Masks Still Don’t Work

Zero difference in cases between states mandating masks and those that don’t.
You're FOS, as usual.

April15 2021
States that required people to mask up last year had lower rates of COVID-19 than those with no mask requirements, a new study finds.

Researchers examined data from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., to assess mask policies, people's self-reported use of masks in public, and COVID rates from May through October 2020.

They factored in a one-month delay between mask wearing and its subsequent potential effect on COVID infection rates.

"States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors," the Boston University team recently wrote on the preprint server medRxiv, before their findings had been peer-reviewed.
 
You're FOS, as usual.

April15 2021
States that required people to mask up last year had lower rates of COVID-19 than those with no mask requirements, a new study finds.

Researchers examined data from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., to assess mask policies, people's self-reported use of masks in public, and COVID rates from May through October 2020.

They factored in a one-month delay between mask wearing and its subsequent potential effect on COVID infection rates.

"States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors," the Boston University team recently wrote on the preprint server medRxiv, before their findings had been peer-reviewed.
 
You're FOS, as usual.

April15 2021
States that required people to mask up last year had lower rates of COVID-19 than those with no mask requirements, a new study finds.

Researchers examined data from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., to assess mask policies, people's self-reported use of masks in public, and COVID rates from May through October 2020.

They factored in a one-month delay between mask wearing and its subsequent potential effect on COVID infection rates.

"States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors," the Boston University team recently wrote on the preprint server medRxiv, before their findings had been peer-reviewed.
before their findings had been peer-reviewed.
Do you know what peer review is and why it’s important?

To filter out bogus conclusions.
But you keep on wearing a mask while driving alone, I fully support that. Makes it easy to spot the moron sheeples.

‘Limited To No Difference’: Masks Are Useless In Schools, Study Finds​


In the Era of Omicron, Mask Mandates Aren’t Working​


Mask Mandates Didn’t Make Much of a Difference Anyway​

 
Ever dawn on you why medical staff never wore masks while around sick people until this political stunt?
1660303160656.png

Sneeze without mask............................................................................Sneeze with mask.
 
NO, it wasn't.
Yes.....................protect.........................just like seatbelts in cars protect you, helmets protect football players and shoes protect feet from injury.

NOT, PREVENT.

People still get injured and die in vehicle accidents, football players still get head injuries and people still get nails that go through their shoes, into their feet.
nice try, but we all heard the rhetoric for the last 2 years. "wear a mask, get the vax, socially distance, and you won't get covid" That's what they all said, and they were all lying.
 
Masks were never supposed to eliminate infection, any more than seat belts eliminate vehicle deaths.
Both HELP, that's it.

Wrong.
If you are not going for full quarantine, then the only thing that ends an epidemic is herd immunity.
And since masks prevent herd immunity, then masks do NOT at all "HELP".
They are a terrible idea if most people wear them, and they should only be worn by the vulnerable.
Otherwise the epidemic can never end, and you get an infinite death toll.
 
NO, it wasn't.
Yes.....................protect.........................just like seatbelts in cars protect you, helmets protect football players and shoes protect feet from injury.

NOT, PREVENT.

People still get injured and die in vehicle accidents, football players still get head injuries and people still get nails that go through their shoes, into their feet.

WRONG!

Wearing a seatbelt does not cause you to become a possible pathogen host that causes more accident deaths.
Wearing a mask does make you a future host for a possible pathogen that will cause many more deaths.
 
Dumbest post of the year

So did you not understand it or have some argument against its similarity to all other epidemics?
The facts are clear.
Once you don't or can't do full quarantine, then you should accelerate infection in order to end the epidemic as quickly as possible.
That is undeniable.
 
You're FOS, as usual.

April15 2021
States that required people to mask up last year had lower rates of COVID-19 than those with no mask requirements, a new study finds.

Researchers examined data from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., to assess mask policies, people's self-reported use of masks in public, and COVID rates from May through October 2020.

They factored in a one-month delay between mask wearing and its subsequent potential effect on COVID infection rates.

"States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors," the Boston University team recently wrote on the preprint server medRxiv, before their findings had been peer-reviewed.

Irrelevant.
The facts are that we never tried full quarantine, so than the only alternative is herd immunity, which can't work if enough people wear masks.
Once the strategy is not full quarantine, then you can't end an epidemic until enough people got it and recovered.
So widespread use of masks prevents the epidemic from ever ending.
 

Forum List

Back
Top