well dude, why is the data being adjusted? You are admitting changes were made correct? Why? Asked you that before.Using more fudged data?
You don't get it. They have been caught SO many times, they have lost all credibility. It's over.
It would be you that doesn't get it. They haven't been "caught" at anything. None of you have provided the slightest shred of evidence that ANY of the various adjustments made to temperature data of all sorts is unjustified. Until you get to Karl et al 2015, the sum of adjustments has REDUCED the measured warming.
All the various holders of data explain why they make changes when they make them. Just because you haven't spent one second looking for their explanation is no reason to assume they're not out there. They are. Why don't you pick a specific adjustment you think it wonky and we'll see if we can find the holder's reasoning?