Ernie S.
Diamond Member
Yeah, then there's a nonpartisan legal analyst on CNN who says it's a "judicial hissy fit"
snip
Jeffrey Toobin, a non partisan legal analyst? You're joking, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, then there's a nonpartisan legal analyst on CNN who says it's a "judicial hissy fit"
snip
Funny part of this is that while the Rs lie about what he really said, they also conveniently ignore that Bush said much worse as did several other presidents.
But, this is President Obama so y'all are just hysterical about his very simple and direct statement of fact.
Blather. The President went to Harvard Law. He was the honcho in the Harvard Law Review. He has been a Constitutional Law Lecturer.
What he said is indefensible because it is unquestionably just a lie. Not some professorial "shorthand." That's bullshit. The President fucking CHOSE to outright lie.
He is a putz.
Wow...you actually read what luddly says? I thought we just all saw his name and neg repped him without subjecting ourselves to his ignorance.
Most people that have a knowledge of the Constitution know that the Constitution is mum about the Supreme Court having the power to declare an Act of Congress, a State law, a presidential act, unconstitutional. The words are not found in any part of the Constitution. The Court decided this power should be a Court power and took that power in a famous court case. Today we accept the idea that there is a clause in the Constitution that gives the Court that power. Not so.
1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States,
Most people that have a knowledge of the Constitution know that the Constitution is mum about the Supreme Court having the power to declare an Act of Congress, a State law, a presidential act, unconstitutional. The words are not found in any part of the Constitution. The Court decided this power should be a Court power and took that power in a famous court case. Today we accept the idea that there is a clause in the Constitution that gives the Court that power. Not so.
1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States,
No, no, that's not the power to decide if a law of Congress is Constitutional. It says the Court has the power to try all cases in law and equity arising under the Constitution, that's under the Constitution. If those words covered the power to declare an act of Congress, there would be little controversy about Marbury. Marshall did a slick con job with Marbury by declaring part of the Judicial Act of 1789 unconstitutional which pleased the Jeffersonians. It took some time for the Jeffersonians to realize what had happened. Too late.
Blather. The President went to Harvard Law. He was the honcho in the Harvard Law Review. He has been a Constitutional Law Lecturer.
What he said is indefensible because it is unquestionably just a lie. Not some professorial "shorthand." That's bullshit. The President fucking CHOSE to outright lie.
He is a putz.
Wow...you actually read what luddly says? I thought we just all saw his name and neg repped him without subjecting ourselves to his ignorance.
His two liners are ok to skim. Just provides fodder to point out how mindless, wrong, dishonest and stupid he is.
It's the right wing that blows. Especially when in a "wide stance".
'So earlier this week, the President did something that as far as I know is completely unprecedented: he not only tried to publicly pressure the Court into deciding a pending case in the way he wants it decided; he also questioned its very authority under the Constitution.'
.
The latest from Carney...
Obama was misunderstood cuz he's just too smart...he was speaking Harvard Professor Shorthand and we all missed what he REALLY meant...
"Carney: What I acknowledged yesterday is that speaking on Monday the president was not clearly understood by some people because he is a law professor, he spoke in shorthand."
"http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/04/05/carney_obama_not_understood_because_he_spoke_in_shorthand_since_he_is_a_law_professor.html
Not only that, that was in response to Obama's law professor telling the world that Obama was wrong....
The American people are just too stupid to understand his pig-latin. Which does not explain why he students, and his own law professor, Lawrence Tribe, say he is full of shit.
Blather. The President went to Harvard Law. He was the honcho in the Harvard Law Review. He has been a Constitutional Law Lecturer.
What he said is indefensible because it is unquestionably just a lie. Not some professorial "shorthand." That's bullshit. The President fucking CHOSE to outright lie.
He is a putz.
Wow...you actually read what luddly says? I thought we just all saw his name and neg repped him without subjecting ourselves to his ignorance.
Must spread, occasionally, I actually read his drivel, but if I could neg every post....
Wow...you actually read what luddly says? I thought we just all saw his name and neg repped him without subjecting ourselves to his ignorance.
Must spread, occasionally, I actually read his drivel, but if I could neg every post....
I usually neg myself, just for reading his posts.
'So earlier this week, the President did something that as far as I know is completely unprecedented: he not only tried to publicly pressure the Court into deciding a pending case in the way he wants it decided; he also questioned its very authority under the Constitution.'
.
It is NOT unprecedented:
History repeats itself.
.
Carney says Barry misspoke??
Jesus. I thought Barry was the smartest Law Professor/Part time Senator/Community Organizer in the whole of the USA and possibly the world??
Guess not.
Carney says Barry misspoke??
Jesus. I thought Barry was the smartest Law Professor/Part time Senator/Community Organizer in the whole of the USA and possibly the world??
Guess not.
No.....he did not say he mis-spoke.
He said (paraphrased) that we are not intelligent enough to understand what he said because he spoke too intelligently for us...
"Carney: What I acknowledged yesterday is that speaking on Monday the president was not clearly understood by some people because he is a law professor, he spoke in shorthand."