More than 60% of comments on Obamacare Facebook page over two years came from fewer than 100 people

OriginalShroom

Gold Member
Jan 29, 2013
4,950
1,042
190
Are these people being paid to post good things and defend Obama-care??

Why aren't they using their own names? Why so many different aliases?

Could they be wanting to deceive people?


Over 60 of comments on Obamacare Facebook page came from under 100 people Daily Mail Online

The most prolific commentator on the Obamacare Facebook site, California-based Cyndi Huynh, posted 59 times a day in 60 days.

Huynh, who has campaigned for the California Democratic Party, told the Times she has a full-time job and does not get paid for her posts but operates under multiple aliases to maximize her influence on the site.
On her LinkedIn page, Huynh describes herself as a Safety and Environmental Compliance Coordinator at production and management company Anonymous Content

When MailOnline called the Los Angeles Anonymous Content office nobody could verify her claim to work there, and she did not appear on a list of employees.
Obamacare invited Huynh to be a patient advocate but she declined, she told the paper, offering instead to voice her support online.
Other commentators included Wanda Milner, from Canada, who has posted 4,695 times in the last two years.
She told the paper she doesn't have any aliases, does not get paid to comment, and posts because she is passionate about the subject.
 
She told the paper she doesn't have any aliases, does not get paid to comment, and posts because she is passionate about the subject.
Just like the job description called for.
 
The over 30,000 negative comments submitted to the Illinois DNR regarding hydraulic fracturing were submitted by fewer than 100 individuals. Yet, the DNR was required by law to review each and every one, slowing down the process by many months.

Liberals/Progressives are a truly fucked up bunch of bad apples.
 

Forum List

Back
Top