Mueller Is Coming for Trump

I have been generally more accurate than you, yes, Rambunctious, thank you for admitting that.

My party is the GOP, and the GOPers in the administration are investigating Trump (and I predict it won't turn out well for Trump.

You have no idea what is socialism. By your understanding, the new Senate bill and the old House bill on AHCA are socialistic: they are not. Trump received ELEVEN MILLION LESS VOTES than those who voted for him.

Rambunctious, you need to start thinking.

The Dems are not investigating Trump, the GOP is.
 
Comey said he did what he did to tell her a special investigation into obstruction. Who gives two fucks about democrats. They have been 100%ineffectual. All their leaks have come to naught, they are getting whipped on the regular at the polls and this investigation is comi to nothing again. Do like Trump and quietly wait for MSNBC to have to announce that the investigation has come out of nothing.
well first get the investigation correct, it is a counter intelligence investigation. period. stop listening to the dems.


Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.

It became a crime when we levied economic sanctions on Russia

Kushner better be clean
 
I have been generally more accurate than you, yes, Rambunctious, thank you for admitting that.

My party is the GOP, and the GOPers in the administration are investigating Trump (and I predict it won't turn out well for Trump.

You have no idea what is socialism. By your understanding, the new Senate bill and the old House bill on AHCA are socialistic: they are not. Trump received ELEVEN MILLION LESS VOTES than those who voted for him.

Rambunctious, you need to start thinking.

The Dems are not investigating Trump, the GOP is.


Trump received ELEVEN MILLION LESS VOTES than those who voted for him.

REALLY?


.
 
Another brain-dead con chimes in.

I say 'anyone associated with Trump's campaign,' ^^^ This one ^^^ hears, Trump himself.

Who would that be, and what did they do?
You know as well as I do that it's still under investigation and the FBI has not said. So who knows why you ask such stupid questions?

So if you have no clue who did what, then how do you justify an investigation? In a real investigation we at least know that someone in America has committed some kind of crime.

"We'll know when they tell us" isn't a legitimate response.
You're a fucking joke. In an FBI investigation, you have no clue about what's going on unless someone involved in the investigation informs the public -- which is rare prior to the conclusion of such an investigation.

That doesn't alter the fact that the FBI better have a clue, and they better have some justification for launching an investigation. However, what Comey and other intelligence officials, including members of Congress who are privy to the FBI's activities, have said there's no evidence of "collusion."

There's no evidence of anything illegal as far as the Trump administration is concerned. On the other hand, we know Obama administration officials broke the law. In fact, the only people who have broken laws are Obama admin dead-enders.

And I justify the investigation based on the FBI indicating there is something there worth investigating.

They've indicated precisely the opposite, idiot. They have said time and again that there's no evidence of "collusion." They claim Russian hacked the DNC server, but they've never examined it, so how would they know?

They know Russia hacked the election.

Actually, no they don't. Nobody will even say precisely what "hacked the election" means. It's just one of those bogeyman phrases Left-wingers use to scare the voters.

They know there were connections between Russians and some of Trump's campaign associates.

The "connections" meme is also pure bullshit propaganda. Sessions shakes the Russian ambassador's hand in front of 300 people and that is somehow a "connection." When you can prove someone discusses something nefarious with the Russians, then perhaps sensible won't laugh at you.

And they know Trump benefited from the hacking. Why are you so afraid for them to see if Trump's people were involved?

Whether he benefited is irrelevant.
Clapper said he was not aware of any evidence of collusion. But he's been out of the DNI since January. New information has been garnered since then, rendering his report at the time, irrelevant in terms of whatever evidence is currently available to the intelligence community.

That the FBI didn't personally inspect the DNC server is a red herring since no one is contending anyone from team Trump personally hacked the DNC. If collusion is there to be found, it will be in connections with Russians, not on the DNC server.

But there are now at least two investigations ongoing into the matter. We'll see what fruit they bear.
 
Comey said he did what he did to tell her a special investigation into obstruction. Who gives two fucks about democrats. They have been 100%ineffectual. All their leaks have come to naught, they are getting whipped on the regular at the polls and this investigation is comi to nothing again. Do like Trump and quietly wait for MSNBC to have to announce that the investigation has come out of nothing.
well first get the investigation correct, it is a counter intelligence investigation. period. stop listening to the dems.


Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.
 
Who knows what you find funny? :dunno: I'm sure Kushner's not laughing. Hell, he's lawyered up
Layering up is not evidence of guilt dupe...the sharks are circling so of course you call your attorney...notice I didn't say if?
LOLOL

Kushner's under investigation for money laundering. That's why he lawyered up.
What money did he launder? What money did he have that was obtained illegally?
Kushner is under investigation for doing business with a country under sanctions. Any money he received from such deals would have been obtained illegally.
 
well first get the investigation correct, it is a counter intelligence investigation. period. stop listening to the dems.


Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
 
Would of could of should of...LMAO now you guys are getting funny. Trump is playing you libs like a Stradivarius :biggrin:

Trump bluffed, and now the Comey memo's are the only version of what happened that will stand up in court. Now it's up to Trump to be deposed by Mueller

What memos? Has anyone seen these supposed memos? It seems Trump is calling Comey's bluff.
Mueller has them.
In other words, no one has ever seen them - more mysterious evidence to be revealed at a later date, preferably after the 2018 election, right?
 
well first get the investigation correct, it is a counter intelligence investigation. period. stop listening to the dems.


Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.
Not necessarily. It depends on the specific sanctions imposed.

I haven't seen anything that lists any sanctions on doing business there. Here is what CNN said:


According to statements from the White House and the Treasury Department, the government has sanctioned nine entities and individuals over their alleged interference in the election: the GRU and the FSB, which are two Russian intelligence services; four individual officers of the GRU; and three companies that provided material support to the GRU's operations.

The US also separately sanctioned two Russian individuals, Evgeniy Mikhailovich Bogachev and Alexey Belan, for using cyber-enabled means to allegedly cause misappropriation of funds and personal identifying information. They've long been sought by the FBI.

That's it. There's nothing about proscribing doing business with Russian firms or even with the Russian government.
 
Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.
Not necessarily. It depends on the specific sanctions imposed.

I haven't seen anything that lists any sanctions on doing business there. Here is what CNN said:


According to statements from the White House and the Treasury Department, the government has sanctioned nine entities and individuals over their alleged interference in the election: the GRU and the FSB, which are two Russian intelligence services; four individual officers of the GRU; and three companies that provided material support to the GRU's operations.

The US also separately sanctioned two Russian individuals, Evgeniy Mikhailovich Bogachev and Alexey Belan, for using cyber-enabled means to allegedly cause misappropriation of funds and personal identifying information. They've long been sought by the FBI.

That's it. There's nothing about proscribing doing business with Russian firms or even with the Russian government.
bri, now bringing facts into this is ludicrous.
 
well first get the investigation correct, it is a counter intelligence investigation. period. stop listening to the dems.


Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.


And who did that? I ho had financial dealings with a sanctioned country?
 
Not. Obstruction is all that's left now. Do date not one person on either side can point to one instance of any collusion or obstruction. Who cares. Let them work. Let the libs punch them selves out. They are already getting quieter.
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
Report suggests potentially alarming development in Jared Kushner's meeting with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank
 
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
Report suggests potentially alarming development in Jared Kushner's meeting with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank


And ? What's new? I hate being said that hasn't already?
 
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
Report suggests potentially alarming development in Jared Kushner's meeting with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank


And ? What's new? I hate being said that hasn't already?
Someone asked why Kushner is under investigation and I posted it.
 
Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
Report suggests potentially alarming development in Jared Kushner's meeting with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank


And ? What's new? I hate being said that hasn't already?
Someone asked why Kushner is under investigation and I posted it.
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/
 
Obstruction is a side issue

Still on the table......illegal contact with foreign agents, failure to disclose meeting foreign agents, financial dealings with a country under sanctions, collusion. Treason
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
Report suggests potentially alarming development in Jared Kushner's meeting with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank
<YAWN!>
 
Yeah, Kushner could be in a whole lotta hurt if financial deals with his name on them turn up. He better hope and pray his father-in-law lasts long enough in office to pardon him.

Even if he did have "financial deals" with the Russians, when did that become a crime? Hillary took $144 million from the Russians, and none of you brainless turds are whining about that.
It became a crime when such "financial deals" were with a country under sanctions; which is a federal crime.

What "financial deals?" We see a lot of talk among snow flakes about this, but no evidence. Furthermore, unless he's making a deal directly with the government, they aren't "with a country." Also, there's nothing in U.S. law that says you can't do business with businesses in a country that is under U.S. sanctions, unless those sanctions deal specifically with the kind of transaction you're making.

To sum up, your conspiracy theory is complete horseshit. Once again, there is no "there" there.
Report suggests potentially alarming development in Jared Kushner's meeting with the head of a sanctioned Russian bank
<YAWN!>
You asked what deal ... I show you ... and the best you can muster is showing the forum how sucking big cocks has loosened your jaw muscles to enable such big yawns?? <smh>
 

Forum List

Back
Top