Youch
Senior Member
- Aug 10, 2014
- 670
- 121
- 45
Of course, regarding the subject topic, this discussion could go many different directions. As the OP, I welcome that.
But one sliver of the discussion on modern racism in America is the bias against the white man, or for the progressives who enjoy hyphenated irrelevancies, the European-Americans. Again, this is a small sliver of the overall issue of racism in America. My intention is not to make this out to be representative of my overall view. I just thought the following was an interesting observation of the Obama/Holder/Jarrett/Lib modus operendi, worth discussing.....
- One of the first acts the POTUS was to tax tanning beds.
- Another was to further tax and further regulate farmers and ranchers.
- Another was to vilify corporate America, e.g., CEOs, business owners, the "rich" etc..., tax them greater, and call them "unpatriotic" for following the current tax code when they (necessarily) shelter income off shore where there are less confiscatory tax policies.
- They illegally used the IRS to go after the Tea Party.
- And of course, the purposeful importation of millions of illegal migrants
And so on and so forth. A narrow slice? Perhaps. Perhaps not. But what do all of those groups generally have in common, and/or who is most adversely affected in each case? They generally target the white demographic. It is, to some degree, the mutant child of affirmative action.
Contrast that to the policies of those same folks (Obama/Holder/Jarrett/Libs) that 1) don't increase the burdens on minorities in any way, and 2) actually advance policies that create dependents (voters, of course) of them all.
It is interesting that the media/libs manufactures racism (nay, desires it) in cases like Ferguson and Trayvon and a gazillion others, but yet ignores trends in establishment racism that goes the other way.
I'm not making a case, just sharing an observation.
But one sliver of the discussion on modern racism in America is the bias against the white man, or for the progressives who enjoy hyphenated irrelevancies, the European-Americans. Again, this is a small sliver of the overall issue of racism in America. My intention is not to make this out to be representative of my overall view. I just thought the following was an interesting observation of the Obama/Holder/Jarrett/Lib modus operendi, worth discussing.....
- One of the first acts the POTUS was to tax tanning beds.
- Another was to further tax and further regulate farmers and ranchers.
- Another was to vilify corporate America, e.g., CEOs, business owners, the "rich" etc..., tax them greater, and call them "unpatriotic" for following the current tax code when they (necessarily) shelter income off shore where there are less confiscatory tax policies.
- They illegally used the IRS to go after the Tea Party.
- And of course, the purposeful importation of millions of illegal migrants
And so on and so forth. A narrow slice? Perhaps. Perhaps not. But what do all of those groups generally have in common, and/or who is most adversely affected in each case? They generally target the white demographic. It is, to some degree, the mutant child of affirmative action.
Contrast that to the policies of those same folks (Obama/Holder/Jarrett/Libs) that 1) don't increase the burdens on minorities in any way, and 2) actually advance policies that create dependents (voters, of course) of them all.
It is interesting that the media/libs manufactures racism (nay, desires it) in cases like Ferguson and Trayvon and a gazillion others, but yet ignores trends in establishment racism that goes the other way.
I'm not making a case, just sharing an observation.