Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 95,050
- 67,852
- 3,645
Because it os an arbitrary, spurious assumption.Why is it that I lose you there?
Which is silly, since we haven't even gathered evidence anywhere else or anything resembling a representative sample. That's no different than assuming all solar systems are just like ours, when you haven't observed any other star systems. An obvious error.The only evidence we have supports this...
Easily...by consuming it, or bu denying it resources. Go ahead, spit in a carp pond...what happens? What happens when dog food is set out for a dog? It becomes dog.Why would the existence of life stop the formation of new basic life?
No doubt. But there is good argument that it would hinder it, both by consuming it and by making scarce the materials it needs to form in the first place, as these materials would be already tied up in extant biomass.There isn't any proof that the existence of a life form renders impossible the formation of new life.
Last edited: