Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Michael Scheuer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJ81HlWmPr8&feature=related[/ame]
Self-blame. It's admirable that Steuer believes that. It is the first step to becoming like Europe.
Wingnuts like to talk endlessly about Islamic terrorism in order to distract attention from the terrorist acts committed by their right wing christian allies. There is no doubt that most of the terrorist acts committed in the US during the three decades have been committed by right wing christians
Got any evidence of that?
Plenty
Start with this thread, where wingnuts are studiously avoiding talking about christian terrorism in order to focus on the much lesser threat posed by islamic terrorism
Self-blame. It's admirable that Steuer believes that. It is the first step to becoming like Europe.
So you're saying that it is absolutely impossible that America is responsible for provoking terrorism despite what Mr. Scheuer (who perhaps has more knowledge on the subject than anyone) says?
That's quite an implication.
imho The invasion of Iraq was a terrorist act.
My point of why Christians and Jews do not need to do traditional terrorism.
I don't think it was. It was misguided.
I like this whole tit-for-tat thing.
Apparently Islam is excused for being barbaric because they were oppressed by the Crusades.
Apparently terrorism can be excused because of the mistakes made by the leaders of countries. When do Muslims ever take responsibility for their actions, instead of playing the victim card?
It's not like the Middle East didn't become mostly Muslim by Muslim armies invading those areas and terrorizing the local populations until they converted. It's not like the Ottomans didn't attempt the same thing in Eastern Europe.
There was a time when all of Pakistan was Hindu. All of Iran was Zoroastrian. Don't give me this crap about Muslims being justified to commit terrorism based on American intervention.
Self-blame. It's admirable that Steuer believes that. It is the first step to becoming like Europe.
So you're saying that it is absolutely impossible that America is responsible for provoking terrorism despite what Mr. Scheuer (who perhaps has more knowledge on the subject than anyone) says?
That's quite an implication.
Give me a break. The only thing it apparently takes to provoke Muslims is to say the wrong thing about their pedophile Prophet. What the fuck doesn't provoke terrorism from these assholes, when it comes down to it?
Self-blame. It's admirable that Steuer believes that. It is the first step to becoming like Europe.
So you're saying that it is absolutely impossible that America is responsible for provoking terrorism despite what Mr. Scheuer (who perhaps has more knowledge on the subject than anyone) says?
That's quite an implication.
Got any evidence of that?
Plenty
Start with this thread, where wingnuts are studiously avoiding talking about christian terrorism in order to focus on the much lesser threat posed by islamic terrorism
The only wingnut here is you you fucking crackhead.
Self-blame. It's admirable that Steuer believes that. It is the first step to becoming like Europe.
So you're saying that it is absolutely impossible that America is responsible for provoking terrorism despite what Mr. Scheuer (who perhaps has more knowledge on the subject than anyone) says?
That's quite an implication.
When has a Christian taken responsibility for Christian terrorism?
That'll do, pig. That'll do.Plenty
Start with this thread, where wingnuts are studiously avoiding talking about christian terrorism in order to focus on the much lesser threat posed by islamic terrorism
The only wingnut here is you you fucking crackhead.
The "I'm not. You are" defense
Bet it took you a lot of thought to come up with that one (or maybe not)
So you're saying that it is absolutely impossible that America is responsible for provoking terrorism despite what Mr. Scheuer (who perhaps has more knowledge on the subject than anyone) says?
That's quite an implication.
When has a Christian taken responsibility for Christian terrorism?
That'll do, pig. That'll do.The only wingnut here is you you fucking crackhead.
The "I'm not. You are" defense
Bet it took you a lot of thought to come up with that one (or maybe not)
When has a Christian taken responsibility for Christian terrorism?
That'll do, pig. That'll do.The "I'm not. You are" defense
Bet it took you a lot of thought to come up with that one (or maybe not)
Ozmar has been reduced to posting childish taunts and images glommed from the Internet. He has been rendered incapable of responding on topic
I accept your surrender
That'll do, pig. That'll do.
Ozmar has been reduced to posting childish taunts and images glommed from the Internet. He has been rendered incapable of responding on topic
I accept your surrender
imho The invasion of Iraq was a terrorist act.
My point of why Christians and Jews do not need to do traditional terrorism.
I don't think it was. It was misguided.
I like this whole tit-for-tat thing.
Apparently Islam is excused for being barbaric because they were oppressed by the Crusades.
Apparently terrorism can be excused because of the mistakes made by the leaders of countries. When do Muslims ever take responsibility for their actions, instead of playing the victim card?
It's not like the Middle East didn't become mostly Muslim by Muslim armies invading those areas and terrorizing the local populations until they converted. It's not like the Ottomans didn't attempt the same thing in Eastern Europe.
There was a time when all of Pakistan was Hindu. All of Iran was Zoroastrian. Don't give me this crap about Muslims being justified to commit terrorism based on American intervention.
It's easy to see that this conversation is no longer intelligent.
It's easy to see that this conversation is no longer intelligent.
It's how conversations with wingnuts always end. Whenever a wingnut doesn't get his way, he reacts with aggression. Sometimes, it's childish taunts and name-calling, and sometimes it gets violent
And the violent culture promoted by christianity is what lies at the root of this problem
It's easy to see that this conversation is no longer intelligent.
It's how conversations with wingnuts always end. Whenever a wingnut doesn't get his way, he reacts with aggression. Sometimes, it's childish taunts and name-calling, and sometimes it gets violent
And the violent culture promoted by christianity is what lies at the root of this problem
