mdn2000
VIP Member
- Banned
- #21
As opposed the uninformed speculation so common on this board. The scientists are trying to warn you that we don't know just how bad it will be, and that by their best 'informed speculation' the range of possibilities looks like this, low to high. In this case, even the low is far too high.
it seems to me that the models change a lot from year to year, revision to revision, and are always in the first year or two of a hundred year prediction, with the disaster heavily loaded into the future and the current warming always falling short of expected from versions of the past.
it all seems like shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic anyways as the real problem is increased population which needs to use resources to live. why isnt population control one of the publicized solutions to 'climate disruption'? another case of cause being ignored while symptom is fixated on.
I agree
Until we are absolutely 100% positive about global warming ....we should do nothing about it
Then, when it is too late to do anything about it we can blame the liberal scientists.
So what should we do?