Mueller Investigation Now Discredited; Based on FBI Misconduct

Nothing from this report invalidates the Mueller Special Counsel.....if anything, it confirms it needed to be taken out of the hands of the FBI running it and in to the lead of a Special Counsel.
3 of the major players in getting the Mueller probe are now fatally compromised and conflicted... this is a fantasy pipe dream..

Comey, McCabe, Strozk all discredited and looking at criminal charges...
 
Sessions is the idiot and for all I know is owned by The Russians.

The deeper you dig the more it looks like people should be tried for Treason including Obama and Clinton and there needs to be a Special Prosecutor who cannot be bought or compromised to take down The Clinton Obama Deep State.

If the Mueller investigation is based on the disgraceful and politically motivated actions of a cabal at upper echelon of FBI and mainstream media...then it is discredited. If the people involved in being a catalyst for FISA warrants and far reaching fantasies that they are acting like heroes are fired...then Trump investigation should be ended.
IG report criticizes Comey's handling of Clinton probe, includes anti-Trump exchanges among FBI personnel

The IG specifically pointed out that he found no evidence that there was any political motivated actions- even as he found that there Comey acted in ways that hurt Clinton- and helped Trump.

And of course- didn't mention Mueller at all.
Horowitz is an idiot. These fuckers actively talked about “stopping” Trump. Also, who are FBI agents 1and 2?What the fuck is that all about? How about some names? Part 2 of IG report is to come. It deals with Russia investigation. Part 1 shows a clear bias. Thus Mueller investigation is 100% tainted.
 
It Is like the Comey thing with Hillary where they read the list of horrors but then say not illegal because they didn’t mean to be bad
 
Nope...socialist like Jim Jones and Barry Sotoro have cult followings.


Your desperation is just a bit funny......
Desperation at what? You liberals have shit your pants and screamed at the sky since Trump was elected. :crybaby:
This report is already backfiring on democrats... People are tuning in FOX and learning the facts their propaganda stations wont tell them and they are seeing the facts themselves..

And what are those 'facts'- I mean other than the Fake News generated by Lying Donnie that you folks slurp up?
 
Nope...socialist like Jim Jones and Barry Sotoro have cult followings.


Your desperation is just a bit funny......
Desperation at what? You liberals have shit your pants and screamed at the sky since Trump was elected. :crybaby:
This report is already backfiring on democrats... People are tuning in FOX and learning the facts their propaganda stations wont tell them and they are seeing the facts themselves..

And what are those 'facts'- I mean other than the Fake News generated by Lying Donnie that you folks slurp up?
Continue wearing your blinders... Hillary will win someday...
 
Nothing from this report invalidates the Mueller Special Counsel.....if anything, it confirms it needed to be taken out of the hands of the FBI running it and in to the lead of a Special Counsel.
3 of the major players in getting the Mueller probe are now fatally compromised and conflicted... this is a fantasy pipe dream..
here's your problem....

the IG's goal was to find out if anyone, (Strzok or Page or Comey etc) did anything wrong, in the investigation of Hillary and with the FBI Russia investigation....those 568 pages of the IG's report show all the wrong doings with the investigation involved the FBI treating Hillary unfairly.

And although Page and Strzok were biased in their personal emails, his investigation showed no political bias was exhibited by either of them when it came to decisions made in either of the two investigations.

AND even McCabe was fired for treating Hillary UNFAIRLY by leaking things on the Clinton Foundation investigation to the press and lying about it.....AGAIN, the FBI harmed Hillary....all of which, HELPED Trump.
 
You cannot conclude that they politically hate Trump but no political bias is involved
 
Nope...socialist like Jim Jones and Barry Sotoro have cult followings.


Your desperation is just a bit funny......
Desperation at what? You liberals have shit your pants and screamed at the sky since Trump was elected. :crybaby:
This report is already backfiring on democrats... People are tuning in FOX and learning the facts their propaganda stations wont tell them and they are seeing the facts themselves..

No. We're watching fox to see the crazies heads explode. It's very entertaining.
 
You cannot conclude that they politically hate Trump but no political bias is involved

They did conclude that any inappropriate actions helped Trump and hurt Hillary. Your hopes were just turned to crap. I feel your pain.
 
You cannot conclude that they politically hate Trump but no political bias is involved
the IG said he went over every decision they made in the investigation and he found no decisions that were made with bias...

you can twist and turn all ya want, but it will not change the tangible facts...
 
Republicans hold the house, senate, presidency, DOJ, and yet they can't prosecute any of these supposed criminals that are working against them.

They are either full of shit or as dumb an inept as a rock. I'm going with both.
 

The deeper you dig the more it looks like people should be tried for Treason including Obama and Clinton

upload_2018-6-14_22-17-52.jpeg
 
You cannot conclude that they politically hate Trump but no political bias is involved
the IG said he went over every decision they made in the investigation and he found no decisions that were made with bias...

you can twist and turn all ya want, but it will not change the tangible facts...


Well remember- they are Trumpsters- they will not only twist the facts- they will deny them and insist on their 'alternate facts'.....
 
Ze Republikans have gotten zeir instruktsii from Ze Centre.

#GoodDogs #KneelBeforeTrump
 
Nothing from this report invalidates the Mueller Special Counsel.....if anything, it confirms it needed to be taken out of the hands of the FBI running it and in to the lead of a Special Counsel.
3 of the major players in getting the Mueller probe are now fatally compromised and conflicted... this is a fantasy pipe dream..
here's your problem....

the IG's goal was to find out if anyone, (Strzok or Page or Comey etc) did anything wrong, in the investigation of Hillary and with the FBI Russia investigation....those 568 pages of the IG's report show all the wrong doings with the investigation involved the FBI treating Hillary unfairly.

And although Page and Strzok were biased in their personal emails, his investigation showed no political bias was exhibited by either of them when it came to decisions made in either of the two investigations.

AND even McCabe was fired for treating Hillary UNFAIRLY by leaking things on the Clinton Foundation investigation to the press and lying about it.....AGAIN, the FBI harmed Hillary....all of which, HELPED Trump.
No...Russian IG report yet to come. This only dealt with Hillary. But does indicate liberal agents who supported Hillary stopped that investigation on a dime and went after Trump to “stop him.”
 
You cannot conclude that they politically hate Trump but no political bias is involved
the IG said he went over every decision they made in the investigation and he found no decisions that were made with bias...

you can twist and turn all ya want, but it will not change the tangible facts...


Well remember- they are Trumpsters- they will not only twist the facts- they will deny them and insist on their 'alternate facts'.....
The FACTS are that there was a political bias in upper echelons of FBI. Horowitz conclusions do not support the body of evidence in his own report.
 
Liberals know there was a political bias and a tainted process leading to creating Mueller investigation. You can read it in the IG report part 1..

Except of course that the IG report doesn't say that.

Except for the facts.

Those pesky facts.

Trumpsters hate the facts.
 
Nothing from this report invalidates the Mueller Special Counsel.....if anything, it confirms it needed to be taken out of the hands of the FBI running it and in to the lead of a Special Counsel.
3 of the major players in getting the Mueller probe are now fatally compromised and conflicted... this is a fantasy pipe dream..
here's your problem....

the IG's goal was to find out if anyone, (Strzok or Page or Comey etc) did anything wrong, in the investigation of Hillary and with the FBI Russia investigation....those 568 pages of the IG's report show all the wrong doings with the investigation involved the FBI treating Hillary unfairly.

And although Page and Strzok were biased in their personal emails, his investigation showed no political bias was exhibited by either of them when it came to decisions made in either of the two investigations.

AND even McCabe was fired for treating Hillary UNFAIRLY by leaking things on the Clinton Foundation investigation to the press and lying about it.....AGAIN, the FBI harmed Hillary....all of which, HELPED Trump.
No...Russian IG report yet to come. This only dealt with Hillary. But does indicate liberal agents who supported Hillary stopped that investigation on a dime and went after Trump to “stop him.”

No- again- you are just lying.

The report actually says the opposite.

The report actually says that the actions by the FBI harmed Clinton.

And doesn't say a thing about 'liberal' agents who supported Clinton

Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz found little affirmative evidence on the whole that political bias affected officials’ handling of the probe itself. (You can read the full text at this link.)

Indeed, FBI director Christopher Wray — appointed by Trump to replace Comey last year — said at a Thursday afternoon press conference that “this report did not find any evidence of political bias or improper considerations actually impacting the investigation under review.”

First, Horowitz writes, FBI officials involved in the case sent each other messages on their FBI devices “that created the appearance” of political bias. Here he particularly criticizes FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok for texting his co-worker and lover, Lisa Page, that “we’ll stop” Trump from winning the election.


Horowitz says he found no affirmative evidence that Strzok skewed his decision-making for political reasons. But he says he “did not have confidence” that Strzok’s decision in the campaign’s final month to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia probe over new Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop “was free from bias.” He writes that Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation.


Second, Horowitz sharply criticizes then-FBI director James Comey for his public statements about the Clinton email case — specifically, his July 2016 decision to publicly announce that he wouldn’t recommend any charges, and then his October 2016 decision to tell Congress about that new emails had been found.


Horowitz concluded that while Comey didn‘t act out of political bias, he “usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decisionmaking.” He writes that the Clinton email case was indeed extremely unusual — but that established procedures “are most important to follow when the stakes are the highest.”
The long-awaited inspector general report on the FBI, Comey, Clinton, and 2016, explained
 
Nothing from this report invalidates the Mueller Special Counsel.....if anything, it confirms it needed to be taken out of the hands of the FBI running it and in to the lead of a Special Counsel.
3 of the major players in getting the Mueller probe are now fatally compromised and conflicted... this is a fantasy pipe dream..
here's your problem....

the IG's goal was to find out if anyone, (Strzok or Page or Comey etc) did anything wrong, in the investigation of Hillary and with the FBI Russia investigation....those 568 pages of the IG's report show all the wrong doings with the investigation involved the FBI treating Hillary unfairly.

And although Page and Strzok were biased in their personal emails, his investigation showed no political bias was exhibited by either of them when it came to decisions made in either of the two investigations.

AND even McCabe was fired for treating Hillary UNFAIRLY by leaking things on the Clinton Foundation investigation to the press and lying about it.....AGAIN, the FBI harmed Hillary....all of which, HELPED Trump.
No...Russian IG report yet to come. This only dealt with Hillary. But does indicate liberal agents who supported Hillary stopped that investigation on a dime and went after Trump to “stop him.”

No- again- you are just lying.

The report actually says the opposite.

The report actually says that the actions by the FBI harmed Clinton.

And doesn't say a thing about 'liberal' agents who supported Clinton

Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz found little affirmative evidence on the whole that political bias affected officials’ handling of the probe itself. (You can read the full text at this link.)

Indeed, FBI director Christopher Wray — appointed by Trump to replace Comey last year — said at a Thursday afternoon press conference that “this report did not find any evidence of political bias or improper considerations actually impacting the investigation under review.”

First, Horowitz writes, FBI officials involved in the case sent each other messages on their FBI devices “that created the appearance” of political bias. Here he particularly criticizes FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok for texting his co-worker and lover, Lisa Page, that “we’ll stop” Trump from winning the election.


Horowitz says he found no affirmative evidence that Strzok skewed his decision-making for political reasons. But he says he “did not have confidence” that Strzok’s decision in the campaign’s final month to prioritize the Trump campaign/Russia probe over new Clinton emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop “was free from bias.” He writes that Strzok and other FBI employees “brought discredit to themselves” and hurt the bureau’s reputation.


Second, Horowitz sharply criticizes then-FBI director James Comey for his public statements about the Clinton email case — specifically, his July 2016 decision to publicly announce that he wouldn’t recommend any charges, and then his October 2016 decision to tell Congress about that new emails had been found.


Horowitz concluded that while Comey didn‘t act out of political bias, he “usurped the authority of the Attorney General,” “chose to deviate” from established procedures, and engaged “in his own subjective, ad hoc decisionmaking.” He writes that the Clinton email case was indeed extremely unusual — but that established procedures “are most important to follow when the stakes are the highest.”
The long-awaited inspector general report on the FBI, Comey, Clinton, and 2016, explained
If there was no wrong doing, why are agents going to be disciplined? Surely your not stupid enough to believe their actions were not intentional?
 

Forum List

Back
Top