Murder at Tomb Illustrates the Future of Jewish Holy Sites in a Palestinian State


not really

Palestinian security forces opened fire early Sunday on three cars full of Israelis who entered the West Bank compound of Joseph's Tomb without permission and then tried to break through a local checkpoint, according to an initial investigation by the Israel Defense Forces and the Palestinian Authority.

Israelis shot in West Bank tried to break through Palestinian roadblock, probe shows - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Your choice of sources is interesting. For this one

The decline and fall of Commentary as a serious magazine is a story that has yet to be told. If I wrote the story, it would be told in a tone more of sorrow than of anger.

.......The back issues were a revelation. Now they are publishing idiots. The sad decline of the specifically Jewish thread of American thinking.

Obama, Hitler, and Commentary Magazine « sans everything

Yesterday you used a 'Settlers Paper'

The station, named Voice of Peace, aired Western music and broadcast peace messages. In response, Israeli settlers opposed to peace with the Palestinians launched Arutz Sheva as an ideological competitor

Arutz Sheva - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
How so?
Palestinian security forces opened fire early Sunday on three cars full of Israelis who entered the West Bank compound of Joseph's Tomb without permission and then tried to break through a local checkpoint, according to an initial investigation by the Israel Defense Forces and the Palestinian Authority.
Guess, jooz should issue permissions to enter that dome of the crock abomination, too. That's fair.
Your choice of sources is interesting. For this one
The decline and fall of Commentary as a serious magazine is a story that has yet to be told. If I wrote the story, it would be told in a tone more of sorrow than of anger. .......The back issues were a revelation. Now they are publishing idiots. The sad decline of the specifically Jewish thread of American thinking.
Obama, Hitler, and Commentary Magazine « sans everything
Whatever the drivel may mean, of course.
Yesterday you used a 'Settlers Paper' The station, named Voice of Peace, aired Western music and broadcast peace messages. In response, Israeli settlers opposed to peace with the Palestinians launched Arutz Sheva as an ideological competitor
Ah, wiki. Settlers, calling others settlers. Altogether, as Miller put it The Palestinians want their own country. There's just one thing about that: There are no Palestinians. It's a made up word. Israel was called Palestine for two thousand years. Like "Wiccan," "Palestinian" sounds ancient but is really a modern invention. Before the Israelis won the land in war, Gaza was owned by Egypt, and there were no "Palestinians" then, and the West Bank was owned by Jordan, and there were no "Palestinians" then. As soon as the Jews took over and started growing oranges as big as basketballs, what do you know, say hello to the "Palestinians," weeping for their deep bond with their lost "land" and "nation."
 
Guess, jooz should issue permissions to enter that dome of the crock abomination, too. That's fair

arabs stuck mosques on every jewish place of worship as soon as they could exercise dominion over those sites. christians put churches over holy sites.

the only people who haven't exercised dominion over the holy sites are israelis.

i wouldn't bother trying to talk sense to jew haters. defending terrorists is in their blood.
 
How so?Guess, jooz should issue permissions to enter that dome of the crock abomination, too. That's fair.
Your choice of sources is interesting. For this one Obama, Hitler, and Commentary Magazine « sans everything
Whatever the drivel may mean, of course.
Yesterday you used a 'Settlers Paper' The station, named Voice of Peace, aired Western music and broadcast peace messages. In response, Israeli settlers opposed to peace with the Palestinians launched Arutz Sheva as an ideological competitor
Ah, wiki. Settlers, calling others settlers. Altogether, as Miller put it The Palestinians want their own country. There's just one thing about that: There are no Palestinians. It's a made up word. Israel was called Palestine for two thousand years. Like "Wiccan," "Palestinian" sounds ancient but is really a modern invention. Before the Israelis won the land in war, Gaza was owned by Egypt, and there were no "Palestinians" then, and the West Bank was owned by Jordan, and there were no "Palestinians" then. As soon as the Jews took over and started growing oranges as big as basketballs, what do you know, say hello to the "Palestinians," weeping for their deep bond with their lost "land" and "nation."


As for the old one of 'No Palestinians'. There is the indigenous population which genetic studies showed last year were likely descended from the original Jews of the area. If you start using 'National Religious' arguments you will get nowhere because on that level they have more right than current Israelis. Genetics showed they are the one group related to all Jews and not only that they stayed in the area for the 3000 years.

Genetic studies bring new hope for peace between Jews and Palestinians
 
not really
How so?Guess, jooz should issue permissions to enter that dome of the crock abomination, too. That's fair.Whatever the drivel may mean, of course.
Yesterday you used a 'Settlers Paper' The station, named Voice of Peace, aired Western music and broadcast peace messages. In response, Israeli settlers opposed to peace with the Palestinians launched Arutz Sheva as an ideological competitor
Ah, wiki. Settlers, calling others settlers. Altogether, as Miller put it The Palestinians want their own country. There's just one thing about that: There are no Palestinians. It's a made up word. Israel was called Palestine for two thousand years. Like "Wiccan," "Palestinian" sounds ancient but is really a modern invention. Before the Israelis won the land in war, Gaza was owned by Egypt, and there were no "Palestinians" then, and the West Bank was owned by Jordan, and there were no "Palestinians" then. As soon as the Jews took over and started growing oranges as big as basketballs, what do you know, say hello to the "Palestinians," weeping for their deep bond with their lost "land" and "nation."
As for the old one of 'No Palestinians'.
That's what it is, of course, - noone of them, until after 1967.
There is the indigenous population which genetic studies showed last year were likely descended from the original Jews of the area.
I, sure, do like the original Jews of the area. Excellent.
If you start using 'National Religious' arguments you will get nowhere because on that level they have more right than current Israelis.
Indeed, like Chruchill said "So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry could lift up the Jewish population."
Genetics showed they are the one group related to all Jews and not only that they stayed in the area for the 3000 years.
Halal settlers of the "jihad argument"?
 
Jews were not the first people to live in Palestine nor were they ever the only people living there.

There is no historic precedence for an exclusive Jewish state.
 
Bottom line--what will happen to Abraham's, Rachel's, and Joseph's Tombs in a Palestinian state? Mr. Tinmore, would you let your parents' graves be desecrated? Or would you never go to visit them?
 
Bottom line--what will happen to Abraham's, Rachel's, and Joseph's Tombs in a Palestinian state? Mr. Tinmore, would you let your parents' graves be desecrated? Or would you never go to visit them?

Good question. How long were they there before Israel?
 
Jews were not the first people to live in Palestine nor were they ever the only people living there.

There is no historic precedence for an exclusive Jewish state.
No, but there the best people that have ever lived there
 
Abraham is the father of the Arab Muslims also.
And Hagar the egyptian is their mom. And koran is a stolen and bastardized jovish bible.

Abraham would be ashamed of Ishmael today, but the prophecy to Hagar the concubine came true: "And he shall be a wild ass of a man, his hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him, and he shall dwell in the face of all his brethren."
 
Bottom line--what will happen to Abraham's, Rachel's, and Joseph's Tombs in a Palestinian state? Mr. Tinmore, would you let your parents' graves be desecrated? Or would you never go to visit them?

Good question. How long were they there before Israel?


how long was WHO in hebron?-----there have always been jews in Hebron----over the past more than 5000 years----except for very short times----like when tinnie's colleagues slit baby throats there----in 1929--and until 1967 Islamo nazi pigs are that vulgar------I mecca was invaded and the meccaist pig ass lickers ejected by force over the dead bodies of their slit throated infants-----if the vile and disgusting islamo nazi pig would sneer at some muslims wanting that shitty city back HOW LONG WERE YOU THERE?
 
Abraham is the father of the Arab Muslims also.

no he isn't -----muhummad invented a fake lineage to Ishmael----and that is the entire link you have btw----the only actual ARABS in the world are those who were either born in arabia----or----at the very least have some ancestors born in arabia-------that is very few people The overhwhelming majority of Egyptians-----and Syrians, and Lebanese and Tunisian and Iraqi etc etc idiots who call themselves "ARABS" do not have a drop of "arab" in them for the record ISHMAEL KNEW HOW TO READ AND WRITE-----what happened to his "kids" they descended into utter ignorance? I have never heard of a once literate society that LEARNED TO BE ILLITERATE It is true that some of the Sudanese are descended from arabs------they were the slave traders of the area and they continued to rape the southern blacks
 
from Tinnie
There is no historic precedence for an exclusive Jewish state.

does anyone have any idea what the writer of the above statement is attempting to express? "HISTORIC PRECEDEND FOR AN EXCLUSIVE JEWISH STATE"? in fact Israel is not an exclusive jewish state----but----even if it were------such a state can easily be justified simply by the fact that exclusively 'this' of 'that' states have popped up many times in history-----including states that were not previously 'exclusively this or that' Tinnie could write Khutbah Jumaat rants-----he is just as idiotic
 
from Tinnie
There is no historic precedence for an exclusive Jewish state.

does anyone have any idea what the writer of the above statement is attempting to express? "HISTORIC PRECEDEND FOR AN EXCLUSIVE JEWISH STATE"? in fact Israel is not an exclusive jewish state----but----even if it were------such a state can easily be justified simply by the fact that exclusively 'this' of 'that' states have popped up many times in history-----including states that were not previously 'exclusively this or that' Tinnie could write Khutbah Jumaat rants-----he is just as idiotic

in fact Israel is not an exclusive jewish state----

Doesn't Nutandyahoo demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
 

Forum List

Back
Top