MSM fawning over Hillary; Nothing else matters....she's "historic" guys. Bow down.

bucs90

Gold Member
Feb 25, 2010
26,545
6,027
280
www.cnn.com

All the leftist media is simply fawning over Hillary folks..she's "historic".

All the lying and corruption.....irrelevant. They don't care. "First Female" tops it all.
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.

Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
 
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.
Good idea Mac, they can do what Prince did and use a symbol....

"The political party formerly known as the Republicans"
Hindenburg_disaster,_1937.jpg
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
Well, call it the Populist Party.

These are not traditional conservatives/Republicans, yet they've taken over that party because they didn't want to have to start from scratch.
.
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
Well, call it the Populist Party.

These are not traditional conservatives/Republicans, yet they've taken over that party because they didn't want to have to start from scratch.
.

But but but the Leftist MSM tells us that Populism is bad.

Why is Populism bad? I think Populism is good and so is Nationalism, with the latter what's wrong with loving your nation and being Patriotic?

This is why Leftists hate Nationalism, because Leftists in general feel Patriotism itself is a negative trait to have.
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
Well, call it the Populist Party.

These are not traditional conservatives/Republicans, yet they've taken over that party because they didn't want to have to start from scratch.
.

But but but the Leftist MSM tells us that Populism is bad.
.

quote?
 
A sad day, that once again something other then character is named by the MSM as a meaningful accomplishment.

Hopefully she will make history with one of the biggest losses to a flawed person such as Trump. If she loses it will restore my faith in the American people, no matter if it is Trump or not. She can not be rewarded for the trouble she has caused the world let alone the USA.

A trump win could actually be very good for the US. It could restore the balance of power that has been tilting towards dictatorship for the last 12 years. If both parties are against him then maybe Congress will start doing their job instead of ceding power to the President. That won't happen if the establishment daring Mrs. Tuzla is elected. More of the damn same.
 
This was inevitable, and that's why the Republicans shouldn't have run such an easy target for the media.
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
Well, call it the Populist Party.

These are not traditional conservatives/Republicans, yet they've taken over that party because they didn't want to have to start from scratch.
.

But but but the Leftist MSM tells us that Populism is bad.

Why is Populism bad? I think Populism is good and so's Nationalism, with the latter what's wrong with loving your nation and being Patriotic?

This is why Leftists hate Nationalism, because Leftists in general feel Patriotism itself is a negative trait to have.
You'd let the MSM stop you from starting the Populist Party? Either you believe in this or you don't, either you feel it would attract enough voters or you don't.

Nationalism, America First, seal the borders, eject illegals, rip up trade agreements. There's the party platform. Let the Republicans and Democrats do what they wanna do.

But this grand larceny of an entire major political party sure hasn't helped it from a PR perspective.
.
 
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
Well, call it the Populist Party.

These are not traditional conservatives/Republicans, yet they've taken over that party because they didn't want to have to start from scratch.
.

But but but the Leftist MSM tells us that Populism is bad.
.

quote?

I don't need to give you a quote. The Leftist MSM has made Populism seem like something terrible, or it's usually Populism and Nationalism together.

The Leftist nightmare across the world is for people voting Populist and Nationalist, why? What's wrong with this?
 
Democrats campaign on the rights of minorities and the poor and on political reform, anti corruption.

And their voters vote in a rich white Southern political family with more corruption than any presidential family in history.

Makes sense.
 
Who, The Donald? Well the Republicans didn't exactly run The Donald, they've been doing everything to hamstring him from day one and it's failed.
Well, whatever you want to name the group of people who have done this to the party.

I think they should give it a new name.
.

How about the Cuckservative Party? Or like most mainstream political parties around the world, they have the same controllers and the same backers behind the scenes, thus the Republicans and the Democrats have essentially converged into the Uni-Party.

This is why The Donald and Bernie Sanders have been so popular with the average voter, The Donald's not a politician and he's funding his own campaign, Bernie is a career politician, but he's not in the Wall Street pocket and is campaigning about the issues that matter to the average voter.

The other Republican candidates were a combination of Special Interest puppets and Hillary's owned by Wall Street and she's also a Neo-Conservative puppet.
Well, call it the Populist Party.

These are not traditional conservatives/Republicans, yet they've taken over that party because they didn't want to have to start from scratch.
.

But but but the Leftist MSM tells us that Populism is bad.

Why is Populism bad? I think Populism is good and so's Nationalism, with the latter what's wrong with loving your nation and being Patriotic?

This is why Leftists hate Nationalism, because Leftists in general feel Patriotism itself is a negative trait to have.
You'd let the MSM stop you from starting the Populist Party? Either you believe in this or you don't, either you feel it would attract enough voters or you don't.

Nationalism, America First, seal the borders, eject illegals, rip up trade agreements. There's the party platform. Let the Republicans and Democrats do what they wanna do.

But this grand larceny of an entire major political party sure hasn't helped it from a PR perspective.
.

Populism and Nationalism can and do attract enough voters, you just have to present the whole platform without the MSM issuing daily Propaganda memos about how "awful" Populism and Nationalism are.

Putting your nation first, sealing the borders, ejecting illegals and ripping up certain trade agreements are all excellent things and should be adopted and pronto.
 

Forum List

Back
Top