Negative aspects of Sharia Law?

presonorek

Gold Member
Jun 7, 2015
7,528
1,148
140
Alabama
  1. I think we could benefit from being ruled by Muslims. Get rid of alcohol. Get rid of pornography. Get rid of shaving. No more daughters fighting with their mothers about wearing inappropriate clothes. No more gay rights nonsense being crammed down our throats. No more fighting over which imaginary magical sky daddy is best or whether imaginary sky daddies really exist or not. We could all be in agreement that Allah is the one true god and He actually does exist! Wouldn't that be refreshing to end that debate once and for all? The three wives for rich men actually makes sense. The rich men in our society always end up getting a mistress or two anyways. This will just be a little more straight forward. Then he would actually be obligated to care for all three of those women. A win-win-win-win for all 4 parties involved. For regular guys the family structure would remain static. Polygamy is permissible under Sharia law. It is not mandatory.
  1. There has to be some drawbacks to being ruled by Muslims. Pork chops are pretty good but so is baked chicken. I think I can sacrifice a pork chop in excchange for a superior nation. What do you guys think? There has to be some negative aspects to being ruled by Muslims. Can anybody think of any?
And before anybody mentions it, yes, I did think about it being bad just because. I just didn't think that was a good enough reason by itself.
 
  1. I think we could benefit from being ruled by Muslims. Get rid of alcohol. Get rid of pornography. Get rid of shaving. No more daughters fighting with their mothers about wearing inappropriate clothes. No more gay rights nonsense being crammed down our throats. No more fighting over which imaginary magical sky daddy is best or whether imaginary sky daddies really exist or not. We could all be in agreement that Allah is the one true god and He actually does exist! Wouldn't that be refreshing to end that debate once and for all? The three wives for rich men actually makes sense. The rich men in our society always end up getting a mistress or two anyways. This will just be a little more straight forward. Then he would actually be obligated to care for all three of those women. A win-win-win-win for all 4 parties involved. For regular guys the family structure would remain static. Polygamy is permissible under Sharia law. It is not mandatory.
  1. There has to be some drawbacks to being ruled by Muslims. Pork chops are pretty good but so is baked chicken. I think I can sacrifice a pork chop in excchange for a superior nation. What do you guys think? There has to be some negative aspects to being ruled by Muslims. Can anybody think of any?
And before anybody mentions it, yes, I did think about it being bad just because. I just didn't think that was a good enough reason by itself.

You might ask irosie91 about her take on Sharia law.
 
  1. I think we could benefit from being ruled by Muslims. Get rid of alcohol. Get rid of pornography. Get rid of shaving. No more daughters fighting with their mothers about wearing inappropriate clothes. No more gay rights nonsense being crammed down our throats. No more fighting over which imaginary magical sky daddy is best or whether imaginary sky daddies really exist or not. We could all be in agreement that Allah is the one true god and He actually does exist! Wouldn't that be refreshing to end that debate once and for all? The three wives for rich men actually makes sense. The rich men in our society always end up getting a mistress or two anyways. This will just be a little more straight forward. Then he would actually be obligated to care for all three of those women. A win-win-win-win for all 4 parties involved. For regular guys the family structure would remain static. Polygamy is permissible under Sharia law. It is not mandatory.
  1. There has to be some drawbacks to being ruled by Muslims. Pork chops are pretty good but so is baked chicken. I think I can sacrifice a pork chop in excchange for a superior nation. What do you guys think? There has to be some negative aspects to being ruled by Muslims. Can anybody think of any?
And before anybody mentions it, yes, I did think about it being bad just because. I just didn't think that was a good enough reason by itself.

You might ask irosie91 about her take on Sharia law.

Hey irosie91 , what is your take on Sharia Law?
 
Well as a non-believer infidel vasuderatorrent you would have to be slain (stoned, beheaded or one of those type deaths) according to sharia law. If death is acceptable to you go for it; perhaps you can get into say Pakistan or Afghanistan and try living it for awhile or just head on up to Detroit or Minnesota and see if you can join in one of their communities there to see how you'll get along.
 
Any religion running a country would be a bad idea.
 
Well as a non-believer infidel vasuderatorrent you would have to be slain (stoned, beheaded or one of those type deaths) according to sharia law. If death is acceptable to you go for it; perhaps you can get into say Pakistan or Afghanistan and try living it for awhile or just head on up to Detroit or Minnesota and see if you can join in one of their communities there to see how you'll get along.

I am not an idiot. I would of course "convert". wink wink
 
One advantage would be that everybody would know exactly what was in the religious book. Christians tend to ignore parts, or make shit up. You mention a verse in the Koran, and everybody would know if it is really there or not.
 
Well as a non-believer infidel vasuderatorrent you would have to be slain (stoned, beheaded or one of those type deaths) according to sharia law. If death is acceptable to you go for it; perhaps you can get into say Pakistan or Afghanistan and try living it for awhile or just head on up to Detroit or Minnesota and see if you can join in one of their communities there to see how you'll get along.

I am not an idiot. I would of course "convert". wink wink

so true------you have hit on the magic formula that so ENLARGED
THE UMMAH -----it is virtually impossible to survive without converting
to the filth
 
[converting
to the filth

Can you expound on why Islam is bad?

I am not one of the people that just blindly accepted that Hillary Clinton is a crook just because it is obvious to everyone. I needed more explanation than that and never got it.

I can't just accept that Islam is filth just because duh. Everybody knows it is bad. I actually need more description than that.
 
[converting
to the filth

Can you expound on why Islam is bad?

I am not one of the people that just blindly accepted that Hillary Clinton is a crook just because it is obvious to everyone. I needed more explanation than that and never got it.

I can't just accept that Islam is filth just because duh. Everybody knows it is bad. I actually need more description than that.

your topic is OVERLY BROAD------but for a hint-----look at post # 656. It is
a totalitarian ideology ----utterly and aggressively imperialistic and very interesting
------a FIX IT FOR ALL THE WORLD. and acts upon an invaded nation in the
same manner as other totalitarian ideologies ----control and genocide and historic
revisionism. Stalinist communism, Hitlerian Nazism. My very own hubby
was born a BONA FIDE DHIMMI. A dhimmi is a person in what muslims teach their kids is "respected" member of another monotheistic religion. "respected"
in the sense that if they remain subjugated to ISLAMIC RULE----they get to live---
sorta.-------as 10 th class residents. Those who refuse the dhimmi status----are simply KILLED. Islamic societies DEPEND on a dhimmi underclass in the same
way that Hindu society DEPENDED on its untouchable class. ----- (the system is
supposedly outlawed -----but the dhimmi thing is STILL ON THE SHARIAH BOOKS
and lauded as a marvelous example of Islamic "tolerance" ) The marvelous example of Islamic tolerance led to the most comprehensive genocides in
the history of all mankind first manifested in Arabia with the COMPREHENSIVE
genocide of Christians, Jews, Sabeans and Zoroastrians in that vile sewer---mediated by the EMULATABLE big shot---muhummad----the paragon of virtue
and all that is right in the teachings of islam. HOWEVER there are always survivors-----just as there are survivors of Stalin's genocide of the Kulaks and Adolf's genocide of the "untermenchen". Interestingly---the "untermenchen" did have a role in the Nazi model------just as dhimmis have a role in Islamic society.
My baby son-----was in the Navy several years ago. His ship docked at various
OIL EMIRATES----his comment "mom, if one day all the hindus in those countries
would sit down and go on strike, the muslim oil rich guys would starve to death within three days" To make it short----dhimmi is not a "protected" status---it is
an exploited and subjugated status-----in constant danger. In Islamic law---the outright murder of a dhimmi -----if prosecuted at all -----is satisfied by a small fine.
Rape of a dhimmi is, in practice-----almost entirely legal. For this status---dhimmis pay a poll tax called JIZYA. Hubby's parents were spirited out of the shariah shit hole -----at great danger as a response to the rape and murder of his grandmother---(whilst a young mother) and the potential enslavement of his mother
under the very interesting "DHIMMI ORPHAN LAW" (he father died when she was
about eleven years old making her the sex slave of the local imam pig.) In that country local rulers and even the king was called "imam". It remains a shariah adherent country------The 1971 genocide of east Pakistani hindus and the 1971
genocide of some 2 million Biafrans ---are examples of legal genocides in shariah law. Remember Daniel Pearl? His murderers were "sentenced to death"----but not by a shariah court---------because according to shariah law ----they are guilty of nothing---------do you want to know why?
 
----do you want to know why?

Of course I do.

oh---ok The murderer of Daniel Pearl was tried in a Special non shariah court---
more like a western court for REASON----The reason is that according to Shariah
Law a muslim cannot be executed for killing a jew (a jew can be executed for
touching a Koran) Remember the erstwhile president of Pakistan Musharraf?
He is responsible for so INSULTING ISLAM ---probably one of the reasons he was
forcibly deposed (lucky to be alive) There are fascinating details of that murder that in order to understand you must know something about Shariah law. The event was videotaped by the murderers for EXCELLENT reason------if a person REFUSES TO CONVERT TO ISLAM----killing him is not a crime in shariah law. unless he is underprotection by being a member of a community that has pledged
complete subjugation to islam and muslims and pays the poll tax JIZYA and does the multitude of things that "dhimmis" must do. Since Daniel Pearl did not
qualify as a dhimmi----his refusal to convert to islam and his statement on
Zionism made his murder LEGAL UNDER SHARIAH LAW. Bottom line---
in shariah----the murderers had every right to slit the man's throat----
ALLAHUAKBAAAAAR
Till today the execution has never happened-----the man is in jail (yeah right)
If he were to be executed, Pakistanis would riot over the INSULT TO ISLAM

Remember the COLE-----USS COLE ---terrorist attack thereon in a port of Yemen----the murderers spent a few weeks in Jail and then MAGICALLY
"escaped" Hubby was born in Yemen-----his community was subjected to
the pact of Omar. His mother lost her father to illness when she was ~~eleven.
That event left her "unprotected'" and subject to enslavement by the local
Chieftain (dhimmi orphan law) The one way to save her was to GET HER OUT.
A cousin had escaped to "Palestine" years before. He supplied the BAKSHEESH money to get her out----she was married which made it legal \
for her to travel with her father-in-law and little ~~ 16 year old husband.
The endeavor took years------Hubby was born in Aden seaport------people got bribed and the little group escaped (sadly the father-in-law died in the process)
What they had done was ILLEGAL in Shariah law. The story ends well----the little
couple had nine more kids that survived and grandchildren and greatgrand. children have been POPPING OUT incessantly. These insults to islam did not go
unnoticed. In 1947 the small Jewish Aden community was subjected to a muslim throat slitting fest. Hubby was already a "Palestinian" at that point. He is kinda the LAST OF THE PALESTINIANS------sometime in the 1960s-----some arabs in the land once called British Mandate Palestine DECIDED to call themselves "Palestinians" ----a really novel idea. For almost 2000 years THE ONLY people in the world called "Palestinians" were jews living in the land that
the romans had renamed "palestina" If I had the opportunity, I would ask RASHIDA TLAIB ---"btw---when did granny BECOME a 'palestinian' " ?
 
----do you want to know why?

Of course I do.

oh---ok The murderer of Daniel Pearl was tried in a Special non shariah court---
more like a western court for REASON----The reason is that according to Shariah
Law a muslim cannot be executed for killing a jew (a jew can be executed for
touching a Koran) Remember the erstwhile president of Pakistan Musharraf?
He is responsible for so INSULTING ISLAM ---probably one of the reasons he was
forcibly deposed (lucky to be alive) There are fascinating details of that murder that in order to understand you must know something about Shariah law. The event was videotaped by the murderers for EXCELLENT reason------if a person REFUSES TO CONVERT TO ISLAM----killing him is not a crime in shariah law. unless he is underprotection by being a member of a community that has pledged
complete subjugation to islam and muslims and pays the poll tax JIZYA and does the multitude of things that "dhimmis" must do. Since Daniel Pearl did not
qualify as a dhimmi----his refusal to convert to islam and his statement on
Zionism made his murder LEGAL UNDER SHARIAH LAW. Bottom line---
in shariah----the murderers had every right to slit the man's throat----
ALLAHUAKBAAAAAR
Till today the execution has never happened-----the man is in jail (yeah right)
If he were to be executed, Pakistanis would riot over the INSULT TO ISLAM

Remember the COLE-----USS COLE ---terrorist attack thereon in a port of Yemen----the murderers spent a few weeks in Jail and then MAGICALLY
"escaped" Hubby was born in Yemen-----his community was subjected to
the pact of Omar. His mother lost her father to illness when she was ~~eleven.
That event left her "unprotected'" and subject to enslavement by the local
Chieftain (dhimmi orphan law) The one way to save her was to GET HER OUT.
A cousin had escaped to "Palestine" years before. He supplied the BAKSHEESH money to get her out----she was married which made it legal \
for her to travel with her father-in-law and little ~~ 16 year old husband.
The endeavor took years------Hubby was born in Aden seaport------people got bribed and the little group escaped (sadly the father-in-law died in the process)
What they had done was ILLEGAL in Shariah law. The story ends well----the little
couple had nine more kids that survived and grandchildren and greatgrand. children have been POPPING OUT incessantly. These insults to islam did not go
unnoticed. In 1947 the small Jewish Aden community was subjected to a muslim throat slitting fest. Hubby was already a "Palestinian" at that point. He is kinda the LAST OF THE PALESTINIANS------sometime in the 1960s-----some arabs in the land once called British Mandate Palestine DECIDED to call themselves "Palestinians" ----a really novel idea. For almost 2000 years THE ONLY people in the world called "Palestinians" were jews living in the land that
the romans had renamed "palestina" If I had the opportunity, I would ask RASHIDA TLAIB ---"btw---when did granny BECOME a 'palestinian' " ?

Convert or die. Right? Easy. Convert. What am I missing?

"Blah blah blah. I am a Muslim. Other magic words. Yadda yadda yadda." = life

Kill any arrogant moron who can't understand power.

It sounds like you rid the population of idiots and create a more cohesive and moral nation.
 
----do you want to know why?

Of course I do.

oh---ok The murderer of Daniel Pearl was tried in a Special non shariah court---
more like a western court for REASON----The reason is that according to Shariah
Law a muslim cannot be executed for killing a jew (a jew can be executed for
touching a Koran) Remember the erstwhile president of Pakistan Musharraf?
He is responsible for so INSULTING ISLAM ---probably one of the reasons he was
forcibly deposed (lucky to be alive) There are fascinating details of that murder that in order to understand you must know something about Shariah law. The event was videotaped by the murderers for EXCELLENT reason------if a person REFUSES TO CONVERT TO ISLAM----killing him is not a crime in shariah law. unless he is underprotection by being a member of a community that has pledged
complete subjugation to islam and muslims and pays the poll tax JIZYA and does the multitude of things that "dhimmis" must do. Since Daniel Pearl did not
qualify as a dhimmi----his refusal to convert to islam and his statement on
Zionism made his murder LEGAL UNDER SHARIAH LAW. Bottom line---
in shariah----the murderers had every right to slit the man's throat----
ALLAHUAKBAAAAAR
Till today the execution has never happened-----the man is in jail (yeah right)
If he were to be executed, Pakistanis would riot over the INSULT TO ISLAM

Remember the COLE-----USS COLE ---terrorist attack thereon in a port of Yemen----the murderers spent a few weeks in Jail and then MAGICALLY
"escaped" Hubby was born in Yemen-----his community was subjected to
the pact of Omar. His mother lost her father to illness when she was ~~eleven.
That event left her "unprotected'" and subject to enslavement by the local
Chieftain (dhimmi orphan law) The one way to save her was to GET HER OUT.
A cousin had escaped to "Palestine" years before. He supplied the BAKSHEESH money to get her out----she was married which made it legal \
for her to travel with her father-in-law and little ~~ 16 year old husband.
The endeavor took years------Hubby was born in Aden seaport------people got bribed and the little group escaped (sadly the father-in-law died in the process)
What they had done was ILLEGAL in Shariah law. The story ends well----the little
couple had nine more kids that survived and grandchildren and greatgrand. children have been POPPING OUT incessantly. These insults to islam did not go
unnoticed. In 1947 the small Jewish Aden community was subjected to a muslim throat slitting fest. Hubby was already a "Palestinian" at that point. He is kinda the LAST OF THE PALESTINIANS------sometime in the 1960s-----some arabs in the land once called British Mandate Palestine DECIDED to call themselves "Palestinians" ----a really novel idea. For almost 2000 years THE ONLY people in the world called "Palestinians" were jews living in the land that
the romans had renamed "palestina" If I had the opportunity, I would ask RASHIDA TLAIB ---"btw---when did granny BECOME a 'palestinian' " ?

There is not a body of humans in the world that have the stomach and capacity to kill 1 billion Muslims. These people are going to rule us. Wouldn't it be wiser to make it a peaceful transaction?
 
----do you want to know why?

Of course I do.

oh---ok The murderer of Daniel Pearl was tried in a Special non shariah court---
more like a western court for REASON----The reason is that according to Shariah
Law a muslim cannot be executed for killing a jew (a jew can be executed for
touching a Koran) Remember the erstwhile president of Pakistan Musharraf?
He is responsible for so INSULTING ISLAM ---probably one of the reasons he was
forcibly deposed (lucky to be alive) There are fascinating details of that murder that in order to understand you must know something about Shariah law. The event was videotaped by the murderers for EXCELLENT reason------if a person REFUSES TO CONVERT TO ISLAM----killing him is not a crime in shariah law. unless he is underprotection by being a member of a community that has pledged
complete subjugation to islam and muslims and pays the poll tax JIZYA and does the multitude of things that "dhimmis" must do. Since Daniel Pearl did not
qualify as a dhimmi----his refusal to convert to islam and his statement on
Zionism made his murder LEGAL UNDER SHARIAH LAW. Bottom line---
in shariah----the murderers had every right to slit the man's throat----
ALLAHUAKBAAAAAR
Till today the execution has never happened-----the man is in jail (yeah right)
If he were to be executed, Pakistanis would riot over the INSULT TO ISLAM

Remember the COLE-----USS COLE ---terrorist attack thereon in a port of Yemen----the murderers spent a few weeks in Jail and then MAGICALLY
"escaped" Hubby was born in Yemen-----his community was subjected to
the pact of Omar. His mother lost her father to illness when she was ~~eleven.
That event left her "unprotected'" and subject to enslavement by the local
Chieftain (dhimmi orphan law) The one way to save her was to GET HER OUT.
A cousin had escaped to "Palestine" years before. He supplied the BAKSHEESH money to get her out----she was married which made it legal \
for her to travel with her father-in-law and little ~~ 16 year old husband.
The endeavor took years------Hubby was born in Aden seaport------people got bribed and the little group escaped (sadly the father-in-law died in the process)
What they had done was ILLEGAL in Shariah law. The story ends well----the little
couple had nine more kids that survived and grandchildren and greatgrand. children have been POPPING OUT incessantly. These insults to islam did not go
unnoticed. In 1947 the small Jewish Aden community was subjected to a muslim throat slitting fest. Hubby was already a "Palestinian" at that point. He is kinda the LAST OF THE PALESTINIANS------sometime in the 1960s-----some arabs in the land once called British Mandate Palestine DECIDED to call themselves "Palestinians" ----a really novel idea. For almost 2000 years THE ONLY people in the world called "Palestinians" were jews living in the land that
the romans had renamed "palestina" If I had the opportunity, I would ask RASHIDA TLAIB ---"btw---when did granny BECOME a 'palestinian' " ?

Convert or die. Right? Easy. Convert. What am I missing?

"Blah blah blah. I am a Muslim. Other magic words. Yadda yadda yadda." = life

Kill any arrogant moron who can't understand power.

It sounds like you rid the population of idiots and create a more cohesive and moral nation.

If that is what you want-----you CAN HAVE IT. Conversion to islam is very easy.
You need know nothing at all------just repeat a phrase phonetically that is
only a few words long. I have no doubt that some shariah compliant nation
will accept you. I am amazed by the community of jews which is hubby's origin that resisted the simple solution for SO LONG. ----(uhm---yemen? "a cohesive and moral nation" ROFLMAO )
 
btw----remember Kruschev? (nikita) He said the same thing about communism
-------in the UN whilst banging his shoe on a table "YOUR GRANDCHILDREN WILL GROW UP UNDER COMMUNISM" (or something like that) Remember
Seven of NINE? She agreed-----RESISTANCE IS FUTILE
 
----do you want to know why?

Of course I do.

oh---ok The murderer of Daniel Pearl was tried in a Special non shariah court---
more like a western court for REASON----The reason is that according to Shariah
Law a muslim cannot be executed for killing a jew (a jew can be executed for
touching a Koran) Remember the erstwhile president of Pakistan Musharraf?
He is responsible for so INSULTING ISLAM ---probably one of the reasons he was
forcibly deposed (lucky to be alive) There are fascinating details of that murder that in order to understand you must know something about Shariah law. The event was videotaped by the murderers for EXCELLENT reason------if a person REFUSES TO CONVERT TO ISLAM----killing him is not a crime in shariah law. unless he is underprotection by being a member of a community that has pledged
complete subjugation to islam and muslims and pays the poll tax JIZYA and does the multitude of things that "dhimmis" must do. Since Daniel Pearl did not
qualify as a dhimmi----his refusal to convert to islam and his statement on
Zionism made his murder LEGAL UNDER SHARIAH LAW. Bottom line---
in shariah----the murderers had every right to slit the man's throat----
ALLAHUAKBAAAAAR
Till today the execution has never happened-----the man is in jail (yeah right)
If he were to be executed, Pakistanis would riot over the INSULT TO ISLAM

Remember the COLE-----USS COLE ---terrorist attack thereon in a port of Yemen----the murderers spent a few weeks in Jail and then MAGICALLY
"escaped" Hubby was born in Yemen-----his community was subjected to
the pact of Omar. His mother lost her father to illness when she was ~~eleven.
That event left her "unprotected'" and subject to enslavement by the local
Chieftain (dhimmi orphan law) The one way to save her was to GET HER OUT.
A cousin had escaped to "Palestine" years before. He supplied the BAKSHEESH money to get her out----she was married which made it legal \
for her to travel with her father-in-law and little ~~ 16 year old husband.
The endeavor took years------Hubby was born in Aden seaport------people got bribed and the little group escaped (sadly the father-in-law died in the process)
What they had done was ILLEGAL in Shariah law. The story ends well----the little
couple had nine more kids that survived and grandchildren and greatgrand. children have been POPPING OUT incessantly. These insults to islam did not go
unnoticed. In 1947 the small Jewish Aden community was subjected to a muslim throat slitting fest. Hubby was already a "Palestinian" at that point. He is kinda the LAST OF THE PALESTINIANS------sometime in the 1960s-----some arabs in the land once called British Mandate Palestine DECIDED to call themselves "Palestinians" ----a really novel idea. For almost 2000 years THE ONLY people in the world called "Palestinians" were jews living in the land that
the romans had renamed "palestina" If I had the opportunity, I would ask RASHIDA TLAIB ---"btw---when did granny BECOME a 'palestinian' " ?

Convert or die. Right? Easy. Convert. What am I missing?

"Blah blah blah. I am a Muslim. Other magic words. Yadda yadda yadda." = life

Kill any arrogant moron who can't understand power.

It sounds like you rid the population of idiots and create a more cohesive and moral nation.

If that is what you want-----you CAN HAVE IT. Conversion to islam is very easy.
You need know nothing at all------just repeat a phrase phonetically that is
only a few words long. I have no doubt that some shariah compliant nation
will accept you. I am amazed by the community of jews which is hubby's origin that resisted the simple solution for SO LONG. ----(uhm---yemen? "a cohesive and moral nation" ROFLMAO )

As a 40 year old man I could refuse to convert and die based on principles. I wouldn't lose much. However, if I was caring for a three year old Jewish girl and she is given the choice to convert or die I would force her to convert immediately.

I don't think dying when given those two choices is the best option. I could be wrong though. I just never seen a strong case for it.
 
----do you want to know why?

Of course I do.

oh---ok The murderer of Daniel Pearl was tried in a Special non shariah court---
more like a western court for REASON----The reason is that according to Shariah
Law a muslim cannot be executed for killing a jew (a jew can be executed for
touching a Koran) Remember the erstwhile president of Pakistan Musharraf?
He is responsible for so INSULTING ISLAM ---probably one of the reasons he was
forcibly deposed (lucky to be alive) There are fascinating details of that murder that in order to understand you must know something about Shariah law. The event was videotaped by the murderers for EXCELLENT reason------if a person REFUSES TO CONVERT TO ISLAM----killing him is not a crime in shariah law. unless he is underprotection by being a member of a community that has pledged
complete subjugation to islam and muslims and pays the poll tax JIZYA and does the multitude of things that "dhimmis" must do. Since Daniel Pearl did not
qualify as a dhimmi----his refusal to convert to islam and his statement on
Zionism made his murder LEGAL UNDER SHARIAH LAW. Bottom line---
in shariah----the murderers had every right to slit the man's throat----
ALLAHUAKBAAAAAR
Till today the execution has never happened-----the man is in jail (yeah right)
If he were to be executed, Pakistanis would riot over the INSULT TO ISLAM

Remember the COLE-----USS COLE ---terrorist attack thereon in a port of Yemen----the murderers spent a few weeks in Jail and then MAGICALLY
"escaped" Hubby was born in Yemen-----his community was subjected to
the pact of Omar. His mother lost her father to illness when she was ~~eleven.
That event left her "unprotected'" and subject to enslavement by the local
Chieftain (dhimmi orphan law) The one way to save her was to GET HER OUT.
A cousin had escaped to "Palestine" years before. He supplied the BAKSHEESH money to get her out----she was married which made it legal \
for her to travel with her father-in-law and little ~~ 16 year old husband.
The endeavor took years------Hubby was born in Aden seaport------people got bribed and the little group escaped (sadly the father-in-law died in the process)
What they had done was ILLEGAL in Shariah law. The story ends well----the little
couple had nine more kids that survived and grandchildren and greatgrand. children have been POPPING OUT incessantly. These insults to islam did not go
unnoticed. In 1947 the small Jewish Aden community was subjected to a muslim throat slitting fest. Hubby was already a "Palestinian" at that point. He is kinda the LAST OF THE PALESTINIANS------sometime in the 1960s-----some arabs in the land once called British Mandate Palestine DECIDED to call themselves "Palestinians" ----a really novel idea. For almost 2000 years THE ONLY people in the world called "Palestinians" were jews living in the land that
the romans had renamed "palestina" If I had the opportunity, I would ask RASHIDA TLAIB ---"btw---when did granny BECOME a 'palestinian' " ?

Convert or die. Right? Easy. Convert. What am I missing?

"Blah blah blah. I am a Muslim. Other magic words. Yadda yadda yadda." = life

Kill any arrogant moron who can't understand power.

It sounds like you rid the population of idiots and create a more cohesive and moral nation.

If that is what you want-----you CAN HAVE IT. Conversion to islam is very easy.
You need know nothing at all------just repeat a phrase phonetically that is
only a few words long. I have no doubt that some shariah compliant nation
will accept you. I am amazed by the community of jews which is hubby's origin that resisted the simple solution for SO LONG. ----(uhm---yemen? "a cohesive and moral nation" ROFLMAO )

As a 40 year old man I could refuse to convert and die based on principles. I wouldn't lose much. However, if I was caring for a three year old Jewish girl and she is given the choice to convert or die I would force her to convert immediately.

I don't think dying when given those two choices is the best option. I could be wrong though. I just never seen a strong case for it.

I understand as do millions of others who preferred to preserve the lives
of their children-------or even their own. It is the same option that the mother
of my mother-in-law faced. She preferred to relinquish her 12 year old daughter
to a very uncertain fate. She was a widow with another daughter who was
far too sickly to be interesting to the local muslims-------she stuck it out and then----
some 15 years after losing her daughter-----they were reunited. Today---the largest number of kids subjected to the filth of the "DHIMMI ORPHAN LAW---
are Sudanese Christians and the Zoroastrians of Iraq
 
  1. I think we could benefit from being ruled by Muslims. Get rid of alcohol. Get rid of pornography. Get rid of shaving. No more daughters fighting with their mothers about wearing inappropriate clothes. No more gay rights nonsense being crammed down our throats. No more fighting over which imaginary magical sky daddy is best or whether imaginary sky daddies really exist or not. We could all be in agreement that Allah is the one true god and He actually does exist! Wouldn't that be refreshing to end that debate once and for all? The three wives for rich men actually makes sense. The rich men in our society always end up getting a mistress or two anyways. This will just be a little more straight forward. Then he would actually be obligated to care for all three of those women. A win-win-win-win for all 4 parties involved. For regular guys the family structure would remain static. Polygamy is permissible under Sharia law. It is not mandatory.
  1. There has to be some drawbacks to being ruled by Muslims. Pork chops are pretty good but so is baked chicken. I think I can sacrifice a pork chop in excchange for a superior nation. What do you guys think? There has to be some negative aspects to being ruled by Muslims. Can anybody think of any?
And before anybody mentions it, yes, I did think about it being bad just because. I just didn't think that was a good enough reason by itself.


In the world of bad ideas, this one is a spectacular example. If you can find no drawbacks or negatives about Sharia law, you must know very little about it.

Get rid of alcohol. In a supreme display of ignorance, we outlawed that for awhile. It soon proved to be a costly mistake.

Get rid of pornography. Yes. And get rid of that pesky freedom of speech shit while we're at it.

Get rid of gay rights. I believe they have and are entitled to the same rights you and I have.

Get rid of magical sky daddies. Check. No more freedom of religion.

No more shaving. Really? Who cares. No one forces you to shave though.

No more daughters fighting with mothers over clothing. No, there wouldn't be any because daughters like that will be murdered.

Allah? You're already faking one religion, why add another?

3 wives for rich men. Poor men have affairs/mistresses as well. So long as everyone is in agreeance, I don't care if people marry more than one spouse.
 
Today---the largest number of kids subjected to the filth of the "DHIMMI ORPHAN LAW---
are Sudanese Christians and the Zoroastrians of Iraq

I suppose I am insensitive when I assume these two groups are arrogant dummies. Do Sudanese Christian's not learn the Christian ethic of humility and submission to authority?
 

Forum List

Back
Top