JBeukema
Rookie
- Banned
- #161
Way to miss the point Ravs.
It's only a "civil" right because it's been legislated to be. I believe what people are saying is that the legislation itself runs contrary to the principles in the Constitution.
Feel free to disagree, but at least understand what you're arguing against.
Yeah i think thats what was being argued too mainfold.
Either way the whole thing has been removed from its context and turned into something it wasn't meant as when first stated.
The bottom line is that some people value equality more than they value liberty. In some cases I too think it's a prudent trade-off. But it's the unwillingness of some to acknowledge that the CRA indeed trades in liberty for equality that I find intellectually objectionable.
Don't just about all civil rights laws trade the liberty of they who would discriminate for equality and the welfare of those discriminated against?