Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How can her rights be violated? No One has a RIGHT to a Prom. And the school is NOT holding a Prom. The Judge is an idiot. Is the Judge going to ask the Federal Government to pay for this Prom? This loses on every level.
Use your head. The fact that they excluded her from the prom violated her first amendment rights. They canceled the prom due to her challenge.
The judge didn't say that she had a right to a prom. That is why he didn't order the school to hold one. He said that the school violated her rights by excluding her.
There is no prom there for she was not denied the right to attend. Pretty simple concept.
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are generally permitted. There are exceptions to these general protection, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent danger, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as property rights for authors and inventors (copyright), interests in "fair" political campaigns (Campaign finance laws), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Which part was violated?
Freedom of expression. Give me a hard one.
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are generally permitted. There are exceptions to these general protection, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent danger, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as property rights for authors and inventors (copyright), interests in "fair" political campaigns (Campaign finance laws), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Which part was violated?
Freedom of expression. Give me a hard one.
There is no Prom, Unless the Judge rules the School Board must hold a Prom, which he can not do, she was not denied anything.
Are you really that stupid?What of the other students, did she have the right to ruin their last year memories, she kinda selfish, ya think.
She isn't the one who violated someone's rights, and she isn't the one who canceled the prom. And selfish? Are you kidding me? THEY VIOLATED HER FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
We had a lesbian couple at my prom, NO ONE cared.
Of course if this had been a white christian, I am sure you would feel completely different about the subject.
Prove she was denied the right to attend the Prom? Ohh wait, there is NO PROM, her rights were not violated at all. No prom no rights violation. Pretty simple concept. If this idiot Judge rules other wise the School board should take it up the level of Courts.
One can not be denied a right if nothing happened. No prom means she was not denied anything. And since no one has a RIGHT to a Prom canceling the Prom violates no ones rights in and of itself.
Are you really that stupid?She isn't the one who violated someone's rights, and she isn't the one who canceled the prom. And selfish? Are you kidding me? THEY VIOLATED HER FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
We had a lesbian couple at my prom, NO ONE cared.
Of course if this had been a white christian, I am sure you would feel completely different about the subject.
Prove she was denied the right to attend the Prom? Ohh wait, there is NO PROM, her rights were not violated at all. No prom no rights violation. Pretty simple concept. If this idiot Judge rules other wise the School board should take it up the level of Courts.
One can not be denied a right if nothing happened. No prom means she was not denied anything. And since no one has a RIGHT to a Prom canceling the Prom violates no ones rights in and of itself.
I think Crimson explained it pretty clearly to you, and you still don't get it.
Is your BBQ federally or state funded?The bigotted school board, or whoever ruled the prom cancelled, ruined it.
The other choice was a lawsuit by the ACLU, I don't blame them for canceling the prom, given the circumstances I would too. She is responsible for the prom being canceled. Heck she planned it, did you not read that she went to them in December and again in February, she wanted to make darn good and sure they knew she was gonna wear a tux and bring a female date which was against the school rules. Then she's surprised that after getting an ACLU lawyer to sue the school district for her, they cancel the prom?
That's like me not wanting people to come to my barbecue who use foul language and being sued by the ACLU for infringing on their right to free speech. I'd just cancel the barbecue.
Is your BBQ federally or state funded?The other choice was a lawsuit by the ACLU, I don't blame them for canceling the prom, given the circumstances I would too. She is responsible for the prom being canceled. Heck she planned it, did you not read that she went to them in December and again in February, she wanted to make darn good and sure they knew she was gonna wear a tux and bring a female date which was against the school rules. Then she's surprised that after getting an ACLU lawyer to sue the school district for her, they cancel the prom?
That's like me not wanting people to come to my barbecue who use foul language and being sued by the ACLU for infringing on their right to free speech. I'd just cancel the barbecue.
There is NO RIGHT to a Prom. The School Board is solely and completely in their right to cancel said Prom, even the Judge agreed stating he can not order them to hold a Prom. No Prom means she was not denied her rights at all. You people are amazingly stupid.
Use your head. The fact that they excluded her from the prom violated her first amendment rights. They canceled the prom due to her challenge.
The judge didn't say that she had a right to a prom. That is why he didn't order the school to hold one. He said that the school violated her rights by excluding her.
There is no prom there for she was not denied the right to attend. Pretty simple concept.
Is it really hard to get the fact they denied her access to a public school sponsored event?
Doesn't matter if they canceled the prom after doing so, they still violated her first amendment rights by not allowing her to attend prom in the first place.
Freedom of speech in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and by many state constitutions and state and federal laws. Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy, such as racism, sexism, and other hate speech are generally permitted. There are exceptions to these general protection, including the Miller test for obscenity, child pornography laws, speech that incites imminent danger, and regulation of commercial speech such as advertising. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as property rights for authors and inventors (copyright), interests in "fair" political campaigns (Campaign finance laws), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Which part was violated?
Freedom of expression. Give me a hard one.
There is no Prom, Unless the Judge rules the School Board must hold a Prom, which he can not do, she was not denied anything.
There is no prom there for she was not denied the right to attend. Pretty simple concept.
Is it really hard to get the fact they denied her access to a public school sponsored event?
Doesn't matter if they canceled the prom after doing so, they still violated her first amendment rights by not allowing her to attend prom in the first place.
WRONG, she was not denied anything. They never denied her at all since there is NO PROM, there for no evidence she was denied anything. Since she has no RIGHT to a Prom the school board can cancel it anytime they chose. UNLESS they actually denied her access to a Prom that was being held she has no case. Any other ruling by the Judge will be overturned by saner more intelligent Judges who can see no violation of her rights ever occurred.
Is your BBQ federally or state funded?
There is NO RIGHT to a Prom. The School Board is solely and completely in their right to cancel said Prom, even the Judge agreed stating he can not order them to hold a Prom. No Prom means she was not denied her rights at all. You people are amazingly stupid.
No, really, dude, check out the message: http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/110526-more-on-the-prom-canceling-3.html#post2130997
Will the Army take you back? Have you considered that maybe you'd be much better at being a Sergeant than arguing about civil rights issues - something you clearly know absolutely nothing about?
There is no prom there for she was not denied the right to attend. Pretty simple concept.
Is it really hard to get the fact they denied her access to a public school sponsored event?
Doesn't matter if they canceled the prom after doing so, they still violated her first amendment rights by not allowing her to attend prom in the first place.
WRONG, she was not denied anything. They never denied her at all since there is NO PROM, there for no evidence she was denied anything. Since she has no RIGHT to a Prom the school board can cancel it anytime they chose. UNLESS they actually denied her access to a Prom that was being held she has no case. Any other ruling by the Judge will be overturned by saner more intelligent Judges who can see no violation of her rights ever occurred.
There is no prom there for she was not denied the right to attend. Pretty simple concept.
Is it really hard to get the fact they denied her access to a public school sponsored event?
Doesn't matter if they canceled the prom after doing so, they still violated her first amendment rights by not allowing her to attend prom in the first place.
WRONG, she was not denied anything. They never denied her at all since there is NO PROM, there for no evidence she was denied anything. Since she has no RIGHT to a Prom the school board can cancel it anytime they chose. UNLESS they actually denied her access to a Prom that was being held she has no case. Any other ruling by the Judge will be overturned by saner more intelligent Judges who can see no violation of her rights ever occurred.
YOu are really THAT stupid.
Is it really hard to get the fact they denied her access to a public school sponsored event?
Doesn't matter if they canceled the prom after doing so, they still violated her first amendment rights by not allowing her to attend prom in the first place.
WRONG, she was not denied anything. They never denied her at all since there is NO PROM, there for no evidence she was denied anything. Since she has no RIGHT to a Prom the school board can cancel it anytime they chose. UNLESS they actually denied her access to a Prom that was being held she has no case. Any other ruling by the Judge will be overturned by saner more intelligent Judges who can see no violation of her rights ever occurred.
WRONG, she was not denied anything. They never denied her at all since there is NO PROM, there for no evidence she was denied anything. Since she has no RIGHT to a Prom the school board can cancel it anytime they chose. UNLESS they actually denied her access to a Prom that was being held she has no case. Any other ruling by the Judge will be overturned by saner more intelligent Judges who can see no violation of her rights ever occurred.
You and this Judge are the stupid ones, No prom means she was never denied anything. Pretty simple concept.
There is NO RIGHT to a Prom. The School Board is solely and completely in their right to cancel said Prom, even the Judge agreed stating he can not order them to hold a Prom. No Prom means she was not denied her rights at all. You people are amazingly stupid.
No, really, dude, check out the message: http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/110526-more-on-the-prom-canceling-3.html#post2130997
Will the Army take you back? Have you considered that maybe you'd be much better at being a Sergeant than arguing about civil rights issues - something you clearly know absolutely nothing about?
The only dumb ass in this thread is those of you claiming she was denied any rights. There is no prom thus she can not be denied by the school board to attend since it does not EXIST. Even the Judge stated he can not order the school board to hold a Prom, so no case. The school should sue to have their court costs covered by the losers that have in effect brought a frivolous law suit.
You and this Judge are the stupid ones, No prom means she was never denied anything. Pretty simple concept.
You are fucking high right now, right?
so your saying her families not mexican.
Why does it matter if her family is Mexican? She is still an American citizen and her rights were violated.
What of the other students, did she have the right to ruin their last year memories, she kinda selfish, ya think.
