Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Let me see if I understand you guys correctly. You think forcing your will on others is good and that the GOP is going to lose votes because they want to give people more liberty to make their own contracts?
Are you freaking dumbasses?
Let me see if I understand you guys correctly. You think forcing your will on others is good and that the GOP is going to lose votes because they want to give people more liberty to make their own contracts?
Are you freaking dumbasses?
Watch and learn. New York, California and Hawaii have had these rules for 11 years and not one peep from the catholic church or conservatives. Romneycare had these rules and not one peep. The church abides by them.
Let me see if I understand you guys correctly. You think forcing your will on others is good and that the GOP is going to lose votes because they want to give people more liberty to make their own contracts?
Are you freaking dumbasses?
Watch and learn. New York, California and Hawaii have had these rules for 11 years and not one peep from the catholic church or conservatives. Romneycare had these rules and not one peep. The church abides by them.
No state ever had these rules, but you wouldn't understand that because the White House said otherwise, and you believe anything that comes from them.
Watch and learn. New York, California and Hawaii have had these rules for 11 years and not one peep from the catholic church or conservatives. Romneycare had these rules and not one peep. The church abides by them.
No state ever had these rules, but you wouldn't understand that because the White House said otherwise, and you believe anything that comes from them.
I don't listen or read what the white house puts out. I voted for Obama because he's black, his policies don't concern me.
"n a precedent-setting decision, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday that a Roman Catholic charity must offer birth-control (search) coverage to its employees even though the church considers contraception a sin.
The 6-1 decision marked the first such ruling by a state's highest court. Experts said the ruling could affect thousands of workers at Catholic hospitals and other church-backed institutions in California and prompt other states to fashion similar laws."
Read more: Court: Catholic Group Must Provide Birth Control | Fox News
"Yet, in a majority of states, they already do such as New Jersey, where state law requires Catholic colleges and universities to provide health coverage for contraceptives.
Twenty-eight states now require insurers that cover prescription drugs to also cover contraceptives. Of those, most do not allow religious hospitals to opt out. And nearly half do not allow religious universities to refuse, either."
Birth control a matter of public health, women's choice | NJ.com
"Yet, in a majority of states, they already do such as New Jersey, where state law requires Catholic colleges and universities to provide health coverage for contraceptives.
Twenty-eight states now require insurers that cover prescription drugs to also cover contraceptives. Of those, most do not allow religious hospitals to opt out. And nearly half do not allow religious universities to refuse, either."
Birth control a matter of public health, women's choice | NJ.com
Lies are lies no matter how often you repeat them.
Let me see if I understand you guys correctly. You think forcing your will on others is good and that the GOP is going to lose votes because they want to give people more liberty to make their own contracts?
Are you freaking dumbasses?
Watch and learn. New York, California and Hawaii have had these rules for 11 years and not one peep from the catholic church or conservatives. Romneycare had these rules and not one peep. The church abides by them.
Wow, that should get the GOP a lot of votes!
So there position is, no help for women getting birth control to prevent a pregnancy and no help in raising the child should the woman choose to keep it.
What's next? No breast cancer screenings?
Oh wait ...
Let me see if I understand you guys correctly. You think forcing your will on others is good and that the GOP is going to lose votes because they want to give people more liberty to make their own contracts?
Are you freaking dumbasses?
Watch and learn. New York, California and Hawaii have had these rules for 11 years and not one peep from the catholic church or conservatives. Romneycare had these rules and not one peep. The church abides by them.
These are the same people who are prone to flipping out if a Muslim cab driver refuses to take a fare carrying an unopened bottle of alcohol.
Obama's administration really made a big mistake with this.
They gave the GOP an opportunity to really make some noise.
"Yet, in a majority of states, they already do such as New Jersey, where state law requires Catholic colleges and universities to provide health coverage for contraceptives.
Twenty-eight states now require insurers that cover prescription drugs to also cover contraceptives. Of those, most do not allow religious hospitals to opt out. And nearly half do not allow religious universities to refuse, either."
Birth control a matter of public health, women's choice | NJ.com
Lies are lies no matter how often you repeat them.
Let me see if I understand you guys correctly. You think forcing your will on others is good and that the GOP is going to lose votes because they want to give people more liberty to make their own contracts?
Are you freaking dumbasses?
Watch and learn. New York, California and Hawaii have had these rules for 11 years and not one peep from the catholic church or conservatives. Romneycare had these rules and not one peep. The church abides by them.
No they haven't.
Official Code of Georgia Annotated § 33-24-59.6.
Legislative Declaration Regarding Contraception; Coverage for Contraceptives
(a) The General Assembly finds and declares that:
(1) Maternal and infant health are greatly improved when women have access to contraceptive supplies to prevent unintended pregnancies;
(2) Because many Americans hope to complete their families with two or three children, many women spend the majority of their reproductive lives trying to prevent pregnancy;
(3) Research has shown that 49 percent of all large group insurance plans do not routinely provide coverage for contraceptive drugs and devices. While virtually all health care plans cover prescription drugs generally, the absence of prescription contraceptive coverage is largely responsible for the fact that women spend 68 percent more in out-of-pocket expenses for health care than men; and
(4) Requiring insurance coverage for prescription drugs and devices for contraception is in the public interest in improving the health of mothers, children, and families and in providing for health insurance coverage which is fairer and more equitable.
(b) As used in this Code section, the term:
(1) "Health benefit policy" means any individual or group plan, policy, or contract for health care services issued, delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed in this state, including those contracts executed by the State of Georgia on behalf of state employees under Article 1 of Chapter 18 of Title 45, by a health care corporation, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, accident and sickness insurer, fraternal benefit society, hospital service corporation, medical service corporation, provider sponsored health care corporation, or other insurer or similar entity.
(2) "Insurer" means an accident and sickness insurer, fraternal benefit society, hospital service corporation, medical service corporation, health care corporation, health maintenance organization, or any similar entity authorized to issue contracts under this title.
(c) EVERY HEALTH BENEFIT POLICY THAT IS DELIVERED, ISSUED, EXECUTED, OR RENEWED IN THIS STATE or approved for issuance or renewal in this state by the Commissioner on or after July 1, 1999, WHICH PROVIDES COVERAGE FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ON AN OUTPATIENT BASIS SHALL PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR ANY PRESCRIBED DRUG OR DEVICE APPROVED BY THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION FOR USE AS A CONTRACEPTIVE. This Code section shall not apply to limited benefit policies described in paragraph (4) of subsection (e) of Code Section 33-30-12. Likewise, nothing contained in this Code section shall be construed to require any insurance company to provide coverage for abortion.
(d) No insurer shall impose upon any person receiving prescription contraceptive benefits pursuant to this Code section any:
(1) Copayment, coinsurance payment, or fee that is not equally imposed upon all individuals in the same benefit category, class, coinsurance level or copayment level, receiving benefits for prescription drugs; or
(2) Reduction in allowable reimbursement for prescription drug benefits.
(e) This Code section shall not be construed to:
(1) Require coverage for prescription coverage benefits in any contract, policy, or plan that does not otherwise provide coverage for prescription drugs; or
(2) Preclude the use of closed formularies; provided, however, that such formularies shall include oral, implant, and injectable contraceptive drugs, intrauterine devices, and prescription barrier methods.
