Met Office: Next two years could be the hottest

Crick

Gold Member
May 10, 2014
27,875
5,294
290
N/A
Things are getting bad. Deniers, let us know when you achieve embarrassment at your choices.

Next two years hottest, says Met Office - BBC News

_85498503_elnino.jpg


The next two years could be the hottest on record globally, says research from the UK's Met Office.

It warns big changes could be under way in the climate system with greenhouse gases increasing the impact of natural trends.

The research shows that a major El Nino event is in play in the Pacific, which is expected to heat the world overall.

But it also reveals that summers in Europe might get cooler for a while as the rest of the globe warms.

The scientists confirm that in 2015 the Earth's average surface temperature is running at, or near, record levels (0.68C above the 1961-1990 average).


Volcanic caveat
Met Office Hadley Centre director Prof Stephen Belcher said: "We know natural patterns contribute to global temperatures in any given year, but the very warm temperatures so far this year indicate the continued impact of (manmade) greenhouse gases.

"With the potential that next year could be similarly warm, it's clear that our climate continues to change."

An external reviewer, Prof Rowan Sutton, from the University of Reading, confirmed: "Unless there's a big volcanic eruption, it looks very likely that globally 2014, 2015 and 2016 will be among the very warmest years ever recorded.

"This isn't a fluke. We are seeing the effects of energy steadily accumulating in the Earth's oceans and atmosphere, caused by greenhouse gases."

_85534991_85534990.jpg


California reprieve?
The scientists say that the combination of the effect of increasing CO2, coupled with long-term natural ocean trends, leaves the climate system looking "very interesting". They suspect major changes may be under way.

Prof Adam Scaife from the Met Office said: "It's an important turning point in the Earth's climate with so many big changes happening at once."

Two trends affecting weather patterns in the near and medium term are in the Pacific Ocean. El Nino happens when a Pacific current reverses on average every five years or so, bringing downpours where there is normally drought and drought where there is normally rain. El Nino tends to push world temperatures upwards.

This growing event is now looking similar to the 1998 El Nino, which bleached corals and brought havoc to world weather systems. The current event could increase drought risk in South Africa, East Asia, and the Philippines - and bring floods to southern South America.

One good outcome might be the end of the crippling, four-year California drought.

Arctic implication
The second natural change is a shift in the decadal temperature pattern in the North Pacific known as the PDO. It has been in a cool phase, which the Met Office says has contributed to the pause in the rise of average surface atmospheric temperatures over the past decade. Now, it is entering a warm phase, which will typically make the world hotter.

But there's another factor at play. These two warming events will be partly offset by the North Atlantic temperature pattern (AMO) switching into a cool phase.

The scientists say they have recently learned more about how these great ocean patterns temper or accelerate human-induced warming, but Prof Sutton said: "The bit we don't understand is the competition between those factors - that's what we are working on."

So the researchers can say that changes in the Atlantic mean Europe is likely to get slightly cooler and drier summers for a decade - but only if the Atlantic signal is not overridden by the Pacific signal. And they cannot be sure yet which influence will prevail.

The Atlantic cooling could lead to the recovery of sea-ice in adjacent Arctic areas.

Energy input
The Met Office is being ultra-cautious after being castigated for what some said were over-confident decadal forecasts in the past, when natural ocean trends were less well understood.

When asked when the pause in surface warming would end, they stressed that from their perspective there was no real pause in the Earth's warming because the oceans continued to heat, sea levels continued to rise and ice continued to melt.

Prof Scaife said: "We can't be sure this is the end of the slowdown, but decadal warming rates are likely to reach late 20th-Century levels within two years."

And Prof Sutton warned: "If greenhouse gas-driven warming continues unabated, the long-term effects on global and regional climate will dwarf those of short-term fluctuations like El Nino."
 
Oh....had to throw this in of course!!!!! Remember too.......Dr Judith Curry was the darling of the global warming hysteria industry until she jumped off the alarmist/end of the world bandwagon thus leading to every single AGW k00k to throw her under the bus forever.

Climate Scientist Dr. Judith Curry on Global Warming


This goofball Sutton draws hail mary pass conclusions as would be expected as he is a hack of the alarmist industry!!:up::eusa_dance:
 
:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

Given the MET's 100% failed predictions rate... This is funny as hell...


Given YOUR 100% failure rate, THAT is funny as hell.

Forecast failure: how the Met Office lost touch with reality

It has been a glorious sunny week in Britain — it feels as if summer is finally here. As Andy Murray was winning Wimbledon, temperatures on Centre Court exceeded 40˚C in the sun. Northern Ireland has been hotter than Cancun. The papers have begun their annual drip-feed of stories about ‘tombstoning’ — young people throwing themselves from cliffs and bridges into water. It is hard to believe that it was just a few weeks ago that the Met Office braced us for a ‘colder-than-average’ July and a decade of soggy summers. Not so hard to believe that they held a crisis meeting recently, to discuss why they have got the weather so wrong for so long.

Only this week has Britain had a small taste of the kind of temperatures the Met Office has been promising for over a decade. In September 2008, it forecast a trend of mild winters: the following winter turned out to be the coldest for a decade. Then its notorious promise of a ‘barbecue summer’ was followed by unrelenting rain. Last year, it forecast a ‘drier than average’ spring — before another historic deluge that was accompanied by the coldest temperatures for 50 years. Never has the Met Office had more scientists and computing power at its disposal — yet never has it seemed so baffled by the British weather.

And their failures have continued in all predictions to date.. this one will be no different as it is driven by alarmism and not science..



The big list of failed climate predictions
 
here's a tip: don't live 700m down in the ocean since that's where the imaginary warming is
 
My God Crick --- you are dense.. I AM embarrassed. But it's for you..

The big picture of an El Nino pattern right in front of you and the Met Office confirming the NATURAL CAUSE of this prediction was not enough of a hint for you?

You guys are seriously not following the topic.. NO SIGNIFICANT CARBON induced warming for over 16 years is still a true statement. And you are just amazed at the shape of the curve and scared and fascinated by the fact that "relative maximums" in math can generate records..

Deniers, let us know when you achieve embarrassment at your choices.

Ok deal.. But this ain't it.... :banana:
 
My God Crick --- you are dense.. I AM embarrassed. But it's for you..

The big picture of an El Nino pattern right in front of you and the Met Office confirming the NATURAL CAUSE of this prediction was not enough of a hint for you?

You guys are seriously not following the topic.. NO SIGNIFICANT CARBON induced warming for over 16 years is still a true statement. And you are just amazed at the shape of the curve and scared and fascinated by the fact that "relative maximums" in math can generate records..

Deniers, let us know when you achieve embarrassment at your choices.

Ok deal.. But this ain't it.... :banana:
Quite on the contrary. The warming induced by the GHGs reinforces the natural patterns, the normal highs will be higher, the normal lows also higher. And that is what we are seeing. And that statement of no significant warming over the last sixteen years is a flat out lie. Those years have seen all but one of the top ten warmest years on record. And that one year was 1998.

When we see a decade of years that are as cold, or colder than the 20th Century norm, then you can start your claims of no warming.
 
My God Crick --- you are dense.. I AM embarrassed. But it's for you..

The big picture of an El Nino pattern right in front of you and the Met Office confirming the NATURAL CAUSE of this prediction was not enough of a hint for you?

You guys are seriously not following the topic.. NO SIGNIFICANT CARBON induced warming for over 16 years is still a true statement. And you are just amazed at the shape of the curve and scared and fascinated by the fact that "relative maximums" in math can generate records..

Deniers, let us know when you achieve embarrassment at your choices.

Ok deal.. But this ain't it.... :banana:
Quite on the contrary. The warming induced by the GHGs reinforces the natural patterns, the normal highs will be higher, the normal lows also higher. And that is what we are seeing. And that statement of no significant warming over the last sixteen years is a flat out lie. Those years have seen all but one of the top ten warmest years on record. And that one year was 1998.

When we see a decade of years that are as cold, or colder than the 20th Century norm, then you can start your claims of no warming.

You really don't get simple trend analysis --- do you? The number of "records" have NOTHING to do with the linear trend of the data.. And whatever is causing that trend to be near zero -- has swamped the signature of the INCREASED warming that was predicted.. Don't go crazy on us here.. Those "records" are only in the surface data -- and they are met by less than 0.02 or 0.04degC. And ONLY because they've juiced the surface records to overtake 1998 -- which was CLEARLY by satellite record -- the outstanding year for warmth..
 
My God Crick --- you are dense.. I AM embarrassed. But it's for you..

The big picture of an El Nino pattern right in front of you and the Met Office confirming the NATURAL CAUSE of this prediction was not enough of a hint for you?

You guys are seriously not following the topic.. NO SIGNIFICANT CARBON induced warming for over 16 years is still a true statement. And you are just amazed at the shape of the curve and scared and fascinated by the fact that "relative maximums" in math can generate records..

Deniers, let us know when you achieve embarrassment at your choices.

Ok deal.. But this ain't it.... :banana:
Quite on the contrary. The warming induced by the GHGs reinforces the natural patterns, the normal highs will be higher, the normal lows also higher. And that is what we are seeing. And that statement of no significant warming over the last sixteen years is a flat out lie. Those years have seen all but one of the top ten warmest years on record. And that one year was 1998.

When we see a decade of years that are as cold, or colder than the 20th Century norm, then you can start your claims of no warming.
to which you can't prove your statement as fact. First one has to take records, adjust said records, because that is the right thing to do, right? Because if we don't correct the historical records we're all doomed. Right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top