Mueller Clown Show: Worse Than Anthrax Bungling, and Enron Railroading.

[Skylar]

WTF?

I never said Mueller and Comey murdered anyone, dumbass. Stop making shit up, even though it is what you do best.

I did. Mueller was an accessory to 19 murders by Whitey Bulger.

Oh yeah. The batshit conspiracy hysteria that the right is rolling around in like a pig in mud.....just keeps getting batshittier.

With Tree insisting "THIS IN NAZI GERMANY!!!" and now accusing Mueller of being a murderer. The more indictments that come down, the more Mueller works his way up the Trump team ladder, the more wild, baseless, and hysteric the Trumpies accusations become.

I never said America was Nazi Germany. I said The DemNazis use Nazi tactics to leverage power and to gain it. If it looks like a DemNazi, quacks like a DemNazi, walks like a DemNazi, and talks like a DemNazi, it's a DemNazi.

DemNazis, same as them Nazis.

You said, and I quote 'We are in Nazi Germany!'

Don't try to backpedal from your insane panty shitting hysterics now.

Trying to force people to lie while interrogating them is against the law. It is called Suborning Perjury. This is a standard tactic of Nazis in Nazi Germany when they were hunting down their political enemies.

Save for one small problem in your batshit conspiracy theory; Corsi's emails demonstrate that he lied to investigators. Corsi told investigators that he declined Stone's request to get in contact with Julian Assange and collect information on data dumps of documents held by Wikileaks.

Corsi's emails prove that he did *exactly* what Stone asked him.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Corsi got in touch with a contact in London. That contact got the information that Stone requested from Julian Assange and delivered to Corsi. Corsi delivered that information to Stone. Exactly as Stone requested.

Corsi lied.

Just destroying your silly claim that Mueller tried to threaten Corsi into commiting perjury. And your blithering hysterics about how 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!"

You're gonna need another fainting couch and a bit more running mascara for your next bout of hysteric hyperbole, Tree.

 

[The Original Tree]

I did. Mueller was an accessory to 19 murders by Whitey Bulger.

Oh yeah. The batshit conspiracy hysteria that the right is rolling around in like a pig in mud.....just keeps getting batshittier.

With Tree insisting "THIS IN NAZI GERMANY!!!" and now accusing Mueller of being a murderer. The more indictments that come down, the more Mueller works his way up the Trump team ladder, the more wild, baseless, and hysteric the Trumpies accusations become.

I never said America was Nazi Germany. I said The DemNazis use Nazi tactics to leverage power and to gain it. If it looks like a DemNazi, quacks like a DemNazi, walks like a DemNazi, and talks like a DemNazi, it's a DemNazi.

DemNazis, same as them Nazis.

You said, and I quote 'We are in Nazi Germany!'

Don't try to backpedal from your insane panty shitting hysterics now.

Trying to force people to lie while interrogating them is against the law. It is called Suborning Perjury. This is a standard tactic of Nazis in Nazi Germany when they were hunting down their political enemies.

Save for one small problem in your batshit conspiracy theory; Corsi's emails demonstrate that he lied to investigators. Corsi told investigators that he declined Stone's request to get in contact with Julian Assange and collect information on data dumps of documents held by Wikileaks.

Corsi's emails prove that he did *exactly* what Stone asked him.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Corsi got in touch with a contact in London. That contact got the information that Stone requested from Julian Assange and delivered to Corsi. Corsi delivered that information to Stone. Exactly as Stone requested.

Corsi lied.

Just destroying your silly claim that Mueller tried to threaten Corsi into commiting perjury. And your blithering hysterics about how 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!"

You're gonna need another fainting couch and a bit more running mascara for your next bout of hysteric hyperbole, Tree.

There will be a court case to determine Mueller's guilt so I hardly believe this is an illegitimate charge like so called "Russian Collusion" is. Corsi has filed a 70 plus page lawsuit detailing each violation of his Civil Rights and each crime committed by Mueller.

Corsi said, you lied, and Mueller is lying. Who do we believe, you with an Axe to Grind, and avowed Trump hater, Mueller who stocked his team with criminals half of which had to be fired and are under investigation? Mueller and his team have been charged with prosecutorial misconduct, manufacturing evidence, falsifying testimony, and have cost the taxpayers millions of dollars in restitution for knowingly sending innocent men to jail and suppressing exculpatory evidence. Mueller is a criminal like Comey, Lynch and Holder who hid The Rosatom Bribery scandal so Obama and Clinton could do Putin a favor and sell him 20% of our Uranium.

BTW, what is The DemNazi Vendetta against anything Infowars now?

 

[Skylar]

Oh yeah. The batshit conspiracy hysteria that the right is rolling around in like a pig in mud.....just keeps getting batshittier.

With Tree insisting "THIS IN NAZI GERMANY!!!" and now accusing Mueller of being a murderer. The more indictments that come down, the more Mueller works his way up the Trump team ladder, the more wild, baseless, and hysteric the Trumpies accusations become.

I never said America was Nazi Germany. I said The DemNazis use Nazi tactics to leverage power and to gain it. If it looks like a DemNazi, quacks like a DemNazi, walks like a DemNazi, and talks like a DemNazi, it's a DemNazi.

DemNazis, same as them Nazis.

You said, and I quote 'We are in Nazi Germany!'

Don't try to backpedal from your insane panty shitting hysterics now.

Trying to force people to lie while interrogating them is against the law. It is called Suborning Perjury. This is a standard tactic of Nazis in Nazi Germany when they were hunting down their political enemies.

Save for one small problem in your batshit conspiracy theory; Corsi's emails demonstrate that he lied to investigators. Corsi told investigators that he declined Stone's request to get in contact with Julian Assange and collect information on data dumps of documents held by Wikileaks.

Corsi's emails prove that he did *exactly* what Stone asked him.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Corsi got in touch with a contact in London. That contact got the information that Stone requested from Julian Assange and delivered to Corsi. Corsi delivered that information to Stone. Exactly as Stone requested.

Corsi lied.

Just destroying your silly claim that Mueller tried to threaten Corsi into commiting perjury. And your blithering hysterics about how 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!"

You're gonna need another fainting couch and a bit more running mascara for your next bout of hysteric hyperbole, Tree.

There will be a court case to determine Mueller's guilt so I hardly believe this is an illegitimate charge like so called "Russian Collusion" is. Corsi has filed a 70 plus page lawsuit detailing each violation of his Civil Rights and each crime committed by Mueller.

Corsi can file whatever he likes and make whatever accusation he likes. What he doesn't have is evidence to back his claims.

While Mueller....has emails proving that Corsi lied.

See, you have no use for evidence. You work exclusively on accusation, emotion and conspiracy speculation.
And that's what separates Corsi's accusations from Mueller's investigation: Evidence. Evidence you ignore and pretend doesn't exist:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Ignore as you will. The courts won't.

Smiling.....but scream 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!' for us again. Just for panty shitting old times sake.

 

[The Original Tree]

I never said America was Nazi Germany. I said The DemNazis use Nazi tactics to leverage power and to gain it. If it looks like a DemNazi, quacks like a DemNazi, walks like a DemNazi, and talks like a DemNazi, it's a DemNazi.

DemNazis, same as them Nazis.

You said, and I quote 'We are in Nazi Germany!'

Don't try to backpedal from your insane panty shitting hysterics now.

Trying to force people to lie while interrogating them is against the law. It is called Suborning Perjury. This is a standard tactic of Nazis in Nazi Germany when they were hunting down their political enemies.

Save for one small problem in your batshit conspiracy theory; Corsi's emails demonstrate that he lied to investigators. Corsi told investigators that he declined Stone's request to get in contact with Julian Assange and collect information on data dumps of documents held by Wikileaks.

Corsi's emails prove that he did *exactly* what Stone asked him.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Corsi got in touch with a contact in London. That contact got the information that Stone requested from Julian Assange and delivered to Corsi. Corsi delivered that information to Stone. Exactly as Stone requested.

Corsi lied.

Just destroying your silly claim that Mueller tried to threaten Corsi into commiting perjury. And your blithering hysterics about how 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!"

You're gonna need another fainting couch and a bit more running mascara for your next bout of hysteric hyperbole, Tree.

There will be a court case to determine Mueller's guilt so I hardly believe this is an illegitimate charge like so called "Russian Collusion" is. Corsi has filed a 70 plus page lawsuit detailing each violation of his Civil Rights and each crime committed by Mueller.

Corsi can file whatever he likes and make whatever accusation he likes. What he doesn't have is evidence to back his claims.

While Mueller....has emails proving that Corsi lied.

See, you have no use for evidence. You work exclusively on accusation, emotion and conspiracy speculation.
And that's what separates Corsi's accusations from Mueller's investigation: Evidence. Evidence you ignore and pretend doesn't exist:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Ignore as you will. The courts won't.

Smiling.....but scream 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!' for us again. Just for panty shitting old times sake.

He has way more Evidence of Mueller being a Criminal that Mueller has of anyone visiting Assange. Mueller's reputation is right up there with Creepy Porn Lawyer Avenatti who literally screwed Porn Slut, Spermy Daniels out of millions of dollars meant for her protection and legal defense that he pocketed himself.

Stormy Daniels says Michael Avenatti sued Trump without permission | Daily Mail Online

I'm sure you will double down on electing Creepy Porn Lawyer as president if he runs in the Clown Show known as The Rigged DNC Primary

DemNazis same as Them Nazis

 

[Skylar]

You said, and I quote 'We are in Nazi Germany!'

Don't try to backpedal from your insane panty shitting hysterics now.

Trying to force people to lie while interrogating them is against the law. It is called Suborning Perjury. This is a standard tactic of Nazis in Nazi Germany when they were hunting down their political enemies.

Save for one small problem in your batshit conspiracy theory; Corsi's emails demonstrate that he lied to investigators. Corsi told investigators that he declined Stone's request to get in contact with Julian Assange and collect information on data dumps of documents held by Wikileaks.

Corsi's emails prove that he did *exactly* what Stone asked him.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Corsi got in touch with a contact in London. That contact got the information that Stone requested from Julian Assange and delivered to Corsi. Corsi delivered that information to Stone. Exactly as Stone requested.

Corsi lied.

Just destroying your silly claim that Mueller tried to threaten Corsi into commiting perjury. And your blithering hysterics about how 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!"

You're gonna need another fainting couch and a bit more running mascara for your next bout of hysteric hyperbole, Tree.

There will be a court case to determine Mueller's guilt so I hardly believe this is an illegitimate charge like so called "Russian Collusion" is. Corsi has filed a 70 plus page lawsuit detailing each violation of his Civil Rights and each crime committed by Mueller.

Corsi can file whatever he likes and make whatever accusation he likes. What he doesn't have is evidence to back his claims.

While Mueller....has emails proving that Corsi lied.

See, you have no use for evidence. You work exclusively on accusation, emotion and conspiracy speculation.
And that's what separates Corsi's accusations from Mueller's investigation: Evidence. Evidence you ignore and pretend doesn't exist:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Ignore as you will. The courts won't.

Smiling.....but scream 'WE'RE IN NAZI GERMANY!!!' for us again. Just for panty shitting old times sake.

He has way more Evidence of Mueller being a Criminal that Mueller has of anyone visiting Assange. Mueller's reputation is right up there with Creepy Porn Lawyer Avenatti who literally screwed Porn Slut, Spermy Daniels out of millions of dollars meant for her protection and legal defense that he pocketed himself.

Corsi has presented no evidence that Mueller is a criminal. He's made the accusation. Backed by nothing.

See, you equate accusations with evidence. But the courts don't. Mueller didn't merely 'accuse' Corsi of lying to Federal Authorities about contacts with Julian Assange.

Mueller proved it with evdence; Corsi's own emails.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Evidence you ignore and pretend doesn't exist.

Good luck with that.

 

[The Original Tree]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

Why yes you do. We now know quite a bit more about you than we really wanted to.

DemNazis same as Them Nazis

 

[Skylar]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

 

[The Original Tree]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

GOT......RUSSIAN.......COLLUSION?


What Evidence? The Evidence That Herr Mueller is a DemNazi Operative acting like a Spanish Inquisitor? 72 pages of Evidence filed with the IG...that evidence?

You never answered one question I posed. You said you agreed with a prosecutor like Mueller using Illegal and Unethical Tactics to violate someone's Constitutional Rights to get what they wanted, even if they knew they were lying to the court, even if Mueller was knowingly falsifying evidence, and submitting false testimony to The Court from a witness whose life was being destroyed and who under extreme duress consented to telling the lies Mueller wanted them to tell....so long as in the end....Herr Mueller The DemNazi Inquisitor General gets what he wanted?

I'd like you to answer why you think Law Enforcement can violate a person's Constitutional and Civil Rights just because they have an agenda and bias against that person.

You also said you were fine with Comey, Yates, Rosenstein, and McCabe knowingly submitting False Affidavits in the FISA Court when they used The Salacious and False Clinton Funded Russian Dossier to spy on a Rival Presidential Candidate they were afraid would drain their little corrupt swamp of self enrichment.

Can I get a Seig Heil Herr Mueller from you?

Come on, you know you want to click your heels together and give Merr Mueller your DemNazi salute!

Tell the truth, you put on a funny little mustache and have been practicing your goose stepping for the day when the next DemNazi President is elected, haven't you?

 

[Skylar]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

What Evidence? T

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

 

[The Original Tree]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

What Evidence? T

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

I am asking you again...... Do you think that a Special Counsel and his team despite the fact they may be partisan, contributed to a rival campaign Financially and Have Personal Relationships with Hillary Clinton should be held to such a high Standard as to Prohibit Prosecutorial Misconduct, Suborning Perjury, Filing False Affidavits, Submitting False Testimony, Pressuring Witnesses to Submit False Testimony, and Threatening their so called 'witnesses' with Financial and Personal Ruin if they do not provide The Testimony The Special Counsel wants to hear as opposed to Telling The Truth and Nothing But The Truth?

Those kinds of tactics are illegal and unethical and that is not what America is about. Those are Nazi tactics.

An Easy Yes or No to my question would suffice.

If you answer Yes, then I need to call your Hypocrisy in to question. MY HUNCH IS YOU WILL WALK AWAY WITHOUT ANSWERING LIKE THE COWARD YOU ARE.

 

[Skylar]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

What Evidence? T

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

I am asking you again...... Do you think that a Special Counsel and his team despite the fact they may be partisan, contributed to a rival campaign Financially and Have Personal Relationships with Hillary Clinton should be held to such a high Standard as to Prohibit Prosecutorial Misconduct, Suborning Perjury, Filing False Affidavits, Submitting False Testimony, Pressuring Witnesses to Submit False Testimony, and Threatening their so called 'witnesses' with Financial and Personal Ruin if they do not provide The Testimony The Special Counsel wants to hear as opposed to Telling The Truth and Nothing But The Truth?

Your claims of 'prosecutorial misconduct' lack evidence. Your claims of 'suborning perjury' lack evidence. Your claims of 'filing false affidavits' lack evidence. And your word salad level accusations demonstrate that you continue to equate any accusation you can make up as evidence.

Accusations aren't evidence. You haven't factually established your claims. You just keep spewing increasingly disjoined, bizarre, obscure and poorly thought through conspiracies.

Meanwhile, Corsi's emails factually establish that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Your obsessive fixation on ignoring the evidence doesn't make the evidence disappear, Tree.

It just demonstrates that you don't use evidence as the foundation of the bizarre conspiracy theories you make up.

 

[The Original Tree]

So in other words, you agree with Prosecutors bankrupting people and destroying their lives and getting them to admit to crimes they did not commit. You agree with prosecutorial misconduct because of your personal hatred and bias towards President Trump. You agree with sedition, treason, plotting coups, falsifying affidavits in a FISA court, and you agree with Obama and The Clinton Campaign colluding with Russia and Foreign Agents to purchase Propaganda to be used in our elections in order to manipulate the public and alter the outcome of our elections?

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

What Evidence? T

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

I am asking you again...... Do you think that a Special Counsel and his team despite the fact they may be partisan, contributed to a rival campaign Financially and Have Personal Relationships with Hillary Clinton should be held to such a high Standard as to Prohibit Prosecutorial Misconduct, Suborning Perjury, Filing False Affidavits, Submitting False Testimony, Pressuring Witnesses to Submit False Testimony, and Threatening their so called 'witnesses' with Financial and Personal Ruin if they do not provide The Testimony The Special Counsel wants to hear as opposed to Telling The Truth and Nothing But The Truth?

Your claims of 'prosecutorial misconduct' lack evidence. Your claims of 'suborning perjury' lack evidence. Your claims of 'filing false affidavits' lack evidence. And your word salad level accusations demonstrate that you continue to equate any accusation you can make up as evidence.

Accusations aren't evidence. You haven't factually established your claims. You just keep spewing increasingly disjoined, bizarre, obscure and poorly thought through conspiracies.

Meanwhile, Corsi's emails factually establish that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Your obsessive fixation on ignoring the evidence doesn't make the evidence disappear, Tree.

It just demonstrates that you don't use evidence as the foundation of the bizarre conspiracy theories you make up.

That quote doesn't even remotely point to "Collusion with Anyone" It was widely know that an email dump was coming. It means nothing. Nothing that is unless you are manufacturing evidence and are engaged in an endless limitless unrestricted fishing expedition with the goal of "Get Trump". That is what a witch hunt is. An endless series of politically motivated investigations with the sole purposes of finding crimes the investigator has yet to name.

In other words it is entirely illegitimate and unethical, just like you.

Again, I ask you, should Robert Mueller face penalties, and have to answer in a court of law for breaking the law when trying to coerce witnesses to lie under oath?

Yes or No?

 

[Skylar]

In other words, I agree with the evidence. And Mueller has the evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

Its not coincidence that you omit any mention of the evidence that Mueller has demonstrating Corsi lied. As you have no use for evidence. You run on pure emotion, pure conspiracy batshit.

Courts use evidence. Which is why you so consistently fail.

What Evidence? T

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

I am asking you again...... Do you think that a Special Counsel and his team despite the fact they may be partisan, contributed to a rival campaign Financially and Have Personal Relationships with Hillary Clinton should be held to such a high Standard as to Prohibit Prosecutorial Misconduct, Suborning Perjury, Filing False Affidavits, Submitting False Testimony, Pressuring Witnesses to Submit False Testimony, and Threatening their so called 'witnesses' with Financial and Personal Ruin if they do not provide The Testimony The Special Counsel wants to hear as opposed to Telling The Truth and Nothing But The Truth?

Your claims of 'prosecutorial misconduct' lack evidence. Your claims of 'suborning perjury' lack evidence. Your claims of 'filing false affidavits' lack evidence. And your word salad level accusations demonstrate that you continue to equate any accusation you can make up as evidence.

Accusations aren't evidence. You haven't factually established your claims. You just keep spewing increasingly disjoined, bizarre, obscure and poorly thought through conspiracies.

Meanwhile, Corsi's emails factually establish that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Your obsessive fixation on ignoring the evidence doesn't make the evidence disappear, Tree.

It just demonstrates that you don't use evidence as the foundation of the bizarre conspiracy theories you make up.

That quote doesn't even remotely point to "Collusion with Anyone" It was widely know that an email dump was coming. It means nothing. Nothing that is unless you are manufacturing evidence and are engage in an endless limitless unrestricted fishing expedition with the goal of "Get Trump"

It means that Corsi lied to federal investigators. It means that he didn't decline Stone's request to get in touch with Jullian Assange about unreleased documents that could hurt Hillary.

It means that contrary to what Corsi told federal investigators, Corsi pursued contact with Assange. That Corsi got a hold of a contact in London and had him convey Stone's request for information on undisclosed documents to Assange. It means that this contact relayed the information Assange to Corsi. It means that Corsi delivered the information to Stone.

Exactly as Stone asked him too.

And it demonstrates, with evidence, that Corsi lied to federal investigators. Just obliterating your hysteric rant about Mueller 'suborning perjury'. As Mueller's account of Corsi's actions is factually accurate, backed with evidence.

Its Corsi that has lied.

Again, I ask you, should Robert Mueller face penalties, and have to answer in a court of law for breaking the law when trying to coerce witnesses to lie under oath?

Your claim that Mueller has broken the law trying to cooerce a witness to lie under oath lacks evidence.

To the contrary, Mueller has factually established Corsi did in fact lie to federal investigators with Corsi's own email.

Thus, your entire narrative predictably collapses.

 

[basquebromance]

Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu barked orders at his guards as they led him to the firing squad.

with Trump, history, my friends, is repeating itself!

 

[The Original Tree]

What Evidence? T

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

I am asking you again...... Do you think that a Special Counsel and his team despite the fact they may be partisan, contributed to a rival campaign Financially and Have Personal Relationships with Hillary Clinton should be held to such a high Standard as to Prohibit Prosecutorial Misconduct, Suborning Perjury, Filing False Affidavits, Submitting False Testimony, Pressuring Witnesses to Submit False Testimony, and Threatening their so called 'witnesses' with Financial and Personal Ruin if they do not provide The Testimony The Special Counsel wants to hear as opposed to Telling The Truth and Nothing But The Truth?

Your claims of 'prosecutorial misconduct' lack evidence. Your claims of 'suborning perjury' lack evidence. Your claims of 'filing false affidavits' lack evidence. And your word salad level accusations demonstrate that you continue to equate any accusation you can make up as evidence.

Accusations aren't evidence. You haven't factually established your claims. You just keep spewing increasingly disjoined, bizarre, obscure and poorly thought through conspiracies.

Meanwhile, Corsi's emails factually establish that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Your obsessive fixation on ignoring the evidence doesn't make the evidence disappear, Tree.

It just demonstrates that you don't use evidence as the foundation of the bizarre conspiracy theories you make up.

That quote doesn't even remotely point to "Collusion with Anyone" It was widely know that an email dump was coming. It means nothing. Nothing that is unless you are manufacturing evidence and are engage in an endless limitless unrestricted fishing expedition with the goal of "Get Trump"

It means that Corsi lied to federal investigators. It means that he didn't decline Stone's request to get in touch with Jullian Assange about unreleased documents that could hurt Hillary.

It means that contrary to what Corsi told federal investigators, Corsi pursued contact with Assange. That Corsi got a hold of a contact in London and had him convey Stone's request for information on undisclosed documents to Assange. It means that this contact relayed the information Assange to Corsi. It means that Corsi delivered the information to Stone.

Exactly as Stone asked him too.

And it demonstrates, with evidence, that Corsi lied to federal investigators. Just obliterating your hysteric rant about Mueller 'suborning perjury'. As Mueller's account of Corsi's actions is factually accurate, backed with evidence.

Its Corsi that has lied.

Again, I ask you, should Robert Mueller face penalties, and have to answer in a court of law for breaking the law when trying to coerce witnesses to lie under oath?

Your claim that Mueller has broken the law trying to cooerce a witness to lie under oath lacks evidence.

To the contrary, Mueller has factually established Corsi did in fact lie to federal investigators with Corsi's own email.

Thus, your entire narrative predictably collapses.

Again, I am asking that if Mueller is breaking the law bullying bankrupting, harassing, and twisting arms to get witnesses to submit false testimony rather than simply telling the truth, should Mueller be put on trial for it? If found guilty should he do jail time or pay an extremely painful financial price for it?

If for instance Hillary Clinton lied, and she did, should she have been put on trial, and paid a price for her numerous perjuries, high crimes and misdemeanors?

I can't even get you to answer one simple fucking question, so there is another one. A simple yes or no will do.

 

[The Original Tree]

Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu barked orders at his guards as they led him to the firing squad.

with Trump, history, my friends, is repeating itself!

So looks like you are in favor of Mueller facing a firing squad for crimes against America. I agree.

 

[Skylar]

The evidence I've shown you and you've consistently ignored and refused to acknowledge in every reply:

Emails from Corsi that document Corsi carrying out Stone's request to make contact with Jullian Assange about coordinated efforts to release emails stolen by Russia to harm Hillary's campaign.

This has been shared with you....what? Half a dozen times now. And yet you continue to ignore it.

As I said, you have no use for evidence. You don't use evidence to form your positions, merely working on pure emotion and imagination. You ignore evidence when you're contradicted with it.

The reason you fail....is that the courts DO use evidence. As demonstrated by the indictments, the convictions and the guilty pleas.

I am asking you again...... Do you think that a Special Counsel and his team despite the fact they may be partisan, contributed to a rival campaign Financially and Have Personal Relationships with Hillary Clinton should be held to such a high Standard as to Prohibit Prosecutorial Misconduct, Suborning Perjury, Filing False Affidavits, Submitting False Testimony, Pressuring Witnesses to Submit False Testimony, and Threatening their so called 'witnesses' with Financial and Personal Ruin if they do not provide The Testimony The Special Counsel wants to hear as opposed to Telling The Truth and Nothing But The Truth?

Your claims of 'prosecutorial misconduct' lack evidence. Your claims of 'suborning perjury' lack evidence. Your claims of 'filing false affidavits' lack evidence. And your word salad level accusations demonstrate that you continue to equate any accusation you can make up as evidence.

Accusations aren't evidence. You haven't factually established your claims. You just keep spewing increasingly disjoined, bizarre, obscure and poorly thought through conspiracies.

Meanwhile, Corsi's emails factually establish that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

Your obsessive fixation on ignoring the evidence doesn't make the evidence disappear, Tree.

It just demonstrates that you don't use evidence as the foundation of the bizarre conspiracy theories you make up.

That quote doesn't even remotely point to "Collusion with Anyone" It was widely know that an email dump was coming. It means nothing. Nothing that is unless you are manufacturing evidence and are engage in an endless limitless unrestricted fishing expedition with the goal of "Get Trump"

It means that Corsi lied to federal investigators. It means that he didn't decline Stone's request to get in touch with Jullian Assange about unreleased documents that could hurt Hillary.

It means that contrary to what Corsi told federal investigators, Corsi pursued contact with Assange. That Corsi got a hold of a contact in London and had him convey Stone's request for information on undisclosed documents to Assange. It means that this contact relayed the information Assange to Corsi. It means that Corsi delivered the information to Stone.

Exactly as Stone asked him too.

And it demonstrates, with evidence, that Corsi lied to federal investigators. Just obliterating your hysteric rant about Mueller 'suborning perjury'. As Mueller's account of Corsi's actions is factually accurate, backed with evidence.

Its Corsi that has lied.

Again, I ask you, should Robert Mueller face penalties, and have to answer in a court of law for breaking the law when trying to coerce witnesses to lie under oath?

Your claim that Mueller has broken the law trying to cooerce a witness to lie under oath lacks evidence.

To the contrary, Mueller has factually established Corsi did in fact lie to federal investigators with Corsi's own email.

Thus, your entire narrative predictably collapses.

Again, I am asking that if Mueller is breaking the law bullying bankrupting, harassing, and twisting arms to get witnesses to submit false testimony rather than simply telling the truth, should Mueller be put on trial for it.

Again, there's no evidence that Mueller is breaking the law. You're inventing yet another baseless piece of conspiracy batshit, backed by nothing.

While there is evidence that Corsi lied to federal investigators.

"Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps," Corsi wrote on Aug. 2, 2016, referring to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the draft court papers. "One shortly after I'm back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging."

Mueller has emails from Stone pal Corsi about WikiLeaks Dem email dump

We get it, Tree. You don't use evidence. You use speculation and conspiracy backed by nothing. And no one is going to be charged with any crime because you make up some baseless conspiracy backed by jackshit.

The currency of the court room is evidence. And you have none to back your accusations. While Mueller can factually establish that Corsi lied to investigators, with evidence.

 

[Skylar]

Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu barked orders at his guards as they led him to the firing squad.

with Trump, history, my friends, is repeating itself!

So looks like you are in favor of Mueller facing a firing squad for crimes against America. I agree.

So lets just sum up your absolutely hysteric panty shitting and conspiracy insanity.

Per you,

We're in Nazi GERMANY!!!

Also per you:

Mueller is a murderer!

Also per you:

Mueller should be executed.

All based on your imagination. Sorry, Tree.....but we're not killing anyone because you made up yet another in an endless litany of mindless conspiracy batshit.

 

[The Original Tree]

Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu barked orders at his guards as they led him to the firing squad.

with Trump, history, my friends, is repeating itself!

So looks like you are in favor of Mueller facing a firing squad for crimes against America. I agree.

So lets just sum up your absolutely hysteric panty shitting and conspiracy insanity.

Per you,

We're in Nazi GERMANY!!!

Also per you:

Mueller is a murderer!

Also per you:

Mueller should be executed.

All based on your imagination. Sorry, Tree.....but we're not killing anyone because you made up yet another in an endless litany of mindless conspiracy batshit.

Mueller is an Accessory to Murder due to his protecting Whitey Bulger when he was an informant for Mueller.
You lie. I never said Mueller was a murder. But an accessory to murder is the same as being the murderer in my book.... so interpret that as you like. Mueller looked the other way why Bulger murdered 19 people same as he looked the other way, when he and Comey got paid to shut their mouths about The Rosatom Bribery scandal.

Mueller if he is found to have committed treason and committed crimes against The United States such as he did in The Rosatom Bribery scandal should go on trial for treason charges. If Due Process plays out and finds him a traitor, then he should face the ultimate penalty.

Again I ask you, if Mueller is found guilty of committing crimes during his investigation, should be be tried in a court of law for that and pay the penalty whatever that penalty should be?

Are you for Due Process, or are you a Witch Hunt Lover, Constitution be Damned?

I tend to think you are one of those Gawd Dam Amerika types.

The kind that uses The Constitution for Toilet Paper.

Am I right, Comrade?

Get Trump....because he dared to pull the throne out from under Hillary Von Cankles Fat Ass.

Am, I right?

 

[basquebromance]

i regret my poor choice of words and the way they were pounced on