Mourdock Now Maybe Losing! Internal Muurdock Poll Shows A Time!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
So at RNC, the obvious place to trust with your money is to send $3.0 mil. to Karl Rove to spend on Mourdock in Indiana(?)! The Mourdock campaign has apparently released an internal poll showing that Senate Race dead even, subsequent the Christ-Centered-Rape(?) remarks.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2010 - Nevada Senate - Angle vs. Reid

Romney still embraces the Mourdock candidacy in public. The internal polls at the Romney campaign, likely show some level of trouble not surfacing in Gallup Tracking or at Rasmussen Tracking! The link notes that likely Donnelly is ahead in Indiana, if Mourdock's own poll is showing a tie.

Gallup registered voters poll is also at a tie. The Likely Voter polling has been shown mostly skewed toward the responses in The South.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Preaching of Christ-Centered-Rape(?)!)
 
So at RNC, the obvious place to trust with your money is to send $3.0 mil. to Karl Rove to spend on Mourdock in Indiana(?)! The Mourdock campaign has apparently released an internal poll showing that Senate Race dead even, subsequent the Christ-Centered-Rape(?) remarks.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2010 - Nevada Senate - Angle vs. Reid

Romney still embraces the Mourdock candidacy in public. The internal polls at the Romney campaign, likely show some level of trouble not surfacing in Gallup Tracking or at Rasmussen Tracking! The link notes that likely Donnelly is ahead in Indiana, if Mourdock's own poll is showing a tie.

Gallup registered voters poll is also at a tie. The Likely Voter polling has been shown mostly skewed toward the responses in The South.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes come to Lands of Many Nations: Preaching of Christ-Centered-Rape(?)!)

How much you want to bet in 2014 there isn't a single mention of the word "abortion" by a GOP candidate anywhere? Just playing.

Its shocking that Romney isn't calling this guy out with so much on the line with the women's vote. Another mistake by the Romney campaign.
 
Mourdock led the charge with the release of only the one poll, possibly not all that reliable--depending on just how "Murdock" is actually spelled(?), or how "tie" is actually spelled(?). The faction is mostly famous in 2010 for the witches and the broomsticks!

So DNC has Mourdock in the toilet later in the day, maybe bringing along his fellow Travellers, Romney-Ryan-Akin(?)!

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/10/dueling-polls-i-1.php

General Powell could easily be leading a flight of moderates away from Romney-Ryan support. Mourdock's numbers may also reflect a bolt of Lugar voters away from Mourdock. Galllup may be noting a neo-Mid-Terms surge, for example, but mostly it would also be said confined to the South. An "intensity" voter is still one vote. The contrast is made with Secretary Powell: Who is only one vote, but at least it's in Virginia, where it may be worth more!

Anyone wonders, now, how Indiana may be polling in the national election.

Even GDP grew better than expected, and would have done better without a drought, far more major and severe than a simple, "Frankenstorm," on the East Coast. The drought took 0.4 point away from GDP in the third quarter report. Romney-Ryan only have a tax cut--to bail out the European Luxury Car Manufacturers--and an increase of spending on bayonets: To remedy all the years of the Major Disasters, plus Bush-Cheney, when in office!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(White Eyes discover shiny yellow on Sacred Lands of Many Nations! So much for religions!)
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top