JBeukema
Rookie
- Banned
- #21
1) the 'thermite or explosives' argument is afalse-dichotomy
2)demolitions don't generally use thermite, but detcord and explosives proper
3)about those quibs...
4)and the fall of building 7...
5)and the Silverstein confession...
a lot of unanswered questions, here
and if terrorists are smart enough to take over a plane, why would they turn to attack the empty and reinforced side of the pentagon, instead of just ploughing straight into the nearest side? Why put forth the extra effort to minimize military casualties?
Why not realize the video of a plane striking the pentagon?
And why did most of the 9-11 hijackers turn out to be alive and well in their homelands?
too many questions, too many benefactors, and not enough answers for my comfort
2)demolitions don't generally use thermite, but detcord and explosives proper
3)about those quibs...
4)and the fall of building 7...
5)and the Silverstein confession...
a lot of unanswered questions, here
and if terrorists are smart enough to take over a plane, why would they turn to attack the empty and reinforced side of the pentagon, instead of just ploughing straight into the nearest side? Why put forth the extra effort to minimize military casualties?
Why not realize the video of a plane striking the pentagon?
And why did most of the 9-11 hijackers turn out to be alive and well in their homelands?
too many questions, too many benefactors, and not enough answers for my comfort