- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,121
- 4,970
- 280
Attaching a clearly editorial comment in the context of a report is not original, but not very good form.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Attaching a clearly editorial comment in the context of a report is not original, but not very good form.
Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Journalist on cable news networks are hired because of their ability to add commentary to their reporting that attracts a targeted demographic.Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Who do these so called journalist think they are these days ??
Do they own the platform that they are using in order to report the news they are given to air ??
Do we have some sort of highjacking going on now, otherwise where liberoids just take over what ever format or platform they want in order to push their personal biases over and above the wishes of those who actually own and operate the platforms ?? Are these owners acting as if they don't know what's going on in order to try and keep their hands clean ??
Do people let their kids come into their homes, take them over, and destroy them without stopping them ?
Are they adding acceptable commentary or are they taking over in a highjacking form (the platform), in order to get their biases known, and to hell with having any respect for the network or platform provided by the ownership of said platform ???Journalist on cable news networks are hired because of their ability to add commentary to their reporting that attracts a targeted demographic.Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Who do these so called journalist think they are these days ??
Do they own the platform that they are using in order to report the news they are given to air ??
Do we have some sort of highjacking going on now, otherwise where liberoids just take over what ever format or platform they want in order to push their personal biases over and above the wishes of those who actually own and operate the platforms ?? Are these owners acting as if they don't know what's going on in order to try and keep their hands clean ??
Do people let their kids come into their homes, take them over, and destroy them without stopping them ?
It is the networks decision. You nor the government has anything to do with it. Take a look at FOX. Do you hold them to the same standards?Are they adding acceptable commentary or are they taking over in a highjacking form (the platform), in order to get their biases known, and to hell with having any respect for the network or platform provided by the ownership of said platform ???Journalist on cable news networks are hired because of their ability to add commentary to their reporting that attracts a targeted demographic.Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Who do these so called journalist think they are these days ??
Do they own the platform that they are using in order to report the news they are given to air ??
Do we have some sort of highjacking going on now, otherwise where liberoids just take over what ever format or platform they want in order to push their personal biases over and above the wishes of those who actually own and operate the platforms ?? Are these owners acting as if they don't know what's going on in order to try and keep their hands clean ??
Do people let their kids come into their homes, take them over, and destroy them without stopping them ?
Or the ownership is in it up to their necks as well by condoning the bullcrap being allowed to be spewed upon the network.
Of course they are held to the same standards, why would you think otherwise ??It is the networks decision. You nor the government has anything to do with it. Take a look at FOX. Do you hold them to the same standards?Are they adding acceptable commentary or are they taking over in a highjacking form (the platform), in order to get their biases known, and to hell with having any respect for the network or platform provided by the ownership of said platform ???Journalist on cable news networks are hired because of their ability to add commentary to their reporting that attracts a targeted demographic.Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Who do these so called journalist think they are these days ??
Do they own the platform that they are using in order to report the news they are given to air ??
Do we have some sort of highjacking going on now, otherwise where liberoids just take over what ever format or platform they want in order to push their personal biases over and above the wishes of those who actually own and operate the platforms ?? Are these owners acting as if they don't know what's going on in order to try and keep their hands clean ??
Do people let their kids come into their homes, take them over, and destroy them without stopping them ?
Or the ownership is in it up to their necks as well by condoning the bullcrap being allowed to be spewed upon the network.
Funny you mention the government as if it is the leftist enemy now.. lolIt is the networks decision. You nor the government has anything to do with it. Take a look at FOX. Do you hold them to the same standards?Are they adding acceptable commentary or are they taking over in a highjacking form (the platform), in order to get their biases known, and to hell with having any respect for the network or platform provided by the ownership of said platform ???Journalist on cable news networks are hired because of their ability to add commentary to their reporting that attracts a targeted demographic.Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Who do these so called journalist think they are these days ??
Do they own the platform that they are using in order to report the news they are given to air ??
Do we have some sort of highjacking going on now, otherwise where liberoids just take over what ever format or platform they want in order to push their personal biases over and above the wishes of those who actually own and operate the platforms ?? Are these owners acting as if they don't know what's going on in order to try and keep their hands clean ??
Do people let their kids come into their homes, take them over, and destroy them without stopping them ?
Or the ownership is in it up to their necks as well by condoning the bullcrap being allowed to be spewed upon the network.
Well, journalism has changed. Most likely due to the internet and explosion of available news sources, competition, etc. So I guess this was inevitable.Or be fired for not reading it like this women did.Back in the days before "the news" became little more than transparent advocacy journalism, the "anchor" would read have read it and just let the viewer decide.
Who do these so called journalist think they are these days ??
Do they own the platform that they are using in order to report the news they are given to air ??
Do we have some sort of highjacking going on now, otherwise where liberoids just take over what ever format or platform they want in order to push their personal biases over and above the wishes of those who actually own and operate the platforms ?? Are these owners acting as if they don't know what's going on in order to try and keep their hands clean ??
Do people let their kids come into their homes, take them over, and destroy them without stopping them ?
What is the difference? SemanticsTwitter said everyone should hear them. Right?Yes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
They did not say that everyone had to read them outloud...nice try though. I am sure it pisses you off to know that someone will not be reading the gospel according to your savior.
They’re hisYes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I think we're just tired of the hypocrisy, given the bold face lies from MSNBC.
Why are the bold face lies from MSNBC bad but the ones from your savior Trump ok?
They’re hisYes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I think we're just tired of the hypocrisy, given the bold face lies from MSNBC.
Why are the bold face lies from MSNBC bad but the ones from your savior Trump ok?
What is the difference? SemanticsTwitter said everyone should hear them. Right?Yes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
They did not say that everyone had to read them outloud...nice try though. I am sure it pisses you off to know that someone will not be reading the gospel according to your savior.
Name a fkng lie and we’ll see! Again, it’s the agenda and not the man. I’ve told you that many times, you choose to ignore itThey’re hisYes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I think we're just tired of the hypocrisy, given the bold face lies from MSNBC.
Why are the bold face lies from MSNBC bad but the ones from your savior Trump ok?
Sorry, I forgot. Your saviour is allowed to lie because he is the almighty Trump and his lies are actually true is so powerful.
Fucking ass kissing zealots are taking over the place
Not sure what that has to do with the discussion, but I understand it’s trump syndromeWhat is the difference? SemanticsTwitter said everyone should hear them. Right?Yes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
They did not say that everyone had to read them outloud...nice try though. I am sure it pisses you off to know that someone will not be reading the gospel according to your savior.
The difference is you doing something for yourself and someone doing it for you.
For example,
I go to work and earn a paycheck...that is doing something for yourself.
You sit at home and get your welfare check...that is someone doing something for you.
Hope that helps
Not sure what that has to do with the discussion, but I understand it’s trump syndrome
Name a fkng lie and we’ll see! Again, it’s the agenda and not the man. I’ve told you that many times, you choose to ignore itThey’re hisYes, how dare her not repeat the official party line from the White House.
Send her off to see the SS
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I think we're just tired of the hypocrisy, given the bold face lies from MSNBC.
Why are the bold face lies from MSNBC bad but the ones from your savior Trump ok?
Sorry, I forgot. Your saviour is allowed to lie because he is the almighty Trump and his lies are actually true is so powerful.
Fucking ass kissing zealots are taking over the place