Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I seem to remember them saying how great it was.
Funny, aren't they?
Don't you member? I member.
Yes, I remember and I hated it, around that time I was most against CNN. I also hated Bill's constant bombing of Iraq.
However, I will still stick with my point that Trump is much worse than Hillary many times over.
Yes...the correct term is invasionInvaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
I seem to remember them saying how great it was.
Funny, aren't they?
Don't you member? I member.
Yes, I remember and I hated it, around that time I was most against CNN. I also hated Bill's constant bombing of Iraq.
However, I will still stick with my point that Trump is much worse than Hillary many times over.
Over eight years I never saw Clinton invade Iraq
Only took Bush two years and he had less justification
I'll bet none of you have ever even read the Iraq Liberation Act.
And we know that you far left drones have never read anything, you just act upon your religious dogma.
Have you ever read it? Yes or no.
See how the far left wants to know what was read, when they are incapable of reading!
Prove that you have read and understand it first!
Otherwise your claims and questions are moot!
What part of yes or no did you not understand? lol
Once again the far left proves they can not read!
Yes...the correct term is invasionInvaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
It means taking a military force and capturing territory, killing people in a hope of overthrowing the government
WWII had ample justification, Bush did not
And we know that you far left drones have never read anything, you just act upon your religious dogma.
Have you ever read it? Yes or no.
See how the far left wants to know what was read, when they are incapable of reading!
Prove that you have read and understand it first!
Otherwise your claims and questions are moot!
What part of yes or no did you not understand? lol
Once again the far left proves they can not read!
So what you're saying is you haven't read it and have nothing. And you try to deflect with insults. Just like the Trumpenfuerher.
Can't wait to hear you pissing and moaning when Trump's plans go amok
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Invaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
Invaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
google 'Normandy invasion' and let us know who says that wasn't an invasion.
lol
No it was not an enforcement of Clnton's act.
Invaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
Invaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
No it was not an enforcement of the Clinton liberation act.
Why not?
Because the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED THE INVASION THAT BUSH PERPETRATED:
"Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise
speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in
section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act."
'member' when Bush asked for the authorization in 2002? That's because he did NOT have it in the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998,
therefore, no, he was not enforcing that act.
and MOST Democrats voted against the Iraq war act of 2002.
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy stating that "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq..." It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States ...
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (1998 - H.R. 4655)
Invaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
No it was not an enforcement of the Clinton liberation act.
Why not?
Because the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED THE INVASION THAT BUSH PERPETRATED:
"Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise
speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in
section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act."
'member' when Bush asked for the authorization in 2002? That's because he did NOT have it in the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998,
therefore, no, he was not enforcing that act.
and MOST Democrats voted against the Iraq war act of 2002.
Notice how they do not link to where they go the quote as it is from a far left drone hack site, otherwise they would have!
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy stating that "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq..." It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States ...
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (1998 - H.R. 4655)
And we know that you far left drones have never read anything, you just act upon your religious dogma.
Have you ever read it? Yes or no.
See how the far left wants to know what was read, when they are incapable of reading!
Prove that you have read and understand it first!
Otherwise your claims and questions are moot!
What part of yes or no did you not understand? lol
Once again the far left proves they can not read!
So what you're saying is you haven't read it and have nothing. And you try to deflect with insults. Just like the Trumpenfuerher.
Can't wait to hear you pissing and moaning when Trump's plans go amok
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Invaded?Remember when Bush abandoned the war on terror to invade a nation that wasn't a threat to us or its neighbors?
I suppose the US "invaded" Germany in 1944.
Wait, Germany bombed America, right? Right?
I can't remember learning that.
Invading Iraq. Fucking left wing losers. It was a liberation from a tyrant, you stupid fucking losers.
Either way, it was an enforcement of a clinton doctrine. Ohhhh, but the left care sooooo much about the tortured. All while wishing saddam was still alive murdering and torturing. Funny.
Oh that is right, they only care when 5 dirty sandNIGGERS who planned 911 (great for American hating left) were made uncomfortable.
Fucking losers.
No it was not an enforcement of the Clinton liberation act.
Why not?
Because the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED THE INVASION THAT BUSH PERPETRATED:
"Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise
speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in
section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act."
'member' when Bush asked for the authorization in 2002? That's because he did NOT have it in the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998,
therefore, no, he was not enforcing that act.
and MOST Democrats voted against the Iraq war act of 2002.
Notice how they do not link to where they go the quote as it is from a far left drone hack site, otherwise they would have!
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy stating that "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq..." It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States ...
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (1998 - H.R. 4655)
lol, I made you look it up.
THIS is my link:
Text - H.R.4655 - 105th Congress (1997-1998): Iraq Liberation Act of 1998
Yeah, sure, that's why Kosh posted part of it, because they didn't read it. You and NY are a little slow this morning, aren't you...Have you ever read it? Yes or no.
See how the far left wants to know what was read, when they are incapable of reading!
Prove that you have read and understand it first!
Otherwise your claims and questions are moot!
What part of yes or no did you not understand? lol
Once again the far left proves they can not read!
So what you're saying is you haven't read it and have nothing. And you try to deflect with insults. Just like the Trumpenfuerher.
Can't wait to hear you pissing and moaning when Trump's plans go amok
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Don't you love it when this quote applies?
Yeah, sure, that's why Kosh posted part of it, because they didn't read it. You and NY are a little slow this morning, aren't you...See how the far left wants to know what was read, when they are incapable of reading!
Prove that you have read and understand it first!
Otherwise your claims and questions are moot!
What part of yes or no did you not understand? lol
Once again the far left proves they can not read!
So what you're saying is you haven't read it and have nothing. And you try to deflect with insults. Just like the Trumpenfuerher.
Can't wait to hear you pissing and moaning when Trump's plans go amok
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I forced him to read it.
Yeah, sure, that's why Kosh posted part of it, because they didn't read it. You and NY are a little slow this morning, aren't you...See how the far left wants to know what was read, when they are incapable of reading!
Prove that you have read and understand it first!
Otherwise your claims and questions are moot!
What part of yes or no did you not understand? lol
Once again the far left proves they can not read!
So what you're saying is you haven't read it and have nothing. And you try to deflect with insults. Just like the Trumpenfuerher.
Can't wait to hear you pissing and moaning when Trump's plans go amok
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
I forced him to read it.
