime Laws | CRT | Department of Justice
 
Last edited:
Well, at least they were not victims of a hate crime...white people cannot be victims of hate crimes.

Yes they can be.

Not according to Eric Holder and Barry Sotoro.

Pay attention and listen carefully. Holder is saying that attacking someone for what they say or the position that they take is not covered under the hate crime statute. That is different than attacking someone for who or what they are. And while the law is intended to protect minorities who historically have been victimized, if a white person, or a straight person, or a Christian were attacked, and the motive was hate, I'm willing to be that they could be prosecuted. I don't know if you and Sessions are just being pig headed or playing games.

He said “history” and “certain groups.” How dumb are you? Holder has flipped you to defend his racism.
 
Virginia teen shot girlfriend’s parents and self because they wouldn’t let their daughter date a neo-Nazi

I wonder if he said "Merry Christmas " before he pulled the trigger

A Reston, VA couple are dead and their daughter’s boyfriend is in critical condition after the teenager shot them both and then himself because they refused to let their daughter date a neo-Nazi.
The Washington Post said that Buckley Kuhn-Fricker, 43, and her husband Scott, 48, were shot dead in their daughter’s bedroom in the early morning hours of Friday, Dec. 22 and that the teen gunman turned the gun on himself, but survived.

Do any of you right wingers want to try to defend this? I mean, after all, how many of you blamed the victim after Charlottesville. How many of you defended Trump when he said there are fine people on both sides and that the Nazis had a permit to march when the counter protesters , allegedly did not!! Speak up! Let's hear from you scum bukettes


The Washington Post said that Buckley Kuhn-Fricker, 43, and her husband Scott, 48, were shot dead in their daughter’s bedroom in the early morning hours of Friday, Dec. 22 and that the teen gunman turned the gun on himself, but survived.

Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker’s mother Janet Kuhn told the Post that the family had deep misgivings about the boy their daughter was dating. Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker called the teen an “outspoken neo-Nazi” and friends and family say she had forced her daughter to break up with the boy in the days before the double murder.

“We can’t allow her to see someone associated with Nazis,” a friend who spoke on the condition of anonymity recalled Kuhn-Fricker saying. “We don’t associate with hate groups in our house.”

The two teens had been dating since June. The family became concerned when their daughter began to parrot pro-Nazi talking points like blaming Europe’s Jewish population for World War II.

Report Advertisement
Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker — a social justice activist who specialized in improving the lives of the elderly — saw messages on her daughter’s phone attributed to an online account believed to be operated by the teen boy, who the Post declined to name.

The concerned mom printed off copies of the messages, which “had retweeted missives praising Hitler, supporting Nazi book burnings, calling for ‘white revolution,’ making derogatory comments about Jews and featuring an illustration of a man hanging from a noose beneath a slur for gay people.”

She submitted the information to the principal of her daughter and the boy’s school and asked the boy’s mother to keep him away from her daughter.

Late Friday night, the Kuhn-Fricker’s were awakened by a noise in their daughter’s room. They found the boy there brandishing a gun. An angry confrontation reportedly ensued, wherein the boy murdered both adults and shot himself.

Mrs. Kuhn-Fricker’s final Facebook post, written when she believed she had permanently excised the disturbed teen from her family’s life, said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

The quote is commonly attributed to Irish philosopher and statesman Edmund Burke.

Read the full report here.

Watch video about this story, embedded below:
I wouldn't be happy if my child dated a far-left winger either.
 
Well, at least they were not victims of a hate crime...white people cannot be victims of hate crimes.

Yes they can be.

Not according to Eric Holder and Barry Sotoro.

Pay attention and listen carefully. Holder is saying that attacking someone for what they say or the position that they take is not covered under the hate crime statute. That is different than attacking someone for who or what they are. And while the law is intended to protect minorities who historically have been victimized, if a white person, or a straight person, or a Christian were attacked, and the motive could be established as hate, I'm willing to be that they could be prosecuted as a hate crime. I don't know if you and Sessions are just being pig headed or playing a sick game. Read the damned law: Hate Crime Laws | CRT | Department of Justice

Knockout game...Holder DoJ went after the white-on-black crime...but fuck the numerous whites attacked by blacks.
White man charged with 'knockout game' hate crime. Racial hypocrisy?
 
Well, at least they were not victims of a hate crime...white people cannot be victims of hate crimes.

Yes they can be.

Not according to Eric Holder and Barry Sotoro.

Pay attention and listen carefully. Holder is saying that attacking someone for what they say or the position that they take is not covered under the hate crime statute. That is different than attacking someone for who or what they are. And while the law is intended to protect minorities who historically have been victimized, if a white person, or a straight person, or a Christian were attacked, and the motive was hate, I'm willing to be that they could be prosecuted. I don't know if you and Sessions are just being pig headed or playing games.

He said “history” and “certain groups.” How dumb are you? Holder has flipped you to defend his racism.


Read the damned law!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well, at least they were not victims of a hate crime...white people cannot be victims of hate crimes.

Yes they can be.

Not according to Eric Holder and Barry Sotoro.

Pay attention and listen carefully. Holder is saying that attacking someone for what they say or the position that they take is not covered under the hate crime statute. That is different than attacking someone for who or what they are. And while the law is intended to protect minorities who historically have been victimized, if a white person, or a straight person, or a Christian were attacked, and the motive was hate, I'm willing to be that they could be prosecuted. I don't know if you and Sessions are just being pig headed or playing games.

He said “history” and “certain groups.” How dumb are you? Holder has flipped you to defend his racism.


Read the damned law!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Obama administration was racist. It did not apply the law the same. Now go back to tossing your black tops salad.
 

Forum List

Back
Top