Mulvaney Admits Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

The acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when a reporter pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” he added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

Mulvaney Acknowledges Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

So, Mulvaney admits there was a quid pro quo. Get over it, he says. Sounds like he is trying to normalize criminal behavior.


President Trump asked for Ukrainian help in resolving the problems with collusion in the 2016 election. Ukraine's previous regime was colluding with the Democrats and almost fixed the 2016 election for Trump's adversary.

Not good.

But they've had regime change in Ukraine, and the new President is interesting in rooting out Liberal Corruption.
 
The acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when a reporter pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” he added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

Mulvaney Acknowledges Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

So, Mulvaney admits there was a quid pro quo. Get over it, he says. Sounds like he is trying to normalize criminal behavior.


President Trump asked for Ukrainian help in resolving the problems with collusion in the 2016 election. Ukraine's previous regime was colluding with the Democrats and almost fixed the 2016 election for Trump's adversary.

Not good.

But they've had regime change in Ukraine, and the new President is interesting in rooting out Liberal Corruption.

Is that why they hacked and released the DNC's emails, cultist? To hurt Trump? What a goofball.
 
Trump bitch slapped the Dem's by releasing the call transcript. Now Schiff and the rest of these lying asshole Dem's can't lie, twist, and spin what was said its out in the public for all to see. That's why Dem's are squealing like stuck pigs.

Trump confirmed the whistleblower's report by releasing a summary transcript. Then he stood in front of the world and said the opposite. He doesn't respect his Base or himself.

Don't worry about it, they were just discussing their grandkids like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch did at the secret tarmac meeting. :eusa_whistle:

They have fuckall to do with the whistleblower and the transcript. Which did you like best - when Trump called the whistleblower a liar, or when he released the summary transcript showing the whistleblower was a truth-teller?

By all means defend Adam Schiff's account of the call...I predict you will run away and hide. :icon_rolleyes:
 
The acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when a reporter pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” he added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

Mulvaney Acknowledges Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

So, Mulvaney admits there was a quid pro quo. Get over it, he says. Sounds like he is trying to normalize criminal behavior.


President Trump asked for Ukrainian help in resolving the problems with collusion in the 2016 election. Ukraine's previous regime was colluding with the Democrats and almost fixed the 2016 election for Trump's adversary.

Not good.

But they've had regime change in Ukraine, and the new President is interesting in rooting out Liberal Corruption.

Is that why they hacked and released the DNC's emails, cultist? To hurt Trump? What a goofball.


No one was proven to have "hacked" the DNC server at all. Law Enforcement never looked at the server, only CrowdStrike, a Ukraine linked outfit.

As far as Wikileaks is concerned, they did release certain DNC emails. But Mr. Assange admitted the Russians weren't involved, it was most likely a Whistleblower in the DNC. Perhaps one that was killed in a whacking made to look like a "botched robbery"
 
Wasn’t trump asking about 2016 election interference? Don’t you want Trump to not let that happen again ?

No.....trump was asking FOR foreign interference in 2016. He invited publicly Russians to interfere and they did....or are you too stupid to understand that....?
/——-/ Why would he ask for help publicly when all he had to do was use the private back door channel Libs claimed he had? You know full well he was taunting Hildabeast and the LSM.

Extoration of military aid appropriated to stop Russian aggression is beyond illegal...it is treasonous and immoral....trump placed the security of this nation below his own political ambitions....Evil....Snake.
/——-/ Its not illegal. Joe Bite Me said so. Video of a bragging Biden trading $1 billion in Ukraine aid for official firing resurfaces amid Trump flap
 
Trump bitch slapped the Dem's by releasing the call transcript. Now Schiff and the rest of these lying asshole Dem's can't lie, twist, and spin what was said its out in the public for all to see. That's why Dem's are squealing like stuck pigs.

Trump confirmed the whistleblower's report by releasing a summary transcript. Then he stood in front of the world and said the opposite. He doesn't respect his Base or himself.

Don't worry about it, they were just discussing their grandkids like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch did at the secret tarmac meeting. :eusa_whistle:

They have fuckall to do with the whistleblower and the transcript. Which did you like best - when Trump called the whistleblower a liar, or when he released the summary transcript showing the whistleblower was a truth-teller?

By all means defend Adam Schiff's account of the call...I predict you will run away and hide. :icon_rolleyes:

Dude! The summary-transcript - not a word-for-word transcript - confirms the whistleblower's complaint. Both have been released. Neither you nor I need to rely on Adam Schiff's account.

I predict you won't admit you're full of shit, evidence notwithstanding.
 
Trump bitch slapped the Dem's by releasing the call transcript. Now Schiff and the rest of these lying asshole Dem's can't lie, twist, and spin what was said its out in the public for all to see. That's why Dem's are squealing like stuck pigs.

Trump confirmed the whistleblower's report by releasing a summary transcript. Then he stood in front of the world and said the opposite. He doesn't respect his Base or himself.

Don't worry about it, they were just discussing their grandkids like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch did at the secret tarmac meeting. :eusa_whistle:

They have fuckall to do with the whistleblower and the transcript. Which did you like best - when Trump called the whistleblower a liar, or when he released the summary transcript showing the whistleblower was a truth-teller?

By all means defend Adam Schiff's account of the call...I predict you will run away and hide. :icon_rolleyes:

Dude! The summary-transcript - not a word-for-word transcript - confirms the whistleblower's complaint. Both have been released. Neither you nor I need to rely on Adam Schiff's account.

I predict you won't admit you're full of shit, evidence notwithstanding.
I’m glad trump wants to end Russian interference
 
The acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when a reporter pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” he added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

Mulvaney Acknowledges Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

So, Mulvaney admits there was a quid pro quo. Get over it, he says. Sounds like he is trying to normalize criminal behavior.


President Trump asked for Ukrainian help in resolving the problems with collusion in the 2016 election. Ukraine's previous regime was colluding with the Democrats and almost fixed the 2016 election for Trump's adversary.

Not good.

But they've had regime change in Ukraine, and the new President is interesting in rooting out Liberal Corruption.

Russia DID fix the 2016 election by trolling false stories about Hillary on social media. There was an investigation...by US Intel agencies and it was PROVEN Russia acted to get trump elected ...The Kremlin celebrated trump's election.

trump has done nothing to keep it from happening again....
 
The acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when a reporter pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” he added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

Mulvaney Acknowledges Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

So, Mulvaney admits there was a quid pro quo. Get over it, he says. Sounds like he is trying to normalize criminal behavior.


President Trump asked for Ukrainian help in resolving the problems with collusion in the 2016 election. Ukraine's previous regime was colluding with the Democrats and almost fixed the 2016 election for Trump's adversary.

Not good.

But they've had regime change in Ukraine, and the new President is interesting in rooting out Liberal Corruption.

Is that why they hacked and released the DNC's emails, cultist? To hurt Trump? What a goofball.


No one was proven to have "hacked" the DNC server at all. Law Enforcement never looked at the server, only CrowdStrike, a Ukraine linked outfit.

As far as Wikileaks is concerned, they did release certain DNC emails. But Mr. Assange admitted the Russians weren't involved, it was most likely a Whistleblower in the DNC. Perhaps one that was killed in a whacking made to look like a "botched robbery"

I Ignore Trolls....lying Trolls
 
Trump confirmed the whistleblower's report by releasing a summary transcript. Then he stood in front of the world and said the opposite. He doesn't respect his Base or himself.

Don't worry about it, they were just discussing their grandkids like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch did at the secret tarmac meeting. :eusa_whistle:

They have fuckall to do with the whistleblower and the transcript. Which did you like best - when Trump called the whistleblower a liar, or when he released the summary transcript showing the whistleblower was a truth-teller?

By all means defend Adam Schiff's account of the call...I predict you will run away and hide. :icon_rolleyes:

Dude! The summary-transcript - not a word-for-word transcript - confirms the whistleblower's complaint. Both have been released. Neither you nor I need to rely on Adam Schiff's account.

I predict you won't admit you're full of shit, evidence notwithstanding.
I’m glad trump wants to end Russian interference

Link?
 
The acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney admitted on Thursday that President Donald Trump withheld foreign aid in order to get Ukraine’s help in the U.S. election.

“We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mulvaney responded when a reporter pointed out that withholding funding from Ukraine “unless the investigation into the Democrats’ server happens” is a “quid pro quo.”

“Get over it,” he added later. “There’s going to be political influence in foreign policy. ... That is going to happen. Elections have consequences.”

Mulvaney Acknowledges Quid Pro Quo In Trump Ukraine Call, Says ‘Get Over It’

So, Mulvaney admits there was a quid pro quo. Get over it, he says. Sounds like he is trying to normalize criminal behavior.


President Trump asked for Ukrainian help in resolving the problems with collusion in the 2016 election. Ukraine's previous regime was colluding with the Democrats and almost fixed the 2016 election for Trump's adversary.

Not good.

But they've had regime change in Ukraine, and the new President is interesting in rooting out Liberal Corruption.

Is that why they hacked and released the DNC's emails, cultist? To hurt Trump? What a goofball.

The world of a lying trumpette is opposite of reality....
 
Don't worry about it, they were just discussing their grandkids like Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch did at the secret tarmac meeting. :eusa_whistle:

They have fuckall to do with the whistleblower and the transcript. Which did you like best - when Trump called the whistleblower a liar, or when he released the summary transcript showing the whistleblower was a truth-teller?

By all means defend Adam Schiff's account of the call...I predict you will run away and hide. :icon_rolleyes:

Dude! The summary-transcript - not a word-for-word transcript - confirms the whistleblower's complaint. Both have been released. Neither you nor I need to rely on Adam Schiff's account.

I predict you won't admit you're full of shit, evidence notwithstanding.
I’m glad trump wants to end Russian interference

Link?
Your in the link
 
tRump and his cronies don't investigate, they fabricate.
Not only is that statement false and opposite reality, but it exposes a problem for your party who is so corrupt and fascist in behavior that it believes this administration is not allowed to investigate corruption by questioning the foreign entities involved in colluding with that Dem corruption, however your party has no problem asking foreign entities questions about Trump and his cabinet and associates=double standard. Furthermore Pelosi is standing in front of a podium telling the corrupt media that her congress is doing their job investigating corruption when she's actually obstructing investigating corruption by her party members while only targeting her opponents for sake of manipulating elections, including using foreign actors and info to collude with foreign actors and agents against an opposition candidate= Collusion, abuse of Power, Treason, coup, maybe in some sense espionage by the Dems.
So Pelosi is not investigating corruption, they are the corruption and deflecting it and obstructing the real corruption investigation.

Remember BARR IS ALLOWED TO CONTACT FOREIGN NATIONS INVOLVED, but harassing him and trying to delay and use his time is=obstruction of Justice.
The president is required to stamp out corruption and when told by Barr to let countries involved know to cooperate with his investigation, then it is both the Sec. Of State and Presidents right to carry that out.
If you didn't have the whole Mueller probe open up this door then your party's skeletons would probably still be hidden. The fact Trump and the Country is allowed to defend itself against these abuses and treasonous acts means your denial of rights is further proof of a serious problem and fascist behavior by those supressing true investigations of true corruption.
Note Guilliani is an expert fighting mobsters and corruption, perfect for this task and that is why the state dept sent him in the lions den.
When treasonous politicians and media hosts and trolling forum posters blast Giuliani for being a patriot risking his life to erradicate corruption then ask yourself why you hate the national hero who cleans up mobster like behavior while you praise and supported pay to play Hillary and her sex offender
husband who in taking money from Saudis might have given a qid pro quo of letting Bin Laden slip away in 1998 thus inadvertantly leading to 9/11 all by and through this corruption, and greed and being politically compromised by said corruption those foreign parties can expose if you don't do their favors when asked.
That is where corruption and true qid pro quo can lead to thousands murdered and wars that lead to forming Isis, all through 1 single Saudis Sheik's envelope and favor.
View attachment 285115
In conclusion you chose the mobster like instigators of 9/11 (Clintons) over the hero (Giuliani) of the aftermath who's always stood for eradicating mobsters and political corruption.
Just thought you'd need to self reflect on that, because you seem to have forgotten which side of evil you are on.
Your long-winded fantasy doesn't change reality.

What I posted is true.

Crepitus....do yourself a favor. Ignore Assholes like this trumpette.....

They basically saying..."You did not hear what you and the rest of the world heard."

We are suppose to wait until trump tells us if we heard what we think we heard and read.

The Bastard in Chief is not "The Chosen One" as he stated.
1)thank you for admiting fascist behavior like censorship, asking others to tune out ones rights of speach=priceless admission.
2)both you and your party friend used
ad hominem personal attack responses, because the post was unrefutable.
3) are you gonna change your profile icon to a picture of Gabbard now or did you not get Hillary's memo on who to demonize next? *L*
"Russia Russia Russia everyone is a Russian agent"-SAYS Hillary Clinton
View attachment 285181
Pictured above: Gabbard with Russian spy Joseph Mifsud


I can Ignore who I please....as can you.....BYE!
IF in Sept 25, 2001 you were one of those bitter people trying to censor voices by telling people not to listen to me, then you'd still be fighting
Bin Laden with an intact millitary command and weapons cache as they would not have been destroyed or made impotent by the British army in operations on Oct 5 2001. Hundreds of thousands of people including our soldiers
would be dead because of you and who knows how many terrorist acts would have been carried out if they weren't squashed early on.
You also would have told them not to listen to my warning about the treasonous coup and spygate which became the premise of
Greg Jarret's book and today's eventual discussion on investigating corruption which is taking place in the D.O.J., which means you would have caused obstruction of justice while preventing me from saving this country a second time. That would make you an anti patriot all because you chose party before country and human pride(ego) before social and mental stability, and choosing forum trolling instead of forum mitzvahs. Use the New Year wisely to self reflect, censorship and not harkening to the voice of "the Philadelphian" is not a wise move, so you are wrong again in your response.
In Judaism
-[Devarim 30:3-5 & Deutronomy 18:18-19 &EXODUS 23:20]-Hilchot,Yesodei HaTorah, ch.9.-

In Christianity--Apocalypse of Paul 42 and
and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

and in Islam- Sura 2:98
 

Forum List

Back
Top